SPF1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

SPF1 Protein Overview

SPF1 is an ER-localized P5A-ATPase implicated in:

  • Manganese transport: Regulating luminal Mn²⁺ levels critical for metalloenzyme activity .

  • Transmembrane protein quality control: Dislocating mislocalized mitochondrial outer membrane proteins from the ER .

  • SUMO protease activity: In plants (Arabidopsis), SPF1 and SPF2 deSUMOylate transcription factors like WRKY33 to modulate immune responses .

Antibody-Based Detection of SPF1

Studies employ epitope tags (e.g., HA, GFP, GST) fused to SPF1 for detection. Key antibodies and their applications include:

Antibody TargetApplicationStudy FindingsSource
Anti-HAWestern blot, activity-based profilingConfirmed SPF1/SPF2 SUMO protease activity using HA-tagged SUMO-VME probes .
Anti-GFPImmunoprecipitation, phosphorylation assaysTracked WRKY33-GFP SUMOylation dynamics in Arabidopsis under pathogen stress .
Anti-GSTIn vitro SUMOylation assaysPurified GST-tagged SPF1 catalytic domains for enzymatic activity validation .
Anti-HisRecombinant protein purificationAssessed ATP13A1 (human SPF1 homolog) Mn²⁺-related functions .

ER Stress and Manganese Homeostasis

  • ∆spf1 yeast mutants showed reduced ER luminal Mn²⁺, impairing Mn²⁺-dependent enzymes like galactosyltransferase .

  • ATP13A1 overexpression in human cells rescued Mn²⁺ deficits, validated via anti-His antibodies for protein detection .

SUMOylation Regulation

  • SPF1/SPF2 in Arabidopsis desumoylate WRKY33, enhancing pathogen resistance. Anti-HA/anti-GFP antibodies quantified SUMO-WRKY33 complexes .

  • Phos-tag assays combined with anti-GFP antibodies revealed WRKY33 phosphorylation states during immune signaling .

Functional Conservation Across Species

OrganismSPF1 HomologRoleAntibody Tools
YeastSpf1Mn²⁺ transport, ER protein quality controlAnti-HA, anti-GST
ArabidopsisSPF1/SPF2Immune response via SUMO protease activityAnti-HA, anti-GFP
HumanATP13A1Neuronal Mn²⁺ homeostasisAnti-His, custom polyclonals

Technical Considerations

  • Tag-specific limitations: Epitope tags may alter SPF1 localization or activity.

  • Cross-reactivity: Anti-HA/GFP antibodies require controls to exclude nonspecific binding .

  • Custom antibodies: Polyclonals targeting SPF1’s N-terminal domain (e.g., residues 1–300) are used in unpublished structural work .

Future Directions

  • Develop SPF1-specific monoclonal antibodies to bypass tagging artifacts.

  • Explore ATP13A1’s role in Mn²⁺-linked neurodegeneration using humanized yeast models .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPF1 antibody; YEL031WManganese-transporting ATPase 1 antibody; EC 7.2.2.- antibody
Target Names
SPF1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The SPF1 antibody targets the endoplasmic reticulum translocase, which is essential for the removal of mitochondrial transmembrane proteins that have been mistakenly directed to the endoplasmic reticulum. This antibody recognizes SPF1 as a dislocase, facilitating the ATP-dependent extraction of these mislocalized proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Notably, SPF1 exhibits a preference for mitochondrial tail-anchored transmembrane proteins, possessing an exceptionally large substrate-binding pocket capable of recognizing and binding moderately hydrophobic transmembrane regions with short hydrophilic lumenal domains.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Inhibition of the Formation of the Spf1p Phosphoenzyme by Ca2+. PMID: 26858246
  2. Studies indicate a role of the endogenous P5A-ATPase Spf1p in separation of charges in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the sterol metabolism. PMID: 24836520
  3. role of spf1 in manganese transport into the endoplasmic reticulum PMID: 24392018
  4. Shadows of an absent partner: ATP hydrolysis and phosphoenzyme turnover of the Spf1 (sensitivity to Pichia farinosa killer toxin) P5-ATPase. PMID: 22745129
  5. In mutants that lack Spf1p, a mutation in the gene Mdm39p is lethal. PMID: 15909163

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

KEGG: sce:YEL031W

STRING: 4932.YEL031W

Protein Families
Cation transport ATPase (P-type) (TC 3.A.3) family, Type V subfamily
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is SPF1 and why are antibodies against it important in research?

SPF1 is a P-type ATPase that functions as an endoplasmic reticulum calcium pump in Candida albicans, playing a crucial role in maintaining calcium homeostasis. Antibodies against SPF1 are important research tools because they allow investigators to study the protein's localization, expression levels, and functional roles in calcium regulation and endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contacts. Given that SPF1 deletion affects virulence factor secretion and modulates immune responses during infection, antibodies targeting this protein enable researchers to investigate its role in pathogenicity and host-pathogen interactions .

What types of samples can be analyzed using SPF1 antibodies?

SPF1 antibodies can be used to analyze various sample types including fungal cell lysates, purified recombinant proteins, fixed cells for immunofluorescence microscopy, and tissue samples from infection models. For Candida albicans studies, researchers typically prepare fungal extracts under conditions that preserve protein integrity while disrupting the cell wall. For immunofluorescence applications, proper fixation protocols are essential to maintain cellular architecture while allowing antibody access to endoplasmic reticulum structures where SPF1 is predominantly localized .

What detection methods work best with SPF1 antibodies?

SPF1 antibodies can be employed in various detection methods including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. For Western blotting, standard SDS-PAGE protocols as described in antibody literature work effectively, typically using 4-12% Bis-Tris gels with appropriate sample preparation including heating at 90°C for 5 minutes in sample buffer . For immunofluorescence applications, protocols may need optimization to ensure adequate permeabilization of fungal cell walls while preserving the integrity of membrane structures. Quantitative measurements can be performed using techniques similar to those employed for analyzing fluorescence intensity in viral studies, where stepwise tracking of fluorescence changes provides insights into protein dynamics .

How should SPF1 antibodies be validated before experimental use?

Validation of SPF1 antibodies should include multiple complementary approaches:

  • Specificity testing using wild-type and SPF1-knockout strains of C. albicans

  • Western blot analysis to confirm binding to a protein of the expected molecular weight

  • Immunofluorescence to verify localization to endoplasmic reticulum structures

  • Pre-absorption controls with recombinant SPF1 protein to demonstrate specific binding

  • Cross-reactivity testing against related P-type ATPases to ensure target specificity

Researchers should also validate antibody performance in each specific application and experimental system, as antibody performance can vary between techniques and sample preparation methods .

How can SPF1 antibodies be used to investigate endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contact sites?

SPF1 antibodies offer powerful tools for investigating endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane (ER-PM) contact sites in Candida species. Methodology should include:

  • Co-localization studies: Combine SPF1 antibodies with markers for tethering proteins like Ist2 and Tcb1/3 using multi-channel immunofluorescence microscopy .

  • Quantitative analysis: Employ advanced imaging techniques such as lattice light-sheet microscopy (LLSM) to quantify the number and distribution of contact sites under different conditions.

  • Sequential immunoprecipitation: Use SPF1 antibodies in conjunction with antibodies against plasma membrane proteins to isolate intact ER-PM contact complexes.

  • Proximity labeling techniques: Combine SPF1 antibody staining with biotin-based proximity labeling to identify proteins within the contact site microenvironment.

This approach has revealed that SPF1 deletion results in reduced plasma membrane localization of key tethering proteins (Ist2 and Tcb1/3), leading to decreased ER-PM contacts that impact virulence factor secretion during infection .

How can epitope mapping be performed for SPF1 antibodies?

Epitope mapping for SPF1 antibodies can be conducted using several complementary approaches:

  • Fragment-based mapping: Express and purify overlapping fragments of the SPF1 protein to identify which region binds the antibody.

  • Peptide arrays: Synthesize overlapping peptides covering the SPF1 sequence on membranes or microarrays to pinpoint binding regions.

  • Mutagenesis: Introduce point mutations or deletions in recombinant SPF1 to identify critical binding residues.

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS): Compare deuterium uptake patterns in the presence and absence of the antibody to identify protected regions.

  • Cryo-EM structural analysis: Similar to approaches used for analyzing antibody-antigen interactions like those described for SP1-77 binding to SARS-CoV-2 RBD, structural techniques can provide detailed binding information .

For the most robust results, researchers should apply at least two independent methods and confirm findings using competition assays with predicted epitope peptides .

What are the best strategies for tracking SPF1 dynamics during fungal infection using antibodies?

Tracking SPF1 dynamics during fungal infection requires specialized approaches:

  • Ex vivo tissue analysis: Harvest infected tissues and perform immunofluorescence staining with SPF1 antibodies coupled with markers for fungal cell walls and host cell structures.

  • Time-course sampling: Collect samples at different infection stages to monitor changes in SPF1 expression and localization.

  • Quantitative image analysis: Apply methods similar to those used in single virus tracking studies to quantify SPF1 distribution and abundance changes during infection progression.

  • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM): Combine immunofluorescence of SPF1 with electron microscopy to gain ultrastructural context.

  • In vivo imaging models: In appropriate animal models, use fluorescently-labeled SPF1 antibody fragments for real-time visualization of SPF1 dynamics.

These approaches have revealed that SPF1 regulation is dynamic during infection processes, with significant impacts on immune response and host survival outcomes .

How can researchers troubleshoot inconsistent SPF1 antibody staining patterns?

Inconsistent SPF1 antibody staining patterns may stem from multiple factors. Researchers should implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Sample preparation variability:

    • Standardize fixation protocols (duration, fixative concentration)

    • Optimize permeabilization for fungal cells (enzymatic pre-treatment may be required)

    • Test multiple antigen retrieval methods

  • Antibody-specific factors:

    • Titrate antibody concentration using a dilution series

    • Test different incubation temperatures and durations

    • Compare monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies (polyclonals may provide more robust staining under variable conditions)

  • Detection system optimization:

    • Compare direct versus amplified detection methods

    • Evaluate background reduction strategies (e.g., additional blocking steps)

    • Test alternative secondary antibodies or detection reagents

  • Controls and validation:

    • Include SPF1-knockout controls in each experiment

    • Use positive controls with known high SPF1 expression

    • Consider dual-labeling approaches to confirm localization patterns

  • Fungal state considerations:

    • Account for morphological states (yeast versus hyphal forms)

    • Control for growth phase and stress conditions that might alter SPF1 expression

    • Document cell wall composition variations that might affect antibody penetration

Methodologically, differential scanning fluorimetry (similar to that described for antibody stability testing ) can be used to optimize buffer conditions for SPF1 antibody applications.

How can SPF1 antibodies be used to investigate immune response modulation?

SPF1 antibodies can be used to investigate fungal-induced immune response modulation through several methodological approaches:

  • Co-culture systems analysis: Establish co-cultures of C. albicans with immune cells and use SPF1 antibodies to track protein expression and localization during interaction, correlating with cytokine production measured by ELISA or multiplex arrays.

  • Immunofluorescence cytokine mapping: Combine SPF1 antibody staining with fluorescent labeling of pro-inflammatory cytokines to visualize spatial relationships between fungal SPF1 expression and host immune activation.

  • Calcium flux measurement: Use SPF1 antibodies alongside calcium indicators to correlate SPF1 function with calcium signaling events during host-pathogen interaction.

  • Phagocytosis assays: Apply SPF1 antibodies in live-cell imaging to monitor protein dynamics during phagocytosis by immune cells.

Research has demonstrated that SPF1 deletion leads to decreased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, suggesting its role in regulating immune responses. This methodological approach allows researchers to investigate how SPF1-dependent calcium regulation influences the inflammatory response to fungal infection .

What methods can be used to analyze the relationship between SPF1 function and virulence factor secretion using antibodies?

The relationship between SPF1 function and virulence factor secretion can be analyzed using these methods:

  • Quantitative secretion assays: Combine SPF1 antibody-based protein quantification with measurements of secreted virulence factors (phospholipases, secreted aspartyl proteases, candidalysin, and Hwp1).

  • Pulse-chase experiments: Use metabolic labeling followed by immunoprecipitation with SPF1 antibodies to track the temporal relationship between SPF1 activity and virulence factor processing.

  • Subcellular fractionation: Apply differential centrifugation combined with SPF1 antibody detection to isolate and analyze secretory pathway compartments.

  • Proximity labeling: Use SPF1 antibodies in conjunction with proximity labeling techniques to identify protein interactions within the secretory pathway.

  • Real-time secretion monitoring: Adapt techniques like those used for viral fusion monitoring to track virulence factor secretion in relation to SPF1 activity.

These approaches have revealed that reduced ER-PM contacts resulting from SPF1 deletion lead to decreased secretion of virulence factors during infection, including phospholipase, secreted aspartyl protease, candidalysin, and the cell wall-anchored protein Hwp1 .

How can researchers combine SPF1 antibodies with calcium imaging techniques?

Researchers can combine SPF1 antibodies with calcium imaging using these methodological approaches:

  • Sequential imaging protocol:

    • First perform live calcium imaging using fluorescent calcium indicators (Fluo-4, Fura-2)

    • Fix cells while preserving spatial information

    • Perform immunofluorescence with SPF1 antibodies

    • Align and overlay the calcium and SPF1 imaging data

  • Correlative microscopy workflow:

    • Use gridded coverslips for calcium imaging

    • Fix and stain the same cells with SPF1 antibodies

    • Perform quantitative correlation analysis between calcium dynamics and SPF1 distribution

  • Genetically encoded calcium indicators with immunostaining:

    • Express genetically encoded calcium indicators in C. albicans

    • Perform calcium imaging followed by fixation and SPF1 antibody staining

    • This approach prevents indicator leakage issues associated with chemical calcium dyes

  • Calcium uncaging experiments with fixed timepoint analysis:

    • Perform calcium uncaging at defined timepoints

    • Fix cells and perform SPF1 immunostaining

    • Create a temporal map of how calcium perturbations affect SPF1 localization and function

These integrated approaches can reveal how SPF1's calcium pump activity correlates with spatial calcium regulation and downstream physiological effects in real-time during infection and stress response .

What are the best practices for combining SPF1 antibodies with other markers in multiplexed imaging?

For optimal multiplexed imaging with SPF1 antibodies, researchers should follow these best practices:

  • Antibody panel design:

    • Select primary antibodies from different host species to avoid cross-reactivity

    • When using multiple antibodies from the same species, employ sequential staining with careful blocking steps

    • Test each antibody individually before attempting multiplexed staining

  • Spectral considerations:

    • Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap

    • Include single-stain controls for spectral unmixing

    • Consider brightness matching to ensure detection of all targets

  • Staining protocol optimization:

    • Determine optimal fixation that preserves all antigens of interest

    • Test different permeabilization methods compatible with all antibodies

    • Optimize blocking to minimize background across all channels

  • Validation approaches:

    • Perform replicate experiments with changed fluorophore assignments

    • Include colocalization controls (known interacting and non-interacting pairs)

    • Use computational analysis to quantify colocalization metrics

  • Advanced imaging techniques:

    • Consider cyclic immunofluorescence for highly multiplexed imaging

    • Explore clearing techniques for thick specimens while preserving antibody binding

    • Implement super-resolution microscopy for detailed colocalization analysis

Research combining SPF1 antibodies with markers for ER-PM tethering proteins has revealed the molecular mechanisms by which SPF1 regulates these critical membrane contact sites .

How can researchers develop and validate monoclonal antibodies against specific domains of SPF1?

Development and validation of domain-specific SPF1 monoclonal antibodies requires a systematic approach:

  • Antigen design strategy:

    • Express and purify individual SPF1 domains as recombinant proteins

    • Design peptide immunogens from predicted surface-exposed regions

    • Consider carrier protein conjugation for improved immunogenicity

  • Immunization and hybridoma development:

    • Employ standard hybridoma technology with appropriate adjuvants

    • Screen hybridoma supernatants against full-length SPF1 and domain-specific constructs

    • Perform counter-selection to identify domain-specific clones

  • Validation workflow:

    • Test reactivity against wild-type and knockout C. albicans lysates

    • Perform epitope mapping using peptide arrays or mutagenesis

    • Confirm domain specificity using truncated protein constructs

    • Verify native conformation recognition using non-denaturing techniques

  • Functional validation:

    • Assess ability to detect SPF1 in its native cellular context

    • Evaluate capacity to immunoprecipitate SPF1 and associated proteins

    • Test for interference with SPF1 function in calcium transport assays

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test against related P-type ATPases

    • Evaluate specificity across different fungal species

    • Check for non-specific binding to host proteins in infection models

Methods similar to those used for characterizing antibody stability and specificity in therapeutic contexts can be adapted for research-grade SPF1 antibodies .

What are the comparative advantages of using different antibody formats (full IgG, Fab, scFv) for SPF1 studies?

Each antibody format offers distinct advantages for SPF1 research:

FormatAdvantagesDisadvantagesBest Applications
Full IgG- Highest avidity due to bivalency
- Excellent stability
- Compatible with standard detection systems
- Long half-life in vivo
- Large size (150 kDa) limits tissue penetration
- May cause artificial clustering due to bivalency
- Potential Fc-mediated effects
- Western blotting
- Standard immunofluorescence
- Immunoprecipitation
- Flow cytometry
Fab fragments- Smaller size (50 kDa) improves tissue penetration
- Monovalent binding prevents artificial clustering
- No Fc-mediated effects
- Lower avidity than full IgG
- Shorter half-life
- May require optimization of detection systems
- Super-resolution microscopy
- Live cell imaging
- Studies where clustering must be avoided
- Proximity measurements
scFv- Smallest size (25-30 kDa) for maximal penetration
- Easily produced recombinantly
- Can be genetically fused to tags or reporters
- Amenable to phage display selection
- Lower stability than IgG or Fab
- Shortest half-life
- May require specialized detection
- Lower affinity in some cases
- Intracellular antibodies (intrabodies)
- Proximity labeling applications
- FRET-based sensors
- High-density epitope tagging
Stabilized scFv (spFv)- Improved thermal stability (ΔTm ~10°C higher than scFv)
- Better expression yields
- Reduced aggregation
- Maintains small size advantages
- More complex production
- Requires design and validation of stabilizing elements
- Long-term imaging studies
- Applications requiring higher temperature
- Studies where aggregation is problematic

Stabilized scFv formats ("stapled" scFv or spFv) show significantly improved thermal stability with Tm increases of approximately 10°C compared to traditional scFv, making them valuable for applications requiring enhanced stability while maintaining the advantages of the smaller antibody format .

How can researchers optimize SPF1 antibody-based pull-down assays to identify interaction partners?

Optimization of SPF1 antibody-based pull-down assays requires attention to several methodological considerations:

  • Lysis buffer optimization:

    • Test various detergent types and concentrations (digitonin, CHAPS, NP-40)

    • Adjust ionic strength to preserve interactions while reducing non-specific binding

    • Include calcium chelators or defined calcium concentrations based on experimental goals

    • Incorporate appropriate protease and phosphatase inhibitors

  • Antibody coupling strategies:

    • Compare direct coupling to beads versus capture via Protein A/G

    • Evaluate different coupling chemistries (NHS-ester, epoxy, aldehyde)

    • Test oriented coupling approaches to maximize antigen binding sites

    • Determine optimal antibody density on beads

  • Pull-down protocol refinement:

    • Optimize binding time and temperature

    • Compare batch binding versus column formats

    • Determine ideal wash stringency through stepwise testing

    • Develop elution strategies that preserve interactor activity

  • Control implementation:

    • Include isotype-matched control antibodies

    • Perform parallel pull-downs from SPF1-knockout samples

    • Use competitive elution with SPF1 peptides to confirm specificity

    • Implement SILAC or TMT labeling for quantitative comparison

  • Analysis methodologies:

    • Apply mass spectrometry approaches similar to disulfide mapping protocols

    • Implement data filtering based on quantitative enrichment over controls

    • Perform network analysis to identify functional clusters

    • Validate key interactions through reciprocal pull-downs

This methodological approach has been successful in identifying SPF1-dependent protein interactions that contribute to endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contacts and virulence factor secretion in C. albicans .

How might SPF1 antibodies be used in developing new antifungal strategies?

SPF1 antibodies could contribute to novel antifungal strategies through several research approaches:

  • Target validation studies:

    • Use SPF1 antibodies to confirm expression and accessibility in clinical isolates

    • Employ immunofluorescence to map SPF1 distribution during different infection stages

    • Correlate SPF1 levels with virulence in diverse clinical strains

  • Small molecule screening platforms:

    • Develop competition assays where compounds displace SPF1 antibody binding

    • Create SPF1 antibody-based FRET sensors to detect conformational changes

    • Establish cellular assays where antibodies detect SPF1 mislocalization after drug treatment

  • Immunotherapeutic development:

    • Engineer SPF1 antibody fragments for intracellular delivery

    • Create bispecific antibodies linking SPF1 recognition to immune cell engagement

    • Develop antibody-drug conjugates targeting SPF1-expressing fungi

  • Diagnostic applications:

    • Apply SPF1 antibodies in rapid diagnostic tests for fungal infections

    • Develop quantitative assays correlating SPF1 detection with antifungal resistance

    • Create imaging agents for in vivo detection of fungal burden

Research has demonstrated that SPF1 regulation significantly impacts C. albicans infectivity and host survival, suggesting that targeting this calcium pump could provide a promising approach for antifungal development .

What methodological considerations are important when using SPF1 antibodies in different fungal species?

When applying SPF1 antibodies across fungal species, researchers should consider:

  • Sequence conservation analysis:

    • Perform bioinformatic alignment of SPF1 sequences across target species

    • Identify conserved versus variable epitope regions

    • Select antibodies targeting conserved domains for cross-species applications

  • Cell wall variability adjustments:

    • Optimize permeabilization protocols for each species' cell wall composition

    • Consider enzymatic pretreatment (chitinase, glucanase) requirements

    • Adjust fixation conditions to accommodate differences in membrane composition

  • Expression pattern validation:

    • Confirm SPF1 expression levels in each species under study conditions

    • Verify subcellular localization using species-specific markers

    • Establish positive and negative controls for each new species

  • Cross-reactivity testing:

    • Perform Western blots on lysates from multiple species

    • Include blocking peptide controls to confirm specificity

    • Test immunoprecipitation efficiency across species

  • Functional conservation assessment:

    • Compare calcium-related phenotypes in SPF1 mutants across species

    • Assess conservation of protein interactions using pull-down approaches

    • Evaluate immune response modulation in different host-fungal pairings

These methodological considerations ensure reliable antibody performance when investigating SPF1 function across diverse fungal pathogens, allowing for comparative studies of calcium regulation and virulence mechanisms .

How can researchers integrate SPF1 antibody data with multi-omics approaches to understand calcium signaling networks?

Integration of SPF1 antibody data with multi-omics requires sophisticated methodological approaches:

  • Coordinated sample preparation:

    • Design experiments where samples for antibody-based studies and omics analysis are derived from identical conditions

    • Implement parallel workflows with appropriate preservation methods for each technique

    • Include spike-in standards for quantitative normalization across platforms

  • Spatial context preservation:

    • Apply spatial transcriptomics in conjunction with SPF1 immunofluorescence

    • Use laser capture microdissection guided by SPF1 staining for region-specific omics

    • Implement computational registration of imaging and omics datasets

  • Temporal synchronization:

    • Conduct time-course experiments with matched sampling for antibody-based detection and omics

    • Employ pulse-chase designs to track dynamic processes

    • Develop time-delay analysis to identify cause-effect relationships

  • Network analysis framework:

    • Construct calcium signaling networks incorporating SPF1 antibody-derived localization data

    • Apply machine learning approaches to integrate heterogeneous data types

    • Implement Bayesian network analysis to infer causal relationships

  • Validation strategies:

    • Design targeted experiments to test network-derived hypotheses

    • Employ orthogonal techniques to confirm key findings

    • Perform perturbation studies to validate predicted network connections

This integrated approach can reveal how SPF1-regulated calcium homeostasis interfaces with broader cellular processes including stress responses, morphogenesis, and virulence factor production in pathogenic fungi .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.