Os01g0969100 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Os01g0969100 antibody; LOC_Os01g73790 antibody; OJ1656_A11.20 antibody; OsJ_04912UDP-D-apiose/UDP-D-xylose synthase antibody
Target Names
Os01g0969100
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets Os01g0969100, an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of UDP-D-glucuronate to a mixture of UDP-D-apiose and UDP-D-xylose. D-Apiose (3-C-hydroxymethyl-d-erythrose) is the only plant cell wall monosaccharide with a branched carbon skeleton. It is found in rhamnogalacturonan II (RG-II), apiogalacturonan, and several apioglycosides.
Database Links

KEGG: osa:4323835

STRING: 39947.LOC_Os01g73790.1

UniGene: Os.4743

Protein Families
NAD(P)-dependent epimerase/dehydratase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Os01g0969100 and why is it significant in rice research?

Os01g0969100 is an enzyme found in rice (Oryza sativa) that catalyzes the conversion of UDP-D-glucuronate to a mixture of UDP-D-apiose and UDP-D-xylose. This enzyme plays a critical role in cell wall synthesis in plants. D-Apiose (3-C-hydroxymethyl-d-erythrose) is the only plant cell wall monosaccharide with a branched carbon skeleton, found in rhamnogalacturonan II (RG-II), apiogalacturonan, and several apioglycosides.

The significance of Os01g0969100 in rice research stems from its fundamental role in:

  • Cell wall formation and structural development

  • Plant growth regulation and stress responses

  • Potential targets for improving rice varieties

  • Understanding rice biochemistry and metabolism pathways

This UDP-D-apiose/UDP-D-xylose synthase is part of the NAD(P)-dependent epimerase/dehydratase family and is primarily located in the cytoplasm.

What validation methods should be applied for Os01g0969100 antibodies in research?

Rigorous validation of Os01g0969100 antibodies requires a multi-method approach:

Validation MethodDescriptionCritical Parameters
Western blottingConfirms specific binding at expected molecular weightSample preparation methods, loading controls, band specificity
ELISA titrationDetermines antibody titer and binding affinityStandard curve generation, optimal dilution factors
Dot immunoblottingConfirms reactivity with native proteinDetection sensitivity, background levels
Cross-reactivity testingChecks specificity across related proteinsTesting against related rice proteins and other species
Recombinant protein controlsVerification using purified target proteinExpression system, purification method

For rice antibodies, validation typically involves generating standard curves derived from antigen-antibody reactions. As demonstrated with other rice proteins, quantification of concentrations (e.g., ~0.12% for reference proteins like HSP) and establishing detection limits (ranging from 0.06-0.24 ng) are essential validation steps .

Validation should also include testing across multiple rice varieties to confirm consistent recognition across genetic variations.

What experimental applications are suitable for Os01g0969100 antibodies?

Os01g0969100 antibodies can be applied in multiple experimental contexts:

Primary applications:

  • Western blotting (WB): For detection and quantification in tissue extracts

  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): For quantitative measurement with sensitivity down to nanogram levels

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For tissue localization studies at dilutions of approximately 1:50-1:200

  • Dot immunoblotting assay (DIBA): For rapid screening across multiple samples

Advanced applications:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: For studying protein-protein interactions

  • Serological-based reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (S-RT-LAMP): This novel technique has been applied for rice proteins, where viral proteins and associated nucleic acids are precipitated with specific antibodies, then analyzed via RT-LAMP

  • Immunofluorescence (ICC-IF): For cellular and subcellular localization studies

The application versatility of plant antibodies has been demonstrated with similar rice proteins, where a single antibody preparation could be used across multiple techniques with appropriate optimization .

How should Western blot protocols be optimized for Os01g0969100 antibody?

Optimization of Western blot protocols for Os01g0969100 antibody requires systematic adjustment of multiple parameters:

Sample preparation:

  • Use extraction buffers specifically designed for plant tissues (e.g., containing 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4)

  • For rice proteins, specialized extraction buffers for quantitative isolation of total soluble/membrane proteins are available

  • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

Protocol optimization:

  • Antibody dilution: Determine optimal working concentration through titration; typically, rice protein antibodies perform optimally at dilutions between 1:1,000 to 1:10,000

  • Reference protein inclusion: HSP and eEF-1α are validated reference proteins for rice tissue with established concentration standards (~0.12%)

  • Detection system: Select chemiluminescence for higher sensitivity or colorimetric methods for stability

  • Quantification approach: Create standard curves using purified recombinant protein at known concentrations

What reference proteins are recommended for normalization when studying Os01g0969100 expression?

Selection of appropriate reference proteins is critical for accurate quantification:

Validated reference proteins for rice studies:

Reference ProteinAdvantagesApproximate ConcentrationDetection Limit
Heat shock protein (HSP)Stable expression across tissues~0.12% in rice leaves0.24 ng
Elongation factor-1α (eEF-1α)Consistent expression under various conditions~0.12% in rice leaves0.06 ng
ActinWidely used structural proteinVariable by tissue-

These reference proteins have been systematically validated for rice Western blotting and quantitative analyses . When selecting reference proteins:

  • Verify expression stability across your specific experimental conditions

  • Use multiple reference proteins for robust normalization

  • Generate standard curves for each reference protein

  • Apply the same extraction procedures for both target and reference proteins

The standard curves derived from antigen-antibody reactions can be used to accurately calculate the concentrations of both the reference proteins and Os01g0969100 in various rice tissues or experimental conditions .

What approaches can resolve non-specific binding issues with Os01g0969100 antibodies?

Non-specific binding can compromise experimental results. Several strategies can address this issue:

Optimization strategies:

  • Antibody titration: Test serial dilutions to identify concentration with optimal signal-to-noise ratio

  • Blocking enhancement: Evaluate different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat milk, commercial blockers) and concentrations

  • Wash protocol adjustment: Increase stringency with more wash steps and higher detergent concentrations

  • Pre-absorption: Incubate antibody with related proteins to remove cross-reactive antibodies

Advanced strategies:

  • Cold non-specific antibody pretreatment: Although results vary by application, pre-treatment with cold, non-specific isotype-matched antibody can potentially reduce background binding

  • Alternative detection systems: Switch between chemiluminescence, fluorescence, or colorimetric methods

  • Sample preparation modifications: Improve protein extraction to reduce interfering compounds

  • Two-step detection: Use biotinylated secondary antibodies with streptavidin-conjugated detection systems

When troubleshooting, systematic modification of one parameter at a time with appropriate controls allows identification of the specific factor causing non-specific binding.

What methodologies determine epitope specificity of Os01g0969100 antibodies?

Understanding epitope specificity is crucial for antibody characterization and application optimization:

Standard epitope mapping techniques:

  • Peptide arrays: Testing antibody binding against overlapping synthetic peptides covering the full protein sequence

  • Competition assays: Evaluating whether binding is inhibited by specific peptides

  • Mutational analysis: Creating point mutations to identify critical binding residues

Advanced structural approaches:

  • X-ray crystallography: Determining atomic-level structures of antibody-antigen complexes to define epitope sites in molecular detail

  • Fragment-based computational design: Using computational methods to design antibodies targeting specific structured epitopes

  • Deconvolution of polyclonal or monoclonal mixtures: Separating and characterizing individual antibodies within a preparation targeting different epitopes

The precise mapping of epitope regions provides critical information for:

  • Understanding cross-reactivity potential

  • Developing more specific antibodies

  • Interpreting functional studies

  • Predicting antibody performance across applications

For example, X-ray crystallography has revealed details of antibody footprints on target proteins that pinpoint side chain interactions and explain allele specificity in other protein systems .

How do storage conditions impact long-term stability of Os01g0969100 antibodies?

Proper storage is essential for maintaining antibody functionality:

Recommended storage conditions:

  • Short-term storage: 4°C (refrigeration)

  • Long-term storage: -20°C to -70°C

  • Buffer composition: Typically preserved in PBS (pH 7.0-7.4) with 50% glycerol and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative

  • Aliquoting: Divide into small single-use volumes before freezing

  • Freeze-thaw cycles: Strictly avoid repeated freezing and thawing

What considerations are important for co-immunoprecipitation with Os01g0969100 antibodies?

Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) requires specific optimization for plant proteins:

Experimental design considerations:

  • Antibody validation: Confirm the antibody recognizes native, folded protein rather than just denatured epitopes

  • Extraction conditions: Optimize buffers to maintain protein-protein interactions while effectively extracting proteins from plant cell walls

  • Controls: Include appropriate negative controls (non-specific antibody of the same isotype) and positive controls

Technical parameters:

  • Precipitation method selection: Choose between protein A/G beads, magnetic beads, or other systems based on antibody characteristics

  • Washing stringency balance: Find optimal conditions that remove non-specific binding while preserving specific interactions

  • Downstream analysis planning: Consider detection methods for co-precipitated proteins (mass spectrometry, Western blot)

Advanced application:

As demonstrated with rice viral proteins, co-IP can be combined with nucleic acid analysis where "viral genomic dsRNA together with viral CP were precipitated by co-immunoprecipitation using PAb-CP, then the binding RNAs were crudely isolated and used for RT-LAMP diagnosis" . This approach could potentially be adapted for Os01g0969100 to study associated nucleic acids or interaction partners.

What methods enable quantitative assessment of Os01g0969100 protein expression across rice varieties?

Accurate quantification of Os01g0969100 across varieties requires rigorous methodology:

Quantitative approaches:

  • Standard curve development: Create curves using purified recombinant protein at known concentrations

  • Western blot densitometry: Use digital imaging and analysis software to quantify band intensity relative to standards

  • Quantitative ELISA: Develop assays with defined standard curves for high-throughput quantification

  • Multiple antibody validation: Verify results using antibodies against different regions of the protein

Analytical considerations:

  • Reference protein normalization: Normalize target protein expression to stable reference proteins like HSP or eEF-1α

  • Statistical analysis: Apply appropriate statistical methods for comparing expression across varieties

  • Sample preparation standardization: Ensure consistent extraction methods across all varieties

Data table example for comparative analysis:

Rice VarietyOs01g0969100 Expression (% of total protein)HSP (reference)Normalized Expression Ratio
Variety 10.X%0.12%X.XX
Variety 20.X%0.12%X.XX
Variety 30.X%0.12%X.XX

This quantitative approach allows researchers to accurately assess varietal differences in protein expression, potentially correlating with phenotypic traits or environmental responses.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.