At5g44380 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Context of the At5g44380 Gene

The At5g44380/BBE24 gene resides in a six-gene cluster on chromosome 5, alongside BBE23-25 and At5g44400 . Comparative studies of its paralogues reveal:

  • Oxidative Activity: BBE23 (CELLOX2) and BBE22 (CELLOX1) exhibit oxidative activity on cellodextrins (CDs) and mixed-linkage glucans (MLGs), suggesting a role in plant cell wall modification .

  • Immune Response: CELLOX1 is implicated in Arabidopsis immunity against Botrytis cinerea, while BBE23/CELLOX2 shows distinct expression patterns, indicating functional divergence within the cluster .

Though direct functional data for BBE24 is limited, its genomic proximity to characterized oxidases implies potential involvement in similar biochemical pathways .

Key Uses

  • Protein Localization: Tracking BBE24 expression in plant tissues under stress or developmental conditions.

  • Gene Cluster Studies: Investigating co-regulation and functional redundancy within the BBE-like oxidase cluster .

Challenges

  • Functional Redundancy: High sequence similarity among cluster members complicates isoform-specific studies .

  • Antibody Cross-Reactivity: Paralogue conservation may necessitate additional validation (e.g., knockout controls) to confirm signal specificity .

Future Directions

  • Mechanistic Studies: Elucidating BBE24’s substrate specificity and role in pathogen defense.

  • Structural Analysis: Resolving 3D structures to compare with CELLOX1/2 and infer evolutionary adaptations .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At5g44380 antibody; K9L2.18Berberine bridge enzyme-like 24 antibody; AtBBE-like 24 antibody; EC 1.1.1.- antibody
Target Names
At5g44380
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G44380

STRING: 3702.AT5G44380.1

UniGene: At.19702

Protein Families
Oxygen-dependent FAD-linked oxidoreductase family
Subcellular Location
Secreted, cell wall.

Q&A

What is the At5g44380 protein and why are antibodies against it important for plant research?

The At5g44380 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a FAD-binding domain-containing protein that plays roles in plant metabolism and potentially in stress response pathways. Antibodies targeting this protein are valuable tools for studying its expression, localization, and functional interactions in plant systems. The protein contains specific domains that bind flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), suggesting its involvement in redox reactions or electron transport processes . Antibodies against At5g44380 enable researchers to track protein expression levels under various conditions, determine subcellular localization, and investigate protein-protein interactions, providing critical insights into plant biochemical pathways and responses to environmental stimuli.

What approaches should be used for validating At5g44380 antibody specificity?

Validation of At5g44380 antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Western blot with positive and negative controls: Compare wild-type Arabidopsis extracts with knockout/knockdown lines of At5g44380. A specific antibody should show reduced or absent signal in the knockout samples.

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Confirm that the antibody pulls down the target protein by mass spectrometry identification.

  • Pre-absorption test: Pre-incubate the antibody with purified recombinant At5g44380 protein before immunostaining or western blot. This should eliminate specific staining if the antibody is truly specific.

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against closely related FAD-binding proteins to ensure specificity within this protein family.

  • Multiple antibody validation: Use antibodies raised against different epitopes of At5g44380 to confirm consistent localization and expression patterns .

These approaches collectively establish confidence in antibody specificity, particularly important for studying members of protein families with high sequence homology.

What are the optimal sample preparation methods for At5g44380 detection in plant tissues?

Optimal sample preparation for At5g44380 detection varies by experimental approach but requires careful preservation of protein structure and epitope accessibility:

For Western blot analysis:

  • Extract proteins using a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and protease inhibitor cocktail.

  • Include reducing agents like DTT (1-5 mM) to maintain FAD-binding domain structure.

  • For membrane-associated fractions, consider detergent optimization experiments comparing extraction efficiency with different detergents (CHAPS, digitonin, or NP-40).

For immunohistochemistry:

  • Fix tissues with 4% paraformaldehyde for 2-4 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C.

  • Consider epitope retrieval methods if fixation reduces antibody binding.

  • For Arabidopsis, try both paraffin embedding and cryosectioning to determine optimal epitope preservation.

For immunoprecipitation:

  • Use gentler lysis conditions (0.5% NP-40 or digitonin) to maintain protein-protein interactions.

  • Include FAD (10 μM) in buffers to stabilize the FAD-binding domain.

All protocols should be optimized through pilot experiments comparing different extraction methods and buffer compositions to maximize signal-to-noise ratio for the specific antibody being used .

How should Western blot protocols be optimized for At5g44380 detection?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for At5g44380 detection requires attention to several critical parameters:

Protein extraction and loading:

  • Use 20-40 μg of total protein per lane for whole-cell extracts

  • For enriched fractions (e.g., membrane fractions), 5-15 μg may be sufficient

  • Include reducing agent (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to maintain epitope accessibility

SDS-PAGE conditions:

  • Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution of the ~26.8 kDa At5g44380 protein

  • Include molecular weight markers spanning 10-50 kDa range for accurate size determination

Transfer conditions:

  • PVDF membranes generally provide better protein retention than nitrocellulose

  • For FAD-binding proteins, semi-dry transfer at 15V for 30 minutes often provides better results than wet transfer

Blocking and antibody incubation:

  • Test both BSA (3-5%) and non-fat dry milk (5%) as blocking agents

  • Optimize primary antibody dilution (typically start with 1:1000 and adjust)

  • Include 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 in wash buffers to reduce background

Detection optimization:

  • For quantitative analysis, use fluorescent secondary antibodies rather than HRP-conjugated antibodies

  • For enhanced chemiluminescence detection, exposure times should be determined empirically to avoid saturation

When troubleshooting, create a systematic testing matrix for these variables rather than changing multiple parameters simultaneously .

What controls are essential when using At5g44380 antibodies for immunolocalization studies?

Robust immunolocalization studies with At5g44380 antibodies require comprehensive controls:

Essential negative controls:

  • Primary antibody omission: Process samples identically but omit primary antibody

  • Secondary antibody only: Confirms lack of non-specific binding by secondary antibody

  • Pre-immune serum control: For custom antibodies, compare with pre-immune serum

  • Knockout/knockdown tissue: Ideally, use At5g44380 mutant lines as biological negative controls

  • Peptide competition/blocking: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide

Positive controls:

  • Tissues known to express At5g44380 (based on transcriptomic data)

  • Overexpression lines with validated increased expression

  • Co-localization with established organelle markers if subcellular localization is being studied

Additional validation approaches:

  • Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of At5g44380

  • Compare immunolocalization with fluorescent protein fusion localization

  • Validate expression patterns with in situ hybridization for mRNA

For each experiment, document all imaging parameters (exposure times, gain settings) and ensure they are identical between experimental and control samples. For quantitative analysis, perform signal intensity measurements on multiple cells across different experimental replicates to assess statistical significance .

How can I determine the appropriate antibody concentration for immunoprecipitation of At5g44380?

Determining optimal antibody concentration for At5g44380 immunoprecipitation requires systematic titration and validation:

Initial titration experiment:

  • Prepare consistent plant extract aliquots (e.g., 500 μg protein per reaction)

  • Test multiple antibody amounts (2, 5, 10, and 20 μg per reaction)

  • Use protein A/G beads at consistent amounts (40-50 μl of slurry)

  • Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation

  • Analyze by Western blot both the immunoprecipitated fraction and the unbound fraction

Optimization considerations:

  • Calculate immunoprecipitation efficiency at each antibody concentration by comparing band intensity of target protein in IP fraction versus input

  • Plot a saturation curve of IP efficiency against antibody amount

  • Select the lowest antibody concentration that gives near-maximal IP efficiency (typically at the beginning of the plateau phase)

Validation approaches:

  • Compare IP efficiency between different antibody clones or lots

  • Confirm identity of immunoprecipitated protein by mass spectrometry

  • Assess specificity by including knockout/knockdown samples

For co-immunoprecipitation studies, gentler lysis conditions (digitonin or CHAPS instead of Triton X-100) may better preserve protein-protein interactions. Additionally, crosslinking with formaldehyde (0.5-1%) prior to lysis can capture transient interactions but requires optimization to avoid epitope masking .

Why might I observe multiple bands when using At5g44380 antibodies in Western blotting?

Multiple bands in Western blots with At5g44380 antibodies can result from several biological and technical factors:

Biological explanations:

  • Post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation, glycosylation, or other modifications can alter protein migration

  • Alternative splicing: The At5g44380 gene may produce multiple isoforms

  • Protein degradation: Partial degradation during sample preparation can generate fragments

  • Protein complexes: Incomplete denaturation may retain some protein complexes

Technical considerations:

  • Non-specific binding: The antibody may cross-react with related FAD-binding proteins

  • Incomplete reduction: Insufficient reducing agent can allow formation of disulfide-linked complexes

  • Sample overloading: Excessive protein can lead to smearing and apparent multiple bands

Systematic investigation approach:

  • Compare band patterns between different tissues/conditions to identify consistent versus variable bands

  • Perform peptide competition assays to determine which bands are specific

  • Include knockout/knockdown samples to identify the true At5g44380 band

  • Optimize sample preparation to minimize protein degradation

  • Try antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm band identity

Validation strategies:

  • Immunoprecipitate with the antibody, then perform mass spectrometry on excised bands

  • Compare observed molecular weights with predicted values for known isoforms

  • Test whether treatment with phosphatase or deglycosylation enzymes alters band patterns

Documenting all observed band patterns systematically across experiments helps distinguish technical artifacts from biologically meaningful signals .

How can I quantify At5g44380 expression levels accurately across different experimental conditions?

Accurate quantification of At5g44380 expression requires rigorous experimental design and appropriate normalization methods:

Experimental design considerations:

  • Include biological replicates (minimum n=3, ideally n≥5)

  • Process all samples simultaneously to minimize technical variation

  • Include a dilution series of a reference sample to confirm detection linearity

Western blot quantification approach:

  • Use fluorescent secondary antibodies rather than chemiluminescence for wider linear range

  • Include multiple loading controls (e.g., actin, tubulin, and total protein stain)

  • Analyze band intensity using appropriate software (ImageJ, ImageStudio, etc.)

  • Normalize target protein to multiple loading controls

  • Calculate relative expression compared to control condition

Sample normalization table:

SampleAt5g44380 SignalACTIN SignalTUBULIN SignalTotal ProteinNormalized to ACTINNormalized to TUBULINNormalized to Total ProteinMean Normalized Value
Control 112503000250095000.4170.5000.1320.350 ± 0.160
Control 213003100260096000.4190.5000.1350.351 ± 0.152
Treatment 124003050255095500.7870.9410.2510.660 ± 0.294
Treatment 225003150265096500.7940.9430.2590.665 ± 0.290

Statistical analysis:

  • Perform appropriate statistical tests (t-test for two conditions, ANOVA for multiple conditions)

  • Report fold-change with standard deviation or standard error

  • Consider non-parametric tests if data don't meet normality assumptions

For absolute quantification, include purified recombinant At5g44380 protein standards of known concentration on the same blot. For very low abundance proteins, consider immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting to enrich the target protein before quantification .

What approaches can resolve specificity issues when At5g44380 antibodies show cross-reactivity with related proteins?

Addressing cross-reactivity issues with At5g44380 antibodies requires a multi-faceted approach:

Characterization of cross-reactivity:

  • Test the antibody against recombinant proteins of related FAD-binding domain family members

  • Compare immunoblot patterns between wild-type and At5g44380 knockout/knockdown lines

  • Perform peptide array analysis to identify exact cross-reactive epitopes

Experimental strategies to improve specificity:

  • Antibody purification: Perform affinity purification using immobilized At5g44380-specific peptides

  • Blocking optimization: Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers)

  • Antibody dilution: Increase dilution to reduce non-specific binding

  • Stringent washing: Increase wash buffer stringency (higher salt, mild detergents)

  • Peptide competition: Perform parallel experiments with and without competing peptide

Alternative antibody approaches:

  • Test monoclonal antibodies targeting unique epitopes

  • Use a combination of antibodies against different epitopes

  • Consider using epitope-tagged At5g44380 expressed in plants

Data interpretation strategies:

  • When cross-reactivity cannot be eliminated, use knockout controls to identify specific band

  • For immunolocalization, compare antibody staining patterns with fluorescent protein fusions

  • Document all cross-reactivity patterns and account for them in data interpretation

In cases where specificity issues persist, orthogonal approaches such as mass spectrometry or transcript analysis may be necessary to complement antibody-based detection .

How can At5g44380 antibodies be used to study protein-protein interactions in plant stress response pathways?

Studying At5g44380 protein interactions during stress responses requires specialized immunological approaches:

Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:

  • Native co-IP: Use At5g44380 antibody to pull down protein complexes from plant extracts

    • Optimize gentle lysis buffers (0.5% NP-40 or digitonin) to preserve interactions

    • Include FAD (10 μM) in buffers to stabilize FAD-binding protein interactions

    • Analyze co-precipitating proteins by mass spectrometry or targeted Western blotting

  • Crosslinking-assisted IP: Stabilize transient interactions prior to lysis

    • Apply membrane-permeable crosslinkers (DSP, formaldehyde) to intact tissues

    • Compare crosslinked versus non-crosslinked samples to identify stimulus-dependent interactions

    • Use reversible crosslinkers to facilitate downstream analysis

  • Proximity-based labeling: Combine with enzymatic tagging approaches

    • Express At5g44380 fused to BioID or TurboID in plants

    • Compare biotinylated proteins between control and stress conditions

    • Validate interactions using co-IP with At5g44380 antibodies

Experimental design for stress studies:

  • Apply defined stress treatments (drought, salt, temperature, pathogens)

  • Include detailed time-course analysis (minutes to hours)

  • Compare interactions across different tissues and developmental stages

Data analysis approach:

  • Classify interactors based on known functions and pathways

  • Perform Gene Ontology enrichment analysis on identified interactors

  • Validate key interactions using reciprocal co-IP or BiFC assays

Sample data presentation table:

Stress ConditionTimepointKey At5g44380 InteractorsFunctional CategoryValidation Method
Salt (150mM NaCl)30 minMAP Kinase 6, Calmodulin 3SignalingCo-IP, BiFC
Salt (150mM NaCl)2 hoursPeroxidase 42, Catalase 2ROS metabolismCo-IP, Split-YFP
Drought (20% PEG)1 hourLEA proteins, DREB2AStress responseCo-IP, PLA
Cold (4°C)6 hoursCBF transcription factorsTranscriptional regulationCo-IP, ChIP

This comprehensive approach can reveal how At5g44380 functions within dynamic protein interaction networks during plant stress responses .

What approaches work best for studying At5g44380 subcellular localization and trafficking during development and stress?

Investigating At5g44380 subcellular localization and trafficking requires complementary imaging and biochemical approaches:

Immunofluorescence microscopy optimization:

  • Test different fixation methods (4% paraformaldehyde, methanol, or glutaraldehyde)

  • Optimize permeabilization conditions for different cellular compartments

  • Use confocal microscopy with z-stack acquisition for 3D localization

  • Include co-staining with organelle markers for precise localization

Complementary localization approaches:

  • Fluorescent protein fusions: Create N- and C-terminal GFP/RFP fusions to confirm antibody-based localization

  • Correlative light-electron microscopy: Combine immunofluorescence with electron microscopy for nanoscale resolution

  • Live-cell imaging: Use fluorescent protein fusions to track protein dynamics

Subcellular fractionation approach:

  • Perform differential centrifugation to separate organelles

  • Use density gradient separation for fine organelle resolution

  • Analyze fractions by Western blotting with At5g44380 antibodies

  • Include organelle marker proteins as controls

Trafficking dynamics investigation:

  • Apply protein synthesis inhibitors (cycloheximide) to study protein turnover

  • Use Brefeldin A to disrupt ER-Golgi trafficking

  • Perform pulse-chase experiments to track protein movement

  • Apply specific stress treatments and monitor localization changes over time

Quantitative analysis of localization:

  • Measure co-localization coefficients (Pearson's, Manders')

  • Perform intensity profile analysis across cellular compartments

  • Use specialized software (ImageJ with coloc plugins, Imaris, etc.)

Sample localization data:

Developmental StageNormal ConditionsSalt StressDrought StressHeat Stress
SeedlingCytoplasmic, Nuclear peripheryEnhanced nuclearCytoplasmic aggregatesER-associated
Mature leafChloroplast-associated, CytoplasmicNuclear, ChloroplastPlasma membraneCytoplasmic foci
RootCytoplasmic, ERVacuolar boundaryNuclear, CytoplasmicCytoplasmic aggregates
Floral tissuesNuclear, CytoplasmicNuclear aggregatesPlasma membraneER-associated

These approaches collectively provide a comprehensive view of At5g44380 subcellular dynamics across different biological contexts .

How can I design experiments to investigate the role of At5g44380 in plant redox regulation using antibody-based approaches?

Investigating At5g44380's role in redox regulation requires specialized experimental approaches that combine antibody detection with redox analysis:

Redox state-specific antibody approaches:

  • Oxidation-state specific antibody generation:

    • Generate antibodies against reduced versus oxidized forms of At5g44380

    • Validate using recombinant At5g44380 under controlled redox conditions

    • Use these antibodies to monitor protein redox state in vivo

  • Post-translational modification detection:

    • Generate phospho-specific antibodies targeting known regulatory sites

    • Use these alongside standard At5g44380 antibodies to determine modification status

    • Calculate modification ratio across different redox conditions

Experimental design for redox studies:

  • Apply redox-modulating treatments (H₂O₂, DTT, GSH/GSSG)

  • Include time-course analysis to capture rapid redox transitions

  • Compare wild-type plants with redox-compromised mutants

FAD cofactor interaction studies:

  • Use purified At5g44380 to determine FAD binding affinity under different redox states

  • Monitor FAD fluorescence quenching to assess cofactor-protein interaction

  • Correlate FAD binding with protein activity and localization

Protein-protein interaction changes with redox state:

  • Perform co-immunoprecipitation under different redox conditions

  • Use redox-stabilizing crosslinkers to capture transient interactions

  • Identify redox-dependent interaction partners by mass spectrometry

Sample data presentation for redox regulation:

Redox TreatmentAt5g44380 Oxidation StateFAD Binding Affinity (Kd)Key Interacting PartnersSubcellular Localization
Control20% oxidized1.2 μMTRX-h1, GRX-C1Cytosolic, Chloroplast periphery
H₂O₂ (1 mM, 15 min)85% oxidized5.6 μMHSP70, APX1, GRX-C1Nuclear, Stress granules
DTT (5 mM, 30 min)5% oxidized0.8 μMTRX-h1, RBOH-DPlasma membrane, Cytosolic
Paraquat (10 μM, 3h)75% oxidized4.9 μMAPX1, CAT2, SOD1Chloroplast, Peroxisomes

This multi-faceted approach reveals how At5g44380's biochemical properties, interactions, and localization are modulated by cellular redox conditions, providing insight into its functional role in plant stress responses .

What epitopes of At5g44380 are typically targeted by research antibodies and how does epitope selection affect experimental outcomes?

The selection of target epitopes for At5g44380 antibodies significantly impacts their utility in different experimental applications:

Common epitope regions in At5g44380:

  • N-terminal region: Contains unique sequences that differentiate At5g44380 from related proteins

  • FAD-binding domain: Conserved region that may be affected by cofactor binding

  • C-terminal region: Often accessible but may be more conserved across related proteins

Epitope selection considerations:

Epitope RegionAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended Applications
N-terminal (aa 1-40)High specificity, accessible in denatured proteinMay be buried in native conformationWestern blot, IHC on fixed tissues
FAD-binding domain (aa 85-150)Recognizes functional domain, evolutionarily conservedBinding affected by FAD occupation, may cross-reactSuitable for cross-species studies, functional assays
Middle region (aa 151-200)Moderate specificity, accessibleMay have reduced antigenicityMultiple applications with optimization
C-terminal (aa 201-268)Good accessibility in native and denatured statesModerate conservation across familyIP, IF, ELISA, Western blot

Impact of epitope selection on experimental outcomes:

  • Antibodies targeting different epitopes may give contradictory results if epitope accessibility varies

  • Phosphorylation or other PTMs near the epitope can block antibody binding

  • FAD binding may induce conformational changes affecting epitope recognition

  • Protein-protein interactions may mask certain epitopes

Validation approaches for epitope specificity:

  • Epitope mapping using peptide arrays or deletion mutants

  • Testing antibody recognition against recombinant protein fragments

  • Comparing antibody performance in wild-type versus epitope-mutated constructs

For comprehensive studies, using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes provides complementary information and increases confidence in experimental results .

What are the critical parameters for validating At5g44380 antibodies for specific plant research applications?

Comprehensive validation of At5g44380 antibodies requires application-specific assessment of multiple performance parameters:

Essential validation parameters matrix:

Validation ParameterWestern BlotImmunoprecipitationImmunohistochemistryFlow Cytometry
SpecificityTest against knockout/knockdown lines, Multiple bands characterizationIP-MS identification, Non-specific protein analysisSignal absence in negative controls, Pattern comparison with mRNAPopulation separation, Blocking with antigen
SensitivityDetection limit with purified protein, Signal-to-noise ratioMinimum protein amount for detection, Recovery percentageDilution series, Signal intensity at different fixation timesMinimum detectable expression, Resolution of populations
ReproducibilityCV across technical replicates, Lot-to-lot consistencyProtein recovery consistency, Technical variabilityPattern consistency across samples, Inter-observer agreementCV of median fluorescence, Day-to-day variation
Cross-reactivityTesting against related proteins, Species cross-reactivityIP against potential cross-reactants, Background analysisTesting in diverse tissues, Pre-absorption testsComparative staining in diverse samples

Quantitative validation metrics:

  • Specificity ratio: Signal in wild-type vs. knockout samples (target: >10:1)

  • Signal-to-noise ratio: Specific signal vs. background (target: >5:1)

  • Coefficient of variation: Across technical replicates (target: <15%)

  • Z-factor: Statistical measure of assay quality (target: >0.5)

Validation documentation requirements:

  • Complete experimental protocols used for validation

  • Raw data from validation experiments (images, numerical values)

  • Positive and negative control data

  • Information on validation sample sources and preparation

  • Comparisons with alternative detection methods

Application-specific considerations:

  • For plant tissues, validate with different extraction methods to optimize for membrane proteins

  • Test specificity across different plant developmental stages

  • Validate performance in stressed versus non-stressed tissues

  • Assess cross-reactivity with common plant secondary metabolites that might interfere

Comprehensive validation documentation should be maintained and updated as new applications are developed, creating a "validation passport" for each antibody that informs experimental design decisions .

How can researchers accurately determine At5g44380 expression levels across different tissues and environmental conditions?

Accurate quantification of At5g44380 expression across diverse contexts requires integration of multiple quantitative approaches:

Comprehensive quantification strategy:

  • Antibody-based quantification:

    • Quantitative Western blotting with recombinant protein standards

    • ELISA development with calibrated standards

    • Quantitative immunohistochemistry with image analysis

    • Flow cytometry of protoplasts or isolated organelles

  • Complementary approaches for validation:

    • RT-qPCR for transcript levels

    • Mass spectrometry-based proteomics

    • Reporter gene fusions (promoter:GUS, translational GFP fusions)

Experimental design for comparative studies:

Experimental ConsiderationRecommendationRationale
Sample normalizationMultiple reference proteins (ACT2, UBQ10, TUB6)Compensates for reference variation across conditions
Biological replicatesMinimum n=5 for each conditionAccounts for biological variability
Technical replicates3 per biological sampleControls for measurement variability
Calibration curve5-7 point standard curveEnsures measurement in linear range
Statistical analysisANOVA with multiple comparison correctionAppropriate for multi-condition experiments

Tissue-specific expression profile example:

Environmental response quantification:

  • Create standardized stress application protocols

  • Establish detailed time-course sampling

  • Include both acute and chronic stress regimes

  • Quantify at both protein and transcript levels

  • Correlate with physiological markers of stress response

This integrated approach provides a robust quantitative framework for understanding At5g44380 expression patterns across developmental and environmental contexts, essential for elucidating its functional roles .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.