AMY1A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Oncocytoma vs. Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma (ChRCC)

AMY1A antibody serves as a highly specific immunohistochemical marker:

  • Sensitivity: 100% for oncocytoma (75/75 cases positive) .

  • Specificity: 96.75% against other renal tumors (e.g., clear cell RCC, papillary RCC) .

Tumor TypeAMY1A Expression (H-Score)Staining Pattern
Oncocytoma100–300 (mean 205)Moderate to strong, diffuse
ChRCC0–30 (mean 1.4)Negative or weak focal

Western Blot Validation

  • Detects AMY1A in human PANC-1 whole-cell lysates and PCP tissue lysates at ~55–58 kDa .

  • Optimal dilution: 0.1–0.5 μg/ml for WB; 0.5–1 μg/ml for IHC .

IHC Protocol (Rat Spleen)

  1. Antigen Retrieval: Citrate buffer (pH 6), 20 minutes.

  2. Primary Antibody: 1 μg/ml, incubated overnight at 4°C.

  3. Detection: Biotinylated secondary antibody + Strepavidin-Biotin-Complex (SABC) with DAB chromogen.

WB Protocol

  • Gel: 5–20% SDS-PAGE.

  • Transfer: Nitrocellulose membrane, 150 mA for 50–90 minutes.

  • Blocking: 5% non-fat milk/TBS.

Research Significance

  • Tumor Diagnostics: AMY1A expression distinguishes oncocytoma from ChRCC with near-perfect sensitivity, reducing diagnostic ambiguity .

  • Metabolic Studies: AMY1A copy number variations correlate with microbiome composition and starch metabolism .

  • Broad Utility: Used in studies of salivary amylase’s role in digestion and industrial applications (e.g., baking) .

Limitations and Considerations

  • Staining Heterogeneity: Oncocytomas show mild-to-moderate variability in AMY1A staining intensity .

  • Species Specificity: No cross-reactivity beyond human, mouse, and rat confirmed .

Product Specs

Buffer
The antibody is provided as a liquid solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50% glycerol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.02% sodium azide as a preservative.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the chosen shipping method and destination. For specific delivery timeframes, please consult your local distributor.
Synonyms
amylase; salivary; B antibody; 1 4 alpha D glucan glucanohydrolase antibody; 1 antibody; 1,4 alpha D glucan glucanohydrolase 2B antibody; 1,4-alpha-D-glucan glucanohydrolase 1 antibody; 4-alpha-D-glucan glucanohydrolase 1 antibody; Alpha amylase antibody; Alpha-amylase 1 antibody; AMY1 antibody; AMY1_HUMAN antibody; AMY1C antibody; AMY2 antibody; AMY2B antibody; AMY3 antibody; amylase; alpha 1A (salivary) antibody; Amylase; alpha 1B (salivary) antibody; amylase; alpha 1C (salivary) antibody; amylase; salivary; alpha-1A antibody; amylase; salivary; alpha-1B antibody; amylase; salivary; alpha-1C antibody; amylase; salivary; C antibody; glycogenase antibody; HXA antibody; PA antibody; Salivary alpha-amylase antibody; salivary amylase alpha 1A antibody; salivary amylase alpha 1B antibody; salivary amylase alpha 1C antibody
Target Names
AMY1A
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is AMY1A and why is it studied?

AMY1A (Alpha-amylase 1) is a member of the glycosyl hydrolase 13 family, also known as salivary alpha-amylase. This enzyme (EC 3.2.1.1) functions as a 1,4-alpha-D-glucan glucanohydrolase, playing a key role in carbohydrate metabolism. AMY1A has gained significant research interest as an immunohistochemical marker in renal tumor differentiation, particularly for distinguishing between oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) . The protein is predominantly expressed in salivary glands, but also has specific expression patterns in renal tissue where it preferentially stains distal tubules and collecting ducts .

What applications are AMY1A antibodies validated for?

AMY1A antibodies have been extensively validated for several laboratory applications, with the most robust performance in:

ApplicationValidation StatusCommon DilutionsNotes
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)Validated1:100-1:500Excellent for renal tumor differentiation
Western Blotting (WB)Validated1:500-1:2000Detects ~58 kDa protein
ImmunocytochemistryLimited validation1:200-1:500Requires optimization

The antibody demonstrates high specificity in IHC applications with paraffin-embedded tissues, particularly after heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH6) .

Which species reactivity has been confirmed for AMY1A antibodies?

Commercial AMY1A antibodies have confirmed reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples . Cross-reactivity with dog tissues has been speculated but not extensively validated . When working with species not listed in validation data, researchers should perform preliminary tests to confirm reactivity before proceeding with full experiments. Sequence homology analysis between the immunogen sequence and the target species protein can provide preliminary guidance on potential cross-reactivity .

How effective is AMY1A antibody for differentiating renal tumor subtypes?

AMY1A antibody has demonstrated exceptional utility as a diagnostic marker for differentiating between renal tumor subtypes. In comprehensive studies:

Tumor TypeAMY1A ExpressionH-score RangePattern
OncocytomaPositive (100%)100-300 (mean 205)Granular, diffuse cytoplasmic
ChRCCNegative (87%)0-70When positive, very weak
Eosinophilic variant ChRCCOccasionally positive≥100Nondescript, diffuse
Clear cell RCCNegative (100%)0No staining
Papillary RCCNegative (100%)0No staining

Statistical analysis shows AMY1A has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) and specificity of 96.75% (95% CI: 0.93-0.99) for identifying oncocytoma. For distinguishing between oncocytoma and ChRCC specifically, the sensitivity remains 100% with a specificity of 90.74% (95% CI: 0.80-0.97) . These robust metrics make AMY1A immunostaining an invaluable tool in challenging differential diagnoses.

What staining heterogeneity issues should researchers anticipate with AMY1A antibodies?

Researchers should be aware that AMY1A exhibits mild to moderate heterogeneity in staining intensity within a given oncocytoma . This variability necessitates careful interpretation and comprehensive assessment of the entire tumor section rather than relying on limited sampling.

The H-score method is recommended for standardized assessment, where:

  • Staining intensity is graded as: no staining=0, weak=1, moderate=2, and strong=3

  • H-score = ∑(intensity × percentage of positive cells)

  • Expected H-score range for oncocytomas: 100-300 (mean 205)

Tissue microarray (TMA) cores may show lower H-scores compared to whole slides, suggesting sampling effects may influence diagnostic interpretation .

How do storage conditions affect AMY1A antibody performance?

Long-term stability and consistent performance of AMY1A antibodies depend on proper storage and handling:

Storage ConditionDurationNotes
Lyophilized at -20°C1 year from receiptOptimal for long-term storage
After reconstitution at 4°C1 monthFor ongoing experiments
Aliquoted and frozen at -20°C6 monthsAvoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly reduce antibody performance, particularly affecting binding affinity and signal-to-noise ratio . Researchers should prepare small aliquots upon reconstitution to minimize freeze-thaw events. Additionally, reconstitution should be performed using the manufacturer's recommended buffer for optimal antibody stability and activity.

What is the optimal protocol for AMY1A antibody in immunohistochemistry?

For maximum sensitivity and specificity in IHC applications, the following optimized protocol is recommended:

  • Tissue preparation: 4-5 μm paraffin-embedded sections

  • Deparaffinization: Standard xylene and ethanol series

  • Antigen retrieval: Heat-mediated in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 20 minutes

  • Blocking: 10% goat serum, 30 minutes at room temperature

  • Primary antibody: 1 μg/ml AMY1A antibody, overnight incubation at 4°C

  • Secondary detection: Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG, 30 minutes at 37°C

  • Development: Strepavidin-Biotin-Complex with DAB chromogen

  • Assessment: H-score method for standardized evaluation

This protocol has been validated to produce the granular cytoplasmic staining pattern characteristic of AMY1A in oncocytomas, with minimal background interference.

How should researchers troubleshoot weak or inconsistent AMY1A staining?

When encountering weak or inconsistent staining with AMY1A antibody, systematic troubleshooting should address:

IssuePotential CausesRecommended Solutions
Weak signalInsufficient antigen retrievalExtend retrieval time; optimize pH and temperature
Antibody concentration too lowPerform titration experiments (1:50 to 1:500)
Detection system sensitivitySwitch to more sensitive detection system
High backgroundIncomplete blockingIncrease blocking time; use alternative blocking reagent
Antibody concentration too highReduce concentration after titration experiments
Non-specific bindingInclude additional washing steps; add 0.1% Tween-20
No signalEpitope degradationUse fresher tissue; optimize fixation time
Wrong secondary antibodyConfirm host species compatibility
Enzymatic activity lossPrepare fresh DAB solution; check HRP activity

Additionally, including positive control tissue (salivary gland or normal kidney) is essential for verifying antibody performance in each experimental run .

Can AMY1A antibody be used for multiplexed immunohistochemistry panels?

AMY1A antibody can be effectively incorporated into multiplexed immunohistochemistry panels for comprehensive renal tumor characterization. When designing such panels:

  • Select complementary markers with different subcellular localization patterns

  • Pair AMY1A (cytoplasmic) with nuclear markers like PAX8 or membranous markers like CD117

  • Use sequential multiplex protocols with:

    • Complete chromogen removal between rounds

    • Different visualization systems (e.g., DAB, Fast Red, HRP-Green)

    • Careful antibody stripping validation

Antibody compatibility testing is essential before developing a full multiplex panel, as certain fixation methods or antigen retrieval protocols might compromise epitope integrity for some markers in the panel .

Beyond renal tumors, what other research applications show promise for AMY1A antibody?

While extensively validated in renal tumor diagnostics, AMY1A antibody shows emerging utility in several other research domains:

Research AreaApplicationCurrent Status
Salivary gland pathologyDiagnostic marker for salivary neoplasmsPreliminary validation
Endocrine researchThyroid tissue studiesLimited exploration
Digestive enzyme researchPancreatic amylase differentiationTheoretical application

The antibody's high specificity makes it valuable for studying normal tissue distribution patterns of alpha-amylase, particularly in distinguishing between pancreatic and salivary isoforms .

What considerations apply when interpreting contradictory AMY1A staining results?

When faced with contradictory or unexpected AMY1A staining results, researchers should systematically evaluate:

  • Technical factors:

    • Antibody clone and manufacturer variability

    • Fixation time and processing methods

    • Antigen retrieval protocol differences

    • Detection system sensitivity

  • Biological factors:

    • Tumor heterogeneity and sampling bias

    • Variant histological patterns

    • Unusual differentiation states

    • Gene copy number variations affecting expression

  • Analytical factors:

    • Scoring system subjectivity

    • Interpretation threshold differences

    • Background staining interference

    • Counterstain masking effects

For critical diagnostic applications, confirmation with molecular techniques (RT-PCR or RNA-seq) may provide complementary evidence of AMY1A expression levels .

How does AMY1A antibody perform in comparison to genetic testing for chromosomal deletions?

AMY1A gene is located on chromosome 1, and its deletion patterns are characteristic of certain renal tumors. Comparing antibody-based detection with genetic approaches:

MethodAdvantagesLimitationsTurnaround Time
AMY1A IHCRapid, inexpensive, widely availableSubjective interpretation, technical variability1-2 days
FISH for chr. 1 deletionsDirect genetic evidence, quantitativeExpensive, requires specialized equipment3-5 days
NGS panel testingComprehensive genetic profileMost expensive, complex interpretation7-14 days

While IHC provides excellent sensitivity and specificity, genetic confirmation may be warranted in ambiguous cases or research studies requiring definitive molecular characterization. Notably, chromophobe RCC commonly exhibits loss of chromosome 1 with deletion of AMY1A, while oncocytomas retain this gene but may show other deletions on chromosome 1 (1p31.3, 1q25.2, and 1q44) .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.