KEGG: ath:AT3G27870
STRING: 3702.AT3G27870.1
Annexin A8 is a protein detected in human tissues including placenta, where it's specifically localized to endothelial cells . It has a molecular weight of approximately 36 kDa when analyzed by Western blot under reducing conditions . For researchers studying this protein, understanding its tissue-specific expression is fundamental for experimental design. The protein corresponds to amino acids Ala2-Pro327 of human Annexin A8 (Accession # P13928) .
Annexin A8 can be detected through several validated methods:
Western Blot: Using 2 μg/mL of Sheep Anti-Human Annexin A8 Antigen Affinity-purified Polyclonal Antibody followed by HRP-conjugated anti-sheep secondary antibody. This approach reliably detects a specific band at approximately 36 kDa in cell lysates such as A549 human lung carcinoma cell line .
Immunohistochemistry: Effective visualization in paraffin-embedded tissue sections using 1 μg/mL of anti-Annexin A8 antibody with overnight incubation at 4°C, following heat-induced epitope retrieval. Visualization can be achieved using HRP-DAB staining systems with hematoxylin counterstaining .
Based on established methodologies, researchers should include several controls:
For immunocytochemistry:
Omission of primary antibodies to assess non-specific binding
Immunoadsorption of primary antibodies with target antigens
Replacement of primary antibodies with unrelated IgG from the same or different species
For Western blot:
Positive control samples with known expression of the target protein
Internal normalization control (e.g., β-actin)
Primary and secondary antibody controls to validate specificity
These controls are critical for verifying antibody specificity and ensuring reliable interpretation of results.
Optimal antibody dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each specific application . The optimization process involves:
Testing a range of antibody concentrations to identify the optimal signal-to-noise ratio
For Western blot: Starting with 2 μg/mL for anti-Annexin A8 antibodies and adjusting based on signal strength
For immunohistochemistry: Starting with 1 μg/mL for paraffin-embedded sections with overnight incubation at 4°C
Evaluating background staining at each concentration
Determining the minimum concentration that yields reproducible and specific signal
The optimization should be performed using positive control samples with known expression levels of the target protein.
For optimal detection of Annexin A8 by Western blot:
Prepare cell lysates under reducing conditions
Load approximately 25 μg protein per lane along with pre-stained molecular weight markers
Transfer proteins to PVDF membrane
Block with appropriate blocking buffer
Probe with 2 μg/mL of Anti-Human Annexin A8 Antibody
Follow with HRP-conjugated Anti-Sheep IgG Secondary Antibody
Develop using chemiluminescence detection systems
This methodology consistently detects Annexin A8 at approximately 36 kDa in appropriate samples.
Based on established experimental approaches, time-course experiments should include:
Multiple time points (e.g., 24h, 48h, 96h) with appropriate controls for each point
Consistent cell numbers and culture conditions across all time points
Multiple replicates (minimum triplicates) per time point
Normalized quantification methods (e.g., to β-actin for Western blot or per 10^5 cells for secreted proteins)
This table illustrates a typical time-course experimental design for protein expression analysis:
| Parameter | 24h | 48h | 96h |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample replicates | n = 6 | n = 6 | n = 6 |
| Control replicates | n = 6 | n = 6 | n = 6 |
| Protein normalization | Per 10^5 cells | Per 10^5 cells | Per 10^5 cells |
| Statistical comparison | Between timepoints and between treatment/control | Between timepoints and between treatment/control | Between timepoints and between treatment/control |
Quantification of immunofluorescence staining requires systematic image acquisition and analysis:
Capture non-overlapping images from the entire area using confocal laser scanning microscopy
Identify immunopositive cells using optimized detection parameters
Perform image analysis to estimate immunopositive area fraction (in percent)
Use cell nuclei counterstained with DAPI for cell counting and normalization
Analyze multiple fields (minimum 8 per sample) to account for heterogeneity
The analysis should use pre-calibrated computer-assisted digital image analysis systems with consistent parameters across all samples and conditions.
Based on established methodologies, appropriate statistical approaches include:
Non-parametric tests such as Kruskal-Wallis test followed by rank sums Wilcoxon test for comparing staining intensities or protein levels between groups
Data presentation as median values with ranges rather than means with standard deviations when data may not be normally distributed
Setting probability level (P = 0.05) as the limit of significance
Using specialized statistical software (e.g., SPSS) for complex analyses
This approach is particularly suitable for immunological data, which often does not follow normal distribution patterns.
Semi-quantitative densitometric analysis of Western blots requires:
Digital image capture under non-saturating conditions
Measurement of integrated optical densities for each target band
Normalization to housekeeping proteins (e.g., β-actin)
Calculation of relative expression using the formula:
Comparison between samples using appropriate statistical tests
This standardized approach enables reliable comparison of protein expression levels across different experimental conditions.
Co-localization studies require:
Dual immunofluorescence staining using antibodies from different species:
Anti-Annexin A8 antibody (e.g., Sheep IgG)
Antibody against the protein of interest (e.g., Mouse or Rabbit IgG)
Species-specific secondary antibodies with distinct fluorophores
Confocal microscopy imaging with appropriate channel separation
Analysis of co-localization using specialized software to calculate:
Pearson's correlation coefficient
Manders' overlap coefficient
Co-localization percentage
This methodology enables precise spatial analysis of protein interactions in cellular contexts.
For successful immunoprecipitation of Annexin A8:
Antibody selection: Use affinity-purified antibodies with demonstrated specificity
Lysate preparation: Optimize lysis buffers to maintain protein-protein interactions
Pre-clearing: Remove non-specifically binding proteins from lysates
Immunoprecipitation conditions:
Antibody amount (typically 2-5 μg per sample)
Incubation time and temperature (overnight at 4°C)
Washing stringency to remove non-specific interactions
Detection: Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated complexes using antibodies against potential interacting partners
These considerations help ensure specific isolation of Annexin A8 protein complexes for interaction studies.
When troubleshooting unexpected antibody results, researchers should systematically evaluate:
Antibody specificity:
Verify recognition of recombinant protein
Confirm appropriate molecular weight detection
Validate with multiple antibodies against different epitopes
Sample preparation issues:
Protein degradation
Insufficient antigen retrieval
Masking of epitopes by protein modifications
Technical parameters:
Antibody concentration optimization
Incubation conditions adjustment
Detection system sensitivity
Biological variables:
Cell/tissue-specific expression levels
Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition
Splice variants or protein isoforms
A systematic approach to troubleshooting ensures reliable and reproducible antibody-based detection.
For high-throughput applications:
Antibody microarrays:
Immobilization of anti-Annexin A8 antibodies on microarray slides
Detection of Annexin A8 in multiple samples simultaneously
Quantification using fluorescent or chemiluminescent detection
Automated immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence:
Standardized staining protocols on automated platforms
Digital image acquisition and analysis
Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition
Flow cytometry:
Intracellular staining for Annexin A8
Multi-parameter analysis with other markers
High-throughput single-cell analysis
These approaches enable efficient screening of Annexin A8 expression across multiple samples or conditions.
Validation of antibodies for post-translational modifications requires:
Specificity validation:
Testing against modified and unmodified recombinant proteins
Competition assays with modified and unmodified peptides
Correlation with mass spectrometry data
Experimental validation:
Treatment with modification-inducing stimuli
Treatment with inhibitors of specific modifications
Correlation with functional outcomes
Technical considerations:
Sample preparation methods that preserve modifications
Appropriate blocking and washing conditions
Validation across multiple experimental systems
This rigorous validation ensures reliable detection of specific post-translational modifications that may regulate Annexin A8 function.
Comprehensive analysis benefits from integrating multiple techniques:
Combine antibody-based detection with:
Mass spectrometry for precise identification of modifications and interacting partners
RNA sequencing for correlation with transcript levels
Functional assays to correlate expression with biological activities
Implement multi-omics integration approaches:
Correlation analyses between protein, transcript, and functional data
Pathway analysis incorporating protein interaction networks
Systems biology approaches to model Annexin A8 function in cellular contexts
Utilize complementary imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization
Live-cell imaging for dynamic studies
Electron microscopy for ultrastructural localization
This integrated approach provides comprehensive understanding of Annexin A8 biology beyond what any single technique can offer.