The At5g42250 Antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA887750XA01DOA) is a polyclonal antibody designed to recognize the protein encoded by the At5g42250 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress). This gene corresponds to Uniprot ID Q9FH04, though its specific biological function remains uncharacterized in publicly available literature .
While direct studies on At5g42250 are absent from indexed publications, its antibody is utilized in plant molecular biology for:
Protein Localization: Mapping expression patterns in Arabidopsis tissues .
Gene Function Studies: Investigating roles in stress responses or developmental pathways via knockout/knockdown models.
Interaction Networks: Identifying binding partners through co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays .
Antibodies like At5g42250 are critical for decoding unannotated plant proteins. For example:
Structural Analogues: Antibodies against other Arabidopsis proteins (e.g., APX5, ARF2) have revealed roles in redox regulation and auxin signaling .
Technical Utility: Such reagents enable high-throughput phenotyping in mutant libraries .
Functional Data: No peer-reviewed studies directly link At5g42250 to metabolic or signaling pathways.
Epitope Mapping: The antibody’s binding region (linear/conformational) is unspecified .
Cross-Reactivity: Validation in non-Arabidopsis species is unreported.
Omics Integration: Coupling antibody-based assays with transcriptomic/proteomic datasets.
Structural Biology: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography to resolve the target protein’s 3D architecture.
At5g42250 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein of significant interest in plant molecular biology. Similar to other Arabidopsis genes like At5g42100, At5g42250 is studied for its role in plant development and stress responses. The protein is part of the complex regulatory networks that govern plant responses to environmental stimuli, similar to transcription factors like ABF2 and ABF3 that regulate nitrate responses . Understanding this protein's function requires specific antibodies that can detect its presence and interactions in various experimental contexts.
Polyclonal antibodies against At5g42250 are typically generated through a process similar to other plant protein antibodies. The standard methodology involves:
Expression and purification of recombinant At5g42250 protein
Immunization of rabbits with the purified protein
Collection of serum after multiple immunization rounds
Affinity purification using chromatography to isolate specific antibodies
This approach mirrors the production method for other Arabidopsis antibodies, where a recombinant protein is used to immunize animals (typically rabbits), followed by serum collection and purification through affinity chromatography . The specificity of the antibody is then validated through techniques such as ELISA and Western blot to ensure it effectively recognizes the target protein.
When validating At5g42250 antibodies, researchers should employ multiple complementary techniques:
| Validation Technique | Purpose | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Confirm antibody detects protein of correct molecular weight | Single band at predicted size for At5g42250 |
| ELISA | Quantify binding affinity and determine detection limits | Strong signal with recombinant At5g42250 |
| Immunoprecipitation | Verify antibody can capture native protein from plant extracts | Enrichment of At5g42250 in IP fraction |
| Negative controls | Confirm specificity | No/minimal signal in knockout/knockdown lines |
| Cross-reactivity tests | Assess potential off-target binding | Limited binding to closely related proteins |
These validation approaches ensure the antibody is suitable for downstream applications by confirming it specifically recognizes At5g42250 rather than related proteins. Similar validation approaches have been documented for antibodies against other plant proteins like those used in ChIP studies for transcription factors .
At5g42250 antibodies can be effectively utilized in ChIP studies to identify genome-wide binding sites of the protein if it functions as a DNA-binding protein. The methodology should follow these steps:
Crosslink proteins to DNA in plant tissue using formaldehyde
Fragment chromatin by sonication to appropriate size (typically 200-500bp)
Immunoprecipitate protein-DNA complexes using At5g42250 antibody
Reverse crosslinks and purify DNA
Analyze DNA by qPCR (ChIP-qPCR) or sequencing (ChIP-seq)
Similar approaches have been successfully applied for other plant transcription factors, such as PIL5, where ChIP-chip analysis identified 748 binding sites across the genome . For ABF transcription factors, researchers have used GFP-tagged proteins (e.g., ABF2pro::GFP:ABF2) in ChIP assays to identify genome-wide binding patterns . These approaches can be adapted for At5g42250 protein studies, particularly if the protein has DNA-binding capabilities.
For cell-specific analysis of At5g42250 protein expression, researchers can employ:
Immunohistochemistry with At5g42250 antibodies on fixed tissue sections
Cell sorting followed by immunoblotting:
Use GFP-based reporter lines for specific cell types
Isolate cells using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
Perform western blot analysis with At5g42250 antibodies on isolated cell populations
This approach allows for spatiotemporal analysis of protein expression across different cell types. Similar cell-specific approaches have been used to study transcription factor expression in different root cell types (epidermis, cortex, endodermis, pericycle, and stele) at various time points after treatment . This methodology can be adapted to study At5g42250 protein localization and abundance across different plant tissues and cell types.
To identify DNA binding motifs for At5g42250 using antibody-based ChIP-seq:
Perform ChIP-seq with validated At5g42250 antibody
Identify statistically significant peaks representing binding sites
Extract sequences from binding regions (typically +/- 250bp around peak center)
Apply motif discovery algorithms to identify enriched sequence patterns:
Use established tools like AlignACE or MDscan for ab initio motif discovery
Analyze motif frequency and distribution relative to binding sites
Similar approaches with PIL5 transcription factor identified G-box motifs as the primary binding sites, with 438 out of 748 binding regions containing G-box motifs . If At5g42250 functions as a transcription factor, this approach can reveal its preferred binding sequences and potential regulatory targets.
For identifying protein interaction partners of At5g42250:
Immunoprecipitation (IP) with At5g42250 antibody:
Prepare plant tissue lysates under native conditions
Incubate with At5g42250 antibody coupled to beads
Wash to remove non-specific binding
Elute protein complexes
Mass spectrometry analysis:
Perform in-gel or in-solution digestion of eluted proteins
Analyze peptides by LC-MS/MS
Identify proteins using database searches
Validate interactions using reciprocal IP or other methods
This approach allows researchers to identify protein complexes that include At5g42250, providing insights into its functional roles through its interaction partners. Similar approaches have been used to study protein complexes in plant systems, enabling the identification of multi-component regulatory networks.
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low signal in Western blot | Insufficient protein extraction | Optimize extraction buffer composition; include appropriate protease inhibitors |
| Low antibody affinity | Increase antibody concentration; extend incubation time | |
| Protein degradation | Use fresh tissue; keep samples cold; add additional protease inhibitors | |
| High background | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking agent concentration; optimize antibody dilution |
| Secondary antibody issues | Test different secondary antibodies; increase washing steps | |
| No signal in IP experiments | Epitope masking by protein interactions | Try different lysis conditions; use alternative antibody recognizing different epitope |
| Cross-reactivity | Similar epitopes in related proteins | Perform pre-absorption with recombinant related proteins; validate with knockout controls |
These troubleshooting approaches are based on standard practices in antibody-based experiments and can be applied to optimize At5g42250 antibody performance across different experimental conditions.
To rigorously validate antibody specificity using genetic approaches:
Obtain or generate At5g42250 knockout or knockdown lines:
T-DNA insertion mutants
RNAi knockdown lines
CRISPR/Cas9 edited lines
Perform Western blot analysis:
Extract proteins from wild-type and mutant plants under identical conditions
Run samples in parallel on the same gel
Probe with At5g42250 antibody
Confirm absence or reduction of signal in mutant lines
Include loading controls:
Probe the same membrane with antibodies against housekeeping proteins
Verify equal loading using total protein stains (Ponceau S, Coomassie)
This validation approach provides definitive evidence of antibody specificity by demonstrating the absence of signal in genetic backgrounds where the target protein is not expressed.
For comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of At5g42250 protein expression:
Tissue-specific analysis:
Collect different plant tissues (roots, leaves, stems, flowers) at various developmental stages
Extract proteins using standardized protocols
Perform quantitative Western blot analysis with At5g42250 antibody
Normalize signal to loading controls
Cell-type specific analysis:
Use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate specific cell populations
Extract proteins from sorted cells
Perform immunoblotting with At5g42250 antibody
Compare expression levels across cell types
Response to environmental stimuli:
Subject plants to various treatments (e.g., light, temperature, nutrient changes)
Collect samples at multiple time points (e.g., 12, 20, 60, and 120 min post-treatment)
Analyze protein expression changes using At5g42250 antibody
This approach allows researchers to create detailed expression maps showing how At5g42250 protein levels vary across tissues, cell types, developmental stages, and in response to environmental cues, similar to the spatiotemporal transcriptome analysis methods described for nitrate response studies .