The ATP6V1B2 antibody targets the 56–58 kDa V1B2 subunit, which is part of the V1 domain of V-ATPases. This subunit plays a pivotal role in ATP hydrolysis, enabling proton transport into organelles . The antibody is typically raised against the immunogen sequence: MALRAMRGIV NGAAPELPVP TGGPAVGARE QALAVSRNYL SQPRLTYKTV SGVNGPLVIL DHVKFPRYAE IVHLTLPDGT KRSGQVLEVS GSKAVVQVFE .
The ATP6V1B2 antibody is utilized in multiple experimental techniques:
Dilution recommendations vary by application:
The ATP6V1B2 antibody has been instrumental in studying lysosomal dysfunction and associated diseases:
Dominant Deafness-Onychodystrophy (DDOD) Syndrome: Mutations in ATP6V1B2 disrupt V-ATPase activity, impairing lysosome acidification and leading to sensorineural deafness, nail dystrophy, and intellectual disability . Immunoblotting with this antibody confirmed protein truncation in patient fibroblasts .
Lysosomal Disorders: The antibody revealed increased autophagosome accumulation in Atp6v1b2 mutant mice, highlighting defective autophagic flux .
Cancer Research: Overexpression of ATP6V1B2 correlated with anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis in breast cancer models .
Yuan et al. (2014): Identified ATP6V1B2 mutations causing DDOD syndrome .
Thermo Fisher Scientific (2025): Product specifications for PA5-52518 .
Li et al. (2024): Demonstrated lysosomal dysfunction in ATP6V1B2 variants .
Proteintech (2025): Detailed antibody applications and protocols .
Wang et al. (2021): Linked ATP6V1B2 to auditory system degeneration .
ATP6V1B2 is a non-catalytic subunit of the V1 complex of vacuolar H⁺-ATPase (V-ATPase), a multisubunit enzyme composed of a peripheral V1 complex that hydrolyzes ATP and a membrane-integral V0 complex that translocates protons. This protein plays a major role in:
Acidification and pH maintenance of intracellular compartments
Lysosomal function and autophagy regulation
Proton transport across cellular membranes
V-ATPase functions as a heteromultimeric enzyme with the V1 complex (including ATP6V1B2) attached to the V0 membrane proton pore complex. ATP6V1B2 is one of two isoforms of ATP6V1 and is expressed in most cell types, displaying a broader expression pattern than ATP6V1B1, which is primarily kidney-specific .
ATP6V1B2 antibodies show varying performance characteristics across experimental platforms:
| Application | Typical Dilution Range | Common Reactive Species | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:40000 | Human, mouse, rat | Observe at 56-58 kDa |
| Immunoprecipitation (IP) | 0.5-4.0 μg per 1-3 mg lysate | Mouse brain tissue | Higher antibody amounts may be needed for dilute samples |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | Human, mouse, rat | May require antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 |
| Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF) | 0.25-2 μg/mL | Human, mouse, rat | Effective for co-localization studies with lysosomal markers |
| ELISA | Varies by antibody | Multiple species | Good for quantitative analysis |
These applications have been validated through published research, with certain antibodies being cited in multiple studies focusing on ATP6V1B2's role in lysosomal function and disease models .
For optimal Western blot results with ATP6V1B2 antibodies:
Sample preparation: Efficiently lyse cells using buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of the target protein
Loading control selection: GAPDH is commonly used for normalization when studying ATP6V1B2
Gel percentage: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal resolution of the 56-58 kDa ATP6V1B2 protein
Blocking conditions: 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST typically provides adequate blocking
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute according to manufacturer recommendations (typically 1:1000-1:5000) and incubate overnight at 4°C
Detection method: Both chemiluminescence and fluorescence-based detection systems work well
Expected results: The observed molecular weight should be approximately 56-58 kDa
When troubleshooting, note that 293T cells, HeLa cells, mouse brain tissue, and other tissue lysates have been successfully used to detect ATP6V1B2 expression .
To effectively study ATP6V1B2's co-localization with lysosomes:
Cell preparation: Seed primary fibroblasts or relevant cell lines at 20 × 10³ cells on cover glasses in 24-well plates
Fixation protocol: Fix cells with 3% PFA for 30 minutes at 4°C
Permeabilization: Treat with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes at room temperature
Primary antibodies: Use mouse monoclonal anti-LAMP1 antibody as a lysosomal marker alongside rabbit polyclonal ATP6V1B2 antibody
Secondary antibody selection: Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Counterstaining: DAPI for nuclear visualization
Imaging: Confocal microscopy is preferable for detailed co-localization analysis
Analysis: Quantify co-localization using Pearson's or Mander's coefficients
This approach has been used successfully to demonstrate ATP6V1B2's association with lysosomes and document morphological changes in lysosomes in patient-derived fibroblasts carrying ATP6V1B2 mutations .
ATP6V1B2 mutations have been linked to several syndromic disorders through distinct molecular mechanisms:
Dominant deafness-onychodystrophy (DDOD) syndrome: Characterized by congenital sensorineural hearing loss and nail abnormalities
DOORS syndrome: Features deafness, onychodystrophy, osteodystrophy, intellectual disability, and seizures
Zimmermann-Laband syndrome (ZLS): Manifests with gingival enlargement, hypoplasia/aplasia of nails and terminal phalanges, and intellectual disability
Recent research demonstrates that these disorders form a phenotypic continuum rather than distinct entities. Dominantly acting variants in ATP6V1B2 (p.Ala332Val, p.Gln376Lys, p.Tyr328His, p.Arg485Pro) result in a gain-of-function mechanism that upregulates V-ATPase function, leading to:
Increased lysosomal acidification
Disrupted lysosomal morphology and function
Defective autophagic flux
Accumulation of lysosomal substrates
These insights have led to the reclassification of these conditions as lysosomal disorders, expanding our understanding of how ATP6V1B2 dysfunction impacts cellular homeostasis.
Several experimental models have been developed to study ATP6V1B2-related hearing loss:
Hair cell-specific knockout mouse (Atp6v1b2 fl/fl; Atoh1): Recapitulates human phenotypes including hair cell loss and abnormal lysosomal morphology and function
Atp6v1b2 Arg506/Arg506 mice**: Develops progressive hearing loss starting at 28 weeks with increased ABR thresholds
Cell culture models: Patient-derived fibroblasts and transfected cell lines expressing mutant ATP6V1B2 constructs
Key findings from these models include:
ATP6V1B2 is essential for maintaining lysosomal function in hair cells
Hair cell degeneration can be prevented through gene therapy approaches
ATP6V1B2 plays a critical role in spiral ganglion neuron maintenance
Hidden hearing loss (HHL) precedes overt hearing loss in some models
The Arg506*/Arg506* Atp6v1b2 mice show accumulation of autophagosomes in spiral ganglion neurons but not in the organ of Corti, suggesting differential effects of ATP6V1B2 dysfunction across auditory tissues .
For successful immunoprecipitation of ATP6V1B2:
Lysate preparation: Use 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate from tissues expressing ATP6V1B2 (e.g., mouse brain tissue)
Antibody amount: 0.5-4.0 μg of purified ATP6V1B2 antibody
Pre-clearing step: Pre-clear lysate with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Immunoprecipitation: Incubate pre-cleared lysate with antibody overnight at 4°C
Bead selection: Protein G works well for most ATP6V1B2 antibodies
Washing conditions: Use stringent washing to minimize non-specific interactions
Elution method: Gentle elution under non-denaturing conditions can preserve protein-protein interactions
Controls: Include IgG control and input samples for validation
IP can be followed by mass spectrometry to identify ATP6V1B2 interaction partners or Western blotting to confirm successful pulldown .
Recent advancements in gene therapy for ATP6V1B2-related disorders reveal several critical considerations:
Vector design: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors incorporating inner ear-specific promoters show promise
Administration route: Direct injection into the scala media at postnatal days 0-2 has demonstrated efficacy
Expression optimization: The AAV-ie-Eh3 vector system enhances therapeutic precision while minimizing toxicity
Dose determination: Single administration can provide long-term (24+ weeks) hearing rescue
Outcome measures:
Prevention of hair cell degeneration
Restoration of lysosome morphology
Rescue of auditory and vestibular function
Timing considerations: Early intervention before irreversible cellular damage occurs is critical
This approach establishes a novel therapeutic paradigm with significant clinical potential for ATP6V1B2-associated hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction .
Confirming ATP6V1B2 antibody specificity requires multiple validation approaches:
Western blot analysis: Verify the detection of a single band at the expected molecular weight (56-58 kDa)
Multiple tissue/cell line testing: Test across tissues known to express ATP6V1B2 (brain, kidney, etc.)
Knockout/knockdown controls: Use ATP6V1B2 knockout or siRNA-treated samples as negative controls
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to confirm signal specificity
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against ATP6V1B1 to ensure no cross-reactivity with this related isoform
Orthogonal validation: Compare results using antibodies targeting different epitopes of ATP6V1B2
Enhanced validation: Some antibodies undergo orthogonal RNAseq validation, providing additional confidence
Antibody validation data should show reactivity with the expected species (human, mouse, rat) and appropriate subcellular localization consistent with ATP6V1B2's known distribution.
Several factors can introduce variability in ATP6V1B2 antibody experiments:
Antibody storage conditions: Store at -20°C or -80°C according to manufacturer recommendations; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Buffer composition: Use recommended buffers (PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol pH 7.3 for many antibodies)
Sample preparation inconsistencies: Standardize lysis protocols and protein quantification methods
Application-specific factors:
WB: Transfer efficiency, blocking conditions, antibody concentration
IHC: Fixation method, antigen retrieval (TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0)
IF: Cell permeabilization, mounting media selection
Antibody class differences: Monoclonal vs. polyclonal antibodies may show different specificities and applications
Cell/tissue-specific expression levels: ATP6V1B2 expression varies across tissues, affecting detection sensitivity
Post-translational modifications: May affect epitope recognition
To minimize variability, careful titration of antibody concentration for each experimental system and thorough documentation of protocols are essential.