ATG101 (Autophagy-related protein 101) is a crucial factor required for autophagosome formation in the autophagy pathway. It functions primarily by stabilizing ATG13, protecting it from proteasomal degradation . The protein is also known by alternative names including C12orf44 and PP894 . Autophagy, the process of bulk degradation of cellular proteins through an autophagosomic-lysosomal pathway, is important for normal growth control and may be defective in tumor cells . ATG101 is part of the ULK1 complex that initiates autophagy, particularly under nutrient starvation conditions, making it an important target for researchers studying cellular stress responses, cancer biology, and neurodegenerative diseases where autophagy plays a significant role.
Based on validated research applications, ATG101 antibodies are suitable for several experimental techniques:
When selecting an application, researchers should consider that some antibodies may perform better in specific applications than others, and optimization for your specific experimental conditions is recommended .
While the calculated molecular weight of ATG101 is approximately 25 kDa (from its 218 amino acid sequence) , researchers should be aware that observed molecular weights can vary. Western blot analyses have shown:
25-28 kDa bands in human liver tissue lysate and lung carcinoma cell lines
A higher 68 kDa band has been reported in some applications, potentially representing a post-translationally modified form or complex of the protein
This variability underscores the importance of including appropriate positive controls in Western blot experiments to confirm antibody specificity and expected band sizes in your specific experimental system.
For optimal preservation of antibody activity, ATG101 antibodies should be stored as follows:
It is crucial to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can degrade antibody quality and reduce specificity and sensitivity . Additionally, antibodies should not be exposed to prolonged high temperatures. Most commercial ATG101 antibodies are supplied in PBS containing preservatives such as sodium azide (0.02%) , which helps maintain stability during storage.
Validating antibody specificity is critical for reliable results. For ATG101 antibodies, consider implementing these validation approaches:
Positive and negative control tissues/cell lines:
Molecular weight verification:
Peptide competition assay:
Orthogonal validation:
Compare results using antibodies targeting different epitopes of ATG101
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Signal reduction after target knockdown:
Verify decreased signal intensity in ATG101 siRNA or shRNA-treated samples
These validation steps are particularly important when studying ATG101 in novel experimental systems or when publishing results in high-impact journals.
ATG101 has emerging significance in cancer research, with several important considerations:
Expression patterns:
Relation to immunotherapy resistance:
While not directly about the ATG101 protein, research on the bispecific antibody ATG-101 (targeting PD-L1 and 4-1BB) has shown promise in treating tumors resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors
This suggests potential interplay between autophagy pathways and immune checkpoint resistance mechanisms
Methodological considerations:
Autophagy modulation in cancer:
When studying ATG101 in cancer contexts, consider its role in both pro-survival and pro-death autophagy mechanisms
Correlate ATG101 expression with other autophagy markers to provide context for its activity
Understanding ATG101's role within the broader autophagy network is essential when evaluating its significance in different cancer types and therapeutic contexts.
This is a critical distinction in the current literature:
ATG101 (protein):
ATG-101 (therapeutic antibody):
A tetravalent "2+2" PD-L1×4-1BB bispecific antibody engineered for cancer immunotherapy
Binds both PD-L1 and 4-1BB concurrently, with greater affinity for PD-L1
Activates 4-1BB+ T cells when cross-linked with PD-L1–positive cells
Demonstrates antitumor activity in tumor models resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors
When reviewing literature, carefully examine context clues:
Papers discussing autophagy mechanisms likely refer to the ATG101 protein
Publications about cancer immunotherapy, particularly those mentioning PD-L1 and 4-1BB, likely refer to the bispecific antibody ATG-101
Note the formatting: ATG101 (no hyphen) typically refers to the protein, while ATG-101 (with hyphen) refers to the bispecific antibody
This distinction is particularly important when conducting literature searches and evaluating research relevance to your specific aims.
For successful IHC with ATG101 antibodies, the following protocol optimizations are recommended:
Fixation and tissue preparation:
Antigen retrieval:
Antibody dilution range:
Detection systems:
Both chromogenic (DAB) and fluorescent secondary detection systems are compatible
When using fluorescent detection, consider tissue autofluorescence, particularly in liver samples
Controls:
Optimization of these conditions for your specific tissue of interest is essential for generating reproducible and meaningful IHC results.
For accurate quantification of ATG101 by Western blot, implement these methodological considerations:
Sample preparation:
Gel selection:
Antibody concentrations:
Normalization controls:
Always include loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH, or total protein stains)
For comparative studies, consider normalizing to multiple housekeeping proteins
Quantification approach:
Use digital imaging and densitometry software for quantification
Ensure signal is in the linear range of detection
For studies of autophagy flux, correlate ATG101 levels with other autophagy markers (LC3-II, p62)
Statistical analysis:
Perform at least three biological replicates for quantitative comparisons
Use appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Following these practices will yield more reproducible and publishable quantitative Western blot data for ATG101.
To effectively investigate ATG101's functional role in autophagy, consider this experimental framework:
Expression manipulation strategies:
siRNA/shRNA knockdown of ATG101 to assess loss-of-function effects
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout for complete elimination of ATG101
Overexpression studies using tagged constructs (consider epitope tags that won't interfere with ATG101-ATG13 interaction)
Functional autophagy assays:
LC3 puncta formation (by fluorescence microscopy)
LC3-I to LC3-II conversion (by Western blot)
p62/SQSTM1 degradation
Autophagic flux measurement using lysosomal inhibitors (bafilomycin A1, chloroquine)
Long-lived protein degradation assays
Interaction studies:
Subcellular localization:
Track ATG101 localization under various conditions (nutrient starvation, mTOR inhibition)
Co-localization with other autophagy markers
Context-dependent regulation:
Examine ATG101 expression and function under different stress conditions:
Nutrient starvation (EBSS media)
mTOR inhibition (rapamycin, Torin1)
ER stress (tunicamycin, thapsigargin)
Hypoxia
Single-cell analysis:
This multifaceted experimental approach will provide comprehensive insights into ATG101's specific contributions to autophagy regulation in your biological system of interest.
When encountering weak or absent ATG101 signal in Western blot experiments, consider these systematic troubleshooting approaches:
Sample preparation issues:
Antibody-specific considerations:
Detection system optimization:
Use more sensitive detection methods (enhanced chemiluminescence plus or fluorescent secondary antibodies)
Increase exposure time incrementally
Check secondary antibody compatibility and freshness
Technical parameters:
Optimize transfer conditions (time, current, buffer composition)
Ensure appropriate blocking (5% milk may be too stringent; try 3% BSA)
Reduce washing stringency (lower salt concentration or fewer washes)
Biological considerations:
Verify ATG101 expression in your cell type/tissue (check RNA-seq databases)
Consider induction of autophagy to upregulate ATG101 (starvation, rapamycin)
Some cell lines may have naturally low ATG101 expression
Positive controls:
Systematic evaluation of these factors will help identify and resolve the source of weak ATG101 signal in Western blot applications.
To minimize cross-reactivity and non-specific binding with ATG101 antibodies:
Antibody selection:
Choose antibodies validated for your specific application and species
Polyclonal antibodies (like those in the search results) may have higher cross-reactivity risk than monoclonals
Review validation data from manufacturers showing single bands at expected molecular weight
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers)
Increase blocking time or concentration for high-background samples
Add 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to reduce non-specific hydrophobic interactions
Antibody dilution optimization:
Titrate antibody concentrations to find optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Higher dilutions (e.g., 1:1000 vs 1:500) may reduce non-specific binding
Washing stringency:
Increase number of washes or duration
Use TBS-T with higher Tween-20 concentration for more stringent washing
Absorption controls:
Pre-absorb antibody with the immunizing peptide where available
This can confirm which bands are specific vs. non-specific
Species-specific considerations:
When working with tissue samples, use species-specific secondary antibodies
Consider species cross-reactivity when working with mixed species samples
Validation approaches:
Test antibody in ATG101 knockdown/knockout samples
Compare staining patterns across multiple antibodies targeting different ATG101 epitopes
These strategies should significantly reduce non-specific binding issues with ATG101 antibodies across different experimental applications.
For publication-quality research using ATG101 antibodies, implement these rigorous quality control measures:
Antibody validation documentation:
Experimental controls:
Positive controls: Include samples known to express ATG101
Negative controls: Include antibody omission controls and ideally ATG101 knockdown/knockout samples
Isotype controls: Particularly important for IHC/IF applications
Technical replication:
Perform at least three independent biological replicates
Include technical replicates within each experiment
Document consistency across replicates with appropriate statistical analysis
Quantification standards:
Use digital image capture with consistent exposure settings
Apply standardized quantification methods (region selection, background subtraction)
Include calibration standards when appropriate
Multi-method confirmation:
Verify key findings with orthogonal methods (e.g., IF and WB)
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Consider mass spectrometry validation for critical findings
Data transparency:
Show full blots/gels with molecular weight markers visible
Indicate any image adjustments applied (contrast, brightness)
Maintain raw, unprocessed image files for potential journal requests
Method documentation:
Following these quality control measures will strengthen the reliability and reproducibility of research findings involving ATG101 antibodies, increasing the likelihood of acceptance in high-impact journals.