ACS12 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of CA12 Antibody

Carbonic Anhydrase XII (CA12) is a zinc-containing enzyme involved in pH regulation and tumor progression. Antibodies targeting CA12 are primarily used in cancer research and diagnostics due to CA12's overexpression in malignancies such as lung adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and breast cancer .

Key Features of CA12 Antibodies:

  • Target: CA12 (UniProt: O43570)

  • Host Species: Rabbit (polyclonal) , Mouse (monoclonal)

  • Applications:

    • Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

    • Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF)

    • Western Blot (WB)

    • Flow Cytometry (FC)

2.1. Role in Cancer

CA12 is a hypoxia-inducible enzyme linked to poor prognosis in tumors. Studies demonstrate that CA12 antibodies inhibit tumor growth by blocking enzymatic activity. For example:

  • Humanized CA12 Antibody: A humanized monoclonal antibody reduced spheroid growth in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells in vitro by neutralizing CA12 activity .

  • Knockout Validation: CA12 gene knockout in A549 cells replicated anti-tumor effects observed with antibody treatment .

3.2. Recommended Protocols

  • IHC-Paraffin: Use HIER pH 6 retrieval; dilution 1:200–1:500 .

  • Flow Cytometry: 0.25–2 µg/ml with PFA/Triton X-100 fixation .

Future Directions

  • Therapeutic Development: Humanized CA12 antibodies are under investigation for targeted cancer therapy .

  • Diagnostic Potential: CA12 antibody-based assays may improve early detection of CA12-positive tumors .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
ACS12 antibody; At5g51690 antibody; K10D11.3 antibody; MIO24.18Probable aminotransferase ACS12 antibody; EC 2.6.1.- antibody
Target Names
ACS12
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a probable aminotransferase. Enzyme assays indicate a lack of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (ACS) activity, suggesting it is not involved in ethylene biosynthesis.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G51690

STRING: 3702.AT5G51690.1

UniGene: At.18827

Protein Families
Class-I pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent aminotransferase family
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in roots. Expressed at low level in leaves, stems, flowers and siliques.

Q&A

What is CXCL12 antibody and what are its primary research applications?

CXCL12 antibody is a neutralizing antibody that targets the CXCL12 chemokine (also known as stromal cell-derived factor 1 or SDF-1). This antibody has demonstrated significant research utility in multiple disease models. CXCL12 is traditionally classified as a homeostatic chemokine involved in embryogenesis, hematopoiesis, and angiogenesis, but its dysregulation has been implicated in various pathological conditions . The antibody has shown therapeutic potential in several research applications:

  • Autoimmune disease models, particularly alopecia areata (AA)

  • Inflammatory conditions research

  • Cancer research

  • Viral infection models

  • Inflammatory bowel disease studies

  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis research

The humanized form of CXCL12 antibody has been specifically developed for advanced non-clinical studies and demonstrates significant potential in modulating immune responses in autoimmune conditions .

How should researchers validate CXCL12 antibody specificity in experimental systems?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for ensuring experimental rigor. For CXCL12 antibody, researchers should implement a multi-faceted validation approach:

  • Overexpression systems: Transfect cells (e.g., HEK293T) with CXCL12 expression vectors and confirm increased antibody binding using flow cytometry or immunoblotting .

  • Knockdown validation: Utilize shRNA-based approaches to reduce CXCL12 expression and confirm decreased antibody binding. This can be assessed through:

    • qPCR to confirm reduced mRNA expression

    • Flow cytometry to quantify reduction in antibody-positive cells

  • Specificity controls: Include analysis of non-target proteins (like GLAST for ACSA-2 antibody validation) to confirm antibody specificity, as demonstrated in astrocyte research .

  • Functional assays: Confirm that antibody treatment neutralizes known CXCL12 functions, such as chemotaxis or signaling through its receptors CXCR4/ACKR3.

  • Western blotting: Verify that the antibody recognizes a protein of the expected molecular weight for CXCL12.

What experimental methods are recommended for evaluating CXCL12 antibody efficacy?

When evaluating CXCL12 antibody efficacy in research models, multiple complementary approaches should be employed:

  • Flow cytometry analysis: Quantify changes in immune cell populations following antibody treatment. This is particularly useful for assessing reductions in disease-associated immune cells like CD8+ T cells in autoimmune models .

  • Transcriptomic analysis:

    • Bulk RNA sequencing to identify differentially expressed genes

    • Single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize cell-specific responses to antibody treatment

  • Functional assays:

    • Cell migration assays to assess inhibition of CXCL12-mediated chemotaxis

    • Signaling assays to evaluate blockade of downstream pathway activation

  • Disease-specific outcome measures:

    • In AA models, monitor hair growth and follicle health

    • In other autoimmune models, assess tissue-specific inflammation markers

  • Protein-protein interaction studies:

    • Use STRING network analysis to identify affected interaction networks

    • Perform enrichment analysis to characterize modulated biological pathways

What molecular mechanisms underlie the immunomodulatory effects of CXCL12 antibody in autoimmune disease models?

The immunomodulatory effects of CXCL12 antibody operate through several complementary mechanisms revealed through comprehensive single-cell analyses. Research indicates that CXCL12 antibody treatment affects multiple immune pathways:

  • Modulation of immune cell chemotaxis: CXCL12 antibody significantly suppresses pathways associated with lymphocyte and monocyte chemotaxis, disrupting the recruitment of inflammatory cells to affected tissues. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) confirms downregulation of the lymphocyte chemotaxis pathway (GO:0048247) following antibody treatment .

  • Inhibition of interferon responses: The antibody downregulates cellular responses to both type I and type II interferons. In particular, the pathway for cellular response to type II interferon (GO:0034341) shows significant reduction after treatment .

  • T cell regulation: CXCL12 antibody treatment suppresses CD8+ T cell activation and reduces expression of key T cell-associated genes including Ifng, Cd8a, Ccr5, Ccl4, Ccl5, and Il21r .

  • JAK/STAT pathway modulation: In AA models, CD8+ T cells show activation via the JAK/STAT pathway, which is subsequently inactivated following CXCL12 antibody treatment .

  • Complement system effects: The antibody influences pathways linked to the complement system, particularly affecting functions of dendritic cells and macrophages .

These mechanisms collectively contribute to the therapeutic potential of CXCL12 antibody in autoimmune conditions by normalizing dysregulated immune responses.

How can researchers analyze differentially expressed genes (DEGs) following CXCL12 antibody treatment?

Analyzing DEGs after CXCL12 antibody treatment requires a systematic approach to identify therapeutic mechanisms. Based on published research methodologies:

  • Pseudobulk RNA-seq analysis:

    • Aggregate transcript counts from single-cell data to create pseudobulk samples for each experimental group

    • Compare expression profiles between control, disease model, and antibody-treated groups

    • Identify genes showing reversal patterns (upregulated in disease and downregulated after treatment, or vice versa)

  • DEG identification strategy:

    • Apply fold-change thresholds (typically >2-fold) to identify significant changes

    • Generate heatmaps showing normalized Z-scores of all DEGs

    • Create Venn diagrams to identify overlapping gene sets between comparisons

  • Network analysis of identified DEGs:

    • Use STRING network analysis to visualize protein-protein interactions

    • Apply community detection methods based on weighted edge betweenness

    • Identify major functional clusters within the DEG network

  • Functional enrichment analysis:

    • Perform Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for each cluster

    • Focus on biological processes with significant P values (<0.001)

    • Apply GSEA using log2 fold change values to identify enriched pathways

  • Distinguishing treatment-specific effects:

    • Compare common DEGs (disease vs. control and treatment vs. disease) with antibody-specific DEGs

    • Evaluate potential off-target effects by analyzing biological processes uniquely affected by the antibody

This comprehensive analytical framework allows researchers to uncover both the therapeutic mechanisms and potential side effects of CXCL12 antibody treatment.

What considerations are important when designing single-cell RNA sequencing experiments to evaluate CXCL12 antibody effects?

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful tool for characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to CXCL12 antibody treatment. When designing such experiments, researchers should consider:

  • Experimental design optimization:

    • Include appropriate control groups (negative control, disease model, antibody-treated)

    • Optimize tissue dissociation protocols to maintain cell viability and surface marker integrity

    • Standardize antibody administration route and dosage (e.g., subcutaneous injection)

  • Cell isolation and preparation:

    • Develop protocols for isolating specific cell populations of interest

    • Consider using immunoaffinity-based methods for cell purification when appropriate

    • Maintain consistent cell processing times to minimize ex vivo transcriptional changes

  • Technical considerations:

    • Select appropriate scRNA-seq platform based on research questions (droplet-based vs. plate-based)

    • Determine optimal sequencing depth for detecting low-abundance transcripts

    • Include spike-in controls for quality assessment and normalization

  • Analytical pipeline development:

    • Implement robust pre-processing workflows for quality control and filtering

    • Apply dimensionality reduction techniques (PCA, t-SNE, UMAP) for visualization

    • Utilize specialized algorithms for cell type identification and trajectory analysis

  • Integration with other data types:

    • Combine scRNA-seq with protein-level analyses (e.g., CyTOF, flow cytometry)

    • Validate key findings using orthogonal techniques (qPCR, immunohistochemistry)

    • Correlate transcriptional changes with functional outcomes

Following these considerations will enhance the quality and interpretability of scRNA-seq data in CXCL12 antibody research.

What are effective methods for applying CXCL12 antibody in animal models of autoimmune disease?

Optimizing CXCL12 antibody administration in animal models requires attention to several methodological details:

  • Administration route selection:

    • Subcutaneous injection has proven effective in AA mouse models

    • Consider local administration for tissue-specific effects

    • Evaluate systemic routes (intraperitoneal, intravenous) for widespread conditions

  • Dosing protocol development:

    • Establish dose-response relationships through preliminary studies

    • Determine optimal treatment frequency based on antibody half-life

    • Consider escalating dose schedules for chronic conditions

  • Treatment timing considerations:

    • Prophylactic administration (before disease onset) to evaluate preventive effects

    • Therapeutic administration (after disease establishment) to assess treatment efficacy

    • Comparison of early vs. late intervention to determine optimal timing window

  • Model-specific adaptations:

    • For AA models, synchronize treatment with hair growth cycles

    • In other autoimmune models, align treatment with disease progression markers

    • Consider genetic background effects on treatment responsiveness

  • Outcome assessment standardization:

    • Define primary and secondary endpoints relevant to the specific disease

    • Develop standardized scoring systems for disease severity

    • Implement blinded assessment to minimize observer bias

Consistent application of these methodological principles will enhance the reproducibility and translational value of CXCL12 antibody research.

How can researchers distinguish between therapeutic effects and off-target effects of CXCL12 antibody?

Differentiating therapeutic from off-target effects is crucial for accurate interpretation of CXCL12 antibody research. Recommended approaches include:

  • Comprehensive transcriptional analysis:

    • Compare disease-specific DEGs (altered by both disease and treatment) with antibody-specific DEGs (uniquely altered by treatment)

    • Limited number of biological processes affected by antibody-specific DEGs suggests minimal off-target effects

  • Pathway-level assessment:

    • Evaluate whether antibody-modulated pathways are relevant to disease pathogenesis

    • For example, CXCL12 antibody increases expression of genes in the TLR receptor pathway, which may represent either an off-target effect or a beneficial immunomodulatory mechanism

  • Functional validation studies:

    • Test antibody effects in non-disease contexts to identify disease-independent activities

    • Evaluate dose-dependent relationships for therapeutic vs. off-target effects

  • Receptor binding analysis:

    • Assess antibody binding to receptors besides the intended target (CXCR4/ACKR3)

    • Quantify relative binding affinities to estimate potential for off-target effects

  • Advanced imaging approaches:

    • Use fluorescently labeled antibodies to track tissue distribution and cellular binding

    • Compare binding patterns in diseased vs. healthy tissues

These approaches provide a framework for distinguishing beneficial therapeutic effects from potential unwanted activities of CXCL12 antibody.

What are the key considerations for transitioning from mouse models to human applications of CXCL12 antibody?

Translating CXCL12 antibody research from mouse models to human applications involves navigating several critical considerations:

  • Species-specific antibody development:

    • Humanized CXCL12 antibodies have been specifically developed for translational research

    • Evaluate cross-reactivity with human CXCL12 and its isoforms

    • Consider affinity and specificity differences between species

  • Comparative pathway analysis:

    • Validate conservation of key pathways identified in mouse models

    • For example, confirm that CD8+ T cell mechanisms in mouse AA models reflect human pathophysiology

    • Use comparative genomics to identify potential species-specific responses

  • Safety assessment expansion:

    • Evaluate effects on wider range of human immune cell types

    • Consider potential immunogenicity of humanized antibodies

    • Assess impact on beneficial CXCL12 functions (e.g., tissue repair, stem cell homing)

  • Biomarker development:

    • Identify translatable biomarkers of response based on mouse model findings

    • Develop assays to monitor treatment effects in human samples

    • Consider the 153 DEGs identified in mouse models as potential human biomarkers

  • Clinical trial design considerations:

    • Patient stratification based on CXCL12 expression levels or pathway activation

    • Timing of intervention based on disease stage

    • Selection of appropriate clinical endpoints that reflect mechanisms observed in preclinical models

Careful consideration of these factors will facilitate successful translation of CXCL12 antibody research to human applications.

How might CXCL12 antibody interact with other immunomodulatory therapies in combination treatment approaches?

The potential for combining CXCL12 antibody with other immunomodulatory therapies represents an important frontier in research:

  • Mechanistic rationale for combinations:

    • CXCL12 antibody primarily affects immune cell chemotaxis and interferon responses

    • Complementary mechanisms could target other aspects of immune dysfunction

    • Potential for synergistic effects through simultaneous modulation of multiple pathways

  • Candidate combination partners:

    • JAK inhibitors, given the role of JAK/STAT signaling in CXCL12-mediated effects

    • Biologics targeting other chemokines or inflammatory cytokines

    • T cell-directed therapies, particularly those affecting CD8+ T cells

  • Experimental approaches for combination studies:

    • Sequential vs. simultaneous administration protocols

    • Dose optimization to minimize toxicity while maintaining efficacy

    • Single-cell analyses to characterize cell type-specific combination effects

  • Safety considerations:

    • Monitoring for additive immunosuppression

    • Assessing potential for antagonistic interactions

    • Evaluating impact on beneficial inflammatory responses

  • Translational implications:

    • Potential for reducing individual drug dosages through synergistic combinations

    • Strategies for overcoming treatment resistance

    • Personalized combination approaches based on individual patient characteristics

This research direction may lead to more effective therapeutic strategies for complex autoimmune conditions.

What technical advances are improving CXCL12 antibody characterization and application?

Recent technological innovations are enhancing both the understanding and application of CXCL12 antibody:

  • Advanced sequencing approaches:

    • Single-cell RNA sequencing has revealed cell type-specific effects of CXCL12 antibody

    • Spatial transcriptomics can map antibody effects within tissue microenvironments

    • Long-read sequencing enables more complete isoform characterization

  • Improved antibody engineering:

    • Humanization techniques have enhanced translational potential

    • Fragment-based approaches (Fab, scFv) offer alternative binding properties

    • Site-specific modifications can optimize pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration

  • Novel delivery systems:

    • Controlled-release formulations for sustained antibody availability

    • Tissue-targeted delivery approaches to enhance local effects

    • Nanoparticle-based delivery systems for improved biodistribution

  • High-dimensional protein analysis:

    • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for comprehensive cellular phenotyping

    • Multiplexed imaging techniques to visualize antibody distribution and effects

    • Proteomic approaches to characterize broader protein-level changes

  • Computational modeling advances:

    • Systems biology approaches to predict antibody effects across complex networks

    • Machine learning algorithms for biomarker identification

    • In silico screening for antibody optimization

These technological advances are accelerating both basic research and translational applications of CXCL12 antibody.

How can CXCL12 antibody research inform our understanding of immune privilege in autoimmune conditions?

CXCL12 antibody research provides valuable insights into immune privilege mechanisms and their disruption in autoimmune diseases:

  • Immune privilege concept in autoimmunity:

    • AA results from the loss of immune privilege at the hair follicle, leading to autoimmune attack

    • CXCL12 antibody treatment helps restore aspects of immune privilege by modulating immune cell trafficking and activation

  • Cellular mechanisms of immune privilege:

    • Research shows that CD8+ T cells are the predominant disease-driving cell type in AA

    • CXCL12 antibody reduces infiltration of these cells into protected tissues

    • Additional roles for CD4+ Treg cells, NK T cells, and γδ T cells in human AA have been identified

  • Molecular mediators of immune privilege:

    • CXCL12/CXCR4 axis dysregulation contributes to immune privilege breakdown

    • Neutralizing CXCL12 with antibody treatment helps restore normal immune homeostasis

    • Treatment affects expression of key genes involved in T cell function and recruitment

  • Tissue-specific considerations:

    • Different immune-privileged sites may have unique requirements for maintenance

    • CXCL12 functions may vary between immune-privileged tissues

    • Comparative studies across tissues could reveal common principles

  • Translational implications:

    • Understanding immune privilege mechanisms through CXCL12 research may inform therapies for multiple autoimmune conditions

    • Potential for preventive approaches targeting immune privilege maintenance

    • Development of biomarkers for immune privilege status

This research area represents an important intersection between basic immunology and clinical applications.

What is the role of CXCL12 antibody in investigating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in autoimmune diseases?

CXCL12 antibody research has revealed important insights into JAK/STAT pathway involvement in autoimmune conditions:

  • Pathway activation in disease states:

    • In AA models, CD8+ T cells show activation via the JAK/STAT pathway

    • This activation contributes to the inflammatory and autoimmune processes

  • CXCL12 antibody effects on JAK/STAT signaling:

    • Treatment with CXCL12 antibody leads to inactivation of the JAK/STAT pathway in CD8+ T cells

    • This effect correlates with clinical improvement in disease models

  • Mechanistic investigation approaches:

    • Phospho-flow cytometry to quantify STAT phosphorylation

    • Transcriptional analysis of JAK/STAT target genes

    • Pharmacological inhibitor studies to confirm pathway involvement

  • Therapeutic implications:

    • Findings suggest potential synergy between CXCL12 antibody and JAK inhibitors

    • Pathway analysis informs biomarker development for treatment response

    • Identification of specific JAK/STAT components affected by CXCL12 blockade

  • Comparative biology perspectives:

    • Similar mechanisms may operate in multiple autoimmune conditions

    • Species-specific differences in pathway regulation require consideration

    • Tissue-specific JAK/STAT activation patterns influence treatment outcomes

This research provides mechanistic understanding that bridges basic signaling research with clinical applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.