cut23 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
cut23 antibody; apc8 antibody; SPAC6F12.14Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 8 antibody; 20S cyclosome/APC complex protein apc8 antibody; Cell untimely torn protein 23 antibody
Target Names
cut23
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cut23 Antibody is a component of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), a cell cycle-regulated E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex. The APC/C plays a crucial role in regulating progression through mitosis and the G1 phase of the cell cycle. It is believed to confer substrate specificity and, in conjunction with ubiquitin-conjugating E2 enzymes, catalyzes the formation of protein-ubiquitin conjugates. These conjugates are subsequently degraded by the 26S proteasome. Cut23 Antibody has a significant role in facilitating the transition from metaphase to anaphase by mediating the ubiquitination of specific mitotic substrates.
Database Links

Q&A

What is Cut23 and why is it significant in cell cycle research?

Cut23 (also known as CDC23, Anapc8, or Apc8) is a core subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), a multi-protein E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates cell cycle progression. It plays a critical role in the metaphase-to-anaphase transition by mediating the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of key cell cycle regulators including cyclin B and securin . Cut23 is particularly significant because mutations in this protein can cause metaphase arrest, indicating its essential role in mitotic progression . Research using Cut23 antibodies has been instrumental in elucidating the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control, particularly in understanding how the APC/C is regulated during mitosis.

What are the structural features of Cut23 and how do they relate to its function?

Cut23 contains multiple tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains, which are structural motifs that mediate protein-protein interactions. Specifically, Cut23 contains a block of eight tandem TPRs (2nd to 9th) followed by a C-terminal tail . These TPR domains are critical for the assembly of the APC/C complex and for interactions with regulatory proteins such as Polo-like kinase (Plo1). Research has demonstrated that the TPR domain is sufficient for association with Plo1, and truncation experiments have shown that specific regions within the TPR domain are necessary for this interaction . Understanding these structural features is essential for researchers designing experiments to study Cut23 function or developing antibodies that target specific functional domains.

What are the most common applications for Cut23 antibodies in cell cycle research?

Cut23 antibodies are valuable tools in several experimental applications:

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detecting Cut23 localization in tissue sections

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP): For isolating APC/C complexes and studying protein interactions

  • Western blotting: For quantifying Cut23 protein levels and examining post-translational modifications

  • Immunofluorescence: For visualizing Cut23 localization during different cell cycle stages

According to available data, polyclonal antibodies against CDC23/Cut23 have been validated for immunohistochemistry applications in human tissues . When selecting a Cut23 antibody for your research, it's important to choose one that has been validated for your specific application and species of interest.

How can I validate the specificity of a Cut23 antibody for my experimental system?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable results. For Cut23 antibodies, consider these approaches:

  • Positive and negative controls: Use known Cut23-expressing cells or tissues as positive controls. For negative controls, use either tissues known not to express Cut23 or perform immunodepletion with the specific antigen.

  • Genetic validation: In model organisms, compare antibody staining between wild-type and Cut23 knockout/knockdown samples.

  • Multiple antibodies approach: Use antibodies that recognize different epitopes of Cut23 to confirm consistent results.

  • Western blot analysis: Confirm that the antibody detects a protein of the expected molecular weight (~70-75 kDa for human Cut23).

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Verify that the antibody specifically pulls down Cut23 and known interacting partners.

Remember that antibody validation should be performed for each experimental system and application, as antibody performance can vary significantly between different techniques and sample preparations .

How does Cut23 interact with Polo-like kinase (Plo1) and what is the functional significance?

Cut23 interacts with Polo-like kinase (Plo1) through its TPR domain, as demonstrated in fission yeast studies. This interaction is mediated by the non-catalytic region of Plo1 and the TPR domain of Cut23 . The functional significance of this interaction is substantial:

  • APC/C activation: The interaction appears to be essential for proper APC/C function, as mutations that disrupt this interaction (such as cut23-PD26) lead to metaphase arrest .

  • Regulation mechanism: The cut23-PD26 mutation results in a single amino acid change (serine 349 to asparagine) in the TPR domain, dramatically reducing interaction with Plo1 without disrupting APC/C formation . This suggests the interaction is regulatory rather than structural.

  • Rescue mechanism: Elevated expression of Plo1 can rescue the metaphase arrest phenotype of cut23-PD26 mutants, indicating that increasing the concentration of Plo1 can compensate for the reduced binding affinity .

This research highlights a critical regulatory mechanism for APC/C activation during mitosis and provides insight into how polo-like kinases contribute to cell cycle regulation.

What experimental approaches can be used to study Cut23 post-translational modifications?

Studying post-translational modifications (PTMs) of Cut23 requires specialized techniques:

  • Phospho-specific antibodies: Use antibodies that specifically recognize phosphorylated forms of Cut23. This approach requires prior knowledge of the phosphorylation sites.

  • Mass spectrometry analysis: Use techniques such as:

    • Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

    • Phosphopeptide enrichment methods (e.g., titanium dioxide chromatography)

    • SILAC (Stable Isotope Labeling with Amino acids in Cell culture) for quantitative analysis

  • Mutation studies: Generate phospho-mimetic (e.g., S→D) or phospho-deficient (e.g., S→A) mutants at specific sites to study the functional consequences of phosphorylation.

  • In vitro kinase assays: Identify kinases that phosphorylate Cut23 using recombinant proteins and radioactive ATP or phospho-specific antibodies.

  • Synchronization experiments: Analyze PTMs at different cell cycle stages to identify cell cycle-dependent modifications.

When analyzing results, researchers should account for potential technical artifacts and validate findings using multiple complementary approaches.

What are the optimal conditions for immunoprecipitation of Cut23 and APC/C complexes?

Based on experimental protocols used in published research, the following conditions are recommended for immunoprecipitation of Cut23 and APC/C complexes:

  • Lysis buffer composition:

    • Use HB buffer (contains protease inhibitors) for cell lysis

    • Prepare soluble extracts by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 20 minutes after disrupting cells

  • Immunoprecipitation protocol:

    • Incubate soluble extracts with anti-Cut23 antibodies or anti-tag antibodies (if using tagged versions)

    • Follow with incubation with protein A beads

    • Wash beads four times in HB buffer before analysis by SDS-PAGE

  • Considerations for preserving interactions:

    • For studying interactions with Plo1, avoid harsh detergents that might disrupt protein-protein interactions

    • If studying phosphorylation-dependent interactions, include phosphatase inhibitors in all buffers

  • Controls:

    • Use IgG of the same species as the primary antibody as a negative control

    • Include input samples to confirm the presence of your protein of interest

    • For tagged proteins, include untagged controls to identify non-specific binding

These conditions have been successfully employed to demonstrate the interaction between Cut23 and Plo1 in fission yeast .

How can I design experiments to investigate the metaphase arrest phenotype associated with Cut23 mutations?

The metaphase arrest phenotype associated with Cut23 mutations like cut23-PD26 can be investigated using these experimental approaches:

  • Immunofluorescence analysis:

    • Perform immunostaining of α-tubulin and spindle pole body (SPB) components like Sad1

    • Look for cells with short bipolar spindles (~3 μm) and unseparated, hypercondensed chromosomes

    • Quantify the percentage of cells showing metaphase arrest

  • Live cell imaging:

    • Use fluorescently tagged APC substrates like Cyclin B (Cdc13-GFP) or securin (Cut2-GFP)

    • Monitor their degradation kinetics in wild-type versus Cut23 mutant cells

    • Analyze the timing of metaphase-to-anaphase transition

  • Genetic rescue experiments:

    • Test whether elevated expression of interacting proteins (e.g., Plo1) can rescue the metaphase arrest

    • Construct double mutants to identify genetic interactions

  • Biochemical analysis of APC/C activity:

    • Perform in vitro ubiquitination assays using immunopurified APC/C from wild-type and mutant cells

    • Analyze the sedimentation profile of APC/C components to assess complex formation

  • Complementation studies:

    • Introduce wild-type or mutant versions of Cut23 into cut23-deficient cells

    • Assess their ability to rescue the metaphase arrest phenotype

The comprehensive approach allows researchers to understand both the cellular consequences and molecular mechanisms of Cut23 dysfunction.

What are common issues with Cut23 antibody specificity, and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with Cut23 antibodies may encounter several specificity issues:

  • Cross-reactivity with related proteins:

    • Problem: Cut23/CDC23 belongs to a family of TPR-containing proteins, which may lead to cross-reactivity

    • Solution: Use antibodies raised against unique regions of Cut23 rather than conserved TPR motifs

    • Validation: Perform western blots in cells where Cut23 is depleted to confirm specificity

  • Non-specific background in immunofluorescence:

    • Problem: High background staining making it difficult to detect specific Cut23 signals

    • Solution: Optimize blocking conditions (increase BSA concentration or use alternative blockers like normal serum)

    • Validation: Include peptide competition controls where the antibody is pre-incubated with the immunizing peptide

  • Variability in fixation sensitivity:

    • Problem: Different fixation methods may affect epitope accessibility

    • Solution: Test multiple fixation protocols (PFA, methanol, glutaraldehyde) to determine optimal conditions

    • Validation: Compare results with different antibodies targeting the same protein

  • Batch-to-batch variability:

    • Problem: Different antibody lots may show varying specificity

    • Solution: Always validate new antibody lots against previously used lots

    • Validation: Keep reference samples to compare antibody performance

  • Species specificity limitations:

    • Problem: Antibodies may not recognize orthologs across different species

    • Solution: Confirm species reactivity information provided by manufacturers

    • Validation: Test the antibody in samples from the specific species you're working with

How can I optimize immunofluorescence protocols to detect Cut23 localization during different cell cycle stages?

Optimizing immunofluorescence for Cut23 localization across the cell cycle requires several considerations:

  • Cell synchronization:

    • Use appropriate synchronization methods (e.g., double thymidine block, nocodazole arrest)

    • Validate synchronization efficiency by flow cytometry or by staining for cell cycle markers

  • Fixation optimization:

    • Test different fixation methods: 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 min), methanol (-20°C, 10 min), or a combination

    • For detecting subtle changes in localization, shorter fixation times may preserve structures better

  • Permeabilization conditions:

    • Optimize detergent concentration and time (e.g., 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100, 5-15 min)

    • For nuclear proteins like Cut23, ensure sufficient nuclear permeabilization

  • Co-staining strategy:

    • Include markers for cell cycle stages (e.g., PCNA for S-phase, phospho-histone H3 for mitosis)

    • Co-stain with other APC/C components or substrates (e.g., Cdc13/Cyclin B, Cut2/Securin)

    • Use tubulin staining to identify mitotic spindles and determine precise mitotic stages

  • Signal amplification:

    • Consider using secondary antibody amplification systems for weak signals

    • Use high-sensitivity detection methods (e.g., tyramide signal amplification)

  • Image acquisition parameters:

    • Use consistent exposure settings across samples for quantitative comparisons

    • Capture Z-stacks to ensure complete visualization of three-dimensional structures

By comparing Cut23 localization with cell cycle markers and APC/C substrates, researchers can gain insights into the dynamic regulation of Cut23 throughout the cell cycle.

What are the latest advances in using generative AI for designing antibodies against targets like Cut23?

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have opened exciting possibilities for designing antibodies against challenging targets like Cut23:

  • De novo antibody design:

    • Generative deep learning models now allow zero-shot design of antibodies against specific targets

    • These approaches have demonstrated experimental validation, not just in silico predictions

    • For example, recent research has generated antibodies against HER2 that bind tighter than therapeutic antibodies like trastuzumab

  • Advantages over traditional methods:

    • Traditional antibody discovery requires resource-intensive screening of large immune or synthetic libraries

    • AI-generated antibodies can be designed with greater control over properties like affinity and developability

    • This results in fewer lead candidates with sub-optimal binding or poor developability attributes

  • Diversity and naturalness:

    • AI-designed antibodies show high diversity and low sequence identity to known antibodies

    • They can adopt various structural conformations while maintaining high "Naturalness" scores

    • This suggests they are likely to possess desirable developability profiles and low immunogenicity

  • Applications to Cut23 research:

    • These approaches could potentially be applied to generate highly specific antibodies against different domains or conformational states of Cut23

    • Such antibodies could help distinguish Cut23's various functional states during the cell cycle

This technological frontier represents a significant opportunity for creating next-generation research tools for studying complex proteins like Cut23.

How can Cut23 antibodies be used to study the relationship between cell cycle dysregulation and cancer?

Cut23 antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating the connections between APC/C dysfunction, cell cycle dysregulation, and cancer:

  • Diagnostic and prognostic applications:

    • Immunohistochemical analysis of Cut23 expression or localization in tumor samples

    • Correlation of Cut23 alterations with clinical outcomes or response to specific therapies

    • Development of Cut23-based biomarker panels for cancer subtyping

  • Mechanistic studies:

    • Investigation of how oncogenic mutations affect Cut23 function within the APC/C

    • Analysis of how viral oncoproteins may target Cut23 or other APC/C components

    • Exploration of synthetic lethality relationships involving Cut23 and cancer-related genes

  • Therapeutic target validation:

    • Use of Cut23 antibodies to validate potential therapeutic approaches targeting the APC/C

    • Development of proximity-based assays (e.g., FRET, BRET) to screen for molecules that disrupt abnormal protein interactions

    • Investigation of how existing cancer drugs might affect Cut23 function

  • Cell cycle checkpoint studies:

    • Analysis of how Cut23 dysfunction contributes to genomic instability

    • Investigation of the relationship between Cut23 and mitotic checkpoint proteins

    • Exploration of how Cut23 mutations might confer resistance to anti-mitotic drugs

By developing specialized antibodies against different epitopes or modified forms of Cut23, researchers can gain deeper insights into its role in both normal cell cycle regulation and cancer pathogenesis.

What are the key technical specifications for commercially available Cut23 antibodies?

The following table summarizes technical specifications for representative Cut23/CDC23 antibodies:

Product InformationSpecifications
ClonalityPolyclonal, Monoclonal (clone 1Q2I3)
Host SpeciesRabbit
ApplicationsIHC (validated for human samples)
EpitopeVaries by product; some target specific domains of Cut23/CDC23
Gene AliasesCDC23, Anapc8, Apc8, Cell division cycle 23 homolog, Cut23
Storage ConditionsTypically 2-8°C
FormLiquid
Species ReactivityHuman (specific products may vary)

When selecting an antibody for your research, consider these factors:

  • The specific application (WB, IP, IF, IHC)

  • Validated species reactivity

  • Target epitope location (N-terminal, C-terminal, TPR domain)

  • Clonality (monoclonal for consistency, polyclonal for higher sensitivity)

What experimental protocols have been successful in studying Cut23-Plo1 interactions?

The following experimental protocols have been successfully used to study Cut23-Plo1 interactions:

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.