BDG1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
BDG1 antibody; BDG antibody; CB5 antibody; CED1 antibody; At1g64670 antibody; F1N19.24 antibody; Probable lysophospholipase BODYGUARD 1 antibody; AtBDG1 antibody; EC 3.1.1.- antibody; Protein 9-cis epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase defective 1 antibody; Protein COOL BREATH 5 antibody
Target Names
BDG1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The BDG1 antibody targets a protein crucial for cuticle development and morphogenesis in plants. It promotes the incorporation of cutin and suberin monomers, contributing to the regulation of abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis in response to osmotic stress. BDG1 plays a significant role in osmotic stress and drought resistance by reducing aerial tissue permeability and preventing transpiration. Furthermore, it regulates lateral root hair development and is implicated in the infection process of the necrotrophic fungus *Botrytis cinerea*, likely through modulation of cuticle structure.
Gene References Into Functions
The following studies highlight the importance of BDG1:
  1. This research identifies BDG1 as a key component of the Arabidopsis cutin biosynthesis pathway. Manipulation of BDG1 significantly alters cutin composition without affecting cuticular water barrier properties or transpiration. [BDG1] PMID: 26990896
  2. Map-based cloning revealed that *CED1*, allelic to *BODYGUARD* (encoding BDG1), is a putative alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein essential for cuticle biogenesis. PMID: 21610183
  3. Bodyguard (BDG1) encodes an extracellular synthase responsible for cuticle formation. [BDG1] PMID: 16415209
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G64670

STRING: 3702.AT1G64670.1

UniGene: At.35974

Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Lipid-anchor. Secreted, cell wall.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed exclusively in protodermal and epidermal cells of all organs, especially on adaxial sides.

Q&A

What are the primary methodologies for antibody screening in research settings?

Antibody screening has evolved beyond conventional hybridoma-based approaches to include more efficient recombinant antibody-based screening methods. The traditional workflow involves multiple labor-intensive steps: cloning two Ig gene fragments encoding heavy and light chains independently from a single cell, co-expressing these chains, and purifying individual recombinant antibodies .
Advanced approaches include:

  • Golden Gate-based dual-expression systems: This technique enables the linkage of heavy-chain variable and light-chain variable DNA fragments obtained from a single-sorted B cell, followed by the expression of membrane-bound Ig. This single-step procedure allows for the enrichment of antigen-specific, high-affinity Igs by flow cytometry .

  • Thin-layer chromatogram overlay technique: For specialized applications such as detecting antibodies to acidic glycolipids, chromatograms can be prepared with separated ganglioside fractions from peripheral nerve and brain, then overlaid with appropriate dilutions of patient sera. Antibody binding is subsequently revealed with radiolabeled or peroxidase-labeled second antibodies .

How can researchers accurately quantify antibody titers in longitudinal studies?

Longitudinal antibody monitoring requires standardized quantification methods to track changes over time. In clinical investigations of Guillain-Barré syndrome, researchers have demonstrated that antibody titers can decrease substantially (8-fold over 6 weeks) coincident with clinical improvement .
Methodological approach:

  • Establish baseline antibody levels using standardized dilution series

  • Maintain identical assay conditions across timepoints

  • Include positive and negative controls in each assay run

  • Document changes in specific antibody isotypes (IgG vs. IgM)

  • Correlate titer changes with clinical parameters to establish meaningful thresholds

How can next-generation sequencing (NGS) improve antibody discovery workflows?

NGS technology has revolutionized the sequencing of immunoglobulin variable-region genes, enabling researchers to identify tens of thousands of Ig genes specific to certain antigens. This can be achieved by combining droplet-based single-cell isolation with DNA barcode antigen technology, followed by NGS .
Key methodological considerations include:

  • Design of an appropriate B cell isolation strategy

  • Selection of compatible sequencing platforms

  • Implementation of computational pipelines for sequence analysis

  • Integration with functional screening methods to validate candidates
    The challenge lies in developing high-throughput functional screening methods compatible with NGS technology to rapidly identify antigen-specific clones .

What approaches can researchers use to isolate broadly neutralizing antibodies?

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) represent valuable research tools and potential therapeutic agents. A methodological approach to isolating these antibodies includes:

  • Sequential immunization with heterotypic antigens to raise cross-reactive B cells

  • Single-cell sorting of antigen-specific B cells

  • Amplification of paired heavy and light chain genes

  • Expression and functional characterization of candidate antibodies
    This approach has successfully identified bNAbs against diverse targets including influenza hemagglutinin antigens across both group 1 and group 2 .
    For HIV-1 bNAbs, researchers have demonstrated the isolation of potent neutralizing antibodies that target non-overlapping sites on the HIV-1 envelope trimer (Env). These antibodies can neutralize a broad spectrum of viral variants, with the best candidates showing activity against 64% of viruses in diverse viral panels with geometric mean IC50 values as low as 0.03 mg/ml .

How can researchers correct technical noise in single-cell antibody sequencing data?

Single-cell protein sequencing data faces challenges from technical noise that can mask biological variations. The ADTGP R package addresses this issue by using Gaussian process regression to correct droplet-specific technical noise .
Methodological approach:

  • ADTGP models the distribution of protein expression, conditioned on equal isotype control counts across cells

  • Unlike methods employing log-normalization, ADTGP directly models raw count data

  • The package calculates the posterior distribution of protein expression conditioned on isotype control counts being equal across cells

  • This approach avoids the technical errors introduced by log-transformation and pseudocount addition
    Implementation requires:

  • Protein raw counts

  • Isotype control raw counts

  • A design matrix

What in vivo models exist for evaluating antibody efficacy against viral pathogens?

Humanized mouse models provide valuable systems for evaluating antibody efficacy against viral pathogens. In HIV-1 research, these models have demonstrated that:

  • Administration of potent neutralizing antibodies can rapidly decrease viral load (approximately one log10)

  • Viral rebound typically follows as escape mutations develop

  • Sequencing of rebounding viruses reveals specific escape mutations (e.g., alterations in N-linked glycosylation sites)
    These models allow researchers to understand the selective pressure exerted by antibodies and the mechanisms of viral escape.

How can researchers optimize antibody expression systems for rapid screening applications?

Optimizing antibody expression for rapid screening requires careful design of expression vectors and cell systems. An efficient approach includes:

  • Design of a dual-expression vector expressing both Ig heavy and kappa/lambda chains in a single vector

  • Transient transfection into appropriate cell lines (e.g., FreeStyle 293)

  • Surface expression of antibodies for direct detection of binding

  • Incorporation of reporter genes (e.g., Venus) to confirm and normalize expression levels
    This approach enables:

  • Expression of membrane-bound antibodies within 2 days post-transfection

  • Direct assessment of binding without purification steps

  • Rapid enrichment of clones through bulk screening

  • Identification of unique clones through CDR3 sequencing

What statistical approaches should researchers use when analyzing antibody binding data?

When analyzing antibody binding data, researchers should consider:

  • Distribution modeling: Understanding whether the data follows normal, log-normal, or other distributions

  • Appropriate normalization: Methods like central-log normalization (CLR) across antibodies are common but may disregard important control information

  • Control incorporation: Utilizing isotype control antibodies to correct for technical noise

  • Direct modeling: For count data, directly modeling raw counts rather than applying log-transformation which requires pseudocounts and introduces technical errors

How can researchers interpret cases where antibody-sensitive pathogens coexist with neutralizing antibodies?

The coexistence of pathogens with neutralizing antibodies presents an interesting research question. In HIV-1 research, a singular case study demonstrated that bNAb-sensitive strains of HIV-1 can coexist with potent neutralizing antibodies that target the virus .
Methodological approach to investigate this phenomenon:

  • Longitudinal sampling of both antibodies and pathogens

  • Single-genome sequencing to characterize pathogen diversity

  • Isolation and characterization of autologous antibodies

  • Neutralization assays testing antibodies against contemporaneous viral isolates

  • Analysis of escape mutations and sensitivity patterns
    In the documented HIV-1 case, 88.5% (31 of 35) of circulating viruses remained sensitive to at least one of the temporally coincident autologous bNAbs, suggesting potential contribution to viral control .

How can genotype-phenotype linked antibody screening systems accelerate vaccine development?

Genotype-phenotype linked antibody screening systems represent a valuable approach for accelerating vaccine development by enabling rapid isolation of desirable antibodies. A methodological implementation includes:

  • Assembly of paired B-cell repertoire amplicons, destination vector, and donor vector containing BsaI restriction sites

  • Incubation through multiple temperature cycles (37°C, 16°C, 50°C, and 80°C)

  • Expression of antibodies fused to reporter genes (e.g., Venus) in membrane form

  • Transfection into appropriate cell lines and culture

  • Flow cytometry-based screening with fluorescently labeled antigens
    This system has demonstrated the rapid isolation of influenza cross-reactive antibodies with high affinity from immunized mice within 7 days, making it particularly valuable for isolating therapeutic or diagnostic antibodies during emerging pandemics .

What are the methodological considerations for designing studies to identify antibodies against novel epitopes?

When designing studies to identify antibodies against novel epitopes, researchers should consider:

  • Antigen design: Using structurally modified or engineered antigens to expose cryptic epitopes

  • Sequential immunization: Employing heterotypic antigens to guide B cell evolution toward cross-reactive responses

  • Sorting strategy: Developing multi-parameter flow cytometry panels to isolate rare B cell populations

  • Functional screening: Implementing high-throughput assays to rapidly assess binding and functional properties

  • Structural analysis: Employing crystallography and electron microscopy to characterize unique binding modes
    This comprehensive approach can yield antibodies with unique properties, such as the BG18 antibody against HIV-1, which recognizes the virus envelope in a manner distinct from other antibodies in its class .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.