APX2 Antibody, HRP conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship your order within 1-3 business days of receiving it. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery timelines.
Synonyms
APX1b antibody; APX2 antibody; APX2_ARATH antibody; AtAPx02 antibody; cytosolic antibody; L-ascorbate peroxidase 1b antibody; L-ascorbate peroxidase 2 antibody
Target Names
APX2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
APX2 Antibody, HRP conjugated plays a crucial role in the removal of hydrogen peroxide.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Deficiency in APX2 resulted in diminished tolerance to light stress but enhanced tolerance to salinity and oxidative stresses. PMID: 23183257
  2. The drought tolerant alx8 mutant provides evidence for shared pathways in drought and high light stress responses. PMID: 17080642
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G09640

STRING: 3702.AT3G09640.1

UniGene: At.129

Protein Families
Peroxidase family, Ascorbate peroxidase subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.
Tissue Specificity
Detected in bundle sheath cells, the photosynthetic cells that surround the phloem and xylem.

Q&A

What is APX2 and what role does it play in plant physiology?

APX2 (L-ascorbate peroxidase 2) is a cytosolic enzyme that plays a critical role in hydrogen peroxide removal in plants, particularly in Arabidopsis thaliana . This enzyme is part of the plant's antioxidant defense system, helping to mitigate oxidative stress by catalyzing the conversion of hydrogen peroxide to water using ascorbate as an electron donor. APX2 expression is typically induced under stress conditions such as high light intensity, drought, or heat, making it an important marker for studying plant stress responses. The protein is encoded by genes including At3g09640 and F11F8_23 in Arabidopsis thaliana . Understanding APX2 function is critical for research into plant stress physiology and the development of stress-resistant crop varieties.

What are the key differences between APX2 antibodies and other plant stress marker antibodies?

APX2 antibodies target a specific component of the plant antioxidant system that responds rapidly to oxidative stress, unlike other stress markers that may indicate different stress response pathways. While other stress marker antibodies (such as those targeting heat shock proteins or dehydrins) may indicate general stress conditions, APX2 antibodies specifically monitor hydrogen peroxide detoxification capacity . Based on Western blot analysis results, APX2 antibodies typically detect a protein band at approximately 29 kDa in Arabidopsis samples, slightly larger than the predicted size of 28 kDa . This specificity makes APX2 antibodies particularly valuable for studies focusing on redox homeostasis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling in plants. When designing multi-marker studies, researchers should consider that APX2 provides information specifically about the ascorbate-dependent antioxidant system rather than other stress response mechanisms.

How does HRP conjugation enhance antibody functionality in research applications?

HRP (horseradish peroxidase) conjugation provides a direct enzymatic reporter system that eliminates the need for secondary antibody incubation steps in immunoassays. The bioconjugation process involves using heterobifunctional cross-linkers such as Sulfo-SMCC to generate stable maleimide-activated HRP that reacts with sulfhydryl groups created in antibodies through SATA-mediated thiolation . This chemical linkage maintains antibody affinity while adding detection capability through the HRP enzyme. In practice, HRP-conjugated antibodies offer several advantages:

  • Simplified workflow with fewer incubation and washing steps

  • Reduced background noise due to elimination of secondary antibody cross-reactivity

  • Higher signal-to-noise ratio through optimized working dilutions (typically 1:3,000)

  • Compatible with multiple detection systems including colorimetric, chemiluminescent, and chemifluorescent substrates

These benefits make HRP-conjugated APX2 antibodies particularly valuable for high-throughput screening experiments and applications requiring enhanced sensitivity.

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining APX2-HRP antibody activity over time?

Proper storage is critical for maintaining the activity of APX2-HRP conjugated antibodies. Research indicates that these antibodies should be stored under the following conditions:

Storage DurationRecommended TemperatureAdditional Considerations
Short-term-20°CAvoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Long-term-80°CAliquot upon delivery to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Shipping4°CProcess immediately upon arrival

Most manufacturers provide these antibodies in a stabilized buffer solution containing 50% glycerol (v/v) and preservatives such as 0.03% Proclin 300 in a 0.01M PBS buffer at pH 7.4 . When stored properly, these antibodies typically maintain their activity for at least one year, though specific shelf-life information should be requested from the manufacturer. To further preserve antibody activity, researchers should:

  • Avoid contamination by using sterile technique when handling

  • Return antibodies to appropriate storage temperature immediately after use

  • Consider adding additional stabilizing proteins for diluted working solutions

  • Monitor antibody performance over time using consistent positive controls

What dilution and incubation parameters yield optimal results in Western blotting with APX2-HRP antibodies?

Optimizing dilution and incubation parameters is essential for successful Western blotting with APX2-HRP antibodies. Based on published protocols and manufacturer recommendations:

ParameterRecommended RangeOptimization Notes
Primary dilution1:1,000 to 1:3,000Start with 1:3,000 to minimize background
Blocking solution5% non-fat milk or BSABSA may be preferred for phospho-specific detection
Incubation time1-2 hours (room temp) or overnight (4°C)Longer incubation at lower temperature may improve sensitivity
Washing bufferTBST or PBST (0.05-0.1% Tween-20)Minimum 3 washes of 5 minutes each

Western blot analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana lysates has shown successful detection of APX2 protein when using the antibody at a concentration of 0.6μg/ml with protein loads ranging from 20-80μg per lane . The expected band size is approximately 28 kDa, though the observed size is often around 29 kDa. To further optimize results:

  • Include a gradient of protein concentrations (20-80μg) to determine optimal loading

  • Consider membrane type (PVDF typically provides better results than nitrocellulose for plant proteins)

  • Adjust exposure time based on signal intensity to prevent overexposure

  • For quantitative analysis, ensure that the signal falls within the linear range of detection

How can researchers validate the specificity of APX2-HRP antibodies in new experimental systems?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial, especially when working with new plant species or experimental conditions. A comprehensive validation approach should include:

  • Positive and negative controls: Include known APX2-expressing samples (e.g., stressed Arabidopsis) and negative controls (e.g., APX2 knockout lines or non-plant samples) .

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess synthetic APX2 peptide before application to show signal reduction with specific binding.

  • Multiple detection methods: Cross-validate results using different techniques (e.g., immunohistochemistry, ELISA, and Western blotting) .

  • Expression pattern analysis: Verify that detected signals correlate with known APX2 expression patterns (e.g., increased expression under oxidative stress conditions).

  • Molecular weight confirmation: Ensure detected bands correspond to the expected molecular weight (approximately 28-29 kDa for APX2) .

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: For the most rigorous validation, immunoprecipitate the target protein and confirm identity through mass spectrometry.

Remember that even antibodies showing reactivity in one plant species may require additional validation when used in different species due to potential variations in protein sequence and post-translational modifications .

How can APX2-HRP antibodies be utilized in multiplexed immunoassays to study coordinated stress responses?

Multiplexed immunoassays allow researchers to simultaneously detect multiple proteins, providing insights into coordinated stress responses. For effective multiplexing with APX2-HRP antibodies:

  • Spectral separation strategy: When combining with other HRP-conjugated antibodies, use sequential detection with different substrates that produce spectrally distinct signals:

    • 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for brown precipitate

    • 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) for red precipitate

    • 4-chloro-1-naphthol for blue-purple precipitate

  • Size-based multiplexing: Combine APX2-HRP antibodies with antibodies against other stress markers of different molecular weights (e.g., APX2 at ~29 kDa, heat shock proteins at 70-90 kDa) for simultaneous detection on the same blot.

  • Compartment-specific analysis: Use APX2-HRP antibodies in combination with antibodies targeting stress markers in different cellular compartments to assess compartment-specific stress responses:

Cellular CompartmentRecommended Stress Marker Combination
CytosolAPX2 (cytosolic, ~29 kDa)
Chloroplast2-Cys peroxiredoxin (~22 kDa)
MitochondriaAlternative oxidase (AOX, ~35 kDa)
ERBiP (~78 kDa)
  • Sequential immunodetection: After detection with APX2-HRP antibodies, strip and reprobe membranes with antibodies against other stress-related proteins to analyze correlation between different stress response pathways.

This approach allows researchers to comprehensively characterize plant stress responses across multiple pathways simultaneously, providing insights into signal integration and coordination during stress responses .

What methodological approaches can improve detection sensitivity when working with low-abundance APX2 protein samples?

When working with samples containing low levels of APX2 protein, several methodological approaches can enhance detection sensitivity:

  • Signal amplification systems:

    • Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates designed for ultrasensitive detection

    • Employ tyramide signal amplification (TSA) to increase sensitivity by up to 100-fold

    • Consider biotin-streptavidin systems as an alternative amplification strategy

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Enrich target proteins through immunoprecipitation before analysis

    • Use optimized extraction buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

    • Concentrate samples using protein precipitation methods (TCA/acetone, ammonium sulfate)

  • Detection system modifications:

    • Extend exposure times while maintaining low background

    • Use cooled CCD cameras for digital imaging to improve signal-to-noise ratio

    • Consider fluorescent secondary detection systems with appropriate substrate for APX2-HRP

  • Experimental design enhancements:

    • Increase protein loading (up to 80μg per lane has shown good results)

    • Reduce membrane pore size to prevent protein pass-through

    • Optimize transfer conditions (lower voltage for longer time)

    • Consider using gradient gels to improve protein separation

  • Combined analytical approach:

    • Use parallel detection methods (e.g., ELISA and Western blot)

    • Consider RT-qPCR for mRNA expression as a complementary approach

These strategies can be combined as needed depending on the specific challenges presented by your experimental system. Western blot analysis with protein loads ranging from 20-80μg has successfully detected APX2 with HRP-conjugated antibodies at concentrations of 0.6μg/ml .

How should researchers address non-specific binding and background issues when using APX2-HRP antibodies?

Non-specific binding and high background are common challenges when working with HRP-conjugated antibodies. To address these issues:

  • Optimize blocking conditions:

    • Test different blocking agents (BSA, casein, non-fat milk) at various concentrations (3-5%)

    • Extend blocking time to 2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C

    • Consider commercial blocking solutions specifically designed for plant samples

  • Adjust antibody dilution:

    • Increase dilution factors (start with 1:3,000 as recommended)

    • Prepare antibody in fresh blocking solution

    • Consider adding 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 to antibody diluent

  • Enhance washing protocols:

    • Increase wash buffer volume (use at least 10x membrane volume)

    • Extend washing times (5-10 minutes per wash)

    • Increase number of washes (minimum 4-5 washes)

    • Add up to 0.2% Tween-20 in wash buffer for stubborn background

  • Sample preparation improvements:

    • Include reducing agents (e.g., DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) in sample buffer

    • Pre-clear lysates by centrifugation at high speed

    • Consider using detergent-compatible protein assays for accurate quantification

  • Membrane handling:

    • Never allow membrane to dry during procedure

    • Use gentle agitation during all incubation steps

    • Handle membranes with clean forceps only at edges

The double affinity-purified nature of quality HRP conjugates helps eliminate nonspecific immunoglobulins and reduces false positives . Implementing these strategies should significantly reduce background issues while maintaining specific APX2 signal detection.

What are the common sources of data variability when using APX2-HRP antibodies, and how can researchers ensure experimental reproducibility?

Ensuring reproducibility when working with APX2-HRP antibodies requires addressing several sources of variability:

Variability SourceMitigation Strategy
Antibody qualityUse antibodies with high specificity (Rz ratio ≥0.25)
Sample preparationStandardize extraction protocols and protein quantification methods
Loading consistencyUse loading controls (e.g., actin, tubulin, or total protein stains)
Transfer efficiencyVerify with reversible stains (Ponceau S) before blocking
Detection conditionsStandardize substrate volume, incubation time, and imaging settings
Data analysisUse digital image analysis with defined threshold settings

To maximize reproducibility:

  • Implement standardized protocols:

    • Document all procedures in detail

    • Use consistent reagent sources and lot numbers when possible

    • Establish detailed SOPs for critical steps

  • Include appropriate controls:

    • Positive controls (known APX2-expressing samples)

    • Negative controls (APX2 knockout or non-expressing samples)

    • Technical replicates (minimum of 3)

    • Biological replicates (minimum of 3 independent experiments)

  • Validate quantification methods:

    • Establish standard curves with purified protein when possible

    • Verify linear dynamic range of detection

    • Use appropriate normalization strategies

  • Monitor antibody performance:

    • Test new antibody lots against reference samples

    • Track antibody performance over time with control samples

    • Consider preparing large batches of control samples for long-term studies

  • Data reporting standards:

    • Report all experimental conditions completely

    • Include raw data and analysis methods

    • Consider data repositories for sharing complete datasets

Implementing these practices helps ensure that results obtained with APX2-HRP antibodies are reproducible and reliable across experiments and between laboratories .

How can APX2-HRP antibodies contribute to studies on plant adaptation to climate change stressors?

APX2-HRP antibodies offer valuable tools for investigating plant responses to climate change-related stressors, particularly through:

  • High-throughput screening of germplasm collections for enhanced oxidative stress tolerance:

    • Identify genotypes with constitutively higher APX2 expression

    • Screen for varieties with more rapid APX2 induction under stress

    • Evaluate post-translational regulation under fluctuating environments

  • Multiple stress interaction studies:

    • Analyze APX2 expression patterns under combined stresses (e.g., heat+drought, UV+drought)

    • Compare APX2 response kinetics under individual versus combined stresses

    • Correlate APX2 levels with physiological stress tolerance metrics

  • Temporal dynamics analysis:

    • Monitor APX2 expression during stress acclimation and recovery

    • Study priming effects on APX2 expression during repeated stress exposure

    • Investigate transgenerational effects on APX2 expression

  • Spatial expression patterns:

    • Compare APX2 expression in different tissues and developmental stages

    • Study organ-specific responses to localized stresses

    • Examine APX2 expression gradient in response to environmental gradients

These approaches can significantly advance our understanding of plant adaptation mechanisms to climate change stressors. The high specificity of APX2-HRP antibodies for Arabidopsis thaliana makes them valuable tools for model system studies, while validation for other crop species would expand their utility in agricultural research .

What considerations are important when interpreting APX2 protein levels in relation to gene expression data?

Interpreting APX2 protein levels in relation to gene expression data requires understanding several important factors:

  • Temporal dynamics discrepancies:

    • APX2 mRNA often shows more rapid changes than protein levels

    • Protein levels may persist after mRNA levels decline

    • Consider collecting both mRNA and protein samples at multiple timepoints

  • Post-transcriptional regulation:

    • Evaluate potential microRNA-mediated regulation

    • Consider alternative splicing that may affect epitope availability

    • Investigate mRNA stability factors during stress

  • Post-translational modifications:

    • APX2 activity may be regulated by phosphorylation or other modifications

    • Modifications may affect antibody binding or protein stability

    • Consider activity assays alongside immunodetection

  • Protein turnover dynamics:

    • APX2 protein may have different half-life under stress conditions

    • Proteasome inhibitor studies can help understand degradation patterns

    • Consider pulse-chase experiments to measure turnover rates

  • Statistical analysis approaches:

    • Use time-series analysis methods for temporal data

    • Consider Pearson or Spearman correlations between mRNA and protein levels

    • Implement multivariate analysis to account for multiple factors

When designing experiments to compare gene expression and protein levels, researchers should include:

  • Multiple biological replicates (minimum 3-5)

  • Technical replicates for both qPCR and Western blot analyses

  • Appropriate normalization methods for both datasets

  • Statistical tests appropriate for the specific comparison

This comprehensive approach will provide more accurate insights into the relationship between APX2 gene expression and protein abundance under various experimental conditions .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.