AAV8 antibodies are immunoglobulins that recognize and neutralize AAV8 capsid proteins. These antibodies arise from prior exposure to wild-type AAV8 or cross-reactive immune responses, posing challenges for AAV8-based gene therapies in hemophilia and other diseases .
Structure: AAV8 antibodies typically target conformational epitopes on the viral capsid, involving interactions with complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of the antibody paratope .
Function: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) block AAV8 vector transduction by preventing viral attachment or entry into host cells .
A multicenter longitudinal study (2019–2023) evaluated AAV8 immunity in 1,036 participants with hemophilia :
Parameter | Baseline | Year 1 | Year 2 |
---|---|---|---|
Neutralizing Antibodies (%) | 46.9 | 46.8 | 45.6 |
Binding Antibodies (IgG, %) | 53.4 | 53.2 | 52.1 |
Cell-Mediated Immunity (%) | 12.4 | 11.9 | 10.8 |
AAV8 NAbs and IgG binding antibodies (BAbs) persisted at stable rates over three years .
Co-prevalence of NAbs and BAbs was observed in 38.7% of participants, complicating eligibility for gene therapies .
Neutralization Assay: Measures NAb titers via inhibition of AAV8 transduction in cell cultures .
ELISA: Quantifies IgG/IgM BAbs using immobilized AAV8 capsids .
Pre-existing Immunity: 46.9% of hemophilia patients had baseline NAbs against AAV8, excluding them from treatment .
Immunogenicity Risks: AAV8 antibodies correlate with reduced therapeutic efficacy and adverse immune reactions .
Epitope Diversity: Limited structural data on AAV8-specific paratopes .
Cross-Reactivity: Mechanisms of antibody cross-reactivity between AAV serotypes remain poorly understood .
Biomarker Development: Predictive models for immunogenicity risk are needed .
Studies cited here derive from peer-reviewed methodologies, including: