A6 is a well-characterized monoclonal antibody (mAb) with applications in immunology and oncology.
Target: Recognizes a carbohydrate-dependent epitope on leukocyte common antigen (LCA/CD45) isoforms, particularly the p180 isoform .
Epitope Specificity: Neuraminidase-sensitive and trypsin-resistant, indicating glycan-dependent binding .
Cellular Reactivity:
Depletion Studies:
Therapeutic Potential: Linked to targeting functional T cell subsets in autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection .
ANO6, a calcium-activated chloride channel, is targeted by antibodies such as ACL-016-F (Alomone Labs) .
Applications:
Method | Use Case |
---|---|
Western blot | Detects ANO6 in cell lysates |
Live cell flow cytometry | Labels extracellular ANO6 in live cells |
Nomenclature Errors: "AUG6" may stem from typographical confusion with A6 or ANO6.
Commercial Availability:
The role of AUG6 in microtubule organization is evidenced by studies of its hypomorphic allele, gem3 (aug6-1). Research indicates that gem3 disrupts cell division during male meiosis, pollen mitosis I, and female gametophyte development. This disruption arises from the compromised function of the augmin complex, a key mediator of microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation in acentrosomal cells. [gem3] PMID: 27121542
AUG6 Antibody (CSB-PA297044XA01DOA) is a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody that specifically targets the AUG6 protein (UniProt: Q94BP7) from Arabidopsis thaliana . This antibody is designed for research applications in plant molecular biology, particularly in studies examining microtubule-organizing centers, as AUG6 is part of the augmin complex involved in microtubule nucleation. The antibody is raised against a recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana AUG6 protein as its immunogen, making it particularly valuable for studying this specific plant protein .
Based on vendor specifications, AUG6 Antibody has been tested and validated for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting (WB) applications . The antibody's performance in these applications suggests its suitability for detecting AUG6 protein in complex protein mixtures from Arabidopsis samples. When selecting an antibody for specific experimental applications, researchers should determine whether the antibody has been characterized for their intended use, as antibody performance can vary significantly across different experimental conditions and protocols .
Upon receipt, AUG6 Antibody should be stored at either -20°C or -80°C to maintain its efficacy and specificity . Importantly, researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as these can significantly degrade antibody quality and performance. For long-term storage, aliquoting the antibody into single-use volumes is recommended to minimize freeze-thaw damage. The antibody is provided in liquid form with an appropriate storage buffer, which helps maintain stability during proper storage .
To thoroughly validate AUG6 Antibody specificity, implement multiple complementary approaches from the "five pillars" of antibody validation:
Validation Strategy | Implementation for AUG6 Antibody | Specificity Level | Potential Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Genetic Strategy | Use AUG6 knockout/knockdown Arabidopsis lines as negative controls | High | Requires generation of transgenic plants or access to mutant lines |
Orthogonal Strategy | Compare antibody-based detection with RNA-seq or qPCR data for AUG6 expression | Moderate | Protein and mRNA levels may not always correlate |
Independent Antibody Strategy | Compare results using different antibodies targeting distinct AUG6 epitopes | Moderate | Requires availability of multiple validated AUG6 antibodies |
Recombinant Strategy | Overexpress tagged AUG6 in plant systems to confirm antibody detection | Moderate | Exogenous expression may alter normal protein behavior |
Capture MS Strategy | Identify proteins captured by AUG6 Antibody using mass spectrometry | Variable | Requires access to specialized equipment and expertise |
For maximum confidence, implement at least two validation strategies. For instance, combining genetic strategy (using aug6 mutant plants as negative controls) with an orthogonal approach (correlating protein detection with transcriptomic data) provides robust validation of specificity .
Antibody suitability for specific experimental conditions requires contextual validation. For AUG6 Antibody:
Perform preliminary tests under your exact experimental conditions, including buffer compositions, incubation times, and temperatures.
Include positive controls (samples known to express AUG6) and negative controls (samples lacking AUG6 expression) specific to your experimental system.
Titrate antibody concentrations to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratios.
Validate protocol-specific parameters (e.g., fixation methods for immunofluorescence or blocking conditions for Western blotting).
Document all optimization steps methodically to ensure reproducibility .
Remember that antibody performance is context-dependent, and characterization data from vendors may not precisely translate to your specific experimental setup. End-user validation is essential for each specific use and experimental condition .
While exact optimal conditions may require empirical determination, the following protocol provides a starting point for Western blotting with AUG6 Antibody:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins from Arabidopsis tissues using a plant-specific lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of AUG6 protein.
Protein separation: Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane on a 10-12% SDS-PAGE gel.
Transfer: Use PVDF membrane for optimal protein binding during wet transfer (100V for 60-90 minutes).
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature.
Primary antibody: Dilute AUG6 Antibody 1:500 to 1:2000 in blocking buffer; incubate overnight at 4°C.
Washing: Wash membrane with TBST (3 × 10 minutes).
Secondary antibody: Use anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody at 1:5000 to 1:10000; incubate for 1 hour at room temperature.
Detection: Develop using ECL substrate, optimizing exposure time to avoid signal saturation.
Include both positive controls (wild-type Arabidopsis samples) and negative controls (aug6 mutant samples when available) to verify specificity .
Although AUG6 Antibody is not explicitly validated for immunofluorescence by the manufacturer , researchers may optimize this application through:
Fixation method testing: Compare paraformaldehyde (4%), methanol, and acetone fixation to determine which best preserves AUG6 epitopes.
Antigen retrieval: Evaluate whether heat-induced or enzymatic antigen retrieval improves signal detection.
Permeabilization: Optimize cell wall and membrane permeabilization using 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 or plant-specific cell wall degrading enzymes.
Antibody concentration: Test a range of primary antibody dilutions (1:100 to 1:1000) and incubation times (overnight at 4°C is often optimal).
Validation controls: Include:
Peptide competition assays
aug6 mutant samples as negative controls
Dual-labeling with known interacting partners
Secondary antibody-only controls to assess background
Document all optimization parameters systematically to establish a reproducible protocol.
When facing challenges with signal detection using AUG6 Antibody, systematically evaluate:
Antibody integrity: Verify storage conditions; consider obtaining a new antibody lot if degradation is suspected.
Protein abundance: AUG6 may be expressed at low levels; increase protein loading or concentrate samples.
Epitope accessibility: Test different sample preparation methods:
For Western blotting: Adjust reducing conditions or denaturation procedures
For immunohistochemistry: Optimize fixation and antigen retrieval
Detection method sensitivity: Switch to more sensitive detection methods (e.g., from colorimetric to chemiluminescent or fluorescent detection).
Buffer optimization: Adjust salt concentration, pH, or detergent levels in washing and incubation buffers.
Incubation parameters: Extend primary antibody incubation time (up to overnight at 4°C) or optimize temperature.
Document each troubleshooting step methodically to identify critical parameters affecting antibody performance .
Discrepancies between protein detection using AUG6 Antibody and transcript levels may result from several biological or technical factors:
Post-transcriptional regulation: Evaluate potential mechanisms including:
microRNA-mediated repression
RNA binding protein regulation
Altered mRNA stability
Post-translational modifications: Consider if modifications might affect:
Epitope recognition by the antibody
Protein stability or half-life
Protein localization or compartmentalization
Technical considerations:
Antibody specificity: Validate using knockout/knockdown controls
Extraction efficiency: Different protocols may extract proteins with varying efficacy
Detection sensitivity thresholds: Protein detection may require more sensitive methods than transcript analysis
To resolve contradictions, implement orthogonal validation strategies that measure AUG6 at different biological levels (transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional) .
For rigorous quantification of AUG6 protein levels:
Western blot densitometry:
Use housekeeping proteins (actin, tubulin) for normalization
Ensure signal falls within linear detection range
Employ at least three biological replicates
Consider using fluorescent secondary antibodies for wider linear range
ELISA quantification:
Develop a standard curve using recombinant AUG6 protein
Validate sample matrix effects
Include spike recovery controls to assess accuracy
Flow cytometry (if optimized for plant cells):
Use median fluorescence intensity for quantification
Include calibration beads to standardize across experiments
Perform antibody titration to determine optimal concentration
Statistical analysis:
Apply appropriate statistical tests based on experimental design
Report both biological and technical variability
Consider power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes
Regardless of method, include proper controls and ensure that quantification remains within the validated linear range of detection .
When designing experiments to examine AUG6 expression patterns:
Experimental controls:
Include wild-type samples alongside treated/developmental samples
Consider using aug6 mutant lines (when available) as negative controls
Implement appropriate vehicle controls for treatments
Sampling strategy:
Define precise developmental stages using standardized metrics
Collect samples at consistent times to account for potential circadian regulation
Maintain uniformity in tissue collection, processing, and storage
Technical considerations:
Process all samples simultaneously to minimize batch effects
Randomize sample processing order
Include inter-experimental calibrators for cross-experiment normalization
Documentation requirements:
Record detailed growth conditions (light, temperature, media composition)
Document exact sample collection protocols
Maintain comprehensive records of antibody lot numbers and dilutions
Analysis approach:
Normalize AUG6 expression to appropriate reference proteins
Apply statistical methods appropriate for the experimental design
Consider multiple hypothesis testing correction when examining numerous conditions
This structured approach enhances reproducibility and facilitates meaningful interpretation of AUG6 expression patterns .
While AUG6 Antibody has not been specifically validated for immunoprecipitation , researchers interested in studying AUG6 protein interactions should consider:
Buffer optimization:
Test multiple lysis buffers varying in salt concentration and detergent type
Evaluate non-denaturing conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors to maintain interaction integrity
Control experiments:
Perform parallel IPs with non-specific IgG from the same species (rabbit)
Include aug6 mutant samples as negative controls
Consider expressing tagged versions of AUG6 for validation
Antibody coupling:
Determine optimal antibody-to-bead ratio
Compare direct coupling versus indirect capture using Protein A/G
Evaluate crosslinking to prevent antibody contamination in eluates
Validation approaches:
Confirm AUG6 precipitation by Western blotting a small fraction of the IP
Consider mass spectrometry analysis to comprehensively identify interacting partners
Validate key interactions through reciprocal co-IP or orthogonal methods
Data analysis:
Apply appropriate statistical threshold for identifying significant interactions
Filter results against common contaminant databases
Validate novel interactions through independent experimental approaches
These considerations help ensure specific and biologically relevant results when investigating AUG6 protein complexes .
The validation principles for AUG6 Antibody align with broader antibody validation frameworks, though with plant-specific considerations:
Comparative framework assessment:
The "five pillars" validation framework applies universally to AUG6 and other research antibodies, though implementation differs for plant proteins
Genetic validation using knockout/knockdown lines is particularly valuable for both plant and mammalian systems
Orthogonal validation comparing protein and transcript levels follows similar principles across systems
Plant-specific challenges:
Cell wall barriers require specialized extraction protocols
Plant-specific post-translational modifications may affect epitope recognition
Specialized fixation protocols for plant tissues may be necessary
Lower protein yields often necessitate optimization of detection sensitivity
Cross-experimental validation:
Like other research antibodies, AUG6 Antibody requires validation in each specific experimental context
Application-specific controls should be implemented regardless of antibody target
Independent replication remains the gold standard for all antibody applications
The fundamental principles of specificity verification, context-dependent validation, and appropriate controls are universally applicable across research antibodies .
Innovative approaches for studying AUG6 protein include:
CRISPR-based tagging:
Endogenous tagging of AUG6 with fluorescent proteins or epitope tags
Avoids potential artifacts from antibody cross-reactivity
Enables live-cell imaging of AUG6 dynamics
Proximity labeling technologies:
BioID or TurboID fusion to AUG6 to identify proximal proteins
APEX2 fusions for ultrastructural localization studies
Spatial and temporal mapping of AUG6 protein communities
Single-molecule detection methods:
Super-resolution microscopy of tagged AUG6 variants
Single-molecule pull-down (SiMPull) for quantitative interaction studies
Correlative light and electron microscopy for contextual localization
Quantitative proteomics:
Selective reaction monitoring (SRM) for absolute quantification
Tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling for multiplexed comparative studies
Data-independent acquisition (DIA) for comprehensive protein network analysis
Nanobody development:
Plant-specific nanobodies against AUG6 for improved tissue penetration
Intrabody expression for live-cell studies of AUG6 function
Multiplexed nanobody panels for simultaneous detection of interaction partners
These emerging approaches complement traditional antibody-based methods and may provide enhanced specificity, sensitivity, and contextual information about AUG6 biology.