The ALD1 Antibody (Catalog No. ABIN7179393) is a polyclonal, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody raised against recombinant Staphylococcus aureus Ald1 (Alanine dehydrogenase 1). It is validated for use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and supports research on bacterial cell wall synthesis, where Ald1 contributes to L-alanine production for the peptidoglycan layer .
ELISA Detection: Validated for quantifying Ald1 in S. aureus lysates, with optimal dilution determined empirically .
Functional Studies: Investigates Ald1’s role in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis, particularly in generating L-alanine for peptidoglycan layers .
Function: Catalyzes the reversible deamination of L-alanine to pyruvate, critical for cell wall integrity in S. aureus .
Structural Insight: The antibody targets residues 1–372 of the 372-amino-acid protein.
Pathogenicity Link: Disruption of Ald1 could impair bacterial survival, making it a potential therapeutic target .
While the ALD1 Antibody targets S. aureus Ald1, the term “ALD1” also refers to AGD2-LIKE DEFENSE RESPONSE PROTEIN 1 in plants (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana), which regulates immunity via metabolites like pipecolic acid . These are distinct proteins with no known cross-reactivity.
ALD1 (AGD2-LIKE DEFENSE RESPONSE PROTEIN 1) is a plastid-localized protein that functions in the lysine catabolic pathway to produce infection-induced pipecolic acid (Pip), Pip derivatives, and other defense-related metabolites. It is indispensable for disease resistance against pathogens such as Pseudomonas syringae . ALD1 plays a critical role in both local disease resistance responses and systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a phenomenon where a local infection immunizes the entire plant against subsequent pathogen attacks . Studies have demonstrated that ALD1 is a key regulatory component in the activation of plant immune responses, operating upstream of salicylic acid (SA) accumulation and influencing the expression of other defense-related genes .
ALD1 primarily localizes to plastids, with particularly important functions in the epidermal cell plastids. Using GFP fusion proteins, researchers have confirmed that ALD1 predominantly colocalizes with epidermal cell chloroplasts in confocal micrographs and cofractionates with chloroplast marker proteins . This epidermal plastid localization is particularly significant, as the transient accumulation of ALD1 in these plastids at local immunization sites activates both local disease resistance and systemic acquired resistance in distal tissues . The epidermis, as the first cellular barrier encountered by many pathogens, positions ALD1 strategically to initiate early defense responses .
ALD1 contributes to SAR through multiple mechanisms:
Signal production: ALD1 is required for the production of pipecolic acid (Pip) and N-hydroxypipecolic acid (NHP), key mobile signaling molecules in SAR .
Non-autonomous effects: Interestingly, ALD1 accumulation at the primary immunization site alone can rescue most SAR-associated responses, even without appreciable accumulation of Pip in distal leaves, indicating that ALD1 has non-autonomous effects on pathogen growth and defense activation .
Defense amplification: ALD1 participates in a positive feedback loop with other defense components, including PAD4 and ICS1/SID2, which are involved in salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis, creating an amplification system for defense signals .
Priming function: ALD1-dependent metabolites appear to prime plants for stronger and faster defense responses upon pathogen challenge .
For antibody production against ALD1, researchers should consider:
Transit peptide exclusion: Since ALD1 contains a chloroplast transit peptide that is cleaved during protein maturation, antibodies should target the mature protein sequence rather than the full-length protein including the transit peptide .
Unique epitopes: Selecting peptide regions that distinguish ALD1 from its close homolog AGD2 is critical to ensure specificity. Computational approaches to epitope prediction, as outlined in therapeutic antibody design, can identify unique surface-exposed regions of the mature ALD1 protein .
Conservation analysis: When developing antibodies for cross-species recognition, researchers should analyze sequence conservation across plant species to identify conserved epitopes.
| Protein Region | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| N-terminal (post-transit peptide) | Generally accessible, unique sequence | May interact with substrates |
| Middle domain | Contains unique sequence motifs | Some regions may be buried |
| C-terminal domain | Often surface-exposed | May be similar to AGD2 |
Selection of optimal antigenic regions requires computational structural prediction methods similar to those used in therapeutic antibody design to identify surface-exposed epitopes with high antigenicity .
Based on the characteristics of ALD1 as a plastid-localized protein with aminotransferase activity, several expression systems can be considered:
E. coli expression: Most straightforward approach, but may require optimization to manage potential toxicity issues or inclusion body formation. Using a truncated version of ALD1 without the transit peptide is recommended.
Plant-based expression: Systems like Nicotiana benthamiana transient expression may provide proper folding and post-translational modifications.
Cell-free expression systems: Useful for potentially toxic proteins, allowing immediate purification.
Success in generating functional recombinant ALD1 requires attention to:
Removing the chloroplast transit peptide sequence
Adding appropriate affinity tags for purification
Optimizing codon usage for the chosen expression system
Considering fusion partners to enhance solubility
The aminotransferase activity of purified recombinant ALD1 should be verified to ensure proper folding and functionality before immunization .
Comprehensive validation of anti-ALD1 antibodies should include:
Western blot analysis:
Using wild-type plants, ald1 mutants, and ALD1 overexpression lines (ALD1ox) as controls
Expected results: detecting a ~50 kDa band in wild-type and ALD1ox plants that is absent in ald1 mutants
Testing induced expression following pathogen infection, as ALD1 transcripts are upregulated within 6-12 hours during virulent P. syringae infection
Immunoprecipitation:
Coupled with mass spectrometry to confirm the identity of the precipitated protein
Verifying co-precipitation of known ALD1-interacting proteins
Immunolocalization:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Testing against the homologous AGD2 protein
Evaluating specificity in various plant tissues and under different conditions
Most importantly, all experiments should include ald1 mutant plants as negative controls and potentially ALD1 overexpression lines as positive controls to conclusively demonstrate antibody specificity.
ALD1 exhibits dynamic localization patterns during immune responses, particularly in epidermal plastids. To study these changes:
Time-course immunolocalization:
Using validated anti-ALD1 antibodies for immunofluorescence microscopy
Sampling plant tissues at different timepoints after pathogen infection
Quantifying changes in signal intensity and distribution patterns
Subcellular fractionation combined with immunoblotting:
Separating different cellular compartments (plastids, cytosol, etc.)
Tracking ALD1 protein levels in each fraction over time following infection
Correlating with defense activation markers
Live-cell imaging with inducible systems:
Super-resolution microscopy:
Employing techniques like STED or PALM with immunolabeled ALD1
Resolving fine details of ALD1 distribution within plastids
These approaches can reveal how ALD1 redistributes during infection and potentially links to the formation of defense signaling hubs at specific subcellular locations.
Anti-ALD1 antibodies can serve as powerful tools for investigating ALD1's role in protein complexes:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Using anti-ALD1 antibodies to pull down ALD1 and associated proteins
Identifying interaction partners via mass spectrometry
Confirming interactions with known defense components like PAD4 and SID2/ICS1
Testing how interactions change during infection or in different mutant backgrounds
Proximity labeling:
Combining anti-ALD1 antibodies with proximity labeling techniques (e.g., BioID, APEX)
Identifying proteins in close proximity to ALD1 in vivo
Mapping the dynamic "interactome" during defense responses
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP):
If ALD1 has any nuclear functions or associations with transcription factors
Investigating potential roles in regulating defense gene expression
Immunoelectron microscopy:
Visualizing precise localization and protein associations at the ultrastructural level
Examining ALD1 distribution within plastid subcompartments
These techniques would help elucidate how ALD1 participates in the regulatory network involving PAD4 and SID2/ICS1, which research has shown to be essential for the enhanced disease resistance phenotype of ALD1 overexpression plants .
Anti-ALD1 antibodies can be instrumental in understanding the metabolic functions of ALD1:
Enzyme activity assays:
Immunoprecipitating native ALD1 from plant tissues to measure enzymatic activity
Comparing activity levels in different genetic backgrounds or following pathogen infection
Correlating enzyme activity with metabolite production
Metabolite analysis in conjunction with antibody studies:
Using immunodepletion to assess the contribution of ALD1 to lysine catabolism
Measuring changes in pipecolic acid, N-hydroxypipecolic acid, and other metabolites
Combining with targeted proteomics to correlate protein abundance with metabolite levels
In situ activity visualization:
Developing activity-based probes that can be detected with anti-ALD1 antibodies
Visualizing active enzyme pools versus inactive pools
This integrated approach would help resolve the current questions about ALD1's exact role in producing pipecolic acid versus other metabolites, as the research indicates that some ALD1-dependent SAR responses occur without appreciable accumulation of pipecolic acid or known derivatives in distal leaves .
Research suggests that ALD1 has both pipecolic acid (Pip)-dependent and Pip-independent functions in plant immunity . Antibody-based approaches can help dissect these distinct roles:
Comparative immunoprecipitation:
Perform immunoprecipitation with anti-ALD1 antibodies from wild-type plants, ald1 mutants complemented with structure-guided ALD1 variants with altered substrate specificity
Analyze the metabolite profiles associated with different ALD1 variants
Correlate with defense phenotypes to map functions to specific enzymatic activities
Spatiotemporal analysis:
Use immunolocalization to track ALD1 protein in different tissues and compartments
Correlate with local metabolite measurements
Identify locations where ALD1 is present but Pip is not elevated, suggesting Pip-independent functions
Protein domain studies:
Generate antibodies against specific domains of ALD1
Use domain-specific antibodies to investigate different functional aspects
Block specific domains with antibodies and assess functional consequences
The evidence that ALD1 accumulation in epidermal cells can restore SAR without increasing Pip levels in distal leaves suggests complex non-autonomous effects that could be further elucidated through these targeted antibody approaches .
Anti-ALD1 antibodies can serve as key tools in integrating multiple levels of biological information:
Integrated proteomics approach:
Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS) to identify ALD1 interaction partners
Correlation with transcriptomics data to identify genes co-regulated with ALD1
Integration with metabolomics to link ALD1 protein levels with defense metabolite production
Construction of network models centered on ALD1 function
Spatial multi-omics:
Temporal coordination analysis:
A systems approach integrating antibody-based protein data with other omics layers would help resolve the complex regulatory relationships observed, where ALD1 and PAD4 show interdependence yet also have distinct functions in defense activation.
Modern computational methods can significantly improve antibody development against ALD1:
Structural prediction and epitope mapping:
Machine learning for antibody optimization:
Training models on existing antibody-antigen interaction data
Predicting optimal antibody sequences for ALD1 recognition
Minimizing potential off-target binding
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Modeling antibody-ALD1 interactions in different conformational states
Predicting how post-translational modifications might affect antibody binding
Optimizing antibody stability under experimental conditions
Image analysis automation:
Developing algorithms for quantitative analysis of immunolocalization data
Tracking ALD1 distribution changes during infection processes
Correlating with phenotypic outcomes
These computational approaches would enhance both the development of high-quality antibodies against ALD1 and the analysis of experimental data generated using these antibodies .