This antibody targets a pump responsible for the transport of glutathione S-conjugates. It mediates the transport of various substrates, including S-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-glutathione (DNP-GS), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), cyanidin 3-glucoside-GS (C3G-GS), and metolachlor-GS (MOC-GS).
Relevant Research on ABCC1 Function:
ABCC1, also known as multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1), is a 190 kDa protein encoded by the ABCC1 gene that belongs to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily . This protein plays a critical role in drug and xenobiotic disposition in normal cells and helps protect tissues from cytotoxic insults . ABCC1 may also be referred to as ABC29, ABCC, GS-X, or MRP in scientific literature .
ABCC1 antibodies are essential research tools because:
They enable detection and quantification of ABCC1 protein expression across diverse tissues and cell types
They facilitate investigation of ABCC1's role in drug resistance mechanisms
They support studies examining ABCC1's involvement in cancer progression and immune response
They allow evaluation of ABCC1 as a potential prognostic marker as demonstrated in pan-cancer analysis
Structurally, ABCC1 protein is approximately 171.6 kilodaltons in mass , consisting of three membrane-spanning domains (MSD 0-2) and two nucleotide-binding domains (NBD 1-2) . This complex structure requires careful antibody selection based on experimental objectives.
ABCC1 antibodies are validated for numerous applications in molecular and cellular biology research:
Application | Description | Common Detection Methods |
---|---|---|
Western Blot (WB) | Protein detection in cell/tissue lysates | Chemiluminescence, fluorescence |
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Visualization in tissue sections | DAB, AEC chromogens |
ELISA | Quantitative measurement in solution | Colorimetric, fluorometric |
Flow Cytometry (FCM) | Cellular analysis | Fluorescent detection |
Immunofluorescence (IF) | Subcellular localization studies | Fluorescence microscopy |
Immunoprecipitation (IP) | Protein isolation and interaction studies | Various detection methods |
Most commercially available ABCC1 antibodies are validated for multiple applications, though performance may vary by clone and supplier . When selecting an antibody, researchers should verify the specific applications for which each product has been validated.
Selecting the appropriate ABCC1 antibody requires consideration of several experimental factors:
Species reactivity: Confirm the antibody recognizes ABCC1 in your experimental organism (human, mouse, rat, etc.)
Application compatibility: Verify validation for your specific technique (WB, IHC, ELISA, etc.)
Antibody type:
Monoclonal: Higher specificity for a single epitope
Polyclonal: Often provides stronger signal by recognizing multiple epitopes
Conjugation options: Consider whether unconjugated antibodies or those with tags (FITC, Alexa Fluor, HRP, biotin) are more suitable
Epitope location: For transmembrane proteins like ABCC1, epitope accessibility is crucial, especially when distinguishing between internal and external domains
Validation data: Review experimental validation in your specific cell type or tissue
The search results indicate over 600 ABCC1 antibody products are available across different suppliers, with varying specifications and applications .
To ensure reliable and interpretable results when using ABCC1 antibodies, incorporate these controls:
Control Type | Description | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Positive Controls | Cell lines with confirmed ABCC1 expression (e.g., drug-resistant cancer lines) | Verify antibody functionality |
Negative Controls | ABCC1 knockout/knockdown cells; Isotype controls | Assess specificity |
Technical Controls | Secondary antibody-only; Blocking peptide competition | Identify non-specific binding |
Loading Controls | Housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH) for Western blots | Normalize protein loading |
Expression Controls | qPCR analysis of ABCC1 mRNA | Correlate protein with transcript levels |
For quantitative applications such as ELISA, standard curves using recombinant ABCC1 protein should be established. When performing immunohistochemistry, include tissues known to express varying levels of ABCC1 to calibrate interpretation of staining intensity.
Validating ABCC1 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:
Genetic validation:
Compare antibody signal in wild-type versus ABCC1 knockout/knockdown models
Assess signal in cells with CRISPR-engineered ABCC1 mutations
Biochemical validation:
Cross-reactivity testing:
Test against related ABC transporters (ABCC2, ABCC3, etc.)
Evaluate performance across different species if working with non-human models
Multi-method confirmation:
Compare results from different detection methods (e.g., IF vs. WB)
Use multiple antibodies targeting different ABCC1 epitopes
Bioinformatic correlation:
ABCC1 antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating multidrug resistance mechanisms through several methodological approaches:
Expression-phenotype correlation studies:
Quantify ABCC1 levels in patient samples using IHC or Western blot
Correlate expression with treatment response and clinical outcomes
Studies have demonstrated ABCC1 involvement in resistance to various anticancer drugs in solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer
Functional transport assays:
Mechanistic investigations:
Investigate co-localization with other resistance proteins
Examine conformation changes during drug transport
Study post-translational modifications affecting transport activity
Therapeutic targeting:
Evaluate antibody-drug conjugates targeting ABCC1
Assess antibody-mediated inhibition of transport function
Monitor ABCC1 expression changes during treatment
ABCC1 can recognize and expel many hydrophobic and hydrophilic antineoplastic agents, leading to reduced drug accumulation and cellular resistance . Research has shown differential resistance to different anticancer drugs, highlighting the importance of comprehensive ABCC1 characterization in specific cancer contexts.
Recent research has revealed intricate associations between ABCC1 expression and immune response in cancer. Effective methodologies for investigating these relationships include:
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq):
Computational immune profiling:
Multiplexed imaging techniques:
Immunohistochemical double staining: Combining ABCC1 antibodies with immune cell markers
Multiplex immunofluorescence for simultaneous detection of ABCC1 and multiple immune cell populations
Flow cytometry analysis:
Multi-parameter analysis of ABCC1 expression alongside immune cell markers
Sorting of cell populations for downstream functional assays
In vitro models:
Co-culture systems combining ABCC1-expressing tumor cells with immune cells
Using ABCC1 antibodies to track expression changes during immune cell interaction
The pan-cancer analysis demonstrated that ABCC1 expression exhibits significant associations with diverse immune-related genes and correlates with immune scores across multiple tumor types , positioning ABCC1 as a potential immunological biomarker.
When faced with contradictory results using ABCC1 antibodies across different experimental systems, consider these troubleshooting approaches:
Antibody-specific factors:
Validate epitope accessibility in your specific experimental conditions
Consider antibody lot-to-lot variation
Test multiple antibody clones targeting different ABCC1 domains
Sample preparation considerations:
Optimize protein extraction methods for membrane proteins
Evaluate different fixation protocols for preserved tissue
Adjust antigen retrieval methods for different tissue types
Biological variables:
Assess whether different experimental models express different ABCC1 splice variants
Investigate post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition
Consider the impact of tumor heterogeneity on sampling
Technical validation:
Implement orthogonal detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression analysis
Perform functional assays to confirm biological relevance
Experimental design factors:
Control for cell confluence and culture conditions
Account for treatment timing and duration
Consider microenvironmental factors affecting ABCC1 expression
The pan-cancer analysis showed varied ABCC1 expression across different cancer types , underscoring the importance of context-specific validation when investigating ABCC1 in different experimental systems.
Cutting-edge approaches for investigating ABCC1's role in the tumor microenvironment include:
Spatial transcriptomics with protein detection:
Correlating ABCC1 protein expression with spatial gene expression patterns
Mapping ABCC1-expressing cells relative to other cell types in the tumor microenvironment
Advanced imaging techniques:
Multiplexed immunofluorescence for simultaneous detection of ABCC1 and multiple TME markers
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) using metal-conjugated antibodies for high-dimensional analysis
Imaging mass cytometry for spatial resolution at single-cell level
3D model systems:
Organoid cultures incorporating ABCC1-expressing tumor cells and stromal components
Patient-derived models maintaining original tumor architecture and heterogeneity
In vivo approaches:
Intravital microscopy with fluorescently labeled ABCC1 antibodies
Serial sampling of tumors during treatment to track ABCC1 dynamics
Extracellular vesicle analysis:
Studying ABCC1's presence on cancer-derived exosomes
Investigating how ABCC1-containing vesicles influence recipient cells in the microenvironment
Recent research has demonstrated that ABCC1 expression correlates with macrophage infiltration and various in vitro and in vivo experiments have substantiated the oncogenic role of ABCC1 in hepatocellular carcinoma , suggesting a potential role in modulating immune responses within the tumor microenvironment.
Single-cell technologies offer powerful approaches to study ABCC1-related heterogeneity in complex tissues:
Cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes (CITE-seq):
Simultaneously profiling ABCC1 at both mRNA and protein levels in individual cells
Correlating ABCC1 expression with comprehensive transcriptional signatures
Advanced flow cytometry approaches:
High-dimensional flow cytometry for multi-parameter analysis of ABCC1 alongside other markers
Index sorting for linking single-cell phenotype with downstream molecular analysis
Imaging-based single-cell analysis:
Imaging mass cytometry using metal-tagged ABCC1 antibodies
Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence for spatial single-cell analysis
Functional single-cell assays:
Single-cell drug efflux assays combined with ABCC1 antibody labeling
Correlating ABCC1 expression with functional phenotypes at single-cell resolution
Computational integration:
Integrating single-cell ABCC1 protein data with transcriptomic and genomic information
Trajectory analysis to study ABCC1 expression changes during cellular differentiation or treatment response
The search results mention scRNA-seq analysis revealing positive correlation between ABCC1 expression and macrophage infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma , highlighting the value of single-cell approaches in understanding ABCC1's role in complex cellular ecosystems.
Integrating ABCC1 antibody-based studies with genomic and clinical data enables more comprehensive translational research:
Multi-omic correlation analyses:
Clinicopathological correlations:
Analyze associations between ABCC1 expression and:
Patient survival outcomes
Treatment response metrics
Disease progression parameters
Biomarker development pipeline:
Standardize ABCC1 antibody-based assays for clinical application
Establish scoring systems for ABCC1 expression in patient samples
Validate prognostic or predictive significance in prospective studies
Machine learning approaches:
Develop predictive models incorporating ABCC1 expression with other molecular features
Identify patient subgroups likely to benefit from ABCC1-targeted interventions
ABCC1 overexpression consistently predicts unfavorable outcomes based on TCGA data analysis , highlighting its potential value as a prognostic biomarker.
To rigorously assess ABCC1's functional impact in cancer, researchers should consider these experimental approaches:
Genetic manipulation models:
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or knockdown of ABCC1
Overexpression systems to model increased ABCC1 activity
Site-directed mutagenesis to study specific functional domains
Pharmacological intervention studies:
Testing ABCC1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapeutics
Evaluating drug efflux in the presence of glutathione modulators
Dose-response experiments with ABCC1 substrates
Translational model systems:
Patient-derived xenografts with varying ABCC1 expression
Genetically engineered mouse models
3D organoid cultures recapitulating tumor heterogeneity
Immune interaction studies:
Co-culture experiments with immune cells and ABCC1-modified cancer cells
In vivo models evaluating immune infiltration in tumors with altered ABCC1 expression
Antibody-based imaging to track immune cell recruitment
The search results indicate that various in vitro and in vivo experiments have substantiated the oncogenic role of ABCC1 in hepatocellular carcinoma, along with increased macrophage recruitment , suggesting comprehensive approaches are needed to understand ABCC1's multifaceted functions in cancer.
Optimizing ABCC1 antibody protocols for challenging applications requires systematic method development:
For low expression detection:
Signal amplification techniques (tyramide signal amplification, polymer detection systems)
Enhanced extraction protocols for membrane proteins
Longer primary antibody incubation at optimized temperatures
For specific cellular compartments:
Optimized permeabilization protocols for accessing intracellular domains
Subcellular fractionation prior to analysis
Co-staining with organelle markers for precise localization
For multiplexed detection:
Sequential antibody labeling and stripping protocols
Spectral unmixing for fluorophore separation
Careful antibody pairing to avoid cross-reactivity
For quantitative analysis:
Calibration with recombinant protein standards
Digital image analysis with appropriate controls
Standardized protocols to minimize batch effects
For fixed tissue analysis:
Optimization of fixation time and conditions
Antigen retrieval method comparison (heat-induced vs. enzymatic)
Testing multiple antibody clones on the same tissue
Systematic optimization should include titration of antibody concentrations, evaluation of different detection systems, and validation across multiple biological replicates to ensure reproducibility.
Several cutting-edge techniques are enhancing our understanding of ABCC1 regulation:
Proximity-based interaction assays:
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) for detecting protein-protein interactions involving ABCC1
BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling to identify ABCC1 interactors
FRET-based approaches to study ABCC1 conformational changes
Epigenetic and transcriptional regulation:
ChIP-seq for identifying transcription factors regulating ABCC1
ATAC-seq to assess chromatin accessibility at the ABCC1 locus
CUT&RUN for precise mapping of protein-DNA interactions
Post-translational modification analysis:
Phospho-specific antibodies to track ABCC1 activation
Mass spectrometry to identify novel modifications
Site-directed mutagenesis to evaluate functional impact of modifications
Dynamic expression analysis:
Live-cell reporters for real-time ABCC1 expression tracking
Optogenetic control of ABCC1 expression
Cellular stress response monitoring in relation to ABCC1 levels
High-throughput screening approaches:
CRISPR screens to identify regulators of ABCC1 expression
Small molecule library screening for ABCC1 modulators
Synthetic lethality screens in ABCC1-overexpressing cells
These techniques can provide deeper insights into the complex regulatory mechanisms controlling ABCC1 expression and function in normal and disease states.
ABCC1 antibodies have significant potential in advancing personalized cancer medicine through several approaches:
Predictive biomarker development:
Standardized IHC assays to predict response to specific chemotherapeutics
Quantitative scoring systems correlating ABCC1 levels with treatment outcomes
Multiplex assays combining ABCC1 with other resistance markers
Treatment resistance monitoring:
Serial sampling during treatment to track ABCC1 expression changes
Liquid biopsy approaches using circulating tumor cells
Correlation with drug levels and clinical response
Therapeutic targeting:
Development of ABCC1-targeting antibody-drug conjugates
Evaluation of ABCC1 inhibitors as chemosensitizing agents
Immunotherapeutic approaches targeting ABCC1-expressing cells
Patient stratification strategies:
Identifying high ABCC1 expressors for alternative treatment approaches
Combination strategies specifically for ABCC1-mediated resistance
Clinical trial enrichment based on ABCC1 status
The pan-cancer analysis revealed that ABCC1 overexpression consistently predicted unfavorable outcomes based on TCGA data , highlighting its potential value in patient stratification and treatment planning.
Implementing rigorous quality control is essential for translating ABCC1 antibody-based assays to clinical applications:
Analytical validation requirements:
Sensitivity: Limit of detection determination
Specificity: Cross-reactivity testing with related proteins
Precision: Intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation assessment
Accuracy: Recovery experiments with spiked samples
Linearity: Verification across concentration ranges
Standardization protocols:
Reference standards inclusion
Positive and negative control tissues
Internal calibration controls
Lot-to-lot verification procedures
Pre-analytical considerations:
Sample collection and processing standardization
Fixation time and conditions documentation
Storage duration effects assessment
Transport conditions monitoring
Assay validation across laboratories:
Ring trials with multiple testing sites
External quality assessment participation
Standard operating procedures implementation
Regular proficiency testing
Digital pathology considerations:
Algorithm validation for quantitative analysis
Scanner calibration and performance verification
Color calibration and standardization
Data storage and security protocols
Implementation of these quality control measures ensures that ABCC1 antibody-based assays provide consistent, reliable results that can be meaningfully interpreted in clinical research settings.