APY4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Key Findings for Tci-APY-1

ParameterIgG Response (Serum)IgA Response (Abomasal Mucus)Correlation with Parasite Reduction
Antigen ReactivityStrong differentiation between control and vaccinated groups (PC1 axis)Moderate overlap between groupsWeak association (r < 0.24)
Contribution to Vaccine EfficacyHigh (QDA accuracy: 99.3%)Low (QDA accuracy: 80.65%)Limited predictive value
Trial VariabilitySignificant differences across trialsMinimal trial effectNot statistically significant

This antigen was part of a multivalent vaccine formulation but showed limited correlation with reductions in fecal egg counts (cFEC) or worm burden (Source ).

Potential Misinterpretation of Terminology

The term "APY4" may be conflated with:

  • AQP4 (Aquaporin-4): A water channel protein targeted by pathogenic antibodies in neuromyelitis optica (Sources ).

  • Anti-PF4 Antibodies: Stereotypic antibodies implicated in vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) (Source ).

Neither aligns with "APY4," which lacks established recognition in current antibody nomenclature.

Recommendations for Further Investigation

Given the absence of data on "APY4 Antibody," the following steps are advised:

  1. Verify Terminology: Confirm whether "APY4" refers to a novel target, a typographical error (e.g., AQP4, APY-1), or a proprietary compound not yet published.

  2. Expand Search Parameters: Explore patents, preprints, or proprietary databases for unpublished studies.

  3. Contextualize with Analogous Systems:

    • For parasitic nematode vaccines, review Tci-APY-1 mechanisms (Source ).

    • For autoimmune or therapeutic antibodies, consult literature on AQP4 (Sources ) or IgG4 (Source ).

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
APY4 antibody; At1g14230 antibody; F7A19.33Probable apyrase 4 antibody; AtAPY4 antibody; EC 3.6.1.5 antibody; ATP-diphosphatase antibody; ATP-diphosphohydrolase antibody; Adenosine diphosphatase antibody; ADPase antibody; NTPDase antibody; Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 4 antibody
Target Names
APY4
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
APY4 Antibody catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphoanhydride bonds in nucleoside tri- and di-phosphates.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G14230

STRING: 3702.AT1G14230.1

UniGene: At.26177

Protein Families
GDA1/CD39 NTPase family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass type II membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed both in the primary root and lateral root but not in the rosette leaves.

Q&A

What is AQP4 and what characterizes AQP4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica?

AQP4 (aquaporin-4) is a water channel protein predominantly expressed in astrocytes throughout the central nervous system. In neuromyelitis optica (NMO), autoantibodies (AQP4-IgG) target this protein, leading to complement-dependent cytotoxicity and inflammatory demyelination.

Methodological approach: When investigating AQP4 antibodies, researchers should recognize that AQP4 exists in different isoforms, most notably M1-AQP4 and M23-AQP4. The M23 isoform forms orthogonal arrays of particles (OAPs) that significantly enhance AQP4-IgG binding and complement activation . Initial characterization should include both isoforms to ensure comprehensive understanding of antibody-target interactions.

How do I optimize detection of AQP4 antibodies in research samples?

Detection optimization requires consideration of AQP4 antibody binding characteristics and experimental systems that preserve native protein configuration.

Methodological approach: Fluorescence ratio-imaging assays using cells expressing either M1-AQP4 or M23-AQP4 provide sensitive detection. When developing assays, researchers should:

  • Compare antibody binding to both M1 and M23 isoforms

  • Use native gel electrophoresis to confirm OAP assembly (for M23)

  • Consider confocal and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) to visualize binding patterns

  • Include positive controls from established NMO patient serum

Most monoclonal AQP4-IgGs tested show substantially greater affinity to M23-AQP4 compared to M1-AQP4, with binding affinities of the tightest-binding antibodies around 15 nM .

What experimental considerations are critical when studying AQP4 knockout models?

AQP4 knockout models provide valuable insights into AQP4 function beyond NMO pathogenesis, including roles in astrocyte migration, glial scar formation, and neuroinflammation.

Methodological approach: When designing experiments with AQP4 knockout models, researchers should:

  • Account for attenuated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) responses in these models following MOG peptide immunization

  • Consider altered cytokine profiles, particularly reduced TNF-α and IL-6 secretion from cultured knockout astrocytes

  • Include assays for cell migration, as AQP4-deficient astrocytes show increased migration compared to wild-type

  • Investigate lamellipodial extension as a mechanism for AQP4-mediated migration effects

How do orthogonal arrays of particles (OAPs) affect AQP4-IgG binding and complement activation?

OAPs formed by M23-AQP4 significantly enhance both antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity compared to the non-OAP-forming M1-AQP4 isoform.

Methodological approach: To investigate the role of OAPs in antibody-mediated pathogenicity, researchers should:

  • Compare complement-dependent cytotoxicity between cells expressing M1-AQP4 versus M23-AQP4

  • Analyze multivalent binding of C1q to clustered AQP4-IgG Fc regions on OAP-assembled AQP4

  • Use blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) to confirm higher-order assembly patterns

  • Employ TIRFM to visualize the punctate binding pattern characteristic of OAP recognition

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of M1-AQP4 and M23-AQP4 Characteristics

FeatureM1-AQP4M23-AQP4
OAP formationNoYes
Cellular fluorescence patternSmoothPunctate
Electrophoresis patternSingle (tetramer) bandMultiple higher-order bands
AQP4-IgG binding affinityLowerHigher (up to several-fold)
Complement activationMinimalRobust
Susceptibility to CDCResistantHighly susceptible

CDC = complement-dependent cytotoxicity

What strategies exist for developing therapeutics targeting AQP4-IgG pathogenicity?

Novel therapeutic approaches targeting AQP4-IgG pathogenicity focus on antibody binding inhibition and neutralization of pathogenic antibodies.

Methodological approach: When investigating potential therapeutic strategies, researchers should consider:

  • Developing "aquaporumab" monoclonal antibodies—engineered non-pathogenic antibodies that competitively bind AQP4 without activating complement

  • Screening small molecules that block AQP4-IgG binding to AQP4

  • Testing enzymatic approaches for AQP4-IgG inactivation

  • Evaluating both in vitro complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays and in vivo models for therapeutic efficacy

How do polyclonal versus monoclonal AQP4-IgG preparations affect experimental outcomes?

The heterogeneity of polyclonal preparations significantly impacts experimental reproducibility and interpretation.

Methodological approach: Researchers should be aware that:

  • AQP4-IgG in NMO patient serum is polyclonal, consisting of multiple monoclonal antibodies with varying binding characteristics

  • Monoclonal recombinant AQP4-IgGs derived from CSF plasma cells provide more consistent binding profiles

  • Wide variation exists in absolute and relative affinities for binding to M1 versus M23-AQP4, ranging from comparable binding to exclusive M23-AQP4 binding

  • For mechanistic studies, researchers should consider using well-characterized monoclonal antibodies to ensure reproducibility

What approaches best elucidate the relationship between AQP4 and neuroinflammatory pathways?

Investigating AQP4's role in neuroinflammation requires integrated approaches spanning molecular, cellular, and in vivo methodologies.

Methodological approach: Researchers should implement:

  • Comparative studies between wild-type and AQP4 knockout mice in EAE models

  • Cytokine profiling (especially TNF-α and IL-6) in wild-type versus knockout astrocyte cultures

  • Intracerebral lipopolysaccharide injection to evaluate differential neuroinflammatory responses

  • Analysis of glial scar formation in injury models

  • Migration assays comparing AQP4-expressing versus AQP4-deficient astrocytes

How should researcher standardize AQP4-IgG binding assays for cross-laboratory comparison?

Standardization is critical for comparing results across different research groups and platforms.

Methodological approach: To ensure standardization:

  • Establish reference standards using well-characterized recombinant monoclonal antibodies

  • Carefully control expression levels of M1 and M23-AQP4 in cell-based assays

  • Document OAP assembly using BN-PAGE and TIRFM

  • Report binding affinities rather than only relative binding

  • Include both isoforms in all binding studies to provide comparative data

What considerations are important when studying AQP4 antibodies in different species models?

Species-specific variations in AQP4 sequence and expression can impact antibody recognition and experimental outcomes.

Methodological approach: When conducting cross-species research:

  • Verify epitope conservation between human and model species AQP4

  • Validate antibody cross-reactivity with AQP4 from the species under study

  • Consider differences in AQP4 distribution and OAP formation between species

  • For in vivo studies, human AQP4-expressing transgenic animals may provide advantages for studying human NMO antibodies

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.