Detects ADRA2A in PC-12 cells, mouse brain, and human kidney membrane preparations .
Example: Boster Bio’s A00883-3 antibody shows a 55 kDa band in rat pancreas and small intestine lysates .
Localizes ADRA2A in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) sections .
Protocols recommend antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) or citrate buffer (pH 6.0) .
Cancer Research:
Immunotherapy:
PDAC Subtypes: ADRA2A expression is downregulated in basal-like/squamous PDAC, correlating with advanced disease stages and poor survival. Restoring ADRA2A inhibits invasion and upregulates classical/progenitor markers .
Metabolic Impact: ADRA2A suppresses amino acid and carnitine metabolism, aligning with less aggressive tumor profiles .
α2-AR Agonists: Compounds like dexmedetomidine reduce tumor growth by reprogramming macrophages and T cells, independent of tumor cell targeting .
Combination Therapy: ADRA2A activation synergizes with carboplatin in ovarian cancer, reducing colony formation and enhancing cytotoxicity .
Storage: Stable at -20°C for one year; avoid freeze-thaw cycles .
Controls: Include ADRA2A-knockout tissues or irrelevant transfectants to validate signal specificity .
ADRA2A antibodies are critical for exploring the receptor’s dual role in cancer progression and therapy resistance. Ongoing studies focus on:
STRING: 7955.ENSDARP00000059868
UniGene: Dr.30878
ADRA2A (adrenergic, alpha-2A-, receptor) belongs to the adrenoceptor alpha-2 family of GPCRs coupled to the inhibitory G-alpha subunit (Gi). It functions primarily by suppressing adenylyl cyclase activity, which inhibits the cyclization of AMP to cAMP . ADRA2A plays a crucial role in the central nervous system by inhibiting sympathetic nerve flow, contributing to sedation, anxiolysis, and antinociception . Recent evidence also suggests its importance in pancreatic cancer, where reduced ADRA2A expression correlates with the aggressive basal-like/squamous subtype, increased lymph node metastasis, higher pathological grade, advanced disease stage, and decreased patient survival . These diverse functions make ADRA2A an important target for neuroscience, pharmacology, and oncology research.
ADRA2A antibodies have multiple validated research applications. Based on published literature, these antibodies are primarily used for:
These applications enable researchers to investigate ADRA2A expression, localization, and function across various experimental contexts . The antibody's versatility allows for comprehensive characterization of ADRA2A in different biological systems and disease models.
Most commercially available ADRA2A antibodies demonstrate cross-reactivity with multiple species. According to the search results, several antibodies show tested reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples . This multi-species reactivity is particularly valuable for comparative studies and translational research. For instance, antibody 14266-1-AP has been validated for all three species in Western Blot applications . When selecting an antibody for your specific experimental system, it's advisable to choose one with documented reactivity in your species of interest, preferably with validation data in your specific application context.
ADRA2A antibodies serve as powerful tools for elucidating receptor signaling pathways and disease mechanisms. In pancreatic cancer research, ADRA2A antibodies have been instrumental in demonstrating that ADRA2A suppresses the aggressive basal-like/squamous subtype . Methodologically, researchers have utilized these antibodies in transcriptome and metabolome analyses to identify ADRA2A's role in molecular subtype differentiation and its influence on metabolic features .
For signaling studies, ADRA2A antibodies can be used to:
Quantify receptor expression levels via Western blotting
Visualize receptor localization through immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence
Investigate protein-protein interactions via co-immunoprecipitation
Monitor receptor trafficking and internalization using live-cell imaging combined with IF
In disease models, researchers have employed immunohistochemistry with ADRA2A antibodies (1:200 dilution) on paraffin-embedded sections to correlate expression with clinical outcomes, assigning intensity scores (0-3) and prevalence scores (0-4) to generate comprehensive IHC scores . This approach provides quantitative data for statistical analyses linking ADRA2A expression to disease progression.
When designing co-localization or interaction studies involving ADRA2A, several methodological considerations are critical. Evidence suggests ADRA2A can interact with other receptors, such as TAAR1, as demonstrated through co-immunoprecipitation and ELISA-based methods . For optimal experimental design:
Antibody selection: Choose antibodies targeting different epitopes to avoid steric hindrance. The search results identify multiple antibodies targeting different regions of ADRA2A (AA 240-380, AA 385-450, AA 7-20, etc.) , allowing for strategic selection based on the experimental question.
Controls: Include both positive and negative controls. For instance, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) homo-oligomer has been used as a positive control in ADRA2A-TAAR1 interaction studies .
Expression systems: Consider using established cell lines like COS-7 cells for co-expression studies, which provide robustness through multiple experimental manipulations .
Tagged constructs: Utilize differentially tagged constructs (e.g., N-terminally HA-tagged ADRA2A and C-terminally Flag-tagged interaction partners) to facilitate detection of protein complexes .
Validation approaches: Combine multiple methodologies (co-immunoprecipitation, proximity ligation assays, FRET/BRET) to confirm interactions with confidence.
These methodological considerations ensure rigorous investigation of ADRA2A's role in protein complexes and signaling networks.
Accurate quantification of ADRA2A expression across tissues or disease states requires a multi-modal approach. Based on the research methods described in the search results, the following methodological framework is recommended:
This comprehensive approach enables robust quantification of ADRA2A expression differences, particularly important in comparative studies between normal and pathological states.
For optimal Western blotting with ADRA2A antibodies, the following methodology is recommended based on published protocols:
Sample preparation:
Protein loading and separation:
Transfer and blocking:
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes
Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST
Primary antibody incubation:
Detection and analysis:
This protocol has been validated in multiple publications and provides reliable detection of ADRA2A protein in various sample types.
Successful immunohistochemistry with ADRA2A antibodies requires careful optimization of several critical parameters:
Tissue preparation and fixation:
Antigen retrieval:
Antibody concentration and incubation:
Detection system:
Controls and validation:
These methodological considerations ensure reproducible and specific detection of ADRA2A in tissue sections, enabling reliable comparative studies across different experimental conditions.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for ensuring reliable research outcomes. For ADRA2A antibodies, a comprehensive validation strategy should include:
Genetic approaches:
Test antibody reactivity in ADRA2A knockout or knockdown models
Compare signal in cells with endogenous expression versus those with overexpression
Utilize ADRA2A overexpression systems via lentiviral infection, as described in the literature using constructs like EX-Z5688-Lv103 with appropriate empty vector controls (EX-NEG-Lv103)
Epitope competition:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Methodological validation:
Employ multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of ADRA2A
Compare results across different detection methods (WB, IHC, IF)
Ensure appropriate controls for each application (positive and negative)
Reproducibility verification:
Replicate findings across independent experiments
Validate batch-to-batch consistency if using different lots
This rigorous validation approach ensures that experimental findings can be confidently attributed to ADRA2A-specific detection rather than non-specific antibody binding.
ADRA2A antibodies have shown significant utility in pancreatic cancer research, where they've helped establish ADRA2A's role as a suppressor of the aggressive basal-like/squamous subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) . For pancreatic cancer studies, the following methodological approaches are recommended:
Expression analysis in patient cohorts:
Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays using ADRA2A antibodies (recommended dilution 1:200)
Quantify expression using standardized scoring systems combining intensity and prevalence metrics
Correlate expression with clinical parameters (lymph node metastasis, pathological grade, disease stage, and survival)
Functional studies in cell models:
Generate stable ADRA2A-overexpressing PDAC cell lines using lentiviral expression systems
The literature documents successful use of ADRA2A constructs (EX-Z5688-Lv103) with appropriate empty vector controls (EX-NEG-Lv103)
Assess phenotypic changes (invasion capacity, proliferation, gene expression signatures)
Molecular subtyping:
Metabolomic integration:
These methodological approaches can provide comprehensive insights into ADRA2A's role in pancreatic cancer progression and its potential as a diagnostic or therapeutic target.
Investigating ADRA2A interactions with other receptors or signaling molecules requires sophisticated methodological approaches. Based on the literature, the following methods have been successfully employed:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
ELISA-based interaction assays:
Co-express differentially tagged proteins (N-terminally HA-tagged ADRA2A and C-terminally Flag-tagged partners, or vice versa)
Use robust cell systems like COS-7 cells that can withstand multiple washing steps
Include validated positive controls (e.g., growth hormone secretagogue receptor homo-oligomers)
Proximity-based approaches:
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) for detecting protein interactions in situ
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) or Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) for live-cell interaction studies
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) for visualizing protein complexes
Functional interaction studies:
In silico approaches:
Molecular docking to predict interaction interfaces
Molecular dynamics simulations to assess stability of predicted complexes
Integration with structural data where available
These methodological approaches provide complementary information about ADRA2A interactions, enabling a comprehensive understanding of its signaling networks and potential therapeutic targeting strategies.
ADRA2A plays critical roles in the central nervous system, particularly in inhibiting sympathetic nerve flow and mediating sedation, anxiolysis, and antinociception . For neuroscience applications, the following methodological approaches with ADRA2A antibodies are recommended:
Neuroanatomical studies:
Synaptic physiology:
Immunofluorescence to visualize ADRA2A distribution at synapses
Co-localization studies with pre- and post-synaptic markers
Correlation with electrophysiological recordings to link receptor expression to functional outcomes
Signaling pathway analysis:
Developmental studies:
Track ADRA2A expression patterns during neurodevelopment
Correlate with the emergence of specific neuronal circuits and behaviors
Combine with transgenic models to understand developmental functions
Neurological and psychiatric disorder models:
Compare ADRA2A expression and localization in disease models versus controls
Correlate with behavioral phenotypes
Assess effects of pharmacological targeting (agonists/antagonists) on receptor expression and localization
These approaches enable detailed characterization of ADRA2A's distribution, function, and regulation in the nervous system, contributing to our understanding of its role in normal physiology and neurological disorders.