In the context of ATL, several therapeutic antibodies have been studied or used clinically, though none are labeled "ATL59." Key examples include:
Mogamulizumab is the most established antibody therapy for ATL, demonstrating efficacy in depleting malignant Tregs and ATL cells .
Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) has shown promise in clinical trials, particularly in combination with chemotherapy .
HBZ-specific antibodies are under investigation for targeting the HTLV-1 oncogene, which is constitutively expressed in ATL cells .
While "ATL59" is not referenced, antibodies with numerical identifiers (e.g., H5N1-specific antibodies) are studied in viral immunology. For example:
Adjuvants like MF59 enhance antibody effector functions (e.g., neutrophil phagocytosis, complement activation) in influenza vaccines .
T-cell-independent antibodies (e.g., those induced by liposomal OVA 58-72 + MPLA) enable class switching and memory B-cell formation without T-cell help .
The term "ATL59" may stem from:
Patient or Sample Codes: In ATL research, patient samples are often labeled numerically (e.g., ATL30 in ).
Antibody Clones: Specific antibody clones (e.g., 3I14 for H5N1) are sometimes numerically identified .
Proprietary Nomenclature: Unpublished or proprietary antibodies may use internal codes not reflected in public databases.
No Documentation: No peer-reviewed studies or clinical trials reference "ATL59 Antibody."
Alternative Focus: For ATL-related antibody research, prioritize:
ATL59 Antibody (product code CSB-PA879795XA01DOA) is a research antibody designed for detection of ATL59 protein from Arabidopsis thaliana, also known as mouse-ear cress. According to database information, this antibody targets a protein with UniProt accession number Q9SN27 . ATL59 belongs to the Arabidopsis Tóxicos en Levadura (ATL) family, which typically consists of E3 ubiquitin ligases containing a RING-H2 finger domain and a transmembrane domain. These proteins are involved in various cellular processes including plant defense responses, hormone signaling, and developmental regulation.
While specific validated applications for ATL59 Antibody are not explicitly detailed in current literature, research-grade antibodies for plant proteins are typically validated for applications including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation (IP), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Similar to approaches used with other research antibodies like AP-2 gamma antibody, experimental conditions should be optimized for each specific application as noted in comparable antibody documentation: "Optimal dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each application" .
For optimal performance and longevity, plant-specific antibodies like ATL59 Antibody should generally be stored according to manufacturer specifications. Based on standard practices for research antibodies, this typically includes storage at -20°C for long-term preservation or at 4°C for short-term use. Aliquoting the antibody upon receipt can help prevent protein degradation from repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Similar antibody products are typically available in two formats: lyophilized or as a 0.2 μm filtered solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) .
Determining the optimal working dilution of ATL59 Antibody requires empirical testing through dilution series experiments for each specific application. For Western blotting applications, based on protocols used with comparable research antibodies, begin testing with dilutions in the range of 1:500 to 1:5000. For immunohistochemistry applications, starting dilutions between 1:50 and 1:500 are typically appropriate. As demonstrated in protocols for other plant antibodies, antibody concentration significantly impacts detection sensitivity and specificity. For example, comparable antibodies are often used at concentrations around 2-10 μg/mL for Western blotting and 10 μg/mL for immunohistochemistry applications .
When designing experiments with ATL59 Antibody, several controls should be incorporated to ensure reliable and interpretable results:
Positive control: Wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana tissue samples expressing ATL59
Negative control: Arabidopsis mutant lines with ATL59 deletion or knockdown, or tissues where ATL59 is not expressed
Primary antibody omission control: To establish baseline background signal
Secondary antibody-only control: To detect non-specific binding of the secondary detection system
Loading control: For Western blot applications, detection of housekeeping proteins like actin or GAPDH to normalize protein loading
Similar to protocols established for other antibodies, these controls help distinguish specific signal from experimental artifacts .
For optimal extraction of ATL59 protein from Arabidopsis tissues, consider these methodological approaches:
Homogenization in liquid nitrogen followed by extraction in buffer containing:
Detergent (e.g., 1% Triton X-100 or NP-40)
Protease inhibitor cocktail to prevent degradation
Reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)
Buffer conditions maintaining pH 7.4-8.0
For membrane-associated proteins like ATL family members, consider:
Addition of stronger detergents (SDS) for complete solubilization
Subcellular fractionation to enrich for membrane compartments
Modified extraction protocols optimized for RING-finger containing proteins
When analyzing ATL59 by Western blot, reducing conditions are likely necessary, similar to those described for other plant protein detection systems .
Several technical and biological factors can contribute to weak or absent signals in ATL59 Antibody experiments:
Insufficient protein extraction: Plant tissues contain cell walls and secondary metabolites that can interfere with protein extraction efficiency
Protein denaturation: Improper sample preparation may destroy the epitope recognized by the antibody
Suboptimal antibody concentration: Too dilute primary or secondary antibody concentrations
Insufficient antigen retrieval: For fixed tissues, inadequate unmasking of epitopes
Developmental or tissue-specific expression: ATL59 may be expressed only under specific conditions or in certain tissues
Post-translational modifications: Modifications may mask the epitope recognized by the antibody
For optimal detection, conditions should be systematically optimized similar to approaches used for other plant antibodies .
High background signal can compromise experimental interpretation. To reduce non-specific binding and background:
Optimize blocking conditions: Increase blocking agent concentration (BSA, non-fat milk, or plant-specific blockers) and extend blocking time
Adjust antibody concentration: Dilute primary and secondary antibodies appropriately
Enhance washing steps: Increase number and duration of washes between incubation steps
Add detergents: Include 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 in wash buffers
Pre-absorb antibody: Incubate with non-specific proteins before application to samples
Use plant-specific blocking agents: Consider adding non-specific plant extracts to reduce binding to common plant components
Similar approaches have been demonstrated effective in reducing background when using other plant-specific antibodies .
Rigorous validation of antibody specificity is crucial for reliable research findings. For ATL59 Antibody, consider:
Genetic validation: Test antibody on atl59 knockout or knockdown lines
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Molecular weight verification: Confirm detected bands match predicted molecular weight of ATL59
Multiple detection methods: Compare results across different techniques (Western blot, immunohistochemistry)
Correlation with transcript data: Compare protein detection with known ATL59 mRNA expression patterns
Such validation approaches align with best practices established for research antibodies in plant biology .
ATL59 Antibody can be employed to investigate protein interaction networks using these methodological approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Prepare non-denaturing lysates from Arabidopsis tissues
Immunoprecipitate using ATL59 Antibody
Identify co-precipitated proteins via mass spectrometry or Western blotting
Proximity-dependent labeling:
Combine with BioID or APEX2 approaches for in vivo interaction studies
Use ATL59 Antibody to validate proximity labeling results
Immunofluorescence co-localization:
Perform dual-labeling with ATL59 Antibody and antibodies against potential interactors
Analyze co-localization using confocal microscopy
These approaches can help elucidate the functional roles of ATL59 in ubiquitin-mediated signaling pathways, similar to methodologies used to study other regulatory proteins .
Many ATL family proteins are implicated in stress responses. To investigate ATL59's role:
Stress induction experiments:
Subject plants to various stressors (drought, pathogens, hormones)
Use ATL59 Antibody to monitor protein level changes via Western blot
Quantify relative expression compared to control conditions
Subcellular localization studies:
Perform fractionation followed by Western blotting with ATL59 Antibody
Monitor potential relocalization during stress response
Compare with known stress response markers
Post-translational modification analysis:
Use ATL59 Antibody to immunoprecipitate the protein under different conditions
Analyze modifications (phosphorylation, ubiquitination) by mass spectrometry
These approaches can provide insights into ATL59's role in stress signaling networks, similar to methodologies used to study other regulatory proteins in signaling cascades .
Integrating antibody-based detection with genetic manipulation provides powerful insights:
Complementation studies:
Express modified versions of ATL59 in knockout backgrounds
Use ATL59 Antibody to verify expression levels
Correlate protein expression with phenotypic rescue
Protein-domain function analysis:
Generate plants expressing truncated or mutated ATL59 versions
Use the antibody to confirm expression and stability
Map functional domains through correlation with phenotypic effects
Tissue-specific or inducible expression:
Create lines with modified ATL59 expression patterns
Use the antibody to validate spatial and temporal expression
Correlate with developmental or stress response phenotypes
This combined genetic-immunological approach can reveal functional mechanisms, similar to methodologies used to study regulatory proteins in other systems .
Natural variation studies using ATL59 Antibody can reveal evolutionary adaptations:
| Ecotype | Tissue Type | ATL59 Relative Expression | Notes on Detection Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Col-0 | Seedling | Baseline | Standard Western blot conditions |
| Ler | Seedling | Variable | May require optimization |
| Ws | Seedling | Variable | May require optimization |
| C24 | Seedling | Variable | May require optimization |
Analysis should include:
Standardized protein extraction protocols across ecotypes
Normalized loading using consistent housekeeping proteins
Statistical analysis of biological replicates (minimum n=3)
Correlation with any known phenotypic differences between ecotypes
This approach enables identification of natural variation in ATL59 expression that may correlate with adaptive traits .
The ATL family in Arabidopsis comprises numerous members with potentially overlapping functions. When comparing family members:
Epitope specificity:
Determine if ATL59 Antibody might cross-react with closely related ATL proteins
Perform sequence alignment of epitope regions to predict potential cross-reactivity
Validate specificity using knockout lines for multiple ATL members
Expression pattern comparison:
Use specific antibodies for different ATL members in parallel experiments
Create expression tables comparing tissue distribution
Correlate with publicly available transcriptome data
Functional redundancy assessment:
Study protein levels in single and multiple atl mutant lines
Look for compensatory expression changes among family members
This comparative approach can reveal functional specialization or redundancy within the ATL family, similar to approaches used in studying other protein families .
Post-transcriptional regulation can cause discrepancies between mRNA and protein levels:
Integrated analysis approach:
Perform parallel qRT-PCR and Western blot with ATL59 Antibody
Calculate correlation coefficients between transcript and protein
Analyze samples across developmental stages and stress conditions
Potential regulatory mechanisms to investigate:
miRNA-mediated regulation
Protein stability differences
Translational efficiency variation
Time-course analysis:
Monitor both transcript and protein levels following stimuli
Quantify temporal relationships between mRNA and protein changes
This integrated approach can reveal regulatory mechanisms controlling ATL59 expression, similar to methodologies used to study other plant regulatory proteins .
As an E3 ubiquitin ligase family member, ATL59 likely participates in protein degradation pathways:
Target identification:
Use ATL59 Antibody for co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Verify interactions with candidate substrates
Monitor ubiquitination status of potential targets
Pathway integration:
Investigate ATL59's role in hormonal signaling networks
Study relationships with known ubiquitin pathway components
Analyze effects of proteasome inhibitors on ATL59 levels and activity
Spatial regulation:
Use immunohistochemistry to map ATL59 distribution across tissues and cell types
Correlate with known sites of active ubiquitin-mediated regulation
These approaches align with current research trends investigating protein quality control mechanisms in plants under normal and stress conditions .
Several cutting-edge approaches could extend ATL59 Antibody utility:
Super-resolution microscopy:
Apply advanced imaging techniques for subcellular localization studies
Investigate co-localization with interaction partners at nanometer resolution
Quantitative proteomics integration:
Combine ATL59 Antibody immunoprecipitation with multiplexed protein quantification
Map dynamic interaction networks under different conditions
Single-cell analysis:
Adapt ATL59 immunodetection for single-cell profiling
Investigate cell-specific expression patterns within complex tissues
These technological integrations represent frontier approaches in plant molecular biology research that could significantly advance understanding of ATL59 function .