BDG5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
BDG5 antibody; At5g17720 antibody; MVA3.7Probable lysophospholipase BODYGUARD 5 antibody; AtBDG5 antibody; EC 3.1.1.- antibody
Target Names
BDG5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plays a role in cuticle development and morphogenesis.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G17720

STRING: 3702.AT5G17720.1

UniGene: At.54887

Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Lipid-anchor. Secreted, cell wall.

Q&A

What is BDG5 antibody and what is its target in research applications?

BDG5 antibody targets the BODYGUARD5 protein, which plays a crucial role in plant cuticle development and morphogenesis, particularly in Arabidopsis thaliana. The protein is part of the epidermis-specific extracellular components involved in controlling proper cuticle formation . Understanding the antibody's target is essential for experimental design and interpretation of results in plant developmental biology studies. The antibody specifically recognizes epitopes on the BDG5 protein, allowing researchers to track its expression patterns and functional characteristics during plant development.

What are the standard methods for detecting BDG5 antibody in research samples?

Multiple detection methods exist for BDG5 antibody research, each with specific advantages:

  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): Offers high-throughput capacity with good sensitivity for quantitative analysis .

  • Immunoprecipitation: Provides robust detection of protein-protein interactions involving BDG5 .

  • Immunoblotting (Western Blot): Allows detection of BDG5 protein in plant tissue extracts with size determination .

  • Flow Cytometry: Enables single-cell analysis of BDG5 expression when coupled with appropriate sample preparation techniques .
    For optimal results, researchers should consider using complementary methods. ELISA has demonstrated pooled sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.70) and specificity of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) in antibody detection studies, though these values may vary depending on the specific antibody and target .

How should researchers validate BDG5 antibody specificity?

Rigorous validation is essential for ensuring experimental reproducibility:

  • Positive and negative controls: Use known BDG5-expressing tissues alongside BDG5-deficient samples.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Assess reactivity against related plant proteins to confirm specificity.

  • Epitope mapping: Determine the specific regions of BDG5 recognized by the antibody .

  • Knockout/knockdown validation: Compare antibody signals in wild-type plants versus those with reduced BDG5 expression.

  • Immunogen sequence analysis: Verify the immunogen used matches the target species' BDG5 sequence.
    Validation protocols should include determining the antibody's Ig subclass and confirming specificity through multiple independent methods as demonstrated in antibody characterization studies .

What approaches exist for generating monoclonal antibodies against BDG5?

The generation of monoclonal antibodies against plant proteins like BDG5 typically follows established hybridoma protocols with specific considerations:

  • Immunization strategy: BALB/c mice are commonly immunized with purified BDG5 protein or synthetic peptides derived from predicted antigenic regions .

  • Hybridoma technique: Following immunization, B cells from mice are fused with myeloma cells to create hybridomas that secrete antibodies .

  • Screening process: High-throughput screening of hybridoma supernatants using ELISA against the immunizing antigen .

  • Subcloning and expansion: Selected positive clones undergo subcloning by limiting dilution to ensure monoclonality.

  • Characterization: Detailed characterization including Ig subclass determination (typically IgG1), affinity measurements (optimal affinity constants around 1×10⁹), and epitope mapping .
    For plant-specific applications, researchers should consider using plant expression systems to produce recombinant BDG5 protein to maintain proper folding and post-translational modifications that may be critical for antibody recognition.

How can researchers optimize immunohistochemistry protocols for BDG5 localization in plant tissues?

Optimizing immunohistochemistry for BDG5 in plant tissues requires addressing specific challenges:

  • Tissue fixation: Use 4% paraformaldehyde with controlled penetration parameters to preserve plant tissue morphology while maintaining antigen accessibility.

  • Antigen retrieval: Test multiple methods including heat-induced epitope retrieval with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and enzymatic retrieval using proteases.

  • Blocking optimization: Use 5-10% normal serum with plant-specific blocking agents to reduce background.

  • Primary antibody dilution: Systematically test dilutions (typically starting at 1:100 to 1:1000) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Detection system selection: Compare direct fluorophore conjugation, biotin-streptavidin systems, and polymer-based detection systems for sensitivity and specificity.

  • Counterstaining: Select appropriate counterstains that don't interfere with BDG5 signal localization, especially in cuticle regions.
    Researchers should validate the protocol using known expression patterns of BDG5 in Arabidopsis epidermis, where the protein is expected to localize to the cuticle development sites .

What controls are essential when working with BDG5 antibody in plant developmental studies?

Comprehensive experimental controls ensure result validity:

  • Negative controls:

    • Isotype control antibody (matching the BDG5 antibody class)

    • Secondary antibody-only controls

    • BDG5-knockout or BDG5-silenced plant tissues

    • Pre-immune serum controls

  • Positive controls:

    • Tissues with confirmed high BDG5 expression (e.g., developing epidermal tissues)

    • Recombinant BDG5 protein standards

    • Epitope-tagged BDG5 expressed in plant systems

  • Technical controls:

    • Antibody titration series

    • Multiple biological replicates (minimum n=3)

    • Independent antibody lots to control for batch variation

  • Procedural validation:

    • Peptide competition assays to confirm specificity

    • Multiple detection methods (e.g., Western blot and immunohistochemistry)
      These controls parallel established practices in antibody research methodology as demonstrated across multiple antibody validation studies .

How should researchers troubleshoot weak or nonspecific BDG5 antibody signals?

When facing detection challenges, consider this systematic troubleshooting approach:

IssuePotential CausesTroubleshooting Strategies
Weak signalLow antibody affinityIncrease antibody concentration; Extend incubation time
Low target abundanceUse signal amplification systems; Concentrate sample
Epitope maskingTry alternative fixation methods; Test different antigen retrieval protocols
High backgroundInsufficient blockingIncrease blocking agent concentration; Extend blocking time
Non-specific bindingAdd detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100); Increase wash stringency
Cross-reactivityPre-absorb antibody with related proteins; Use more stringent washing
No signalEpitope denaturationTest native conditions; Use polyclonal antibodies targeting multiple epitopes
Wrong secondary antibodyConfirm primary and secondary compatibility; Test with known positive sample
Inconsistent resultsBatch-to-batch variationUse antibody standardization; Pool validated lots
Sample heterogeneityIncrease biological replicates; Standardize sample preparation
For plant-specific applications, consider the unique challenges of plant tissues including high autofluorescence, presence of cell walls, and abundant secondary metabolites that may interfere with antibody binding .

What analytical approaches are recommended for quantifying BDG5 expression in plant tissues?

Robust quantification requires specialized analytical approaches:

  • Western blot densitometry:

    • Normalize BDG5 signals to stable reference proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin)

    • Use standard curves with recombinant BDG5 protein standards

    • Apply digital image analysis software with background correction

  • ELISA quantification:

    • Generate standard curves using purified BDG5 protein

    • Determine the linear range (typically 0.1-2.0 OD units)

    • Calculate concentrations using four-parameter logistic regression

  • Immunofluorescence quantification:

    • Use confocal microscopy with standardized acquisition parameters

    • Perform z-stack analysis for three-dimensional expression patterns

    • Apply colocalization analysis with cellular markers

  • Statistical considerations:

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

    • Use biological replicates (n≥3) and technical replicates (n≥3)

    • Report variability measures (standard deviation, confidence intervals)
      When reporting results, include detailed methodological parameters and statistical approaches to facilitate reproducibility, similar to standards applied in other antibody research fields .

How do epitope profiles of BDG5 antibody correlate with experimental outcomes?

Understanding epitope recognition patterns is critical for interpreting results:
Different epitopes on the BDG5 protein may be differentially accessible depending on protein conformation, post-translational modifications, or protein-protein interactions. Research on other antibodies has shown that epitope recognition patterns can correlate with specific biological features and experimental outcomes .
For instance, studies on anti-MDA5 antibodies demonstrated that antibodies recognizing different subfragments (epitopes) correlated with distinct clinical features in patients . Applying similar principles to BDG5 research:

  • Conformational epitopes: May be lost in denaturing conditions but preserved in native applications

  • Linear epitopes: Remain accessible in both native and denaturing conditions

  • Post-translational modification sites: May affect antibody binding and experimental interpretation
    Researchers should characterize which specific regions or subfragments of BDG5 their antibodies recognize, as this may explain variations in experimental outcomes across different applications and conditions . When possible, epitope mapping should be performed to precisely identify the antibody binding sites.

How can computational approaches enhance BDG5 antibody development and characterization?

Modern computational tools offer significant advantages for antibody research:

  • Deep learning-based antibody design:

    • Generative models like Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (WGAN+GP) can generate novel antibody sequences with desirable properties

    • Computational screening for "medicine-likeness" (favorable physicochemical properties) before experimental production

    • In-silico humanization to reduce immunogenicity while maintaining binding properties

  • Structural prediction and epitope mapping:

    • Use of AlphaFold or RoseTTAFold to predict BDG5 protein structure

    • Computational docking to predict antibody-antigen interactions

    • Epitope prediction algorithms to identify optimal immunogens

  • Sequence analysis and optimization:

    • Germline analysis for antibody framework optimization

    • CDR grafting simulations for improved specificity

    • Analysis of potential chemical liabilities in CDR regions
      These computational approaches can significantly accelerate antibody development while reducing resources needed. Studies have shown that computationally generated antibodies can exhibit high expression, monomer content, and thermal stability while showing low hydrophobicity, self-association, and non-specific binding .

What emerging technologies are enhancing BDG5 antibody research in plant biology?

Several cutting-edge approaches are transforming plant antibody research:

  • Single-cell antibody detection technologies:

    • Single-cell proteomics for mapping BDG5 expression at cellular resolution

    • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) adapted for plant tissues

    • Microfluidic approaches for high-throughput single cell analysis

  • Advanced imaging techniques:

    • Super-resolution microscopy (STORM, PALM, SIM) for nanoscale localization

    • Light sheet microscopy for 3D visualization in intact tissues

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy for ultrastructural context

  • Proximity labeling approaches:

    • BioID or APEX2 fusion to BDG5 to identify interaction partners

    • Integration with mass spectrometry for comprehensive interactome analysis

    • Spatially resolved protein interaction mapping in plant tissues

  • Genome editing coupled with antibody detection:

    • CRISPR-Cas9 generated BDG5 variants with epitope tags

    • Inducible expression systems for temporal control of BDG5 expression

    • Optogenetic approaches combined with antibody-based detection
      These technologies offer unprecedented insights into BDG5 function in plant development and cuticle formation, particularly when combined with traditional antibody-based methods .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.