TF Identifier | Frequency Isolated | TF Family | Associated Phenotype |
---|---|---|---|
AT1G31630 | 5x | MADS-box | 9-HOT-tolerant root growth |
Screen Design: 6,000 AtTORF-Ex lines tested for root growth under 25 µM 9-HOT .
AGL86 Overexpression: Confers tolerance to 9-HOT, enabling normal root elongation under stress .
Mechanism: Likely regulates detoxification pathways or lipid metabolism genes, though direct targets remain uncharacterized .
AGL86 is implicated in:
Oxylipin Detoxification: Counteracts growth inhibition caused by 9-LOX-derived oxylipins .
Genetic Interactions: Co-expressed with bZIP and ERF transcription factors, suggesting synergistic roles in stress adaptation .
AGL86 antibodies enable:
Functional studies of MADS-box TFs in plant stress responses.
Identification of downstream targets via chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).
Knowledge Gaps: No structural or kinetic data on AGL86-antibody binding.
Unanswered Questions: Specific pathways regulated by AGL86 remain undefined.
AGL86 is a MADS-box transcription factor encoded by the AT1G31630 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. It has been identified in screens for transcription factors that provide tolerance to 9-HOT, a plant oxylipin involved in stress responses . The protein belongs to a large family of plant-specific transcription factors that regulate various developmental processes and stress responses.
Antibodies against AGL86 are critical research tools for several reasons. First, they enable visualization and quantification of endogenous AGL86 protein levels across different tissues and experimental conditions. Second, they facilitate chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to identify genomic binding sites of AGL86. Third, they allow isolation of protein complexes through co-immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners. These applications are essential for understanding AGL86's role in transcriptional networks regulating plant stress responses, particularly in oxylipin signaling pathways.
For MADS-box transcription factors like AGL86, researchers typically have access to several antibody types:
Polyclonal antibodies: Generated by immunizing animals (typically rabbits) with purified AGL86 protein or synthetic peptides corresponding to unique regions of AGL86 . These recognize multiple epitopes, providing robust detection but potentially lower specificity.
Monoclonal antibodies: Produced from a single B-cell clone, these recognize a single epitope on AGL86, offering higher specificity but potentially lower sensitivity for low-abundance transcription factors.
Recombinant antibodies: Engineered antibodies with defined binding properties, including single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) or antigen-binding fragments (Fabs).
The choice depends on the specific application, with polyclonal antibodies often preferred for initial detection and monoclonal or recombinant antibodies for applications requiring higher specificity.
Proper validation of AGL86 antibodies is crucial for reliable experimental results. A comprehensive validation approach includes:
Western blot analysis comparing wild-type plants with AGL86 knockout or knockdown mutants to confirm specificity.
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm that the antibody captures the intended protein.
Preabsorption tests with the immunizing antigen to demonstrate that binding is epitope-specific.
Cross-reactivity testing with related MADS-box proteins, particularly those with high sequence homology.
Orthogonal validation using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of AGL86.
Correlation of protein detection with known mRNA expression patterns from transcriptomic data.
Each validation method addresses different aspects of antibody specificity, and combining multiple approaches provides the strongest evidence for antibody reliability in AGL86 research applications.
For effective detection of MADS-box transcription factors like AGL86 in plant tissues, specialized extraction protocols are essential:
Nuclear extraction is recommended since AGL86 is predominantly nuclear-localized:
Grind tissue in liquid nitrogen
Extract using nuclear isolation buffers (e.g., 50mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol)
Include protease inhibitor cocktails to prevent degradation
Centrifuge to isolate nuclear fraction
Solubilize nuclear proteins with appropriate detergents
Tissue selection considerations:
Fixation for immunohistochemistry:
4% paraformaldehyde fixation preserves protein localization while maintaining epitope accessibility
Antigen retrieval may be necessary if fixation reduces antibody binding
Proper sample preparation significantly impacts the success of downstream applications such as western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and chromatin immunoprecipitation with AGL86 antibodies.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using AGL86 antibodies allows identification of genomic regions bound by this transcription factor. A methodological workflow includes:
Cross-linking: Treat plant tissue with formaldehyde (typically 1%) to stabilize protein-DNA interactions.
Chromatin extraction and fragmentation:
Extract chromatin from nuclei
Sonicate or enzymatically digest to generate 200-500bp fragments
Verify fragmentation by agarose gel electrophoresis
Immunoprecipitation:
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads
Incubate with validated AGL86 antibodies (typically 2-5μg per reaction)
Include appropriate controls (IgG, input samples, no-antibody)
Capture antibody-chromatin complexes with protein A/G beads
Washing and elution:
Use increasingly stringent washes to reduce background
Elute protein-DNA complexes and reverse cross-links
Purify DNA for downstream analysis
Analysis options:
ChIP-qPCR for known or candidate target genes
ChIP-seq for genome-wide identification of binding sites
Bioinformatic analysis to identify binding motifs and associated genes
For plant MADS-box factors like AGL86, optimizing sonication conditions and antibody concentrations is particularly important due to their often moderate expression levels and the complex plant chromatin environment .
For optimal immunoblot detection of MADS-box transcription factors like AGL86, careful optimization of experimental conditions is necessary:
Parameter | Standard Condition | Alternative for Low Signal | Alternative for High Background |
---|---|---|---|
Blocking agent | 5% BSA in TBST | 3% BSA + 2% milk in TBST | 5% milk in TBST |
Primary antibody dilution | 1:2000 | 1:1000 | 1:5000 |
Incubation time | Overnight at 4°C | 48 hours at 4°C | 2 hours at RT |
Secondary antibody dilution | 1:5000 | 1:2500 | 1:10000 |
Wash stringency | 3 × 5 min TBST | 3 × 10 min TBST | 5 × 5 min TBST with 0.1% SDS |
Additional considerations:
Sample loading: Load 30-50μg of nuclear protein extract per lane for optimal detection.
Transfer conditions: Wet transfer at 30V overnight often yields better results for transcription factors than rapid transfer protocols.
Membrane selection: PVDF membranes (0.45μm) typically provide better sensitivity than nitrocellulose for low-abundance transcription factors.
Signal enhancement: Consider using signal enhancement systems (e.g., biotin-streptavidin amplification) for detecting low-abundance AGL86, particularly in tissues with limited expression.
Systematic optimization of these parameters should be performed when establishing a new immunoblot protocol for AGL86 detection.
MADS-box transcription factors typically function in combinatorial protein complexes. AGL86 antibodies enable several approaches to investigate these interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Prepare native protein extracts under non-denaturing conditions
Immunoprecipitate with AGL86 antibodies
Analyze co-precipitated proteins by western blot (for known interactions) or mass spectrometry (for unbiased discovery)
Include appropriate controls (IgG, lysates from knockout plants)
Sequential ChIP (re-ChIP):
Perform first ChIP with AGL86 antibodies
Elute complexes under non-denaturing conditions
Perform second ChIP with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Analyze enriched DNA to identify co-occupied genomic regions
This approach reveals functional interactions at chromatin
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Use primary antibodies against AGL86 and potential interaction partners
Apply oligonucleotide-conjugated secondary antibodies
Amplify signal when proteins are in close proximity (<40nm)
Visualize interaction sites by fluorescence microscopy
Quantify interaction frequency in different cell types or conditions
These complementary approaches can reveal both stable and transient interactions of AGL86 with other transcriptional regulators, particularly in the context of stress responses where it was identified as a factor involved in oxylipin tolerance .
Immunohistochemical detection of AGL86 in plant tissues requires specialized protocols:
Tissue fixation and embedding:
Fix tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) for 4-6 hours
Dehydrate through an ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95%, 100%)
Embed in paraffin or LR White resin for sectioning
Cut 5-10μm sections and mount on adhesive slides
Antigen retrieval:
For paraffin sections, deparaffinize with xylene and rehydrate
Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
For plant tissues, additional cell wall digestion with pectinase/cellulase may improve antibody accessibility
Immunostaining procedure:
Block with 5% normal serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS (2 hours)
Incubate with primary AGL86 antibody (1:100 to 1:500 dilution) overnight at 4°C
Wash thoroughly (3-5 times, 10 minutes each) with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20
Apply fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200 to 1:500) for 2 hours
Counterstain nuclei with DAPI (1μg/ml)
Mount in anti-fade medium
Controls and validation:
Include negative controls (primary antibody omission, non-immune IgG)
Use tissues from AGL86 knockout plants as specificity controls
Compare staining patterns with in situ hybridization data for AGL86 mRNA
These protocols can be adapted for confocal microscopy, allowing co-localization studies with other nuclear proteins or chromatin markers to investigate AGL86 function in specific cell types during plant development or stress responses.
Advanced single-cell methodologies using AGL86 antibodies can uncover cell-type-specific regulation:
Single-cell immunofluorescence analysis:
Perform high-resolution imaging of plant tissues using AGL86 antibodies
Quantify nuclear signal intensity across different cell types
Correlate with cell-specific markers to identify patterns of expression
Track changes in subcellular localization in response to environmental stimuli
CUT&Tag or CUT&RUN with AGL86 antibodies:
These techniques use antibody-directed nuclease activity to map protein binding sites
Require fewer cells than conventional ChIP (can be adapted for specific cell types)
Provide higher resolution data on genomic binding locations
Can reveal cell-type-specific target genes of AGL86
Integration with single-cell transcriptomics:
Isolate nuclei from specific cell types using fluorescence-activated nucleus sorting
Perform parallel analyses of AGL86 binding (CUT&Tag) and gene expression (RNA-seq)
Correlate binding patterns with transcriptional output
Identify cell-type-specific regulatory networks
These approaches are particularly valuable for understanding AGL86 function in complex plant tissues, where its activity may vary between different cell types during development or in response to stresses like oxylipin exposure that have been shown to involve AGL86 .
Non-specific binding is a common challenge with transcription factor antibodies, including those targeting AGL86:
Causes of non-specific binding:
Cross-reactivity with related MADS-box proteins (high sequence homology in DNA-binding domains)
Interaction with abundant proteins in plant extracts
Suboptimal blocking or washing conditions
Optimization strategies:
Pre-adsorb antibodies with plant extracts from AGL86 knockout plants
Increase blocking stringency (longer time, different blocking agents)
Add competing proteins (e.g., BSA) to antibody dilution buffer
Optimize salt concentration in wash buffers (150-500mM NaCl)
Include non-ionic detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100) in wash buffers
Troubleshooting specific problems:
Problem | Possible Cause | Solution |
---|---|---|
Multiple bands in western blot | Cross-reactivity with related MADS-box proteins | Pre-absorb with recombinant related proteins |
High background in immunostaining | Insufficient blocking | Increase blocking time and add 0.1% Tween-20 |
False positives in ChIP | DNA-binding via secondary antibodies | Include IgG control and isotype controls |
Signal in knockout controls | Non-specific binding to abundant proteins | Increase wash stringency and pre-clear lysates |
Systematic optimization of these parameters can significantly improve signal-to-noise ratio when working with AGL86 antibodies, particularly in complex plant extracts where many related MADS-box proteins may be present .
Proper controls are critical for interpreting results obtained with AGL86 antibodies:
Essential negative controls:
Samples from AGL86 knockout or knockdown plants
Non-immune IgG from the same species as the primary antibody
Primary antibody omission controls
Peptide competition assays (pre-incubation with immunizing antigen)
Positive controls:
Recombinant AGL86 protein (for western blots)
Tissues known to express AGL86 based on transcriptomic data
Epitope-tagged AGL86 expressed in transgenic plants
Application-specific controls:
For ChIP: Input samples, IgG controls, positive control regions (known targets)
For immunohistochemistry: Tissues with known expression patterns
For co-immunoprecipitation: Stringency controls with different wash conditions
Validation across methods:
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Confirm key findings with orthogonal detection methods
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes when possible
Implementing these controls systematically ensures reliable interpretation of results obtained with AGL86 antibodies, particularly important when studying members of large transcription factor families like MADS-box proteins in plants .
Batch-to-batch variability can significantly impact experimental reproducibility when using antibodies against transcription factors like AGL86:
Characterization of new antibody batches:
Perform side-by-side western blots with previous batches
Titrate each new batch to determine optimal working dilutions
Create standard curves using recombinant AGL86 protein
Document detection limits and dynamic range
Reference standards and normalization:
Maintain aliquots of reference samples (e.g., nuclear extracts from specific tissues)
Create internal calibration standards with recombinant protein
Normalize signals to housekeeping proteins or total protein stains
Consider absolute quantification using spike-in controls
Long-term mitigation strategies:
Purchase larger lots of validated antibodies when available
Aliquot antibodies to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Document lot numbers and validation data for each experiment
Consider developing monoclonal antibodies for critical applications
Data reporting practices:
Report antibody source, catalog number, and lot number in publications
Include validation data in supplementary materials
Describe specific optimization steps required for each batch
Be transparent about limitations of the antibodies used
These approaches help maintain experimental consistency despite the inherent variability in antibody production, particularly important for quantitative applications of AGL86 antibodies in plant research.
AGL86 was identified in screens for transcription factors providing tolerance to 9-HOT, implicating it in plant stress responses . Antibodies are enabling several research directions in this area:
Stress-responsive dynamics:
Tracking AGL86 protein accumulation, degradation, and post-translational modifications during stress exposure
Comparing AGL86 protein levels across different stress conditions (drought, heat, pathogen attack)
Correlating AGL86 levels with stress tolerance phenotypes
Examining tissue-specific stress responses mediated by AGL86
Stress-specific target gene identification:
ChIP-seq with AGL86 antibodies under normal versus stress conditions
Identifying condition-specific binding events that may explain stress tolerance
Integrating binding data with stress-responsive transcriptomics
Validating direct regulation of stress-responsive genes
Regulatory network mapping:
Co-immunoprecipitation under stress conditions to identify stress-specific protein interactions
Re-ChIP experiments to map combinatorial binding with other stress-responsive transcription factors
Reconstruction of regulatory cascades involving AGL86 during stress responses
These applications provide mechanistic insights into how AGL86 contributes to stress tolerance, particularly in oxylipin response pathways where it was originally identified as a regulatory factor .
MADS-box transcription factors including AGL86 are often regulated by phosphorylation. Developing phospho-specific antibodies presents several challenges:
Identification of physiologically relevant phosphorylation sites:
Mass spectrometry analysis of AGL86 under different conditions
Bioinformatic prediction based on conserved kinase motifs
Comparison with known regulatory phosphorylation sites in related MADS-box proteins
Functional validation of candidate sites through mutagenesis
Antibody design considerations:
Selection of peptide sequences surrounding the phosphorylation site
Ensuring specificity for the phosphorylated versus non-phosphorylated state
Addressing potential cross-reactivity with similar phosphorylation sites in related proteins
Balancing epitope length to maintain specificity while ensuring accessibility
Validation strategies:
Testing against phosphorylated and dephosphorylated (phosphatase-treated) samples
Comparing reactivity with phosphomimetic (S/T→D/E) and phospho-null (S/T→A) mutants
Verification of signal changes in response to kinase or phosphatase inhibitors
Correlation with known biological stimuli that trigger phosphorylation
Application-specific considerations:
Optimizing sample preparation to preserve phosphorylation status
Including phosphatase inhibitors in extraction buffers
Adapting immunoprecipitation protocols for phosphorylated proteins
Developing quantitative assays for phosphorylation dynamics
These phospho-specific antibodies would enable researchers to track the activation state of AGL86 during development and stress responses, providing deeper insights into its regulatory mechanisms.
AGL86 antibodies can serve as valuable tools for comparative studies across plant species:
Cross-species reactivity analysis:
Testing antibody recognition of AGL86 orthologs in different plant species
Mapping epitope conservation across evolutionary distance
Establishing detection protocols for non-model species
Creating conservation maps of recognizable domains
Functional conservation studies:
Comparing subcellular localization patterns across species
Identifying conserved protein interaction partners through co-immunoprecipitation
Mapping conserved versus species-specific genomic binding sites
Correlating binding site conservation with regulatory outcomes
Stress response comparison:
Examining AGL86-like protein expression in stress-tolerant versus susceptible species
Tracking evolutionary adaptations in post-translational modification patterns
Identifying lineage-specific innovations in regulatory networks
Correlating molecular differences with physiological adaptations
Methodological approaches:
Develop degenerate epitope antibodies that recognize conserved domains
Establish systematic validation pipelines for cross-species applications
Create databases of cross-reactivity patterns and epitope conservation
Design peptide arrays to map recognition profiles across species
These evolutionary approaches can reveal fundamental principles of MADS-box factor function while also identifying species-specific adaptations, particularly in stress response pathways where AGL86 has been implicated .