Y39B6A.34 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Compound Identification and Context

SourceRelevant ContentRelevance
C. elegans gene Y39B6A.16 (ZHP-4), a RING finger protein involved in meiosis, was studied for its role in crossover formation.The identifier "Y39B6A" is linked to a gene, not an antibody.

This suggests a potential naming overlap or a misreference. No antibody-related data exists for "Y39B6A.34" in the reviewed materials.

Possible Explanations for the Absence of Data

  1. Nomenclature Confusion:

    • The identifier "Y39B6A" aligns with C. elegans gene nomenclature (e.g., Y39B6A.16 in ). Antibody identifiers typically follow distinct naming conventions (e.g., "LY3300054" , "N6" ).

    • "Y39B6A.34" may refer to a gene, protein, or non-antibody biomolecule.

  2. Novel or Proprietary Compound:

    • If "Y39B6A.34" is a newly developed antibody, it may not yet be published in peer-reviewed literature or registered in public databases.

  3. Typographical Error:

    • A possible typo or misinterpretation of a similar identifier (e.g., "Y39B6A.16" vs. "Y39B6A.34").

Recommendations for Further Investigation

To resolve ambiguity, consider:

  1. Cross-Referencing Databases:

    • Check antibody-specific repositories like the Patent and Literature Antibody Database (PLAbDab) or AbDb , which catalog antibody structures and sequences.

    • Verify against clinical trial registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov) for ongoing studies.

  2. Target-Specific Research:

    • If "Y39B6A.34" is linked to a specific antigen or therapeutic target (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 , CD4bs , or Nipah virus ), review recent preclinical or clinical studies in that domain.

  3. Direct Communication with Researchers:

    • Contact authors of C. elegans studies (e.g., ) to clarify potential connections between Y39B6A.16 and antibody research.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Y39B6A.34COA8 family protein Y39B6A.34 antibody; mitochondrial antibody; COA8 antibody; APOPT family protein Y39B6A.34 antibody; mitochondrial antibody
Target Names
Y39B6A.34
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody may be required for the assembly and function of cytochrome c oxidase (COX). COX is the terminal component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.
Database Links

KEGG: cel:CELE_Y39B6A.34

STRING: 6239.Y39B6A.34

UniGene: Cel.1828

Protein Families
APOPT family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion inner membrane; Peripheral membrane protein; Matrix side.

Q&A

What is ZHP-4 and what role does it play in C. elegans meiosis?

ZHP-4, encoded by gene Y39B6A.16 in C. elegans, is a paralog of ZHP-3 with significant predicted protein sequence similarity (13% identity and 23% similarity). Both proteins share structural features of the C3HC4-type RING finger domain characteristic of known SUMO E3 ligases. ZHP-4 is essential for crossover formation during meiosis, functioning at multiple distinct steps in the meiotic recombination process .

Methodologically, ZHP-4's role has been characterized through:

  • EMS screening for recessive nondisjunction mutants

  • Analysis of protein sequence similarity to identify functional domains

  • Generation and characterization of mutation alleles (vv96, vv103)

  • Cytological analysis of meiotic progression in mutant backgrounds

What techniques are most effective for detecting and visualizing ZHP-4 in C. elegans?

Multiple complementary approaches have been validated for ZHP-4 detection:

  • Antibody-based detection:

    • Custom antibodies raised against the C-terminal 123 amino acids

    • CRISPR-generated HA tag for immunodetection using commercial anti-HA antibodies

  • Visualization techniques:

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy with co-staining of synaptonemal complex components

    • Whole gonad staining with nuclear counterstain (DAPI)

    • Division of gonads into six equivalent zones for standardized analysis of meiotic progression

For optimal results, researchers should standardize fixation protocols and antibody dilutions for each application, as sensitivity varies between detection methods.

How does ZHP-4 co-localize with other meiotic proteins?

ZHP-4 exhibits distinctive co-localization patterns with several key meiotic proteins:

  • ZHP-3: Complete co-localization is observed both along the SC in early pachytene and at the 5-7 crossover sites that emerge in late pachytene .

  • Axis proteins (HTP-3): ZHP-4 localizes to synapsed chromosome axes marked by HTP-3 .

  • Crossover markers: In wild-type, ZHP-4 eventually co-localizes with crossover-specific proteins like COSA-1 and MSH-5 at the 5-7 designated crossover sites .

For co-localization studies, sequential or simultaneous immunostaining protocols may be employed depending on antibody compatibility. Controls for antibody specificity, including staining in null mutant backgrounds, are essential for result interpretation.

How do mutations in zhp-4 affect RAD-51 dynamics and what does this reveal about ZHP-4's function?

RAD-51 foci dynamics in zhp-4 mutants reveal critical insights into ZHP-4's regulatory roles:

Meiotic ZoneWild-typezhp-4(vv103) nullzhp-4(vv96) hypomorph
Zone 3 (TZ/early pach)Initial appearanceHigher levels (p<0.001)Higher levels (p<0.001)
Zones 4-5 (mid-pach)Gradual resolutionElevated (p<0.001)Elevated (p<0.001)
Zone 6 (late pach)Complete resolutionWild-type levels (p>0.05)Remains elevated (p<0.001)

These patterns suggest ZHP-4 functions in both:

  • Negatively regulating DSB formation

  • Facilitating timely resolution of recombination intermediates

Supporting this interpretation, zhp-4(vv103);rad-54(RNAi) double mutants show significantly more RAD-51 foci than rad-54(RNAi) alone (13.5 vs. 9.6, p<0.00001), indicating increased DSB formation rather than defective repair .

Methodologically, these findings were established through:

  • Immunolocalization of RAD-51 and axis component HTP-3

  • Quantitative analysis of foci across standardized germline zones

  • Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney test

  • Combined genetic analysis with repair-defective backgrounds (rad-54)

What is the relationship between ZHP-4 and the localization of pro-crossover factors MSH-5 and COSA-1?

ZHP-4 critically influences the recruitment and stabilization of pro-crossover factors, with distinct effects depending on mutation type:

MSH-5 localization patterns:

  • Wild-type: Numerous small foci in early/mid-pachytene gradually resolve to ~6 foci per nucleus

  • zhp-4(vv103) null: No detectable MSH-5 foci at any stage

  • zhp-4(vv96) hypomorph: Delayed appearance with aberrant morphology; ~10-25 foci of varying sizes persist

COSA-1 localization patterns:

  • Wild-type: ~6 bright foci at designated crossover sites

  • zhp-4(vv103) and zhp-4(vv96): Foci of varying intensities that fail to properly localize to chromosome axes

  • zhp-4(H26A) RING domain mutant: 1-3 foci that do localize to synapsed chromosome axes

GenotypeCOSA-1 foci (median ± IQR)Localization pattern
Wild-type6Bright, axis-associated
zhp-4(vv103)VariableWeak, diffuse, often off-axis
zhp-4(vv96)VariableWeak, diffuse, often off-axis
zhp-4(H26A)1-3Axis-associated

For experimental approaches, researchers should:

  • Use fluorescently tagged versions of MSH-5 and COSA-1 (e.g., GFP::MSH-5)

  • Quantify foci at defined meiotic stages (particularly pachytene exit)

  • Consider size, intensity, and chromosomal association of foci

  • Statistical comparison using non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney)

How does the RING finger domain of ZHP-4 contribute to its function in crossover formation?

The RING finger domain of ZHP-4 appears critical for its full functionality:

  • Structural features:

    • C3HC4-type domain with eight conserved Zn-coordinating residues

    • Characteristic of SUMO E3 ligases

    • Shared structural feature with its paralog ZHP-3

  • Functional analysis through targeted mutation:

    • The zhp-4(H26A) mutant, affecting a conserved histidine in the RING domain, shows intermediate phenotypes

    • Forms 1-3 COSA-1 foci (compared to ~6 in wild-type and none in null mutants)

    • SYP-1 localization restricted normally to short arms of bivalents, similar to wild-type

These observations suggest the RING domain is necessary for crossover designation but may be dispensable for some aspects of crossover maturation, potentially indicating separable functions.

For studying RING domain function, researchers should consider:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of specific zinc-coordinating residues

  • Analysis of potential substrates for SUMO modification

  • In vitro SUMO ligase activity assays with recombinant proteins

  • Proteomic approaches to identify interaction partners

How do ZHP-4 and ZHP-3 functionally interact during meiosis?

ZHP-4 and ZHP-3 demonstrate strong reciprocal dependency:

  • Localization interdependence:

    • ZHP-3 localization is reduced to background levels in zhp-4 mutants

    • ZHP-4 localization is similarly abrogated in zhp-3 mutants

  • Co-localization patterns:

    • Both proteins initially localize to the SC from earliest pachytene

    • Both become restricted to 5-7 late pachytene foci marking crossover sites

    • Complete co-localization throughout meiotic prophase

  • Structural similarities:

    • Both contain RING finger domains characteristic of SUMO E3 ligases

    • 13% identity and 23% similarity at protein sequence level

These findings strongly suggest ZHP-4 and ZHP-3 function as a complex during meiosis, with neither protein able to localize or function independently of the other.

Methodologically, researchers investigating this interaction should:

  • Use co-immunoprecipitation to confirm physical interaction

  • Generate separation-of-function mutations that disrupt specific interaction interfaces

  • Employ quantitative imaging to assess co-localization patterns

  • Consider proteomic approaches to identify additional complex components

What methodological approaches can resolve the different functions of ZHP-4 in crossover designation versus maturation?

Based on the differential phenotypes observed in various zhp-4 mutants, a comprehensive experimental toolkit can be developed:

  • Targeted mutagenesis:

    • RING domain mutations (like H26A) can separate crossover designation from maturation

    • N-terminal vs. C-terminal truncations may identify domain-specific functions

    • Structure-guided mutations of potential protein interaction interfaces

  • Time-resolved analysis:

    • Temporally controlled protein depletion (e.g., auxin-inducible degron system)

    • Sequential immunostaining at defined stages of meiotic prophase

    • Live imaging of ZHP-4 dynamics in relation to other crossover proteins

  • Genetic interaction studies:

    • Double mutants with early recombination factors (MSH-5) versus late maturation factors

    • Suppressor screens to identify factors that can bypass ZHP-4 requirement

    • Analysis in chromosomal contexts that alter crossover distribution (e.g., fusion chromosomes)

  • Biochemical approaches:

    • Identification of SUMO targets during meiosis

    • In vitro reconstitution of ZHP-3/ZHP-4 complexes

    • Structural studies of protein domains and interaction interfaces

By combining these approaches, researchers can dissect the multiple distinct steps at which ZHP-4 functions during meiotic crossover formation.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.