APC4 (encoded by the ANAPC4 gene) is a conserved subunit of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that ensures genomic stability by regulating mitotic progression and G1 phase transitions . The APC/C mediates ubiquitination and degradation of cell cycle regulators like cyclins and securins, primarily forming Lys-11-linked polyubiquitin chains . Dysregulation of APC4 is linked to rare genetic disorders such as Adams-Oliver Syndrome .
APC4 antibodies are polyclonal reagents developed for detecting the APC4 protein in experimental models. Key characteristics include:
APC4 antibodies are widely used in:
Western Blot (WB): Detects APC4 in human brain tissue, HEK-293 cells, HeLa cells, and mouse liver lysates .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes APC4 in mouse brain and rat liver tissues .
Application | Dilution Range | Key Observations |
---|---|---|
WB | 1:1,000–1:6,000 | Detects endogenous APC4 in diverse cell lines . |
IHC | 1:50–1:500 | Antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) . |
Functional Insights: APC4 interacts with APC1, APC5, and CDC23 to maintain APC/C structural integrity. Loss of any subunit destabilizes the complex, disrupting mitotic exit .
Disease Association: ANAPC4 mutations are implicated in Adams-Oliver Syndrome, a congenital disorder characterized by scalp defects and limb abnormalities .
Technical Notes:
While APC4 antibodies target the cell cycle complex, other antibodies (e.g., SR604 ) inhibit Activated Protein C (APC), a serine protease involved in coagulation. SR604, a humanized antibody, blocks APC’s anticoagulant activity but preserves its cytoprotective functions . This highlights the importance of distinguishing between APC4 (cell cycle) and APC (coagulation) targets.
APC4 is a fundamental component of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), which functions as a cell cycle-regulated E3 ubiquitin ligase. This complex is essential for controlling progression through mitosis and the G1 phase of the cell cycle. APC4 plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic stability by facilitating the APC/C's ability to mediate ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of target proteins . The APC/C complex primarily mediates the formation of 'Lys-11'-linked polyubiquitin chains and, to a lesser extent, 'Lys-48'- and 'Lys-63'-linked polyubiquitin chains . This ubiquitination marks proteins for degradation, ensuring that mitotic events occur in the correct sequence. APC4 is particularly vital because it associates interdependently with other APC/C components (APC1, APC5, and CDC23), such that the loss of any one of these subunits reduces binding between the remaining three .
APC4 antibodies are versatile tools in cellular and molecular biology research, suitable for multiple applications:
When selecting an application, researchers should consider the specific experimental question and available validation data for the antibody of interest .
Selecting the appropriate APC4 antibody requires consideration of several factors:
Antibody Type: Choose between polyclonal (broader epitope recognition, higher sensitivity) and monoclonal (higher specificity, better reproducibility) antibodies. For APC4, both rabbit polyclonal antibodies (e.g., from Abcam, MyBioSource) and mouse monoclonal antibodies (e.g., from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) are available .
Target Region: Consider whether you need an N-terminal or C-terminal targeting antibody. This is particularly important if you're studying truncated forms of APC4 or if specific domains are masked in protein complexes .
Species Reactivity: Verify the antibody's reactivity with your experimental species. Some APC4 antibodies react with human, mouse, and rat samples, while others may have limited cross-reactivity .
Application Validation: Ensure the antibody has been validated for your specific application (WB, IHC, IP, IF). Some antibodies perform well in certain applications but not in others .
Experimental Controls: Plan for appropriate positive and negative controls to validate antibody specificity in your experimental system .
Antibody validation is crucial for ensuring reliable and reproducible results. For APC4 antibodies, consider the following comprehensive validation strategy:
Multiple Antibody Approach: Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of APC4 (both N- and C-terminal) to confirm consistent detection patterns. If different antibodies yield the same results, confidence in specificity increases .
RNAi Validation: Perform RNA interference experiments to knockdown APC4 expression, then assess whether the signal detected by your antibody decreases accordingly. This is particularly effective for determining specificity in immunocytochemistry applications .
Immunoprecipitation Cross-Validation: Perform IP with one APC4 antibody followed by Western blotting with a different APC4 antibody. If both antibodies recognize the same protein, this supports specificity .
Cell Line Panels: Test the antibody in cell lines with known APC4 expression patterns. For example, HCT116 and HEK293 cells express full-length APC (314 kDa), while SW480 cells express a truncated version (around 150 kDa) .
Size Verification: Confirm that the detected protein is the expected molecular weight (approximately 92 kDa for APC4) . Note that the whole APC complex is much larger, and some antibodies may detect full-length APC at 314 kDa .
Peptide Competition Assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide before application to verify that this blocks specific binding.
Optimizing Western blotting conditions for APC4 antibodies requires attention to several technical details:
The detection of a 150 kDa protein with both N- and C-terminal APC4 antibodies has been reported and requires careful interpretation:
Cross-Reactivity Consideration: Research has shown that multiple APC4 antibodies detect a protein of approximately 150 kDa, which is detected by both N- and C-terminal antibodies . This consistent detection pattern across different antibodies raises questions about whether this represents:
A specific isoform of APC4
A cross-reactive protein with epitopes similar to both N- and C-terminal regions of APC4
A proteolytic fragment of APC4
Validation Experiments: To determine the identity of this band, researchers have performed immunoprecipitation with different antibodies followed by Western blotting. Studies indicate that both N- and C-terminal APC4 antibodies recognize this 150 kDa species .
Comparison with Truncated APC: In SW480 cells, which express a truncated form of APC with a predicted size of 147 kDa (running at 152-155 kDa), the additional band detected by C-terminal antibodies migrates at a slightly smaller size than the truncated APC .
Interpretation Caution: Based on available evidence, this 150 kDa protein is unlikely to be APC4 itself. When analyzing Western blot results with APC4 antibodies, researchers should be aware of this potential cross-reactivity and include appropriate controls to distinguish between specific and non-specific signals .
Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding in immunohistochemistry requires systematic controls and optimization:
Antibody Titration: Perform a dilution series to determine the optimal concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background. For APC4 antibodies, a starting concentration of 5 μg/mL is often recommended for IHC .
Negative Controls:
Omit primary antibody to assess secondary antibody non-specific binding
Use isotype control antibodies matching the host species and isotype of your APC4 antibody
Include tissue known to be negative for APC4 expression
Positive Controls: Include tissues with confirmed APC4 expression to verify that your staining protocol can detect the protein when present.
Antigen Retrieval Optimization: Test different antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced vs. enzymatic) and conditions to ensure optimal epitope exposure while preserving tissue morphology.
RNAi Validation: When possible, compare staining between normal tissues and those where APC4 has been knocked down to confirm specificity.
Multiple Antibody Approach: Use two or more antibodies targeting different epitopes of APC4 to confirm staining patterns. Consistency across different antibodies supports specificity .
Blocking Optimization: Test different blocking reagents (normal serum, BSA, commercial blocking solutions) to reduce non-specific binding.
Designing experiments to study APC4 function in cell cycle regulation requires multi-faceted approaches:
Expression Manipulation Strategies:
siRNA or shRNA knockdown of APC4 to assess effects on APC/C complex formation and function
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to create APC4 mutants or knockout cell lines
Overexpression of wild-type or mutant APC4 to study dominant effects
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Cell Cycle Analysis:
Synchronization experiments to assess APC4 expression and localization at different cell cycle stages
Flow cytometry following APC4 manipulation to quantify cell cycle distribution
Live-cell imaging with fluorescent markers to track mitotic progression in cells with altered APC4 expression
Ubiquitination Activity Assays:
Genomic Stability Assessment:
Chromosome spread analysis to detect missegregation following APC4 manipulation
γ-H2AX staining to assess DNA damage accumulation
Micronuclei formation as an indicator of genomic instability
Studying protein-protein interactions involving APC4 requires attention to several technical considerations:
Preservation of Protein Complexes:
Use gentle lysis buffers that maintain protein-protein interactions
Consider crosslinking approaches to stabilize transient interactions
Avoid harsh detergents that might disrupt the APC/C complex
Co-immunoprecipitation Strategy:
Controls and Validation:
Include reciprocal co-IPs (IP with antibody to one protein, detect the other, then reverse)
Use siRNA knockdown of interaction partners as negative controls
Include detergent controls to assess specificity of interactions
Detection Methods:
Western blotting can detect stable interactions but may miss weak or transient associations
Mass spectrometry offers unbiased identification of interaction partners
Proximity-based methods (BioID, APEX) can capture transient interactions in living cells
Functional Validation:
Assess the consequence of disrupting specific interactions on APC/C activity
Design mutations that specifically disrupt individual interaction surfaces
Correlate interaction strength with functional outcomes in cell cycle progression
Investigating APC4 localization dynamics requires sophisticated imaging approaches:
Fixed-Cell Imaging Approaches:
Immunofluorescence with validated APC4 antibodies at different cell cycle stages
Co-staining with cell cycle markers (cyclin B, phospho-histone H3) to correlate localization with specific phases
Super-resolution microscopy (STORM, STED) for detailed subcellular localization
Live-Cell Imaging Strategies:
Generation of fluorescently tagged APC4 (e.g., GFP-APC4) for real-time tracking
Photoactivatable or photoconvertible tags to track specific subpopulations of APC4
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to assess mobility and turnover rates
Correlative Approaches:
Correlative light and electron microscopy to place APC4 in ultrastructural context
Multi-color imaging to track APC4 alongside substrates and other APC/C components
Optogenetic approaches to manipulate APC4 function with spatial and temporal precision
Quantitative Analysis:
Automated image analysis for quantifying localization changes
Single-particle tracking to assess movement of individual complexes
Mathematical modeling to interpret dynamic data in context of cell cycle progression
While APC4 is not a DNA-binding protein itself, its potential association with chromatin-bound complexes might be studied through ChIP. Important considerations include:
Crosslinking Optimization:
Test different crosslinking conditions to capture indirect DNA associations
Consider dual crosslinking approaches (formaldehyde plus protein-specific crosslinkers)
Optimize crosslinking time to balance capture efficiency with potential epitope masking
Antibody Selection:
Controls and Validation:
Include IgG control and input samples
Use cell lines with APC4 knockdown as negative controls
Consider sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) to verify co-localization with known interactors
Data Interpretation:
Any APC4 chromatin association is likely indirect through other proteins
Correlate findings with known cell cycle-regulated genes
Integrate with other data types (RNA-seq, proteomics) for comprehensive understanding
Despite significant progress in understanding APC4's role in the APC/C complex, several important questions remain unanswered:
Addressing these questions will require continued development and refinement of antibody-based detection methods alongside complementary genetic, biochemical, and structural approaches.