ARHGAP12 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to ARHGAP12 Antibody

ARHGAP12 antibodies are immunological reagents designed to specifically bind to and detect Rho GTPase activating protein 12 (ARHGAP12). These antibodies are extensively used in research settings to investigate the expression, localization, and function of ARHGAP12 in various cellular contexts. ARHGAP12 is a GTPase activator for Rho-type GTPases, converting them to an inactive GDP-bound state, thereby regulating multiple cellular processes including cytoskeletal organization, cell adhesion, and migration .

The target antigen, ARHGAP12, is a multidomain protein with significant biological importance. In humans, the canonical protein has a reported length of 846 amino acid residues and a molecular mass of approximately 96.3 kDa . The protein contains several functional domains including an N-terminal Src homology (SH3) domain, a tandem WW (tWW) domain, a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, and a C-terminal GAP domain . Up to four different isoforms have been identified, with ARHGAP12a and ARHGAP12b being the most well-characterized .

Types of ARHGAP12 Antibodies

ARHGAP12 antibodies are available in various formats, each designed for specific research applications and requirements. These antibodies differ in their production methods, host species, and targeting characteristics.

Polyclonal ARHGAP12 Antibodies

Polyclonal antibodies against ARHGAP12 are produced by immunizing animals with ARHGAP12 protein or peptide fragments. These antibodies recognize multiple epitopes on the ARHGAP12 protein, offering high sensitivity but potentially lower specificity compared to monoclonal alternatives.

Several commercial suppliers offer polyclonal ARHGAP12 antibodies:

  • Sigma-Aldrich provides affinity isolated antibodies in buffered aqueous glycerol solution

  • Abcam offers rabbit polyclonal antibodies suitable for Western blot applications

  • ThermoFisher Scientific supplies polyclonal antibodies that detect endogenous levels of total ARHGAP12

Monoclonal ARHGAP12 Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies against ARHGAP12 are derived from a single B cell clone, resulting in antibodies that target a specific epitope with high specificity. These antibodies provide consistent results and reduced background.

Examples include:

  • Mouse monoclonal antibodies targeting human ARHGAP12 (aa286-452) suitable for Western blot applications

  • Mouse monoclonal antibodies with human reactivity available from various suppliers

Classification Based on Host Species

ARHGAP12 antibodies are produced in various host species, with rabbit and mouse being the most common:

  • Rabbit-derived ARHGAP12 antibodies: These offer good sensitivity and are suitable for multiple applications. For example, Sigma-Aldrich's HPA000412 is a rabbit polyclonal antibody that has been extensively characterized for immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry applications .

  • Mouse-derived ARHGAP12 antibodies: These are typically monoclonal antibodies that provide high specificity for human ARHGAP12. LSBio offers a mouse monoclonal antibody (LS-C794816) targeting human ARHGAP12 .

Immunogen Information

ARHGAP12 antibodies are generated using various immunogens. For example, the Sigma-Aldrich HPA000412 antibody was produced using the immunogen sequence: "RGTQERTWKPPRWTRDASISKGDFQNPGDQELLSSEENYYSTSYSQSDSQCGSPPRGWSEELDERGHTLYTSDYTNEKWLKHVDDQGRQYYYSADGSRSEWELPKYNASSQQQREIIKSRSLDRRLQEPIVLTKWRHSTIVLDTNDKESPTASKPCFPENESSPSSP" .

Abcam's ab241475 antibody was developed using a synthetic peptide corresponding to a region within amino acids 100-150 of human ARHGAP12 .

Species Reactivity

ARHGAP12 antibodies vary in their species reactivity, with many products demonstrating cross-reactivity with multiple species due to conserved epitopes. Common reactivity profiles include:

AntibodySupplierSpecies Reactivity
HPA000412Sigma-AldrichHuman, mouse, rat
ab241475AbcamHuman, mouse
PA5-104101ThermoFisherHuman, mouse, rat
ABIN6264732Antibodies-onlineHuman, mouse, rat

This cross-reactivity is supported by the conservation of ARHGAP12 across species, with orthologs reported in mouse, rat, bovine, frog, zebrafish, chimpanzee, and chicken .

Recommended Applications

ARHGAP12 antibodies have been validated for various research applications. The table below summarizes the primary applications for selected antibodies:

ApplicationAntibodiesWorking Dilution/Concentration
Western Blot (WB)HPA000412, ab241475, PA5-1041010.04-0.4 μg/mL (HPA000412), 0.1 μg/mL (ab241475)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)HPA0004121:200-1:500
Immunocytochemistry (ICC)ABIN6264732Varies by product
Immunofluorescence (IF)ABIN6264732Varies by product
ELISAABIN6264732, ABIN7185907Varies by product

Validation Methods

Commercial ARHGAP12 antibodies undergo various validation methods to ensure specificity and performance:

  • Enhanced validation: Some antibodies, like Sigma-Aldrich's HPA000412, are validated through orthogonal RNA sequencing approaches .

  • Western blot validation: Many suppliers validate their antibodies by demonstrating specific band detection at the expected molecular weight (~96 kDa) in various cell lines. For example, Abcam's ab241475 was validated in HeLa, HEK-293T, Jurkat, TCMK-1, and NIH/3T3 cell lysates .

  • Immunohistochemistry validation: ARHGAP12 antibodies for IHC applications are typically validated on tissue sections to verify specific staining patterns.

Role in Efferocytosis Studies

ARHGAP12 antibodies have been instrumental in elucidating the dual roles of ARHGAP12 in Stabilin-2 mediated efferocytosis. Research has shown that ARHGAP12 binds to GULP/Stabilin-2 and regulates Rac1 activity during phagocytosis . Specifically, ARHGAP12:

  • Switches off Rac1 basal activity

  • Spatiotemporally regulates Rac1 to orchestrate phagosome maturation

  • Influences the clearance of apoptotic cells

These findings highlight the importance of ARHGAP12 antibodies in visualizing protein localization and interactions during efferocytosis.

Investigation of NK Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity

Research utilizing ARHGAP12 antibodies has revealed that ARHGAP12 plays a crucial role in natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Knockdown of ARHGAP12 in NK cells resulted in diminished cytotoxicity, suggesting its importance in this immune process .

Proteomics studies using ARHGAP12 antibodies have identified that ARHGAP12 interacts with multiple regulators of F-actin dynamics, including:

  • WAVE2

  • WASP

  • Evl

  • VASP

Additionally, ARHGAP12 was found to be tyrosine phosphorylated following stimulation through the NKG2D+2B4 activating receptors, indicating its linkage to important signaling pathways in NK cells .

Cancer Research and ARHGAP12 Expression

ARHGAP12 antibodies have been crucial in uncovering the clinical significance of ARHGAP12 in cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A comprehensive study combining single-cell RNA sequencing, bulk RNA data, immunohistochemistry, and proteomics revealed that ARHGAP12 is highly expressed in HCC tissues .

The research demonstrated:

  • ARHGAP12 mRNA and protein are upregulated in HCC

  • Higher expression is associated with worse prognosis

  • ARHGAP12 may trigger tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance through its regulatory role in focal adhesion (FA)

The table below summarizes the findings on ARHGAP12 expression in relation to clinical pathological features:

Clinicopathological FeatureRelationship with ARHGAP12 Expressionp-value
GenderHigher in females0.0352
Vascular invasionHigher in advanced stages (M2 vs M0)0.0075
T stagingHigher in stage T2 vs T10.0072
N stagingHigher in stage N1 vs N00.0315

Immunohistochemistry using ARHGAP12 antibodies showed intense staining in HCC tissues, confirming protein upregulation .

Studies on Epithelial Tight Junctions

Recent research has employed ARHGAP12 antibodies to investigate the role of ARHGAP12 in epithelial tight junctions (TJ). These studies revealed that ARHGAP12 suppresses F-actin assembly to control epithelial tight junction leak pathway permeability .

Key findings include:

  • ARHGAP12 is recruited to tight junctions via an interaction between its SH3 domain and the TJ protein ZO-2

  • The tandem WW domain of ARHGAP12 interacts directly with N-WASP to suppress actin polymerization

  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated inactivation of ARHGAP12 in MDCK-II cells delays TJ formation and increases junctional tension

This research has significant implications for understanding epithelial barrier function and regulation of macromolecular transport across tight junctions .

G-actin Regulation Studies

ARHGAP12 antibodies have been used to study the relationship between ARHGAP12 and G-actin. Research has shown that ARHGAP12 belongs to the RPEL family of RhoGAPs and links Rac/Cdc42 GTP loading to G-actin availability .

Studies using co-immunoprecipitation with ARHGAP12 antibodies have demonstrated that:

  • Actin is readily detectable in ARHGAP12 immunoprecipitates

  • Actin recovery decreases following serum stimulation

  • G-actin inhibits ARHGAP12 GAP activity

  • ARHGAP12 suppresses basal Rac and Cdc42 activity, F-actin assembly, and invadopodia formation

These findings highlight the role of ARHGAP12 in coordinating cytoskeletal processes with actin dynamics .

Major Suppliers of ARHGAP12 Antibodies

ARHGAP12 antibodies are available from numerous commercial suppliers, each offering products with various specifications:

SupplierProduct ExamplesFormatApplications
Sigma-AldrichHPA000412Rabbit polyclonal, affinity isolatedWB, IHC
Abcamab241475Rabbit polyclonalWB
ThermoFisherPA5-104101Rabbit polyclonalWB
Bethyl LaboratoriesVariousRabbit polyclonal, affinity purifiedWB
MyBioSourceVariousVarious formatsWB, ELISA
Antibodies-onlineMultiple productsVarious formatsWB, ELISA, ICC, IF
LSBioLS-C794816Mouse monoclonalWB
Creative BiolabsCBMOAB-36139FYAMouse monoclonalWB, ELISA

This diverse selection allows researchers to choose antibodies based on specific experimental needs.

Guidelines for Antibody Selection

When selecting ARHGAP12 antibodies for research, consider the following factors:

  1. Target application: Select antibodies validated for your specific application (WB, IHC, ELISA, etc.)

  2. Species reactivity: Ensure the antibody recognizes ARHGAP12 from your species of interest

  3. Format: Choose between polyclonal (higher sensitivity) and monoclonal (higher specificity) based on research needs

  4. Validation data: Review available validation data including Western blot images, IHC staining patterns, and specificity tests

  5. Epitope information: Consider the epitope location when studying specific domains or isoforms of ARHGAP12

Potential as Biomarkers

Recent research on ARHGAP12 expression in HCC suggests potential applications of ARHGAP12 antibodies in cancer diagnostics and prognostics. The correlation between high ARHGAP12 expression and poor prognosis indicates its value as a prognostic biomarker .

Additionally, the link between ARHGAP12 and TKI resistance suggests that ARHGAP12 detection could aid in predicting treatment response, particularly for targeted therapies in cancer patients.

Therapeutic Implications

The identification of ARHGAP12's role in multiple cellular processes, including tight junction regulation, NK cell cytotoxicity, and cancer progression, highlights potential therapeutic applications. ARHGAP12 antibodies could serve as valuable tools in:

  • Developing targeted therapies against ARHGAP12

  • Monitoring treatment response

  • Understanding resistance mechanisms to existing therapies

Technological Advancements

Ongoing improvements in antibody technology may enhance the utility of ARHGAP12 antibodies:

  • Development of recombinant antibodies with improved specificity

  • Creation of antibodies targeting specific phosphorylated states of ARHGAP12

  • Generation of isoform-specific antibodies to distinguish between ARHGAP12 variants

Product Specs

Buffer
The antibody is provided as a liquid solution in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 50% glycerol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.02% sodium azide.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we are able to dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery timeframes.
Synonyms
Arhgap12 antibody; FLJ10971 antibody; FLJ20737 antibody; FLJ21785 antibody; RHG12_HUMAN antibody; Rho GTPase activating protein 12 antibody; Rho GTPase-activating protein 12 antibody; Rho type GTPase activating protein 12 antibody; Rho-type GTPase-activating protein 12 antibody
Target Names
ARHGAP12
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
ARHGAP12 Antibody is a GTPase activator for Rho-type GTPases. It functions by converting these GTPases into their inactive, GDP-bound state.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Molecular cloning and characterization of ARHGAP12. PMID: 11854031
  2. Met-driven invasive growth involves transcriptional regulation of Arhgap12. PMID: 18504429
  3. ARHGAP12 inactivates RAC1, thereby impairing cell motility, invasion and adhesion to the extracellular matrix. Hepatocyte Growth Factor transcriptionally suppresses the gene in vitro. PMID: 18504429
Database Links

HGNC: 16348

OMIM: 610577

KEGG: hsa:94134

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000345808

UniGene: Hs.499264

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

How do I validate the specificity of an ARHGAP12 antibody for Western blot in epithelial cell models?

Validation requires a multi-step approach:

  • Knockout (KO) controls: Use CRISPR-edited ARHGAP12-deficient cell lines (e.g., MDCK-II or HeLa) to confirm loss of signal .

  • Isoform specificity: Test against recombinant ARHGAP12a (130 kDa) and ARHGAP12b (96 kDa) isoforms, as commercial antibodies may target different regions (e.g., ab241475 detects aa 100–150) .

  • Cross-reactivity checks: Include lysates from non-target species (e.g., mouse TCMK-1 or rat NIH/3T3) to rule off-target binding .

Example validation data from recent studies:

Cell LineARHGAP12 StatusObserved Band (kDa)Antibody (Catalog)
MDCK-II WTEndogenous130, 96ab241475
MDCK-II KOCRISPR-editedNo bandab241475
HEK-293TOverexpressed96PA551384

What experimental conditions optimize ARHGAP12 detection in immunohistochemistry (IHC)?

Key parameters from HCC and TJ studies include:

  • Antigen retrieval: Boiling in EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) for 20 min .

  • Antibody dilution: 1:1000 for polyclonal PA551384 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues .

  • Signal validation: Compare staining patterns in ARHGAP12-high (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma) vs. normal tissues .

How do I resolve inconsistent ARHGAP12 localization data between immunofluorescence (IF) and Western blot?

Common pitfalls and solutions:

  • Epitope masking: Pre-treat cells with 0.2% Triton X-100 for IF to expose SH3/WW domains .

  • Fixation artifacts: Compare methanol (-20°C, 10 min) vs. paraformaldehyde (4%, 15 min) fixation .

  • Junctional vs. cytoplasmic pools: Use subcellular fractionation before WB to distinguish membrane-associated ARHGAP12 .

Advanced Research Questions

How can I reconcile contradictory findings about ARHGAP12’s role in cancer progression?

Context-dependent roles require:

  • Pathway-specific analysis: In HCC, ARHGAP12 promotes TKI resistance via focal adhesion (FA) signaling , while in glioma, it suppresses invasion by stabilizing N-cadherin .

  • Functional assays: Combine siRNA knockdown with collagen-based 3D invasion assays to model tissue-specific effects .

  • Post-translational modification (PTM) profiling: Phosphorylation at Tyr-377 (Src kinase site) inversely correlates with metastatic potential .

What methods improve co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) efficiency for ARHGAP12 interactome studies?

Optimized protocols from TJ and cancer studies:

  • Lysis buffer: Use 1% NP-40 + 0.5% deoxycholate to solubilize junctional complexes .

  • Protease/phosphatase inhibitors: Include 10 mM NaF and 1 μM microcystin-LR to preserve SH3 domain interactions .

  • Crosslinkers: Apply DSS (2 mM, 30 min) to stabilize transient interactions with ZO-2 or N-WASP .

How do I address cross-reactivity of ARHGAP12 antibodies in cross-species studies?

Strategies from murine and primate models:

  • Epitope mapping: Antibodies against human aa 2–185 (Abbexa) show 89% homology with macaques but ≤40% with rodents .

  • Recombinant validation: Express species-specific ARHGAP12 fragments in E. coli (e.g., mouse aa 50–200 vs. human) .

  • Negative controls: Use tissues from Arhgap12−/− mice (available via KOMP Repository) to confirm specificity .

What functional assays are critical for linking ARHGAP12 antibody data to TJ regulation?

Integrate antibody-based detection with:

  • Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER): ARHGAP12 KO increases TEER by 40% in MDCK-II monolayers .

  • Paracellular flux assays: Measure 4 kDa dextran permeability (KO reduces flux by 60% vs. WT) .

  • Laser ablation: Quantify junctional tension (KO increases recoil velocity by 2.3-fold) .

Methodological Challenges & Solutions

How should I validate ARHGAP12 antibodies for multiplexed imaging with other TJ markers?

Approaches from super-resolution studies:

  • Spectral validation: Use DNA-PAINT to confirm ≤40 nm colocalization with ZO-1 .

  • Sequential staining: Label ARHGAP12 first (Cy3), then ZO-2 (AF488) to prevent steric hindrance .

  • Quantitative correlation: Calculate Pearson’s coefficient (r ≥0.7 in WT vs. r ≤0.3 in ZO-2 KO) .

What statistical methods resolve ARHGAP12 expression heterogeneity in scRNA-seq data?

From HCC single-cell analyses :

  • CNV inference: Use inferCNV to distinguish malignant (CNV-high) vs. stromal cells.

  • Pseudotime analysis: Monocle3 trajectories show ARHGAP12↑ correlates with FA pathway activation (P <0.001).

  • CellChat: Identify MDK-ITGA6/ITGB1 as top ligand-receptor pairs in ARHGAP12-high clusters .

How can CRISPR/Cas9 models improve interpretation of ARHGAP12 antibody data?

Case examples:

  • Rescue experiments: Re-express HA-tagged ARHGAP12 in KO cells to confirm antibody specificity .

  • Domain truncation: Express ΔSH3 mutants to test junctional localization requirements .

  • Phenotypic correlation: Link WB band intensity (e.g., 96 kDa isoform) to invasion capacity in Boyden chambers .

Data Interpretation Framework

For contradictory findings (e.g., pro- vs. anti-metastatic roles):

FactorPro-Invasive Context Anti-Invasive Context
Cellular ModelGastric cancer (BMX fusion)Hepatocellular carcinoma
Key PathwayJAK/STAT3 → EMTZO-2/N-WASP → TJ leakiness
Antibody TargetC-terminal GAP domain (aa 300–400)N-terminal SH3 domain (aa 1–100)
Functional Readout3D invasion ↑ 220%Dextran flux ↓ 60%

Solution: Contextualize antibody data using orthogonal methods (e.g., RNAscope for spatial expression patterns in FFPE tissues).

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.