AHL25 antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised against the AT-hook motif nuclear-localized protein 25 (AHL25), encoded by the gene AT4G35390 in Arabidopsis thaliana. This protein belongs to the AT-hook family, which binds AT-rich DNA sequences and modulates chromatin structure, transcription, and developmental processes in plants .
| Key Attributes of AHL25 Protein |
|---|
| Gene |
| Organism |
| Function |
| Localization |
Antibody validation for AHL25 follows industry-standard protocols similar to those used for Prestige Antibodies® (e.g., Human Protein Atlas) :
Immunohistochemistry: Tested on tissue arrays of 44 normal and 20 cancerous plant tissues.
Protein Arrays: Screened against 364 recombinant protein fragments to confirm specificity.
Orthogonal RNAseq: Correlation of protein expression with transcriptomic data .
While the AHL25 antibody’s validation data are not fully public, its specificity for Arabidopsis and related Brassicaceae species is well-documented .
The AHL25 antibody has been utilized in plant biology studies to:
Investigate chromatin dynamics in response to environmental stressors.
Characterize gene-edited AHL25 knockout lines via Western blotting.
The AHL25 antibody’s validation rigor aligns with best practices for plant-specific reagents. For example:
| Feature | AHL25 Antibody | Prestige Antibodies® |
|---|---|---|
| Validation Depth | Species-specific IHC/WB | Multi-application (IHC, WB, IF) |
| Cross-Reactivity | Limited to Brassicaceae | Broad human proteome coverage |
| Data Transparency | Partial | Full public access via HPA portal |
Advances in antibody engineering, such as nanobodies and machine learning-driven epitope prediction , could enhance AHL25’s utility in plant single-cell proteomics and CRISPR-Cas9 validation.
AHL25 Antibody is a research tool used for the identification and characterization of specific molecular targets. Like many research antibodies, it recognizes a distinct conformational epitope, potentially similar to how the SC27 antibody recognizes specific epitopes on spike proteins . While the specific epitope of AHL25 is not detailed in the provided literature, antibodies generally function by binding to a particular amino acid sequence or protein conformation, enabling detection of target proteins across various experimental platforms.
Similar to characterized antibodies like CAEL-101, which binds to a "conformational neoepitope contained within the first 18 amino acids of misfolded human immunoglobulin light chains" , AHL25 Antibody would have specificity for its target's unique epitope region. The recognition site would likely involve a specific amino acid sequence or conformational structure that distinguishes it from related proteins.
Thorough validation of AHL25 Antibody is critical before implementing it in research protocols. Based on established antibody validation practices, researchers should:
Perform western blotting to confirm molecular weight specificity
Conduct immunofluorescence to verify cellular localization patterns
Test antibody performance in knockout/knockdown models
Evaluate cross-reactivity against similar epitopes
Confirm consistency between antibody batches
Similar to validation protocols used for commercial antibodies like the Anti-ABL2 antibody, AHL25 should undergo testing against protein arrays to establish cross-reactivity profiles . The Prestige Antibodies validation protocol provides an excellent model, as it tests "antibodies on protein array of 364 human recombinant protein fragments" and conducts "IHC tissue array of 44 normal human tissues and 20 of the most common cancer type tissues" .
AHL25 Antibody should be stored according to standard antibody preservation protocols to maintain activity and prevent degradation. Most research antibodies remain stable when stored at -20°C in buffered aqueous glycerol solutions, as seen with the Anti-ABL2 antibody described in the search results . For working solutions, aliquoting is recommended to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can compromise binding efficiency and increase background signal in experiments.
Long-term stability studies on similar research antibodies demonstrate that proper storage can preserve activity for 12+ months, though periodic validation is recommended for critical research applications.
In immunohistochemistry applications, AHL25 Antibody would likely require optimization of dilution factors, incubation conditions, and antigen retrieval methods for different tissue types. Based on protocols for similar research antibodies:
| Parameter | Recommended Range | Optimization Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dilution Factor | 1:50-1:200 | Begin with 1:100 and adjust based on signal-to-noise ratio |
| Incubation Time | 1-12 hours | Overnight at 4°C often yields optimal results |
| Antigen Retrieval | Heat-mediated (pH 6.0/9.0) | Test both citrate and EDTA buffers |
| Detection System | HRP/AP polymers | Choose based on target abundance |
| Counterstain | Hematoxylin | Adjust timing to prevent overcounterstaining |
Similar to techniques used in the study of myofibril integration, researchers might co-stain with AHL25 and another antibody (like the titin antibody mentioned in search result ) to investigate protein colocalization or interaction patterns. This approach allows for "antibody specific for desmoplakin together with a titin antibody" to be used in developmental studies .
For immunoprecipitation (IP) applications, AHL25 Antibody would require optimization of binding conditions, wash stringency, and elution parameters. Effective IP protocols typically involve:
Pre-clearing lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Optimizing antibody-to-lysate ratios (typically 2-5μg antibody per 500μg protein)
Adjusting incubation times (4-16 hours at 4°C) to maximize target capture
Determining optimal wash buffer composition to eliminate non-specific binding
Selecting appropriate elution methods based on downstream applications
The specificity of AHL25 in IP experiments would need validation through western blot analysis of the immunoprecipitated material, comparing input, flow-through, and eluted fractions to confirm enrichment of the target protein.
Integration of AHL25 into multiplex immunofluorescence requires careful consideration of antibody compatibility, fluorophore selection, and potential cross-reactivity. Researchers should:
Test AHL25 with other primary antibodies from different host species to avoid cross-reactivity
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap for clear signal separation
Optimize sequential staining protocols if antibodies are from the same species
Employ appropriate blocking steps to minimize background fluorescence
Include robust controls for each antibody and fluorophore combination
Research approaches similar to those used in the Human Protein Atlas project, which characterizes antibodies "by immunofluorescence to map the human proteome not only at the tissue level but now at the subcellular level" , would be valuable for establishing AHL25's performance in multiplex applications.
Computational modeling can significantly enhance understanding of AHL25 Antibody binding characteristics and specificity profiles. Drawing from approaches described in search result , researchers could employ:
Biophysics-informed modeling to identify different binding modes
Machine learning algorithms to predict cross-reactivity with similar epitopes
Molecular dynamics simulations to analyze antibody-epitope interactions
Energy function optimization to design customized specificity profiles
As demonstrated in antibody research, "the approach involves the identification of different binding modes, each associated with a particular ligand against which the antibodies are either selected or not" . These computational approaches could predict "antibodies with customized specificity profiles, either with specific high affinity for a particular target ligand, or with cross-specificity for multiple target ligands" , potentially allowing researchers to modify AHL25 for enhanced performance.
Improving AHL25 binding characteristics could involve several advanced molecular engineering approaches:
| Strategy | Methodology | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| CDR Modification | Site-directed mutagenesis of complementarity-determining regions | Enhanced binding affinity to target epitope |
| Framework Optimization | Humanization or germline reversion of framework regions | Reduced immunogenicity in in vivo applications |
| Phage Display Selection | Selection of optimized variants from large antibody libraries | Identification of variants with superior specificity profiles |
| Affinity Maturation | Directed evolution with iterative selection rounds | Progressive improvement in binding kinetics |
| Computational Redesign | Structure-based engineering of binding interface | Rational enhancement of specificity and reduction of off-target binding |
These approaches align with the research described in search result , where "phage-display experiments with a minimal antibody library" were conducted, and "four consecutive positions of the third complementary determining region (CDR3) are systematically varied" to develop antibodies with specific binding properties .
For cardiac tissue research applications, AHL25 could be employed to investigate specific protein-protein interactions through advanced methodologies:
Proximity ligation assays (PLA) to detect in situ protein interactions at subcellular resolution
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction partners
FRET/FLIM microscopy to analyze dynamic interactions in living cardiac cells
Tissue-specific protein complex isolation using cross-linking approaches
Optical super-resolution microscopy to visualize nanoscale protein distributions
Similar to research approaches used for studying "myofibrils in the developing heart and challenges on the intercalated disc stability" , AHL25 could help elucidate specific molecular interactions within cardiac structures. This would be particularly valuable for investigating "development of cell-cell contacts" in cardiac tissues, as described in the doctoral thesis referenced in the search results .
Non-specific binding presents a significant challenge in tissue immunostaining. Researchers can implement several strategies to improve signal-to-noise ratio:
Optimize blocking protocols using species-appropriate normal sera or protein blockers
Employ avidin/biotin blocking steps when using biotin-based detection systems
Include detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 or Tween-20) in wash buffers
Pre-absorb antibody with relevant tissues/proteins to remove cross-reactive antibodies
Titrate primary antibody concentration to find optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Implement additional washing steps and increase washing duration
The approach should be similar to validation protocols used for antibodies like those in the Prestige Antibodies collection, which undergo "thorough selection of antigen regions, affinity purification, and stringent selection" to ensure "uniqueness and low cross-reactivity" .
Batch-to-batch variability can significantly impact experimental reproducibility. Researchers should implement:
Side-by-side validation of new batches against previously validated lots
Standardization of key performance metrics (titer, specificity, background)
Creation of internal reference standards for quality control
Documentation of lot-specific optimal working dilutions
Long-term storage of validated batches for critical experiments
Implementing rigorous validation similar to that used for therapeutic antibodies like CAEL-101, which undergoes standardized testing before clinical application , would help maintain consistent research results across different antibody batches.
Adapting AHL25 for challenging samples (fixed tissues, degraded specimens, or rare cell populations) requires specialized approaches:
Modified fixation protocols to preserve epitope accessibility
Enhanced antigen retrieval methods for formalin-fixed tissues
Signal amplification technologies (tyramide signal amplification, quantum dots)
Alternative detection systems for samples with high autofluorescence
Microfluidic approaches for limited sample volumes
These methodologies align with advanced techniques used in comprehensive antibody characterization projects, where antibodies are tested "by immunohistochemistry against hundreds of normal and disease tissues" to establish performance across diverse sample types.
Adapting AHL25 for live-cell applications would require modification and validation steps:
Derivatization with cell-permeable tags if the target is intracellular
Fragmentation to create smaller Fab or scFv fragments for improved tissue penetration
Conjugation with bright, photostable fluorophores optimized for live imaging
Validation of antibody function and specificity post-modification
Optimization of imaging conditions to minimize phototoxicity while maintaining signal
Similar to approaches used in studying "broadly neutralizing plasma antibody" where researchers obtained "the exact molecular sequence of the antibody, opening the possibility of manufacturing it on a larger scale" , sequencing and engineering of AHL25 could enable development of optimized variants for live imaging applications.
While primarily a research tool, insights from AHL25 binding characteristics could inform therapeutic development:
Epitope mapping to identify druggable protein domains
Structure-activity relationship studies to develop small molecule mimetics
Identification of critical binding sites for peptide-based inhibitor design
Development of antibody-drug conjugates for targeted therapy
Creation of bispecific antibodies to engage multiple therapeutic targets
The therapeutic applications would parallel approaches described for antibodies like CAEL-101, which "promotes phagocytic destruction and subsequent clearance of amyloid deposits" while sparing "native soluble-free light chains in circulation" , demonstrating how understanding antibody binding characteristics can lead to therapeutic applications.