At5g43440 is a gene identifier in Arabidopsis thaliana, and the corresponding antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA888806XA01DOA) is raised against the recombinant protein produced by this gene. The antibody belongs to the immunoglobulin G (IgG) class, produced in rabbits through antigen affinity purification . Its primary function is to bind specifically to the At5g43440 protein, enabling detection and analysis in experimental settings such as Western blot (WB) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) .
The At5g43440 Antibody is primarily used to:
Investigate the expression and localization of the At5g43440 protein in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Study genetic and molecular pathways involving At5g43440, which may relate to plant development, stress responses, or metabolic processes.
Validate protein interactions or post-translational modifications in plant systems .
The At5g43440 Antibody is part of a larger catalog of Arabidopsis-specific antibodies. Below is a subset of related products :
Product Name | Code | Target | Species Reactivity | Size |
---|---|---|---|---|
At5g43440 Antibody | CSB-PA888806XA01DOA | At5g43440 | Arabidopsis thaliana | 2ml/0.1ml |
ABCG25 Antibody | CSB-PA774612XA01DOA | ABCG25 | Arabidopsis thaliana | 2ml/0.1ml |
ABI4 Antibody | CSB-PA370645XA01DOA | ABI4 | Arabidopsis thaliana | 2ml/0.1ml |
Antibodies like At5g43440 are critical for:
Functional Genomics: Linking gene sequences to protein roles in plant biology.
Disease Resistance Studies: Understanding how plant proteins contribute to pathogen defense .
Agricultural Biotechnology: Informing crop improvement strategies through molecular insights .
Specificity Constraints: Cross-reactivity with homologous proteins in other plant species has not been ruled out.
Therapeutic Exclusion: This antibody is not engineered for clinical use, unlike humanized antibodies (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies) .
Need for Validation: Further studies are required to confirm its utility in advanced techniques like immunoprecipitation or fluorescence microscopy.
At5g43440 is a gene locus on chromosome 5 of Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein of research interest. While the exact function isn't specified in the search results, it appears to be related to At5g43450 (OGO), which is described as a "2-oxoglutarate and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase, ACO-like" . Antibodies against this protein enable various research applications including protein expression analysis, protein-protein interaction studies, and potentially chromatin-associated functions if it interacts with DNA.
Research applications best suited for At5g43440 antibody include:
Western blotting for protein expression analysis
Immunoprecipitation for protein complex identification
Chromatin immunoprecipitation if it has DNA-binding properties
Immunolocalization to determine subcellular localization
Flow cytometry for quantitative analysis in cell populations
Generation of antibodies against plant proteins typically follows these methodological approaches:
Antigen preparation: Either full-length recombinant protein, specific protein fragments, or synthesized peptides corresponding to unique regions of At5g43440
Immunization: Using rabbits for polyclonal antibodies or mice for monoclonal antibodies
Screening: ELISA-based screening to identify high-affinity antibodies
Purification: Affinity purification against the immunizing antigen
Validation requires multiple approaches as outlined in scientific literature:
Western blotting with wild-type and knockout plant tissues
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Pre-adsorption with immunizing peptide/protein
ChIP-seq validation using the approach described by Cell Signaling Technology: "Antibody sensitivity for ChIP-seq is confirmed by analyzing the signal:noise ratio of target enrichment across the genome in antibody:input control comparisons"
ChIP-seq experiments with At5g43440 antibody require rigorous controls to ensure data reliability:
According to Cell Signaling Technology's ChIP-seq validation protocol, antibody specificity should be further confirmed by "comparing enrichment across the genome to published ChIP-seq data using additional antibodies for a given target protein" .
Sample preparation significantly impacts antibody recognition and experimental outcomes. Key considerations include:
Protein extraction conditions:
Detergent selection affects membrane protein solubilization
Buffer pH influences protein conformation and epitope accessibility
Protease inhibitors prevent degradation that could destroy epitopes
Fixation parameters:
Crosslinking duration affects epitope preservation
Fixative concentration impacts tissue penetration
Temperature influences fixation kinetics
Tissue-specific considerations:
Different plant tissues require adapted extraction protocols
Developmental stage affects protein abundance and modification states
Stress conditions may alter protein localization and complex formation
Experimental adjustment table:
Issue | Cause | Methodological Solution |
---|---|---|
Weak signal | Low protein abundance | Increase antibody concentration; Longer incubation; Enhanced detection systems |
Multiple bands | Protein degradation | Optimize extraction buffer; Increase protease inhibitors; Lower temperature during extraction |
No signal | Epitope destruction | Try different extraction conditions; Reduce fixation time; Test alternative antibody |
Inconsistent results | Variable PTMs | Standardize plant growth conditions; Use phosphatase inhibitors; Compare with alternative detection methods |
When facing contradictory results across different antibody-based methods:
Systematic method comparison:
Document all procedural differences including fixation methods, extraction buffers, blocking agents, and detection systems. Different methods may have varying sensitivities to post-translational modifications of At5g43440.
Epitope accessibility analysis:
Certain experimental conditions may affect epitope availability. For example, the DyAb study notes that "All ChIP-seq validated antibodies are first subjected to the ChIP-qPCR validation protocol" but "Good antibody performance in ChIP-qPCR does not necessarily mean the antibody will perform well for ChIP-seq" .
Validation through orthogonal approaches:
Confirm results using protein tagging approaches (GFP fusion)
Employ mass spectrometry validation
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Perform genetic validation in knockout/knockdown lines
Analysis of protein modifications:
Post-translational modifications may affect antibody recognition. As observed in antibody engineering studies, even small changes can impact binding: "DyAb produced binders at a much higher rate" when specifically designing antibodies with improved properties .
When troubleshooting western blot issues with At5g43440 antibody:
For weak signals:
Optimize protein extraction using specialized buffers suitable for plant tissues
Increase protein loading (20-50 μg)
Reduce washing stringency
Increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection systems
Consider signal amplification methods
For nonspecific signals:
Increase blocking time and concentration
Optimize antibody dilution through titration experiments
Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 in washing buffers
Increase washing stringency (more washes, longer duration)
Pre-adsorb antibody with plant extract from knockout lines
Try alternative blocking agents (BSA vs. milk)
Optimization matrix:
Parameter | Standard Condition | Optimization Range | Expected Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Antibody dilution | 1:1000 | 1:500 to 1:5000 | Balance between signal strength and specificity |
Blocking agent | 5% milk | 3-5% milk or BSA | Reduced background with maintained signal |
Incubation time | 2 hours/room temp | 1 hour/RT to overnight/4°C | Extended incubation may increase sensitivity |
Washing stringency | 3×5 min TBST | 3-6×5-15 min | Increased washes reduce background |
Optimizing ChIP-seq for At5g43440 requires systematic refinement:
Chromatin preparation:
Test different crosslinking times (10-20 minutes)
Compare sonication vs. enzymatic fragmentation
Optimize chromatin fragment size (200-500 bp ideal)
Immunoprecipitation conditions:
Titrate antibody amount (2-10 μg per IP)
Test different washing stringencies
Optimize incubation time and temperature
Signal enrichment verification:
Following Cell Signaling Technology guidelines: "Antibody sensitivity for ChIP-seq is confirmed by analyzing the signal:noise ratio of target enrichment across the genome in antibody:input control comparisons. The antibody must provide an acceptable minimum number of defined enrichment peaks and a minimum signal:noise threshold compared to input chromatin" .
Bioinformatic optimization:
Select peak callers appropriate for expected binding patterns
Adjust p-value/FDR thresholds based on peak characteristics
Perform motif enrichment analysis if At5g43440 is a DNA-binding protein
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly affect antibody recognition of At5g43440:
Common PTMs affecting recognition:
Phosphorylation: May create or mask epitopes
Ubiquitination: Can sterically hinder antibody access
Glycosylation: May prevent antibody binding
SUMOylation: Can change protein conformation
Acetylation: May alter epitope characteristics
Experimental approaches to address PTM interference:
Use phosphatase treatment to remove phosphorylation
Apply deglycosylation enzymes before analysis
Compare recognition patterns under different stress conditions
Develop modification-specific antibodies for specific research questions
Detection strategies for PTM analysis:
Western blot mobility shift assays
Phos-tag gel electrophoresis for phosphorylation
2D gel electrophoresis to separate modified forms
IP-mass spectrometry to identify specific modifications
Robust quantification requires appropriate statistical approaches:
Experimental design requirements:
Minimum three biological replicates
Include appropriate loading controls
Standard curve for absolute quantification
Quantification methodology:
Use densitometry software (ImageJ, Image Lab)
Normalize to loading controls or total protein
Verify signal is within linear dynamic range
Statistical analysis workflow:
Step | Method | Considerations |
---|---|---|
Data distribution check | Shapiro-Wilk test | Determines appropriate statistical test |
Two-group comparison | t-test (parametric) or Mann-Whitney (non-parametric) | Based on normality testing |
Multiple group comparison | ANOVA with post-hoc tests | Tukey for all pairwise, Dunnett for comparison to control |
Data presentation | Mean ± SD or SEM with significance indicators | Include representative blot images |
Reporting standards:
Report both fold-changes and p-values
Specify normalization method
Include all statistical parameters (test used, n value)
Analysis of ChIP-seq data for At5g43440 requires a structured bioinformatic workflow:
Quality control metrics:
Sequence quality (FASTQC)
Mapping rate (>70% expected)
Library complexity assessment
Fragment size distribution
Alignment and filtering parameters:
Use latest Arabidopsis genome assembly
Remove PCR duplicates
Filter by mapping quality (MAPQ >20)
Peak calling optimization:
Following the ChIP-seq validation principles: "Antibody sensitivity for ChIP-seq is confirmed by analyzing the signal:noise ratio of target enrichment across the genome" . Peak calling should include:
Appropriate peak caller selection (MACS2, HOMER)
Parameter optimization based on binding pattern
Input normalization
FDR threshold selection (typically 0.01-0.05)
Downstream analysis approaches:
Motif discovery if At5g43440 is a transcription factor
Gene ontology enrichment of target genes
Integration with transcriptome data
Comparison with chromatin accessibility data
When designing experiments to identify At5g43440 protein interactions:
Method selection based on interaction type:
Interaction Type | Recommended Method | Key Considerations |
---|---|---|
Stable complexes | Co-immunoprecipitation | Buffer conditions preserve interactions |
Transient interactions | Crosslinking followed by IP | Optimize crosslinker concentration and time |
Direct vs. indirect | Yeast two-hybrid or in vitro binding | Distinguish primary from secondary interactions |
Dynamic interactions | Proximity labeling (BioID) | Captures transient and weak interactions |
Controls for interaction specificity:
Non-specific IgG precipitation control
Reciprocal co-IP with antibodies against suspected partners
Competition with excess antigen peptide
Validation in knockout/knockdown lines
Confirmation approaches:
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC)
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Pull-down with recombinant proteins
Mass spectrometry identification of complex components
Condition-dependent interactions:
Test multiple developmental stages
Compare normal vs. stress conditions
Examine cell-type specific interactions
Investigate effects of post-translational modifications
Based on the efficiency principles observed in antibody engineering studies, researchers should consider multiple validation approaches as "DyAb produced binders at a much higher rate" when multiple complementary strategies were employed .
At5g43440 antibody can be applied to chromatin research through several advanced approaches:
Genome-wide binding profiling:
ChIP-seq following Cell Signaling Technology guidelines: "All ChIP-seq validated antibodies are first subjected to the ChIP-qPCR validation protocol" followed by next-generation sequencing .
Temporal dynamics analysis:
Time-course ChIP-seq following stimuli
Analysis of binding patterns during development
Correlation with gene expression changes
Spatial organization studies:
ChIP-seq combined with chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C)
3D genome organization analysis
Nuclear localization by immunofluorescence
Combinatorial binding analysis:
Sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) to identify co-binding
Integration with histone modification data
Relationship to chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq)
Emerging technologies that could improve At5g43440 antibody performance include:
Advanced antibody engineering:
The DyAb system demonstrates how AI-guided antibody design can "generate antibodies with favorable properties" through sequence optimization . This approach produced antibodies where "85% of this design set successfully expressed in mammalian cells and bound to the target antigen" .
Single-cell applications:
Single-cell ChIP-seq adaptations
CUT&Tag for improved sensitivity
Single-cell protein analysis
Spatial proteomics integration:
Multiplex immunofluorescence
Imaging mass cytometry
Spatial transcriptomics correlation
Targeted protein degradation studies:
Auxin-inducible degron systems
Antibody-based targeted protein degradation
Nanobody adaptations for live-cell applications
In situ structural studies:
Proximity labeling with antibody-enzyme fusions
Cryogenic electron microscopy with antibody labeling
Super-resolution microscopy applications