AP1M2 expression correlates with aggressive tumor phenotypes and immune dysregulation:
AP1M2 drives HCC progression via proliferation and migration mechanisms:
Clinical Relevance:
Functional Role:
Immune Modulation:
AP1M2’s role in shaping tumor immunity is critical:
JNK/ERK Pathway Activation: AP1M2 knockdown reduces phosphorylated JNK/ERK levels, impairing HCC cell migration and proliferation .
Metabolic and Coagulation Pathways: GSEA identifies AP1M2-associated lipid metabolism, bile acid synthesis, and coagulation processes in HCC .
Biomarker Utility: AP1M2 expression levels may stratify patients for targeted therapies in BRCA and HCC .
Therapeutic Targeting: Inhibiting AP1M2 could disrupt tumor progression and immune evasion, particularly in cancers with high neoantigen loads .
Sample Preparation: Lyse cells in RIPA buffer, resolve proteins via SDS-PAGE.
Membrane Transfer: Transfer to PVDF/NC membrane, block with 5% milk/TBST.
Primary Antibody: Incubate with AP1M2 antibody (1:500–1:1000 dilution) overnight at 4°C .
Detection: Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and chemiluminescent substrates .
AP1M2 is a subunit of the clathrin-associated adaptor protein complex 1 (AP-1). This complex plays a crucial role in protein sorting within the trans-Golgi network and early endosomes (TGN/EE). AP complexes facilitate clathrin recruitment to membranes and recognize sorting signals in the cytosolic tails of transmembrane cargo molecules. AP1M2 is essential for KNOLLE localization at the cell plate, a process vital for cytokinesis. It functions redundantly with AP1M1 in various post-Golgi trafficking pathways, directing cargo to the vacuole, plasma membrane, and the cell division plane.
AP1M2 (Adaptor-Related Protein Complex 1, mu 2 Subunit) is a protein encoded by the AP1M2 gene. It functions as part of the adaptor protein complex, which is involved in intracellular protein transport and endocytosis. Recent research has identified AP1M2 as differentially expressed in various cancer types, particularly showing high expression in invasive breast carcinoma . Its importance in research stems from its potential role as a tumor marker gene that could be valuable for early tumor screening and its correlation with patient outcomes and immune system functioning in cancer .
Several types of AP1M2 antibodies are available for research purposes, including:
N-Terminal targeting antibodies - These recognize epitopes at the N-terminal region of the AP1M2 protein, such as the synthetic peptide immunogen used in ABIN2784762 .
Mid-region targeting antibodies - Antibodies targeting amino acids 164-423 of human AP1M2 .
Full-length antibodies - Some antibodies target the complete protein (AA 1-423) .
These antibodies are predominantly available as rabbit polyclonal antibodies, though mouse polyclonal versions also exist . Most are unconjugated, making them versatile for various experimental applications.
AP1M2 antibodies exhibit varying degrees of cross-species reactivity depending on their epitope targets. For example, the N-terminal targeting AP1M2 antibody (ABIN2784762) demonstrates predicted reactivity with multiple species:
| Species | Predicted Reactivity |
|---|---|
| Human | 100% |
| Mouse | 100% |
| Rat | 100% |
| Cow | 100% |
| Dog | 100% |
| Guinea Pig | 100% |
| Horse | 100% |
| Rabbit | 79% |
| Yeast | 83% |
| Zebrafish | 86% |
This broad cross-reactivity is beneficial for comparative studies across different model organisms . Other AP1M2 antibodies may have more restricted reactivity profiles, such as those limited to human, mouse, and rat samples . When selecting an antibody for experimental use, researchers should carefully assess the specificity requirements for their particular study system.
AP1M2 antibodies have been validated for several experimental applications:
Western Blotting (WB) - Most AP1M2 antibodies are validated for detecting the protein in Western blot applications, with recommended dilutions typically ranging from 1/500 to 1/2000 .
Immunofluorescence/Immunocytochemistry (IF/ICC) - Some AP1M2 antibodies are suitable for cellular localization studies using IF/ICC techniques, with recommended dilutions of 1/50 to 1/200 .
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) - Select antibodies are validated for ELISA applications, with typical concentrations of 1 μg/ml .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) - Some antibodies can be used for tissue section analysis through immunohistochemistry .
The specific application suitability varies by antibody, and researchers should verify the validation status for their intended application before proceeding with experiments.
For optimal detection of AP1M2 using Western Blotting, researchers should consider the following protocol guidelines:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins from tissues or cells using standard lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors.
Protein separation: Use SDS-PAGE with appropriate percentage gels (10-12% is typically suitable for the 48 kDa AP1M2 protein) .
Transfer: Transfer proteins to a PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane.
Blocking: Block the membrane with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST.
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute AP1M2 antibody according to manufacturer recommendations (typically 1/500 to 1/2000) and incubate overnight at 4°C.
Secondary antibody: Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG for most AP1M2 antibodies).
Detection: Visualize using enhanced chemiluminescence.
The expected molecular weight for AP1M2 is approximately 48 kDa, which should be confirmed during analysis . Optimization may be required based on specific experimental conditions and sample types.
For maximum stability and performance of AP1M2 antibodies, the following storage and handling recommendations should be followed:
Storage temperature: Store at -20°C for long-term preservation .
Format: Most AP1M2 antibodies are supplied in liquid form, typically in PBS (pH 7.3) containing 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol .
Aliquoting: Upon receipt, prepare small working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can degrade antibody quality .
Thawing: Thaw antibodies gradually at cold temperatures before use.
Working concentration: Dilute to working concentration immediately before use rather than storing diluted antibody.
Contamination prevention: Use sterile techniques when handling antibodies to prevent microbial contamination.
Proper storage and handling are crucial for maintaining antibody specificity and sensitivity in experimental applications. Always check the manufacturer's specific recommendations for the particular antibody being used.
Research using TCGA, GTEx, and CCLE databases has revealed that AP1M2 is abundantly expressed in various cancer types, with particularly high expression in invasive breast carcinoma . The relationship between AP1M2 expression and cancer development involves several key aspects:
These findings suggest that AP1M2 may play a role in cancer development and could potentially serve as a biomarker for cancer detection and prognosis, particularly in breast cancer.
Analysis of the relationship between AP1M2 expression and immune infiltration has revealed significant correlations that may have implications for cancer immunotherapy:
Immune cell infiltration: AP1M2 expression in breast invasive carcinoma was found to be highly associated with infiltration levels of multiple immune cell types, including:
Immune checkpoint correlation: Studies examined the relationship between AP1M2 expression and 47 immune checkpoint genes using Spearman correlation analysis .
Immune and stromal scores: In breast cancer, AP1M2 expression levels were negatively correlated with immune system scores, stromal scores, and composite scores .
These findings suggest that AP1M2 may influence the tumor immune microenvironment, particularly in breast cancer, and could potentially impact the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches.
Research has investigated the relationship between AP1M2 expression and key immunological features in cancer:
Tumor neoantigens: AP1M2 expression was positively correlated with tumor immune neoantigens in breast invasive carcinoma . This is significant because tumor neoantigens can be recognized by specific immune cells and are generated by abnormal proteins resulting from genetic mutations .
Microsatellite instability (MSI): A positive correlation was observed between AP1M2 expression and microsatellite instability in breast invasive carcinoma . MSI is known to increase tumor mutational burden and can influence response to immunotherapy.
Mutational burden: The relationship between AP1M2 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) was investigated using Spearman correlation analysis .
These associations suggest that AP1M2 may be involved in processes that generate tumor-specific antigens and genetic instability, which can influence anti-tumor immune responses and potentially impact the efficacy of immunotherapies.
Several sophisticated methodologies have been employed to investigate AP1M2's role in cancer at a systems level:
Transcriptional data analysis: Researchers have utilized multiple databases (GTEx, CCLE, TCGA) to comprehensively analyze AP1M2 expression across various tissues and cancer types .
Differential expression analysis: Comparison of AP1M2 expression between tumor and normal tissues using the UCSC Xena database with statistical analysis in RStudio .
Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the impact of AP1M2 expression on clinical prognosis .
Immune infiltration assessment:
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA): To identify signaling pathways and functional categories associated with AP1M2 expression in various cancer types .
These methodologies provide complementary approaches to understanding the complex role of AP1M2 in cancer biology and could serve as a template for investigating other potential cancer biomarkers.
To investigate the functional significance of AP1M2 in cancer, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
Gene expression modulation:
RNA interference (siRNA or shRNA) to knockdown AP1M2 expression
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to create knockout or mutant models
Overexpression systems to study gain-of-function effects
Phenotypic assays following expression modulation:
Cell proliferation and viability assays
Migration and invasion assays
Colony formation assays
Apoptosis assays
Protein interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners
Proximity ligation assays to confirm interactions in situ
Mass spectrometry to identify protein complexes
In vivo models:
Xenograft models with AP1M2-modulated cancer cell lines
Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs)
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs)
Correlation with clinical parameters:
Analysis of AP1M2 expression in patient samples and correlation with clinical outcomes
Assessment of AP1M2's relationship with treatment response
These approaches can provide mechanistic insights into AP1M2's role in cancer development and progression, potentially identifying new therapeutic targets or biomarkers.
Despite the potential of AP1M2 as a cancer biomarker, several challenges and limitations exist in antibody-based research:
Antibody specificity issues:
Cross-reactivity with related proteins or isoforms
Batch-to-batch variability in polyclonal antibodies
Limited availability of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies
Methodological limitations:
Variability in tissue fixation and processing affecting epitope accessibility
Differences in antibody performance across applications (WB vs. IHC vs. IF)
Need for standardized protocols for quantitative analysis
Biological complexity:
Heterogeneous AP1M2 expression within tumors
Context-dependent functions of AP1M2 in different cancer types
Limited understanding of AP1M2's molecular interactions and signaling pathways
Clinical translation challenges:
Need for validation in large, diverse patient cohorts
Lack of standardized cutoff values for high vs. low expression
Integration with existing biomarkers and clinical parameters
Addressing these challenges requires rigorous validation of antibody specificity, development of standardized protocols, and integration of antibody-based studies with complementary approaches such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and functional assays.
Based on current research, AP1M2 shows considerable potential as a biomarker in several contexts:
These applications require further validation in larger patient cohorts and integration with other clinical and molecular parameters before adoption in clinical practice.
While research on AP1M2 as a therapeutic target is still emerging, several aspects suggest its potential:
Correlation with tumor biology:
Immune microenvironment modulation:
Association with tumor neoantigens:
Therapeutic approaches to consider:
Small molecule inhibitors targeting AP1M2 protein function
Antibody-drug conjugates for targeted delivery to AP1M2-expressing cells
RNA interference approaches to downregulate AP1M2 expression
Further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms by which AP1M2 contributes to cancer development and to develop effective therapeutic strategies targeting this protein.