The AT3G61400 gene product belongs to the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily, which is involved in:
Oxidative reactions requiring Fe²⁺ and ascorbate as cofactors .
Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, including pathways for flavonoids and phytohormones .
Transcriptomic studies in Arabidopsis autopolyploid lines revealed differential expression of AT3G61400 under stress conditions. For example:
Condition | Expression Fold Change | Significance (p-value) |
---|---|---|
Wild-type (WT) | +1.67 | 0.0009 |
rpt2 mutant | +1.40 | 0.0125 |
This upregulation suggests a role in stress adaptation, potentially through modulating oxidative pathways .
At3g61400 Antibody has been employed in comparative transcriptome analyses to quantify protein levels in Arabidopsis mutants. Key findings include:
Elevated expression in root tissues under phosphate starvation .
Correlation with genes involved in lignin biosynthesis (e.g., 4CL4, PGL5) .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using this antibody localized the AT3G61400 protein to vascular tissues, supporting its hypothesized role in xylem differentiation .
Specificity: The antibody’s epitope resides in the N-terminal region (residues 15-120) of the AT3G61400 protein .
Validation: Western blot analyses confirm a single band at ~35 kDa, consistent with the predicted molecular weight .
Limitations: Cross-reactivity with homologous dioxygenases in Brassica species has been observed, necessitating species-specific controls .
While current data emphasize AT3G61400’s metabolic roles, further studies could explore:
How to resolve contradictions in At3g61400 antibody cross-reactivity across plant species?
Troubleshooting Framework:
Hypothesis Testing: Cross-reactivity may arise from conserved epitopes in homologous proteins (e.g., Brassica species).
Experimental Fix: Perform phylogenetic alignment of At3g61400 homologs to identify conserved regions and design peptide-blocking assays .
Data Interpretation: Use competitive ELISA with peptides from non-target species to quantify cross-reactivity thresholds.
What strategies address low antibody affinity in functional studies of At3g61400?
Advanced Solutions:
Epitope Mapping: Identify antibody-binding regions using peptide arrays or hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) .
Affinity Maturation: Apply phage display or yeast surface display to engineer higher-affinity variants .
Negative Control: Include At3g61400 knockout lines in immunoprecipitation (IP) assays to rule off-target interactions .
How to design a study investigating At3g61400’s role in stress responses?
Multidisciplinary Workflow:
Phenotypic Screening: Expose At3g61400 mutants to abiotic stressors (e.g., drought, salinity).
Transcriptomic Profiling: Compare RNA-seq data between mutants and wild-type under stress.
Antibody-Based Protein Quantification: Use quantitative Western blotting to correlate protein levels with stress phenotypes .
How to reconcile conflicting reports on At3g61400’s substrate specificity?
Root-Cause Investigation:
Variable Sources: Differences in recombinant protein purification methods (e.g., inclusion bodies vs. soluble expression).
Mitigation: Standardize assays using uniformly purified protein and include positive controls (e.g., known 2OG oxygenase substrates).
Evidence Synthesis:
Study | Substrate Identified | Method | Potential Confounder |
---|---|---|---|
A | Flavonoids | LC-MS | Contaminating plant extracts |
B | Alkaloids | NMR | Non-physiological pH conditions |