ASNA1 antibody is a monoclonal or polyclonal immunoglobulin designed to specifically bind to the human ASNA1 protein (UniProt: O43681), an evolutionarily conserved ATPase involved in tail-anchored protein targeting, insulin secretion, and cisplatin sensitivity . This antibody is widely used to investigate ASNA1’s biochemical roles and its implications in diseases such as type 2 diabetes, schizophrenia, and drug-resistant cancers .
Detects ASNA1 at ~40 kDa in lysates from HeLa, 293T, and MCF7 cells .
Used to validate ASNA1 overexpression in drug-resistant Eimeria tenella strains .
Localizes ASNA1 in HeLa cells, showing cytoplasmic distribution .
Identified ASNA1’s presence in E. tenella sporozoites, excluding refractile bodies .
Quantifies ASNA1 expression in live cells (e.g., HeLa), with signal differentiation from isotype controls .
Demonstrated ASNA1’s role in ricin resistance by disrupting TA protein delivery in HEK293T cells .
Linked ASNA1 mutations (e.g., A149V) to Retro-2 compound resistance in CRISPR-edited K562 cells .
Eimeria tenella: ASNA1 expression correlates with resistance to diclazuril, maduramicin, and salinomycin. Western blotting revealed 2–3× higher ASNA1 levels in resistant strains compared to drug-sensitive ones .
Cancer: ASNA1 knockdown sensitizes tumors to cisplatin but impairs insulin secretion. Antibody-based studies identified asna-1(A63V) mutants in C. elegans as cisplatin-sensitive without metabolic side effects .
ASNA1 antibody confirmed that Retro-2 inhibits ASNA1’s ATPase activity, blocking tail-anchored protein insertion into the ER .
In C. elegans, ASNA1’s redox-sensitive roles (TAP targeting vs. chaperone function) were dissected using mutants validated by antibody staining .
ASNA1 levels, detected via ELISA, correlate with dengue severity, tuberculosis activity, and Down’s syndrome .
Specificity: Verified by knockout cell lines (e.g., ASNA1-KO HEK293T) showing no signal in Western blots .
Reproducibility: Consistent performance across ICC/IF, WB, and FACS in multiple cell lines .
Cross-reactivity: No observed cross-reactivity with unrelated ATPases in human or parasite lysates .
ASNA1 is the human homolog of the bacterial arsA gene, which encodes an arsenite-stimulated ATPase component of the arsenite transporter responsible for resistance to arsenicals. In human cells, ASNA1 (also known as TRC40) functions as a central component of a transmembrane domain recognition complex involved in post-translational delivery of tail-anchored (TA) proteins from the cytosol to the endoplasmic reticulum . The protein has garnered significant research interest due to its highly conserved nature across species and its involvement in multiple cellular processes. ASNA1 has been implicated in cisplatin resistance mechanisms in cancer cells, making it a potential target for sensitizing tumors to platinum-based chemotherapy . Additionally, ASNA1 plays important roles in insulin signaling and promotes insertion of tail-anchored proteins into membranes, further expanding its biological significance . The gene knockout in mice causes embryonic lethality, underscoring its essential function in development .
Selection of the appropriate ASNA1 antibody should be guided by the specific experimental application, target species, and epitope requirements. When choosing between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, researchers should consider that polyclonal antibodies like ABIN7254112 offer broader epitope recognition, while monoclonal antibodies provide better specificity for particular epitopes . For species reactivity, it's crucial to verify cross-reactivity with your experimental model - some ASNA1 antibodies react only with human samples, while others recognize ASNA1 from multiple species including mouse, rat, and even zebrafish . Application compatibility must be confirmed, as certain antibodies are validated specifically for techniques like Western blotting (using dilutions of 1:500-1:1000 for polyclonal and 1:5000-1:50000 for monoclonal antibodies), while others are optimized for immunohistochemistry (using dilutions of 1:20-1:200 for polyclonal and 1:50-1:500 for monoclonal antibodies) . Researchers should also consider the specific region of ASNA1 targeted - some antibodies recognize only specific amino acid sequences (e.g., AA 239-348 or AA 1-348), which may affect detection depending on protein modifications or truncations present in your experimental system .
Validating ASNA1 antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches to ensure reliable research outcomes. First, researchers should perform Western blot analysis to confirm that the antibody detects a protein of the expected molecular weight (approximately 37-41 kDa for ASNA1) . Inclusion of positive controls such as human brain tissue, HeLa cells, or mouse brain tissue, which have been confirmed to express ASNA1, is essential for verification . Negative controls should include samples where ASNA1 has been knocked down or knocked out using RNAi or CRISPR techniques to confirm signal specificity . Cross-validation with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of ASNA1 can provide additional confidence in specificity . Peptide competition assays, where the antibody is pre-incubated with the immunizing peptide before application to samples, can help identify non-specific binding. For advanced validation, mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated proteins can definitively confirm antibody target identity. These strategies collectively ensure that experimental results truly reflect ASNA1 biology rather than artifacts from non-specific antibody binding.
For optimal Western blotting with ASNA1 antibodies, researchers should follow this methodological approach based on validated protocols. Sample preparation should begin with cell or tissue lysis in a buffer containing protease inhibitors, followed by protein quantification to ensure equal loading across wells . For ASNA1 detection, load 20-30 μg of total protein per lane on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels, as ASNA1 has a molecular weight of approximately 37-41 kDa . After electrophoresis, transfer proteins to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes using standard wet transfer protocols at 100V for 60-90 minutes. Block membranes with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature. For primary antibody incubation, use polyclonal antibodies at dilutions of 1:500-1:1000 or monoclonal antibodies at 1:5000-1:50000 in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C . After washing with TBST (3 × 10 minutes), incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:5000-1:10000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence substrate and expose to film or capture images using a digital imaging system. For verification, the expected ASNA1 band should appear at approximately 37-41 kDa, with potential variation depending on post-translational modifications or splice variants .
Effective immunohistochemistry (IHC) with ASNA1 antibodies requires careful tissue preparation and optimized staining protocols. Begin with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 4-6 μm thickness mounted on positively charged slides . After deparaffinization and rehydration through graded alcohols, perform antigen retrieval using either TE buffer (pH 9.0) or citrate buffer (pH 6.0), with heat treatment in a pressure cooker or microwave . This step is critical as formalin fixation can mask epitopes recognized by ASNA1 antibodies. Block endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes, followed by protein blocking with 5-10% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody. For primary antibody incubation, dilute polyclonal ASNA1 antibodies at 1:20-1:200 or monoclonal antibodies at 1:50-1:500, and incubate overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber . After washing, apply appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody, followed by streptavidin-HRP complex. Develop with DAB substrate and counterstain with hematoxylin. For validation, include human lung cancer tissue as a positive control, as it has been confirmed to express ASNA1 . Negative controls should include sections processed without primary antibody and, ideally, tissues from ASNA1 knockout models if available.
For immunofluorescence (IF) detection of ASNA1, researchers should employ the following optimized protocol based on validated applications. Begin with cells grown on glass coverslips or tissue sections prepared at 5-8 μm thickness . Fix samples with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15-20 minutes at room temperature, followed by permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes. This allows antibody access to intracellular ASNA1 protein while preserving cellular architecture. Block non-specific binding with 5% normal serum (derived from the same species as the secondary antibody) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 hour at room temperature. For primary antibody incubation, dilute ASNA1 antibodies at 1:200-1:800 in blocking buffer and incubate overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber . After washing with PBS (3 × 5 minutes), apply fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:500-1:1000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark. Counterstain nuclei with DAPI (1:1000) for 5 minutes, wash, and mount slides using anti-fade mounting medium. Based on published data, HEK-293 cells and HepG2 cells serve as excellent positive controls for ASNA1 detection . For co-localization studies, consider using markers for the endoplasmic reticulum, as ASNA1/TRC40 is involved in tail-anchored protein insertion into the ER membrane.
ASNA1 has been identified as a key modulator of cisplatin sensitivity in cancer cells through several mechanistic pathways. Studies using C. elegans as a model organism have demonstrated that null mutation in the asna-1 gene makes worms hypersensitive to cisplatin, establishing a direct link between ASNA1 function and platinum drug resistance . This relationship appears to be highly conserved, as similar effects have been observed in human cancer cell lines where downregulation of ASNA1 increases sensitivity to cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin . Importantly, cisplatin-resistant tumor cells generated through serial exposure to cisplatin have been found to overexpress ASNA1, suggesting its upregulation as an adaptive response that contributes to acquired resistance . Mechanistically, ASNA1's role in cisplatin resistance is distinct from its functions in insulin signaling and protein trafficking, as evidenced by the ability to genetically separate these phenotypes in C. elegans mutants . The protein's ATPase activity appears to be critical for cisplatin resistance, and experimental data show that ASNA1-mediated cisplatin resistance operates independently of the p53/CEP-1 pathway and apoptosis mechanisms . These findings collectively position ASNA1 as a potential therapeutic target for overcoming cisplatin resistance in cancer treatment.
Researchers employ multiple experimental approaches to investigate ASNA1's role in drug resistance, particularly in the context of platinum-based chemotherapeutics. In vitro models begin with establishing cisplatin-resistant cell lines through serial exposure to increasing concentrations of cisplatin, followed by comparing ASNA1 expression levels between resistant and parent cell lines using Western blotting . RNA interference techniques using siRNA or shRNA against ASNA1 allow researchers to assess how its downregulation affects cisplatin sensitivity in various cancer cell types, measured through cell viability assays (MTT/MTS), clonogenic survival assays, and apoptosis detection methods . For in vivo studies, the nematode C. elegans has emerged as a valuable model organism due to its genetic tractability and the conservation of ASNA1 function across species . Researchers can generate ASNA1 mutants in C. elegans (such as asna-1(sv42) and asna-1(ok938)) and measure their sensitivity to cisplatin and other metalloids by determining LC50 values . The table below summarizes experimentally determined LC50 values for various metal salts in wild-type versus asna-1(rnai) C. elegans:
| Metal salt | Wild type LC50 (mg/mL) | asna-1(rnai) LC50 (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin | 0.38 | 0.20 |
| Sodium arsenite | 0.31 | 0.067 |
| Antimony potassium tartrate | 38.9 | 10.7 |
| Zinc chloride | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Cadmium chloride | 0.057 | 0.052 |
These data demonstrate that ASNA1 deficiency specifically increases sensitivity to cisplatin, arsenite, and antimony, but not to zinc or cadmium, suggesting a substrate-specific resistance mechanism .
When encountering challenges with ASNA1 antibody experiments, researchers should implement systematic troubleshooting approaches tailored to specific issues. For high background signals in immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence, optimize blocking conditions by extending blocking time to 2 hours or increasing blocking reagent concentration to 10% . Additionally, increase the number and duration of washing steps, and reduce primary antibody concentration (try serial dilutions starting from recommended concentrations) . If no signal is detected in Western blotting, verify ASNA1 expression in your sample using known positive controls such as human brain tissue, HeLa cells, or mouse brain tissue . Ensure proper antigen retrieval for fixed tissues - ASNA1 antibodies often require TE buffer (pH 9.0) for optimal epitope exposure . For multiple bands or unexpected molecular weight in Western blots, consider that post-translational modifications might affect migration patterns, or verify antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls . Cross-reactivity issues can be addressed by using monoclonal antibodies with higher specificity or by pre-absorbing polyclonal antibodies with related proteins. For degradation problems, ensure samples contain fresh protease inhibitors and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Finally, if antibody performance decreases over time, aliquot antibodies upon receipt to prevent degradation from repeated freeze-thaw cycles and store according to manufacturer recommendations (-20°C with 50% glycerol for most ASNA1 antibodies) .
Quantitative analysis of ASNA1 expression requires meticulous attention to experimental design and analytical methods to ensure accurate results. For Western blot quantification, researchers should use housekeeping proteins with stable expression across experimental conditions (β-actin, GAPDH, or β-tubulin) as loading controls, and employ advanced image analysis software like ImageJ for densitometry . Standard curves using recombinant ASNA1 protein can provide absolute quantification when needed. For qRT-PCR analysis of ASNA1 mRNA expression, carefully designed primers are essential - validated primers for human ASNA1 include 5′-GGCGTCGGCAAGACAACCAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-GTGGACAGCAGCAGCACTGATTC-3′ (antisense) . Each qPCR reaction should be performed in triplicate, with experiments repeated at least three times, and data analyzed using the 2^-ΔΔCt method with appropriate reference genes . For immunohistochemical quantification, consider using digital pathology approaches with algorithms that can distinguish between specific ASNA1 staining and background. Tissue microarrays can facilitate high-throughput analysis across multiple samples while controlling for staining variability. Flow cytometry provides another quantitative approach for cellular ASNA1 expression, allowing analysis at the single-cell level. Regardless of the method, researchers should include appropriate positive and negative controls, and whenever possible, validate findings using complementary techniques (e.g., validating Western blot results with immunofluorescence or mass spectrometry).
Designing effective ASNA1 knockout/knockdown experiments requires careful consideration of several factors to ensure interpretable results while addressing potential confounding issues. When using RNAi approaches, researchers should design multiple siRNA sequences targeting different regions of ASNA1 mRNA to minimize off-target effects . For transient knockdown, siRNA concentrations between 10-50 nM are typically effective, while stable knockdown may require shRNA expressed from lentiviral vectors. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing provides a more complete knockout approach, but researchers should be aware that complete ASNA1 knockout may be lethal in some cell types, as ASNA1 knockout in mice causes embryonic lethality . For CRISPR design, multiple guide RNAs targeting early exons should be tested, and single-cell cloning followed by sequence verification is essential to confirm knockout status. When interpreting results, researchers must account for the dual functions of ASNA1 in both cisplatin resistance and insulin signaling/protein trafficking . Time-dependent inducible systems like Tet-On/Off can help distinguish between acute versus chronic effects of ASNA1 depletion. For comprehensive phenotypic analysis, combine viability assays with more specific readouts like cisplatin sensitivity, apoptosis markers, and TA protein localization. Rescue experiments using wild-type ASNA1 or specific mutants (such as those with altered ATPase activity) can provide valuable information about structure-function relationships . For model organism studies, C. elegans provides an excellent system where human ASNA1 can functionally substitute for the worm homolog, allowing for evolutionary conservation studies .
Several emerging research directions promise to expand our understanding of ASNA1 biology and its therapeutic applications. Single-cell analysis of ASNA1 expression in heterogeneous tumor populations may reveal how varying levels correlate with treatment response, potentially identifying ASNA1-high subpopulations that contribute disproportionately to chemoresistance . Development of phospho-specific ASNA1 antibodies could illuminate how post-translational modifications regulate its function, as suggested by emerging evidence that ASNA1 activity may be controlled through phosphorylation events. Super-resolution microscopy approaches using validated ASNA1 antibodies could provide unprecedented insights into its subcellular localization and dynamic interactions with binding partners during stress responses like chemotherapy treatment. In the clinical realm, research exploring ASNA1 as a biomarker for predicting platinum therapy response in patients with various cancer types holds significant translational potential . Investigations into the potential role of ASNA1 in non-cancer diseases, particularly those involving endoplasmic reticulum stress or protein trafficking defects, represent an understudied area with therapeutic implications. Development of conformation-specific antibodies that distinguish between different functional states of ASNA1 (ATP-bound versus ADP-bound) could enable more precise studies of its activation dynamics in various cellular contexts. Finally, exploring combination therapies that target both ASNA1 and other resistance mechanisms could yield synergistic approaches to overcome the multi-factorial nature of chemoresistance in aggressive cancers.