AGBL2 (ATP/GTP binding protein-like 2) is a carboxypeptidase involved in the tubulin tyrosination cycle, which regulates microtubule dynamics. The protein has been identified as a latexin-interacting protein with significant implications in cancer biology . AGBL2 plays a crucial role in regulating cellular processes related to cancer progression, particularly in cancer stem cells. Recent studies demonstrate that AGBL2 functions in pathways related to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and may contribute to chemotherapy resistance mechanisms .
AGBL2 antibodies are available with various specifications to meet different research needs:
| Reactivity | Applications | Host | Clonality | Common Catalog Numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human | ELISA, IHC | Rabbit | Polyclonal | ABIN7149384 |
| Human, Mouse | ELISA, WB, IHC, IF, ICC | Rabbit | Polyclonal | ABIN6257045 |
| Human | ELISA, WB, IHC | Rabbit | Polyclonal | Various |
Most commercially available AGBL2 antibodies are rabbit-derived polyclonal antibodies that recognize human AGBL2, with some cross-reacting with mouse protein . Antibodies are typically available unconjugated, though conjugated versions (with fluorophores like FITC or Alexa Fluor) can be sourced for specialized applications .
AGBL2 antibodies have been validated for multiple experimental applications:
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): For quantitative detection of AGBL2 in solution
Western Blot (WB): For protein expression analysis in cell/tissue lysates
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues
Immunofluorescence (IF): For subcellular localization studies
Studies have successfully employed these applications to correlate AGBL2 expression with clinical outcomes in cancer patients and to investigate AGBL2's role in cancer stem cells .
For optimal AGBL2 detection in tissue samples:
Prepare 4-μm-thick sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues
Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Block endogenous peroxidase with 3% hydrogen peroxide containing 1% normal horse serum (10 minutes, room temperature)
Incubate with anti-AGBL2 antibody at 1:100 dilution (overnight, 4°C in moist chamber)
Apply horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (30 minutes)
Develop color using AEC substrate
Counterstain with Mayer's hematoxylin
Use normal fetal and adult kidney samples as positive controls
This protocol has been validated in multiple studies examining AGBL2 expression in cancer tissues .
AGBL2 expression can be evaluated using the following semi-quantitative scoring system:
Mild/0: <1% of neoplastic cells express AGBL2
Intermediate/1+: ≥1% and <10% of neoplastic cells express AGBL2
Strong/2+: ≥10% of neoplastic cells express AGBL2
Samples scoring intermediate (1+) or strong (2+) should be considered positive. For accurate assessment, it's recommended to examine multiple fields and score based on both intensity and distribution of staining . In some studies, AGBL2 expression was observed primarily in the cytoplasm of positive cells, and the pattern of expression (rather than just intensity) may have biological significance .
AGBL2 expression has significant correlations with multiple clinical parameters:
| Clinical Parameter | Correlation with AGBL2 | Statistical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Stage | Positive correlation | p < 0.05 |
| Histological Grade | Positive correlation | p < 0.010 |
| Lymph Node Metastasis | Positive correlation | p < 0.05 |
| Tumor Size | Significant association | Varies by study |
| Tumor Necrosis | Significant association | Varies by study |
In multivariate analysis using the Cox regression test, AGBL2 has been identified as an independent prognostic factor in certain cancers . The co-expression of AGBL2 with other markers, such as RARRES1, can have synergistic effects on prognosis prediction, with some co-expression patterns indicating 11-15 times higher risk of cancer relapse .
AGBL2 demonstrates heightened expression in CD44+/CD24- cancer stem cells (CSCs), particularly those that have undergone epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) . Research indicates that:
CSCs with high AGBL2 expression show enhanced tumor-initiating capacity in NOD/SCID mice
AGBL2 expression is upregulated during EMT induction in CSCs
AGBL2 expression correlates with chemotherapy resistance in CSCs
AGBL2 may contribute to the maintenance of stemness properties in cancer cells
These findings suggest that AGBL2 could be a potential therapeutic target for eliminating cancer stem cells and preventing cancer recurrence and metastasis.
Several validated methodologies have been employed to investigate AGBL2 function:
siRNA Knockdown: Transfection with AGBL2-specific siRNA followed by functional assays to assess effects on proliferation, migration, and chemoresistance
Gene Expression Analysis: Affymetrix array analysis to correlate AGBL2 expression with clinical outcomes (e.g., analyzing tumors from patients with poor prognosis vs. good prognosis)
Co-immunoprecipitation: To identify protein-protein interactions, such as the interaction between AGBL2 and latexin
Flow Cytometry: For isolation of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells to study AGBL2 expression in cancer stem cells
Western Blot: For protein expression analysis, using anti-AGBL2 antibody at 1:500 dilution with appropriate controls
AGBL2 forms immune complexes with latexin, as demonstrated through multiple experimental approaches:
Tandem affinity purification (TAP) of latexin complexes reveals AGBL2 as an interacting partner
Immunoprecipitation of endogenous latexin co-precipitates AGBL2
Reverse immunoprecipitation with AGBL2 antibodies pulls down latexin
This interaction has significant therapeutic implications:
Latexin appears to inhibit AGBL2 function in the tubulin tyrosination cycle
Overexpression of latexin may counteract AGBL2-mediated processes in cancer progression
The AGBL2-latexin interaction represents a potential target for developing novel cancer therapeutics
Understanding this interaction pathway could lead to new strategies for targeting cancer stem cells that are resistant to conventional chemotherapy.
Combined expression analysis of AGBL2 with other markers enables more precise patient stratification:
| Expression Pattern | Risk Level | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Membranous RARRES1 + any AGBL2 | Low risk | Excellent disease outcome |
| Cytoplasmic/negative RARRES1 + positive AGBL2 | High risk (11-15× higher) | High risk of cancer relapse |
| Cytoplasmic/negative RARRES1 + negative AGBL2 | Intermediate risk | Variable outcomes |
These expression patterns can guide clinical decision-making:
High-risk patients may benefit from more aggressive surveillance for early detection of metastasis
High-risk patients might be candidates for adjuvant therapy
The expression profile could help identify patients who would benefit from targeted therapies
Researchers face several challenges when using AGBL2 antibodies in complex studies:
Antibody Specificity: Ensuring antibodies specifically detect AGBL2 without cross-reactivity, especially in tissues with complex protein mixtures
Epitope Accessibility: Different fixation methods may affect epitope exposure, requiring optimized antigen retrieval protocols
Variability Between Antibody Lots: Batch-to-batch variation can affect consistency in long-term studies
Multiplex Staining Compatibility: When co-staining with other markers (e.g., RARRES1), antibody compatibility must be carefully validated
Scoring Standardization: Establishing consistent scoring criteria across different studies and pathologists
To address these challenges, rigorous controls (positive, negative, and isotype) should be included in all experiments, and antibodies should be validated using multiple detection methods.
Integration of AGBL2 into biomarker panels requires consideration of several factors:
Complementary Markers: AGBL2 shows enhanced prognostic value when combined with markers like RARRES1, suggesting optimal biomarker panels should include complementary proteins
Tissue Microarray Approach: Using TMAs with multiple samples per tumor (2-5 biopsies from areas of different morphology/grade) improves representation of tumor heterogeneity
Standardized Scoring: Implementing consistent scoring systems across laboratories enables reliable meta-analysis of results
Clinical-Pathological Integration: Correlating AGBL2 expression with traditional parameters (stage, grade) provides more comprehensive risk assessment
Statistical Validation: Employing multivariate analysis techniques like Cox proportional hazard regression model validates the independent prognostic value of AGBL2
The goal should be developing clinically applicable tests that can guide personalized treatment decisions based on a patient's unique tumor biology profile.