ADPG2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to ADPG2 Antibody

ADPG2 (ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE2) is a plant-specific endopolygalacturonase (PG) critical for cell wall modification during developmental processes such as silique dehiscence, floral organ abscission, and root growth. Antibodies targeting ADPG2 enable researchers to study its expression, localization, and enzymatic activity in plant tissues. While no commercial ADPG2-specific antibody is explicitly documented in the provided sources, insights into its structure, function, and detection methods can be inferred from studies on homologous proteins and related antibody technologies .

2.2. Biological Roles

  • Silique dehiscence: Essential for cell separation in Arabidopsis seed pods .

  • Root development: Exogenous application alters root cell adhesion and elongation .

  • Floral organ abscission: Works redundantly with QRT2 to mediate petal shedding .

3.1. Antigen Design Strategies

Antibodies for plant PGs like ADPG2 are typically raised against:

  • Recombinant proteins: Full-length or epitope-tagged ADPG2 expressed in heterologous systems (e.g., Pichia pastoris) .

  • Synthetic peptides: Sequences from hypervariable regions (e.g., residues 304–318 in the T1a turn) .

3.2. Validation Methods

ParameterExample ProtocolReference
SpecificityKnockout mutant analysis or siRNA silencing
SensitivityWestern blotting with serial dilutions (1:1,000–5,000)
Cross-reactivity2D gel electrophoresis to exclude Rubisco interactions

3.3. Case Study: Arabidopsis ADPG2 Detection

While no ADPG2-specific antibody is commercially available, analogous workflows for polyclonal antibodies (e.g., Anti-ADGP, Agrisera AS11 1739) provide a template :

  1. Immunogen: Codon-optimized ADPG2 expressed in P. pastoris.

  2. Host: Rabbit IgG polyclonal antibodies.

  3. Applications: Western blot (predicted MW: ~54 kDa), immunofluorescence.

Comparative Analysis of Related Antibodies

Antibody TargetHost/IsotypeApplicationsKey FeaturesSource
ADPGK (15639-1-AP)Rabbit IgGWB, IHC, ELISADetects 51 kDa band in HepG2 cells
Anti-ADGP (AS11 1739)Rabbit IgGWB (1:5,000)Validated in Arabidopsis, wheat
Poly/Mono-ADP RiboseRabbit mAbIF, IPDetects PARylation in DNA repair

Research Implications and Future Directions

ADPG2 antibodies could advance studies on:

  • Pectin remodeling: Track spatial-temporal activity in root cell walls .

  • Enzyme engineering: Optimize processivity for biotechnological applications .

  • Plant-microbe interactions: Investigate pathogen-induced cell wall degradation .

Challenges include minimizing cross-reactivity with homologous PGs (e.g., ADPG1, QRT2) and developing modular antibody formats for co-detection of enzyme isoforms .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
ADPG2 antibody; PGAZAT antibody; At2g41850 antibody; T11A7.5Polygalacturonase ADPG2 antibody; AtADPG2 antibody; PG ADPG2 antibody; EC 3.2.1.15 antibody; Pectinase ADPG2 antibody; Protein ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE 2 antibody
Target Names
ADPG2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Polygalacturonase ADPG2 plays a critical role in facilitating cell separation during key developmental processes. These processes include the final stages of pod shatter, anther dehiscence, and floral organ abscission.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. ADPG1 and ADPG2 are essential for silique dehiscence. Additionally, ADPG2 and QRT2 contribute to floral organ abscission. PMID: 19168715
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G41850

STRING: 3702.AT2G41850.1

UniGene: At.42781

Protein Families
Glycosyl hydrolase 28 family
Subcellular Location
Secreted, cell wall.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in roots and in the abscission zone of the sepals, petals and stamens of flowers, at the base of cauline leaves and in the basal cell of trichomes from senescing leaves. Found at the site of lateral root emergence, in the dehiscence zone of anth

Q&A

Here’s a structured collection of FAQs tailored for researchers investigating the ADG-2 antibody, based on its role in coronavirus research and engineered antibody development. The questions reflect academic rigor, methodological depth, and analysis of experimental contradictions, drawing from peer-reviewed studies (e.g., ).

Advanced Research Questions

  • What experimental models validate ADG-2’s protective efficacy in vivo?
    ADG-2 was tested in murine models of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection, demonstrating:

    • Complete protection against viral replication in lungs (reduction in viral RNA by >4 logs)

    • Prevention of lung pathology (histopathological scoring)

    • Dose-dependent efficacy (e.g., 10 mg/kg vs. 25 mg/kg)
      Methodological note: Passive transfer studies require careful titration of antibody half-life and biodistribution.

  • How do structural features of ADG-2 resolve contradictions in neutralization breadth vs. potency?
    While some broadly neutralizing antibodies sacrifice potency for breadth, ADG-2 balances both via:

    • Paratope flexibility accommodating RBD conformational changes

    • High-affinity binding to conserved regions (e.g., glycan-shielded residues)

    • Validation through pseudovirus neutralization (IC₅₀ < 0.1 µg/mL for SARS-CoV-2)

  • What are the limitations of current ADG-2 studies, and how might they be addressed?

    • Gaps: Limited data on long-term immunity and escape mutant emergence.

    • Solutions:

      • Longitudinal studies in non-human primates

      • Deep mutational scanning to predict resistance hotspots

      • Combinatorial therapy with antibodies targeting non-overlapping epitopes

Methodological Guidance

  • How to design a robust neutralization assay for ADG-2-like antibodies?

    • Use authentic virus and pseudovirus systems (e.g., VSV-SARS-CoV-2 chimeras)

    • Include diverse sarbecovirus RBDs (e.g., RaTG13, SHC014) to assess cross-reactivity

    • Standardize metrics (e.g., IC₅₀, NT₅₀) across replicates

  • What controls are critical when engineering ADG-2 derivatives?

    • Isotype controls: Compare IgG1 vs. IgG3 subclasses for Fc-mediated effector functions.

    • Binding kinetics controls: SPR/BLI to confirm affinity maturation does not destabilize the antibody.

    • In vivo pharmacokinetic controls: Monitor serum half-life in murine models.

Contradictions and Open Questions

  • Why do some studies report variable efficacy of ADG-2 against emerging variants?
    Discrepancies may arise from:

    • Differences in assay design (e.g., live virus vs. pseudovirus)

    • Mutation-dependent changes in epitope accessibility (e.g., Omicron BA.2.86 vs. XBB.1.5)

    • Host-specific factors (e.g., Fc receptor polymorphisms in murine vs. human models)

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.