ATL17 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Targeting in Adult T-Cell Leukemia (ATL)

ATL is a rare hematologic malignancy associated with HTLV-1 infection. While no "ATL17" antibody exists in published studies, therapeutic strategies for ATL include:

  • Anti-CD25 (IL-2Rα) antibodies: Used to target leukemic cells expressing CD25. Anti-Tac (daclizumab) showed a 32% response rate in ATL patients .

  • Immunotoxin conjugates: Anti-CD25 antibodies fused to yttrium-90 achieved a 56% response rate .

Antibody TargetMechanismClinical OutcomesSource
CD25 (IL-2Rα)Blocks IL-2 signaling32% objective response rate
CD25 + Yttrium-90Radioimmunotherapy56% response rate

IL-17 Antibodies in Immune Disorders

IL-17A/F antibodies are extensively studied in autoimmune diseases but not directly in ATL:

  • Secukinumab (anti-IL-17A): Reduces DAS28 scores in rheumatoid arthritis by 2.3–2.4 vs. 1.7 (placebo) .

  • Brodalumab (anti-IL-17RA): Less effective than IL-17A-neutralizing antibodies .

AntibodyTargetKey Clinical FindingSource
SecukinumabIL-17AACR50 improvement: 42% vs. 24% (placebo)
BrodalumabIL-17RALower efficacy vs. IL-17A inhibitors

Th17/IL-17 Axis in Hematologic Contexts

  • Th17.1 cells: Elevated Th17.1 subsets correlate with poor response to abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (OR=14.6 for low vs. high Th17.1) .

  • IL-17 neutralization: Reduces neutrophil recruitment and antimicrobial peptide release , but no ATL-specific studies exist.

Antibody Databases and Validation

  • PLAbDab: Contains 150,000+ antibody sequences but no "ATL17" entries .

  • SAbDab: Catalogs structural data for 5,300+ antibodies, none targeting ATL17 .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
ATL17 antibody; At4g15975 antibody; dl4025w antibody; FCAALL.90RING-H2 finger protein ATL17 antibody; EC 2.3.2.27 antibody; RING-type E3 ubiquitin transferase ATL17 antibody
Target Names
ATL17
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
ATL17 Antibody may play a role in the initial stages of the plant defense signaling pathway.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT4G15975

STRING: 3702.AT4G15975.1

UniGene: At.33127

Protein Families
RING-type zinc finger family, ATL subfamily
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is ATL and how does it relate to viral carcinogenesis?

Adult T-cell Leukemia (ATL) is a malignancy of CD4+ T-lymphocytes associated with Human T-cell Leukemia Virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection. ATL represents a model of multistep viral carcinogenesis, with only a small proportion (typically <1%-5%) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in asymptomatic carriers containing integrated proviral DNA . The disease is endemic in certain geographical regions, particularly southwestern Japan, where specific antigens associated with ATL can be detected in cell lines derived from patients . In the context of antibody research, understanding this viral etiology is essential as it impacts marker expression patterns and potential therapeutic targets.

How are antibodies utilized to detect HTLV-1-associated antigens in ATL research?

Antibodies serve as critical tools for detecting HTLV-1-associated antigens in ATL research. Indirect immunofluorescence techniques using specific human sera can identify viral antigens in the cytoplasm of ATL cell lines, such as the MT-1 line derived from ATL patients . These antigens are typically present in approximately 1-5% of cultured cells under normal conditions but can be increased by approximately 5-fold when cells are cultured with 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine . When designing experiments, researchers should consider both cellular localization patterns and expression frequency, as these antigens do not show cross-reactivity with other herpesviruses including EBV, HSV, CMV, and others .

What is the significance of antibody detection in asymptomatic individuals from endemic regions?

Antibodies against ATL-associated antigens have significant epidemiological implications. Research has shown that antibodies against antigens found in ATL cell lines are present in all examined ATL patients and in approximately 80% of patients with malignant T-cell lymphomas with ATL-like features but without leukemic manifestation . Notably, these antibodies are detected in 26% of healthy adults from ATL-endemic areas but are rare in individuals from non-endemic regions . This distribution pattern suggests that antibody detection may serve as a valuable epidemiological marker for HTLV-1 exposure and helps identify at-risk populations for potential surveillance programs.

How should single-cell analysis protocols be optimized when studying antibody markers in the ATL microenvironment?

Single-cell analysis of the ATL microenvironment requires careful optimization to capture cellular heterogeneity. Based on recent methodological advances, researchers should implement cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) to simultaneously assess both transcriptomic profiles and surface protein expression at single-cell resolution . When designing such experiments:

  • Include a comprehensive panel of antibody-derived tags (ADTs), while excluding those with insufficient sensitivity or poor separation between positive and negative populations (approximately 31% of antibodies may need to be eliminated from analysis)

  • Generate both scRNA-seq and scADT-seq libraries in parallel from the same cell populations

  • Perform integrated analysis that correlates mRNA and protein expression levels

  • Include sequential sampling when possible to account for disease progression

This approach reveals important discordances between mRNA and protein levels of immune markers, particularly in myeloid lineage cells within the ATL microenvironment .

How can researchers address discordances between mRNA and protein expression when studying ATL-associated antibody markers?

Discordances between mRNA and protein expression levels represent a significant analytical challenge in ATL antibody research. Recent single-cell studies have revealed that certain markers, particularly MHC class I molecules and PTPRC/CD45, exhibit weak positive, no, or even negative correlations between mRNA and antibody-derived tag (ADT) levels .

To address these discordances, researchers should:

  • Calculate correlation coefficients between mRNA and protein levels for each marker across different cell types

  • Identify cell type-specific patterns of discordance, such as myeloid cell-specific dissociated ADT elevation observed for markers including CD47, CD69, and ITGB1/CD29

  • Analyze ratio of ADT to mRNA levels between different cell lineages (e.g., myeloid vs. NK cells) to identify additional markers with lineage-specific post-transcriptional regulation

  • Integrate these findings with functional assays to determine biological significance

This approach can uncover important lineage-specific post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that may impact antibody-based detection strategies in ATL research .

What controls must be implemented when validating antibody specificity in ATL research?

Proper validation of antibody specificity is critical in ATL research to ensure reliable results. Based on methodological approaches in the field, researchers should implement the following controls:

Control TypeImplementation MethodPurpose
Positive ControlUse of cell lines with known expression (e.g., HeLa, HepG2 for ATG7) Confirms antibody can detect target at expected molecular weight
Negative ControlNon-expressing cell lines or isotype controls Establishes baseline and identifies non-specific binding
Validation Across MethodsWestern blot, flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry Ensures consistent target detection across platforms
Induction ControlsTreatment with reagents that modulate expression (e.g., 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine for viral antigens) Confirms antibody detects dynamic changes in expression
Cross-reactivity TestingTesting against related antigens (e.g., herpesvirus antigens for HTLV-1) Eliminates false positives from related epitopes

Additionally, researchers should validate antibodies across multiple biological sample types relevant to ATL (peripheral blood, lymph nodes, cell lines) to account for potential tissue-specific differences in epitope accessibility or expression patterns.

What are the optimal visualization techniques for detecting antibody binding in fixed ATL tissue samples?

Multiple visualization techniques can be employed for detecting antibody binding in fixed ATL samples, each with specific advantages. Based on established methodologies, researchers should consider:

  • Chromogenic IHC with HRP-DAB: Optimal for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections after heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) . This approach provides permanent staining with excellent morphological context and is compatible with hematoxylin counterstaining.

  • Immunofluorescence with confocal microscopy: Preferred for co-localization studies. As demonstrated with ATG7 detection, this approach allows visualization of specific subcellular compartments (e.g., autophagosomes) when combined with DAPI nuclear counterstaining .

  • Flow cytometry for intracellular staining: Requires proper fixation (e.g., Flow Cytometry Fixation Buffer) and permeabilization (e.g., Flow Cytometry Permeabilization/Wash Buffer I) . This approach provides quantitative data on marker expression across cell populations.

For optimal results, antibody concentration should be experimentally determined for each application (e.g., 15 μg/mL for IHC, 25 μg/mL for ICC) . Additionally, appropriate secondary detection systems matched to the primary antibody species are essential for specific signal amplification.

How can antibody-derived tags be effectively incorporated into single-cell analysis of ATL samples?

Incorporating antibody-derived tags (ADTs) into single-cell analysis of ATL samples requires careful methodological consideration. Based on recent technical advances, researchers should:

  • Select antibodies with demonstrated separation between positive and negative lineages, as approximately 31% of tested antibodies may show insufficient sensitivity or separation

  • Implement cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq), which enables simultaneous generation of:

    • 5' single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) libraries

    • Antibody-derived tag sequencing (scADT-seq) libraries
      From the same peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

  • Complement single-cell analysis with bulk genomic characterization, including:

    • Targeted sequencing

    • Whole-exome sequencing (WES)

    • Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array

    • Bulk RNA-seq

This integrated approach allows detection of somatic mutations, copy-number alterations, and correlation between genetic alterations and antibody markers at the single-cell level, providing crucial insights into cellular heterogeneity in ATL microenvironments.

What techniques are most effective for detecting low-abundance markers in ATL cell populations?

Detection of low-abundance markers presents a significant challenge in ATL research. Based on methodological approaches in the field, researchers should consider:

  • Signal amplification techniques:

    • Use tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for immunohistochemistry

    • Employ photomultiplier tube adjustment in flow cytometry

    • Utilize highly sensitive detection systems for Western blot (e.g., chemiluminescent substrates with extended exposure times)

  • Enrichment strategies:

    • Culture cells with inducers such as 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine, which can increase antigen-bearing cells by approximately 5-fold

    • Perform cell sorting to concentrate rare populations prior to analysis

  • Advanced detection platforms:

    • Implement Simple Western™ technology, which has demonstrated detection of specific proteins at concentrations as low as 0.2 mg/mL in cell lysates

    • Consider mass cytometry (CyTOF) for highly multiplexed detection of rare cell populations without fluorescence spillover limitations

  • Single-cell approaches:

    • Use droplet-based CITE-seq, which allows detection of both RNA and protein markers at single-cell resolution

    • Apply computational approaches to identify rare cell populations based on combinatorial marker expression patterns

These approaches should be tailored to the specific research question and the expected abundance of the target marker in ATL samples.

How do ATL-associated antibody markers correlate with disease progression and therapeutic response?

Antibody markers in ATL show complex correlations with disease progression and treatment outcomes. While the search results don't provide complete data on this topic specifically for ATL17 Antibody, research on related markers indicates several important patterns:

  • Disease progression correlation:

    • Antibodies against ATL-associated antigens are found in 100% of ATL patients and approximately 80% of patients with malignant T-cell lymphomas with ATL-like features

    • The presence of antibodies in asymptomatic carriers (26% in endemic regions) suggests potential value as early biomarkers before clinical manifestation

  • Immune microenvironment changes:

    • ATL progression is associated with severe immunocompromise, increasing susceptibility to opportunistic infections

    • Single-cell analysis reveals variegated alterations in the immune microenvironment, including novel modes of PD-L1 upregulation in surrounding cells by CD274 SV-harboring tumors

  • Therapeutic implications:

    • Efficient cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response to HTLV-1 has been reported to limit proviral load and disease risk

    • Genetic alterations in immune molecules, such as structural variations truncating CD274 3'-UTR, may impact immunotherapy response

Researchers should implement longitudinal sampling and integrate clinical data with antibody expression profiles to further elucidate these relationships in the context of therapeutic interventions.

What role do antibody markers play in characterizing the heterogeneity of the ATL microenvironment?

Antibody markers play a crucial role in dissecting the complex heterogeneity of the ATL microenvironment. Recent single-cell analysis has revealed:

  • Cellular composition heterogeneity:

    • ATL samples show varying proportions of malignant cells (15-99%, median 82%), with lower percentages in smoldering subtypes

    • Malignant clusters demonstrate significant interpatient heterogeneity, while non-malignant cells show transcriptomic similarity across patients

  • Expression pattern differences:

    • Almost all malignant clusters express HTLV-1 HBZ

    • Cell type-specific discordances between mRNA and protein levels for various markers, particularly in myeloid cells

    • Lineage-specific post-transcriptional regulation affects antibody detection patterns

  • Functional heterogeneity:

    • NK cells in ATL show decreased CD328 ADT levels

    • MHC class II pathway alterations occur in ATL-derived cells

These findings underscore the importance of integrated analysis of both transcriptomic and protein-level data using antibody markers to fully characterize the complex cellular ecosystem in ATL. Researchers should implement multiparameter approaches that capture this heterogeneity when designing studies of the ATL microenvironment.

How can researchers integrate antibody-based detection with genetic analysis in ATL studies?

Integration of antibody-based detection with genetic analysis provides comprehensive insights into ATL biology. Based on advanced methodological approaches, researchers should:

  • Implement complementary analytical pipelines:

    • Correlate single-cell antibody detection (scADT-seq) with transcriptomic profiles (scRNA-seq)

    • Integrate bulk genomic data (WES, SNP arrays) with cellular protein expression

    • Analyze structural variations affecting immune-related genes (e.g., CD274) and their impact on protein expression

  • Design sequential experimental workflows:

    • Begin with single-cell protein profiling to identify cell populations of interest

    • Perform genetic analysis on sorted populations to identify underlying mutations

    • Validate findings using functional assays that connect genetic alterations to protein expression changes

  • Develop computational approaches:

    • Apply machine learning algorithms to identify patterns between genetic signatures and antibody marker profiles

    • Implement trajectory analysis to map genetic evolution and corresponding protein expression changes

    • Utilize network analysis to identify regulatory relationships between genetic alterations and protein expression patterns

This integrated approach enables researchers to connect genetic drivers of ATL with their functional consequences at the protein level, potentially identifying new therapeutic targets and biomarkers of disease progression.

What are the optimal fixation and permeabilization conditions for intracellular antibody staining in ATL samples?

Optimal fixation and permeabilization conditions are critical for successful intracellular antibody staining in ATL samples. Based on established methodological approaches:

  • For flow cytometry:

    • Use specialized fixation buffers (e.g., Flow Cytometry Fixation Buffer)

    • Follow with appropriate permeabilization reagents (e.g., Flow Cytometry Permeabilization/Wash Buffer I)

    • Optimize incubation times based on the specific antigen compartment (nuclear, cytoplasmic, vesicular)

  • For immunohistochemistry of FFPE sections:

    • Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval using appropriate buffer systems (e.g., Antigen Retrieval Reagent-Basic)

    • Optimize retrieval conditions (temperature, duration) based on the specific antibody

  • For immunocytochemistry:

    • Use immersion fixation for adherent and non-adherent cells

    • Adjust permeabilization conditions based on subcellular localization (e.g., stronger permeabilization for nuclear antigens)

    • Consider protocols specific to non-adherent cells for ATL samples

Researchers should always validate fixation and permeabilization conditions for each antibody, as overfixation can mask epitopes while insufficient fixation may compromise cellular architecture and antigen retention.

What factors influence antibody selection for multiplexed detection in ATL research?

Multiplexed antibody detection in ATL research requires careful consideration of several factors to ensure reliable results:

  • Antibody compatibility:

    • Select antibodies raised in different host species to avoid cross-reactivity between detection systems

    • Consider antibody isotypes when using isotype-specific secondary antibodies

    • Evaluate potential spectral overlap when using fluorescent detection systems

  • Expression level considerations:

    • Balance panel design to include both high and low-abundance markers

    • Account for expected discordances between mRNA and protein levels, particularly in myeloid lineages

    • Consider lineage-specific post-transcriptional regulation that affects protein detection

  • Technical validation:

    • Test antibodies individually before multiplexing

    • Include proper controls to assess spectral spillover and non-specific binding

    • Validate antibody performance in relevant ATL sample types (cell lines, primary samples)

  • Computational analysis:

    • Implement appropriate compensation and unmixing algorithms

    • Use dimensional reduction techniques to visualize complex multiplexed data

    • Apply clustering approaches to identify cell populations based on combinatorial marker expression

These considerations are essential for developing robust multiplexed antibody panels that accurately characterize the complex cellular ecosystem in ATL.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.