ANTXR1 (TEM8) antibodies are immunoglobulins designed to bind specifically to the ANTXR1 protein, which is overexpressed in tumor vasculature and cancer cells. Key features include:
ANTXR1 antibodies are utilized to investigate:
Cancer Biology: ANTXR1 is a tumor endothelial marker overexpressed in gastric, breast, colon, and pancreatic cancers. Its high expression correlates with poor prognosis and stromal/immune cell infiltration in gastric cancer (GC) .
Tumor Microenvironment (TME): ANTXR1 expression positively associates with immune/stromal scores and infiltration of CD8+ T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells in GC, suggesting a role in TME remodeling .
Therapeutic Targeting: Anti-ANTXR1 antibody-drug conjugates and CAR-T cells show promise in preclinical cancer models, inducing tumor regression in triple-negative breast cancer .
Stromal and Immune Modulation: High ANTXR1 expression in GC correlates with elevated stromal/immune cell infiltration and chemoresistance but lower tumor mutational burden (TMB), indicating potential utility in predicting immunotherapy response .
Dual Regulatory Function: ANTXR1 promotes cancer angiogenesis and endothelial cell proliferation in tumors while suppressing it in physiological contexts .
Chondrocyte Regulation: ANTXR1 knockdown reduces cyclin D1 (Ccnd1) expression, impairing chondrocyte proliferation, and delays bone development in mice .
Anthrax Toxin Internalization: ANTXR1 serves as a receptor for anthrax toxin, facilitating cellular entry of edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF) .
Current research focuses on:
ANTXR1 (anthrax toxin receptor 1), also known as TEM8 (tumor endothelial marker 8) and ATR, is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that functions as a tumor-specific endothelial marker. It was initially identified as a receptor for Bacillus anthracis toxin but has since gained significant attention in cancer research . ANTXR1 contains a von Willebrand factor A (vWA) domain responsible for binding to anthrax protective antigen (PA) as well as collagens I and IV . The protein plays crucial roles in cell adhesion, migration, and interaction with the extracellular matrix .
ANTXR1 is particularly significant in cancer research due to its overexpression in multiple malignancies including colorectal, gastric, breast, and pancreatic tumors, making it both a potential biomarker and therapeutic target . Additionally, pathogenic variants in ANTXR1 lead to the rare GAPO syndrome (Growth retardation, Alopecia, Pseudoanodontia, and Optic atrophy) .
| Characteristic | Details |
|---|---|
| Calculated MW | 63 kDa |
| Observed MW | 80-85 kDa (due to glycosylation) |
| Alternative Names | TEM8, ATR |
| Gene ID (NCBI) | 84168 |
| Key Domains | von Willebrand factor A (vWA) domain |
| Isoforms | Multiple splice variants (564 aa, 368 aa, 330 aa, 297 aa) |
Selecting the optimal ANTXR1 antibody requires consideration of multiple factors to ensure experimental success:
Application compatibility: Different antibodies are optimized for specific applications. Review validation data for your intended application (WB, IHC, IF, IP, ELISA).
Species reactivity: Verify cross-reactivity with your experimental species. Many commercial ANTXR1 antibodies show reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples .
Epitope recognition: Consider which region or isoform of ANTXR1 you intend to detect. Some antibodies specifically recognize the C-terminus , while others target different regions. Note that ANTXR1 has multiple isoforms with the 15091-1-AP antibody detecting 80-85 kDa bands .
Clonality considerations: Polyclonal antibodies (like 18717-1-AP, 15091-1-AP) recognize multiple epitopes and often provide stronger signals, while monoclonal antibodies offer higher specificity .
Validation evidence: Review published literature and manufacturer validation data, including Western blot images, IHC staining patterns, and KO/KD validation .
Based on published data, here are application-specific antibody recommendations:
| Application | Recommended Antibodies | Dilution Range |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 15091-1-AP, 18717-1-AP, #23494 | 1:500-1:1000 |
| IHC | 15091-1-AP | 1:20-1:200 |
| IF | 15091-1-AP | 1:50-1:500 |
| IP | #23494 | 1:50 |
Always perform your own validation with appropriate controls to confirm specificity in your experimental system .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for ANTXR1 detection requires attention to several key parameters:
Sample preparation and protein loading:
Extract proteins using standard lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors
Load 20-30 μg of total protein per lane
Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels (appropriate for the ~80 kDa ANTXR1 protein)
Primary antibody conditions:
Antibody 15091-1-AP: 1:500-1:1000 dilution
CST ANTXR1/TEM8 Antibody #23494: 1:1000 dilution
Antibody ABIN499365: 1-2 μg/mL
Incubate overnight at 4°C in 5% BSA or non-fat milk in TBST
Important considerations:
Expect bands at 80-85 kDa despite calculated MW of 63 kDa due to glycosylation
Some antibodies recognize only specific isoforms; 18717-1-AP only detects isoform 1
Positive controls include HeLa cells, mouse testis tissue, mouse lung tissue, and PC-13 cells
Troubleshooting tips:
If multiple bands appear, verify specificity with ANTXR1 knockdown/knockout controls
For weak signals, extend exposure time or consider using more sensitive detection reagents
For high background, increase washing steps and optimize blocking conditions
The observed molecular weight of ANTXR1 varies between 80-85 kDa in Western blots, which differs from its calculated molecular weight of 63 kDa due to post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation .
Successful immunohistochemical detection of ANTXR1 in tissue sections requires careful optimization:
Tissue preparation:
Use 4-6 μm sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues
Mount on positively charged slides to prevent tissue loss
Antigen retrieval (critical step):
Primary recommendation: TE buffer pH 9.0
Alternative method: Citrate buffer pH 6.0
Heat treatment: Water bath or pressure cooker for 20 minutes
Antibody dilution and detection:
For antibody 15091-1-AP: Start with 1:50-1:100 dilution, then optimize (range: 1:20-1:200)
For R&D Systems' AF3886: 3 μg/mL has shown good results
Incubation time: Overnight at 4°C or 1-2 hours at room temperature
Detection system: HRP-polymer detection systems provide optimal sensitivity
Chromogen: DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) with 2-10 minutes development time
Counterstain: Hematoxylin (adjust timing to avoid obscuring ANTXR1 staining)
Expected staining pattern:
ANTXR1 shows cytoplasmic and plasma membrane localization in positive cells
Human colon cancer and liver cancer tissues serve as reliable positive controls
Control sections:
Positive control: Colon cancer tissue, which consistently expresses ANTXR1
Negative control: Primary antibody omission or isotype control
Tissue-matched controls to evaluate specific versus background staining
The optimization process should include a dilution series and careful evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio across different conditions. Document all parameters for reproducibility .
Rigorous experimental design for ANTXR1 studies requires comprehensive controls to ensure data validity:
Essential positive controls:
Cell lines with confirmed ANTXR1 expression: HeLa cells, certain cancer cell lines
Tissue samples known to express ANTXR1: Colon cancer, liver cancer tissues
Recombinant ANTXR1 protein (useful for antibody validation)
Critical negative controls:
ANTXR1 knockout or knockdown samples (gold standard for specificity)
Primary antibody omission control (tests for non-specific secondary antibody binding)
Isotype-matched control antibody at equivalent concentration
Peptide competition assay (pre-incubation of antibody with immunizing peptide)
Method-specific controls:
Western blot: Loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH); molecular weight markers
IHC/IF: Adjacent sections with H&E staining; autofluorescence controls
qPCR: No-RT controls, reference gene validation
Biological context controls:
Multiple experimental models (cell lines, primary cells, tissue samples)
Multiple detection methods (protein and mRNA quantification)
Functional validation connecting ANTXR1 expression to biological outcomes
When working with ANTXR1 antibodies, it's particularly important to validate specificity due to the presence of multiple isoforms and potential cross-reactivity. The observed molecular weight pattern (typically 80-85 kDa bands despite a calculated 63 kDa size) can serve as an internal validation checkpoint .
ANTXR1 expression has emerged as a significant biomarker with prognostic value across multiple cancer types:
Prognostic associations:
Progression indicators:
ANTXR1 plays roles in tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis across cancer types
Overexpression has been documented in gastric, breast, colon, and pancreatic tumors
High ANTXR1 expression correlates with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) in bladder cancer
Therapeutic relevance:
Melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy show significant survival differences based on ANTXR1 expression levels
High ANTXR1 expression tumors demonstrate reduced sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy
ANTXR1 expression correlates inversely with tumor mutation burden (TMB), potentially indicating differential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors
These findings position ANTXR1 as not only a prognostic biomarker but also as a potential predictor of treatment response. The correlation between ANTXR1 expression and clinical outcomes appears consistent across different cancer types, suggesting its broad utility in oncology research .
ANTXR1 plays a complex role in shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME) through multiple mechanisms:
Stromal and immune cell correlations:
ANTXR1 expression positively correlates with stromal score, immune score, and ESTIMATE score in gastric cancer patients, indicating its influence on the infiltration of stromal and immune cells
Analysis using the TIMER algorithm revealed positive correlations between ANTXR1 expression and infiltration of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells
Cell type-specific relationships:
Advanced analysis using xCell algorithm identified 49 cell types significantly correlated with ANTXR1 expression (30 positively, 19 negatively)
Stromal cells and myeloid cells show predominantly positive correlations with ANTXR1
Lymphoid cells generally demonstrate negative correlations with ANTXR1 expression
TME remodeling and therapy implications:
ANTXR1 contributes to TME remodeling, particularly affecting stromal elements
This remodeling appears to influence chemotherapy resistance mechanisms
Patients with low ANTXR1 expression may respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitors due to higher tumor mutation burden
| Cell Compartment | Correlation with ANTXR1 | Clinical Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Stromal cells | Strong positive | May contribute to ECM remodeling |
| Myeloid cells | Predominantly positive | Potential immunosuppressive effect |
| Lymphoid cells | Predominantly negative | May influence anti-tumor immunity |
The data suggest ANTXR1 as a key regulator of the TME composition, with potential implications for therapeutic strategies targeting the tumor-stroma interface .
ANTXR1 promotes tumor progression through several interconnected mechanisms:
Angiogenesis regulation:
ANTXR1 was initially identified as tumor endothelial marker 8 (TEM8) due to its upregulation in tumor vasculature
It plays a critical role in the angiogenic response of endothelial cells
This angiogenic function supports tumor growth by facilitating blood vessel formation
Cell adhesion and migration:
ANTXR1 mediates cell adhesion to type 1 collagen and gelatin through its vWA domain
It promotes reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and enhances cell spreading
These functions facilitate tumor cell migration and invasion into surrounding tissues
Extracellular matrix interactions:
ANTXR1 functions as a sensor of extracellular mechanical cues (ECM rigidity, hydrostatic pressure)
It connects the intracellular cytoskeleton with ECM components, similar to integrins
These interactions may drive epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells
Tumor microenvironment modulation:
ANTXR1 expression shapes the composition of tumor-infiltrating immune and stromal cells
High ANTXR1 expression correlates with specific immune infiltration patterns that may support tumor growth
ANTXR1-mediated TME remodeling contributes to therapy resistance mechanisms
Expression in cancer stem cells:
ANTXR1 is selectively expressed on cancer stem cells and invasive cancer cells
This expression pattern suggests roles in maintaining stemness and promoting invasion
Targeting ANTXR1+ cells potentially addresses tumor-initiating cell populations
Collectively, these mechanisms position ANTXR1 as a multifunctional protein that influences cancer progression through effects on tumor cells themselves, supporting stromal cells, and the extracellular matrix .
ANTXR1 has emerged as an important mechanosensor that detects and responds to extracellular mechanical cues:
Structural basis for mechanosensing:
ANTXR1 shares high structural similarity with integrins, which are canonical mechanosensors
Like integrins, ANTXR1 contains a von Willebrand factor A (vWA) domain that mediates interactions with the extracellular matrix
Despite these similarities, ANTXR1's functions and downstream signaling are independent from integrins
Mechanical cue detection:
Experimental evidence indicates ANTXR1 can sense:
Mechanotransduction mechanisms:
ANTXR1 connects intracellular cytoskeleton to ECM molecules, forming a mechanical linkage
This linkage enables bidirectional force transmission between the cell interior and exterior
The mechanical coupling regulates cellular processes including adhesion, migration, and ECM homeostasis
Biological significance:
In tumor biology, ANTXR1's mechanosensing may influence cancer cell migration and invasion
In normal physiology, it likely contributes to tissue homeostasis and cellular responses to mechanical stimuli
The mechanosensory function may be particularly relevant in contexts where ECM properties are altered, such as fibrosis or tumor stroma
This mechanosensing role represents a novel aspect of ANTXR1 biology beyond its functions as an anthrax toxin receptor and tumor marker, highlighting its importance in cellular adaptation to mechanical environments .
ANTXR1 deficiency causes GAPO syndrome through mechanisms involving cellular senescence and extracellular matrix dysregulation:
GAPO syndrome clinical manifestations:
Named for its four primary features: Growth retardation, Alopecia, Pseudoanodontia, and Optic atrophy
Associated with complex phenotypes affecting cardiovascular, skeletal, pulmonary, and nervous systems
Pathogenic variants in ANTXR1 have been established as the genetic cause
Cellular mechanisms in ANTXR1 deficiency:
Recent evidence demonstrates that ANTXR1 deficiency initiates a senescent phenotype in human fibroblasts
This senescence correlates with defects in nuclear architecture and actin dynamics
The findings suggest GAPO syndrome should be reconsidered as a progeroid (premature aging) disorder
Extracellular matrix abnormalities:
Aberrant accumulation of ECM components and fibrosis are hallmarks of GAPO syndrome
These ECM abnormalities contribute significantly to disease pathogenesis and reduced life expectancy
ANTXR1's normal role in ECM homeostasis appears critical for preventing these abnormalities
Aging-related implications:
ANTXR1 deficiency reveals an unexpected role for this integrin-like ECM receptor in human aging
The senescence phenotype in ANTXR1-deficient cells provides insights into both normal and pathological aging processes
This connection to aging biology opens new research directions for understanding ANTXR1 function
This relationship between ANTXR1 and GAPO syndrome highlights the critical importance of ANTXR1 in normal development and tissue homeostasis, extending our understanding beyond its roles in cancer and anthrax toxin entry .
ANTXR1 has emerged as a promising target for cancer therapy with multiple targeting strategies under development:
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs):
Anti-TEM8 antibody-drug conjugates have shown promise in preclinical studies across diverse cancer types
This approach leverages ANTXR1's selective expression on tumor vasculature and cancer cells
ADCs combine the specificity of anti-ANTXR1 antibodies with cytotoxic payloads
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy:
Byrd and colleagues developed anti-ANTXR1 CAR-T cells for triple-negative breast cancer
This approach successfully induced regression of established patient-derived xenograft tumors
CAR-T targeting leverages the selective expression of ANTXR1 on tumor cells and tumor vasculature
Biomarker-guided therapy selection:
ANTXR1 expression levels can potentially guide therapy selection:
Rationale for ANTXR1 as a therapeutic target:
Selective expression pattern: ANTXR1 is expressed on tumor cells, cancer stem cells, and tumor-associated stromal cells
Limited normal tissue expression reduces potential toxicity
ANTXR1 is rarely mutated in cancers, providing a stable therapeutic target
Targeting ANTXR1 may simultaneously affect tumor cells and the supporting microenvironment
The therapeutic targeting of ANTXR1 represents a promising approach that could address multiple aspects of cancer biology simultaneously, potentially overcoming resistance mechanisms associated with other targeted therapies .
Researchers frequently encounter molecular weight variations when detecting ANTXR1 in Western blots. Understanding the sources of these variations is essential for proper data interpretation:
Expected molecular weight patterns:
Calculated molecular weight: 63 kDa based on amino acid sequence
Typically observed molecular weights: 80-85 kDa in Western blots
This discrepancy is primarily due to post-translational modifications
Sources of molecular weight variation:
Multiple isoforms:
Post-translational modifications:
Glycosylation significantly affects ANTXR1's apparent molecular weight
Other modifications (phosphorylation, ubiquitination) may further alter migration
Tissue/cell-specific differences:
Resolution strategies:
| Issue | Resolution Approach |
|---|---|
| Multiple bands | Verify specificity with knockout/knockdown controls |
| Unexpected MW | Compare with published literature; consider deglycosylation experiments |
| Variable results | Standardize sample preparation; use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes |
| Weak detection | Optimize primary antibody concentration; enhance signal with sensitive detection methods |
When reporting ANTXR1 Western blot results, always specify the observed molecular weight, antibody used, and experimental conditions to facilitate cross-study comparisons .
Resolving conflicting data on ANTXR1 function requires systematic analysis of biological and methodological variables:
Context-dependent function analysis:
ANTXR1 demonstrates different functions in different cellular contexts
Example: ANTXR1 correlates positively with myeloid cells but negatively with lymphoid cells
Cancer type-specific effects: Different relationships with immune infiltration between cancer types
Methodological evaluation:
Examine antibody epitopes and isoform specificity (different antibodies recognize different isoforms)
Compare detection methods (WB, IHC, IF, functional assays) which may yield different results
Evaluate sample preparation differences that might affect ANTXR1 detection or function
Experimental system reconciliation:
Compare in vitro cell culture vs. in vivo animal models vs. human patient samples
Consider 2D vs. 3D culture systems which may reveal different ANTXR1 functions
Analyze genetic background differences that might influence ANTXR1 activity
Integrative analysis approaches:
Combine data from multiple experimental approaches to build a comprehensive model
Conduct meta-analysis of published studies to identify consistent patterns
Use computational methods to integrate diverse datasets and reveal context-specific functions
Design of decisive experiments:
Create experiments specifically designed to resolve contradictions
Employ genetic approaches (CRISPR-Cas9, RNA interference) to directly test functional hypotheses
Include time-course analyses to capture temporal aspects of ANTXR1 function
Multiple factors can influence ANTXR1 detection and expression in experimental models, requiring careful consideration for accurate data interpretation:
Biological factors affecting ANTXR1 expression:
Cell type and origin:
Culture and microenvironmental conditions:
Cell density affects expression (ANTXR1 functions in cell-cell interactions)
Extracellular matrix composition influences expression (ANTXR1 binds collagens)
Oxygen levels may impact expression (association with tumor vasculature)
Mechanical forces likely modulate expression (ANTXR1 functions as a mechanosensor)
Growth phase and cellular state:
Methodological factors affecting ANTXR1 detection:
Antibody selection:
Detection method optimization:
Western blot: Sample preparation, protein extraction method, gel percentage
IHC/IF: Fixation method, antigen retrieval conditions, detection system
Flow cytometry: Cell preparation, antibody concentration, gating strategy
Controls and validation:
Positive controls should be consistent across experiments
Genetic manipulation (overexpression, knockdown) to validate specificity
Multi-method validation to confirm expression patterns
For reproducible ANTXR1 research, systematically document all experimental conditions and standardize protocols when possible. When comparing results across studies, consider how these factors might contribute to observed differences in ANTXR1 expression or function .