ATL38 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

ATL38 in Genetic Mutations

Structural mutations labeled as "ATL38" are referenced in genomic studies of ATL, particularly in the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the PD-L1 gene . These mutations are associated with:

  • Upregulation of PD-L1: A protein that suppresses immune responses, commonly targeted by checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy.

  • Frequency: Found in 27% of ATL cases, predominantly in aggressive subtypes .

  • Functional Impact: May promote immune evasion by enhancing PD-L1 expression, contributing to ATL progression .

Antibody-Based Therapies in ATL

While no "ATL38 Antibody" is described, several antibodies are highlighted in ATL research:

Antibody TargetMechanismClinical RelevanceSource
CCR4Targets CCR4-expressing ATL cellsMogamulizumab (anti-CCR4) improves survival by lysing malignant cells and reducing Treg populations .
PD-1/PD-L1Blocks immune checkpoint interactionInvestigated for reversing immune suppression in ATL, though clinical efficacy remains under study .
TauBinds pathological tau aggregatesAnti-tau antibodies (e.g., HJ8.5) reduce insoluble tau and neurodegeneration in preclinical models .

Antibody Validation Methods

Key validation protocols for antibodies in research (relevant to hypothetical ATL38 antibody characterization):

  • Immunohistochemistry: Assesses staining patterns in 44 normal tissues for reliability .

  • Protein Microarrays: Evaluates specificity against 384 antigens, with 86% of antibodies passing quality thresholds .

  • Flow Cytometry: Used to measure antibody-mediated cellular uptake of targets (e.g., tau aggregates in BV2 cells) .

Research Gaps and Considerations

  • Terminology Clarification: The term "ATL38" may refer to a genetic locus or study-specific identifier rather than a standalone antibody.

  • Therapeutic Potential: Antibodies targeting PD-L1 or CCR4 (e.g., mogamulizumab) are more established in ATL treatment .

  • Validation Requirements: For any novel antibody, enhanced validation (e.g., orthogonal or independent antibody methods) is critical to confirm specificity .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
ATL38; At2g34990; F19I3.22; RING-H2 finger protein ATL38; RING-type E3 ubiquitin transferase ATL38
Target Names
ATL38
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G34990

STRING: 3702.AT2G34990.1

UniGene: At.62396

Protein Families
RING-type zinc finger family, ATL subfamily
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is TAS2R38 antibody and what is its principal target?

TAS2R38 antibody is a polyclonal antibody specifically designed to target the human TAS2R38 protein. Based on information from Atlas Antibodies, it is manufactured as a rabbit polyclonal antibody with a concentration of 0.2 mg/ml for research applications . The antibody targets the human taste receptor type 2 member 38 (TAS2R38), which is primarily known for its role in bitter taste perception. The antibody serves as a critical tool for detecting and studying this receptor in various experimental contexts including immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunocytochemistry-immunofluorescence (ICC-IF), and Western blotting (WB) .

How should TAS2R38 antibody be validated before experimental use?

Antibody validation should follow a multi-pillar approach as recommended by consensus guidelines. At minimum, researchers should validate the TAS2R38 antibody using at least one of the following methods, with increased confidence gained by employing multiple approaches :

  • Orthogonal validation: Compare antibody staining patterns with protein/gene expression data obtained through antibody-independent methods such as targeted mass spectroscopy .

  • Genetic validation: Test antibody specificity using genetic knockdown/knockout models where the target protein is absent or reduced .

  • Independent antibody validation: Verify results using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of TAS2R38 .

  • Tagged protein expression: Compare antibody staining to expression patterns of tagged TAS2R38 protein (using tags like fluorescent proteins or epitope tags) .

  • Immunocapture followed by mass spectroscopy: Analyze captured proteins to confirm that the top three peptide sequences originate from TAS2R38 .

Importantly, validation should be application-specific since the conformation of the TAS2R38 antigen will differ between applications such as Western blotting (denatured) versus immunoprecipitation (native folded) .

What are the recommended experimental applications for TAS2R38 antibody?

Based on available validation data, TAS2R38 antibody is suitable for several experimental applications:

ApplicationRecommended UseKey Considerations
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)Detection of TAS2R38 in tissue sectionsRequires appropriate antigen retrieval methods
Immunocytochemistry (ICC-IF)Cellular localization studiesValidated for cell-based assays
Western Blotting (WB)Protein detection in cell/tissue lysatesUseful for quantifying expression levels

Each application requires specific optimization for buffer conditions, antibody dilution, and protocol parameters to ensure specificity and sensitivity .

How can structural-guided design improve TAS2R38 antibody specificity and function?

Structural-guided design represents an advanced approach to improving antibody specificity and function through iterative improvement processes. This methodology involves:

  • Lead antibody identification: Obtaining an initial antibody with acceptable specificity for TAS2R38 .

  • Structure-function relationship elucidation: Using techniques like X-ray crystallography to understand the molecular basis of antibody-antigen interaction .

  • Next-generation library design: Creating targeted mutations in the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) based on structural insights .

  • Improved antibody selection: Screening and identifying antibodies with enhanced properties such as higher affinity or better specificity for TAS2R38 .

This iterative approach has proven successful in creating next-generation antibodies with significantly improved function. For instance, studies on other antibodies have demonstrated that structure-guided approaches can enhance both affinity and specificity by optimizing the antigen-binding site topography to better accommodate the target epitope .

What methods should be employed to evaluate TAS2R38 antibody's ability to reduce target protein aggregation in neurodegenerative disease models?

When evaluating TAS2R38 antibody for potential therapeutic applications in protein aggregation contexts (similar to anti-tau approaches), researchers should implement the following methodological framework:

  • Detergent-insoluble protein assessment: Quantify changes in the insoluble protein fraction before and after antibody treatment using biochemical fractionation and Western blotting .

  • Histopathological evaluation: Assess tissue sections using appropriate staining techniques (such as Thioflavin-S for aggregates) and quantify using blinded scoring systems (e.g., 1-5 scale) .

  • Volumetric tissue analysis: Measure relevant tissue volumes (e.g., cortical/hippocampal) using stereological methods to determine if antibody treatment prevents tissue atrophy .

  • Functional assessment: Evaluate behavioral or functional parameters related to the disease model to determine if antibody treatment results in functional improvement .

  • Microglial uptake experiments: Assess whether the antibody facilitates microglial clearance of protein aggregates using cell culture models and techniques like flow cytometry to quantify aggregate uptake .

Data should be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods with consideration for dose-dependent effects, as demonstrated in studies of anti-tau antibodies where both 10 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg doses showed effects, but with different magnitudes .

How can next-generation sequencing and high-throughput screening be integrated to develop improved TAS2R38 antibodies?

Advanced antibody development increasingly incorporates high-throughput technologies:

  • AI-assisted antibody design: Utilize generative artificial intelligence models to design antibody complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) with enhanced binding properties for TAS2R38 .

  • Zero-shot antibody generation: Implement computational approaches that can design antibodies without prior examples of binders to the target, allowing for innovative binding solutions .

  • High-throughput screening: Employ techniques such as E. coli based antibody expression systems and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to experimentally assess hundreds of thousands of antibody candidates .

  • Integrated validation pipeline:

    StageTechnologyOutput Data
    DesignAI generative models>1 million candidate sequences
    SynthesisDNA synthesisThousands of physical constructs
    ExpressionE. coli expression systemsAntibody proteins
    Primary ScreenFACS or binding assaysBinding percentages
    Secondary ValidationOrthogonal methodsSpecificity confirmation

This integrated approach has achieved binding rates of 10.6% for heavy chain CDR3 designs and 1.8% for complete HCDR123 designs in similar antibody development projects, demonstrating the potential of these methods for creating next-generation TAS2R38 antibodies .

How should researchers address contradictory results between different validation methods for TAS2R38 antibody?

When facing contradictory results across different validation methods, researchers should follow this systematic approach:

  • Application-specific assessment: Recognize that antibody performance varies between applications due to differences in antigen conformation. An antibody that works well in Western blotting (denatured proteins) may perform poorly in immunoprecipitation (native proteins) .

  • Sample type considerations: Evaluate whether contradictions arise from differences in sample types, as the selectivity of an antibody can be affected by the presence of similar antigens in different tissues or cell types .

  • Protocol variation analysis: Examine whether minor protocol differences could explain contradictory results, as even subtle changes in antigen retrieval methods, buffer conditions, or incubation times can significantly impact antibody performance .

  • Hierarchical validation approach: When contradictions occur, prioritize genetic validation methods (knockout controls) as they generally provide the most definitive evidence of specificity .

  • Statistical validation: Ensure sufficient sample numbers are used to establish statistically significant correlations between different validation approaches, as most contradictions arise from inadequate sampling .

What factors influence the cross-reactivity of TAS2R38 antibody, and how can researchers minimize non-specific binding?

Cross-reactivity and non-specific binding can significantly impact experimental results. Researchers should consider:

  • Epitope conservation analysis: Determine whether the epitope recognized by the TAS2R38 antibody is conserved in related proteins, which could lead to cross-reactivity .

  • Blocking optimization: Systematically test different blocking reagents (BSA, non-fat milk, normal serum) and concentrations to minimize non-specific binding .

  • Antibody concentration titration: Perform detailed titration experiments to identify the optimal antibody concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background .

  • Pre-adsorption controls: Conduct pre-adsorption of the antibody with purified antigen to confirm binding specificity and identify potential cross-reactivity .

  • Washing stringency adjustment: Optimize washing conditions (buffer composition, duration, number of washes) to effectively remove non-specifically bound antibody without reducing specific signal .

How should researchers interpret differences in TAS2R38 antibody performance across tissue types and fixation methods?

Interpretation of varying antibody performance across different experimental conditions requires:

  • Fixation-dependent epitope analysis: Recognize that different fixation methods (formalin, paraformaldehyde, methanol) can alter epitope accessibility and antibody binding efficiency .

  • Antigen retrieval optimization: For each tissue type, systematically compare antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced vs. enzymatic, high vs. low pH) to identify optimal conditions for TAS2R38 detection .

  • Tissue-specific validation: Perform validation controls in each new tissue type rather than assuming performance will be consistent across tissues .

  • Quantitative comparison framework: When comparing staining across tissues, develop a normalized scoring system that accounts for tissue-specific variables and background levels .

  • Multiplex validation approach: Combine antibody staining with orthogonal methods (RNA expression, mass spectrometry) in each tissue type to confirm that differences reflect true biological variation rather than technical artifacts .

How can TAS2R38 antibody be utilized in single-cell analysis techniques?

Single-cell applications represent cutting-edge approaches for TAS2R38 antibody usage:

  • Single-cell Western blotting: Adapt TAS2R38 antibody protocols for microfluidic platforms that enable protein analysis at single-cell resolution .

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF): Conjugate TAS2R38 antibody with rare earth metals for multiplexed single-cell protein detection alongside dozens of other markers .

  • Imaging mass cytometry: Combine tissue imaging with metal-labeled TAS2R38 antibody to visualize receptor distribution with subcellular resolution while preserving spatial context .

  • Proximity ligation assays: Use TAS2R38 antibody in combination with antibodies against potential interaction partners to detect protein-protein interactions at the single-molecule level .

What are the prospects for using TAS2R38 antibody in conjunction with artificial intelligence for improved epitope targeting?

Integration of antibody research with AI technologies offers promising directions:

  • Structure-guided epitope prediction: Advanced computational models can predict optimal epitopes on TAS2R38 for antibody targeting, potentially identifying regions that confer higher specificity or functionality .

  • De novo antibody design: AI-based platforms can generate completely novel antibody sequences targeting TAS2R38 without requiring pre-existing antibody templates, potentially accessing novel binding modes .

  • Zero-shot antibody generation: Implement computational approaches that can design TAS2R38-binding antibodies without prior binding examples, creating innovative solutions for challenging epitopes .

  • High-throughput validation integration:

    AI TechnologyApplication to TAS2R38Potential Impact
    Generative modelsDesign of novel CDRs10.6% binding rate for HCDR3 designs
    Structure predictionAntibody-antigen complex modelingImproved binding site complementarity
    Computational screeningVirtual screening of millions of candidates1-2 orders of magnitude faster development
    Developability predictionIdentify antibody designs with optimal propertiesReduced downstream development issues

These AI-assisted approaches represent the cutting edge of antibody research and development, with potential to significantly accelerate and improve TAS2R38 antibody development .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.