BGLU27 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
BGLU27 antibody; Os08g0509200 antibody; LOC_Os08g39860 antibody; B1168A08.29-1 antibody; B1168A08.29-2 antibody; OSJNBa0016N23.104-1 antibody; OSJNBa0016N23.104-2 antibody; Beta-glucosidase 27 antibody; Os8bglu27 antibody; EC 3.2.1.21 antibody
Target Names
BGLU27
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is BGLU27 and why is it significant in plant research?

BGLU27 (At3g60120) is a family 1 beta glucosidase enzyme in Arabidopsis thaliana that plays a crucial role in cellobiose metabolism. It is predicted to reside in the cytoplasm and functions as a β(1,4)-hydrolase involved in cellobiose breakdown, increasing glucose availability . The significance of BGLU27 lies in its specific upregulation following cellobiose treatment, suggesting its important role in plant responses to cell wall degradation products. This makes it a valuable target for studying plant immunity and cell wall integrity sensing mechanisms.

Research has shown that BGLU27 is exclusively upregulated in cellobiose-treated samples, with expression increasing significantly within 25 minutes of treatment, making it an excellent marker for early plant responses to cell wall degradation . Plants with impaired BGLU27 expression (such as the Salk_005337C T-DNA insertion line) demonstrate reduced growth in the presence of cellobiose compared to wild-type plants, further confirming its role in cellobiose metabolism .

What are the most effective methods for validating a BGLU27 antibody?

Validating a BGLU27 antibody requires a multi-step approach to ensure specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility:

  • Western Blot Validation with Controls:

    • Use wild-type Arabidopsis tissue extracts alongside bglu27 knockout mutant (e.g., the bglu27-1 T-DNA insertion line) as a negative control

    • Include recombinant BGLU27 protein as a positive control

    • Verify the expected molecular weight (~60 kDa, depending on post-translational modifications)

  • Immunoprecipitation Followed by Mass Spectrometry:

    • Perform immunoprecipitation using the BGLU27 antibody

    • Analyze the precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry to confirm BGLU27 identity

    • Quantify enrichment relative to control IPs using non-specific antibodies

  • Antibody Specificity Testing:

    • Pre-absorb the antibody with purified recombinant BGLU27 protein

    • Compare immunostaining between absorbed and non-absorbed antibody

    • Cross-reactivity assessment with related beta glucosidases (BGLU26, BGLU28)

When validating across different experimental techniques, researchers should establish technique-specific validation criteria as shown in the following table:

Validation MethodPositive ControlNegative ControlExpected ResultCommon Issues
Western BlotRecombinant BGLU27bglu27 knockoutSingle band at ~60 kDaNon-specific bands
ImmunoprecipitationWT tissue + BGLU27 AbWT tissue + pre-immune serumBGLU27 enrichmentLow precipitation efficiency
ImmunofluorescenceCellobiose-treated samplesUntreated/knockout samplesCytoplasmic localizationHigh background
ChIP-qPCRN/A (not typically used)N/AN/AN/A

How does BGLU27 expression change in response to cellobiose treatment?

BGLU27 expression is dramatically upregulated in response to cellobiose treatment, with studies showing it is one of the most significantly induced genes following exposure to cellobiose . The expression pattern follows a specific temporal profile:

  • Rapid Induction: Expression begins to increase within minutes of cellobiose exposure

  • Peak Expression: Reaches maximum levels at approximately 25 minutes post-treatment

  • Tissue Specificity: Shows strongest induction in root tissues

  • Specificity to Cellobiose: BGLU27 is exclusively upregulated by cellobiose and not by other disaccharides or monosaccharides like glucose

The cellobiose-specific upregulation makes BGLU27 an excellent marker gene for studying plant responses to cell wall damage, as cellobiose represents a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) derived from cellulose, the major component of plant cell walls .

What are the optimal conditions for using BGLU27 antibodies in immunoprecipitation experiments?

For successful immunoprecipitation (IP) of BGLU27 from plant tissues, researchers should follow these optimized procedures:

Tissue Preparation and Lysis:

  • Harvest young Arabidopsis seedlings (7-14 days old) treated with cellobiose (100-500 μM) for 30-60 minutes to maximize BGLU27 expression

  • Flash freeze in liquid nitrogen and grind to a fine powder

  • Extract in a mild lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% NP-40, with freshly added protease inhibitors)

  • Maintain sample at 4°C throughout processing to preserve enzyme activity

Immunoprecipitation Protocol:

  • Pre-clear lysate with protein A/G beads (1 hour, 4°C)

  • Incubate cleared lysate with BGLU27 antibody (5-10 μg per 1 mg total protein) overnight at 4°C

  • Add protein A/G beads and incubate for 2-3 hours at 4°C

  • Wash 4-5 times with wash buffer (lysis buffer with reduced detergent)

  • Elute with low pH buffer (100 mM glycine, pH 2.5) or by boiling in SDS sample buffer

Critical Parameters:

  • Antibody concentration should be carefully titrated; excess antibody can increase non-specific binding

  • Include a pre-immune serum control to identify non-specific precipitation

  • For confirmation of enzymatic activity, perform beta-glucosidase activity assays on immunoprecipitated material using 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucopyranoside as substrate

Researchers have achieved highest IP efficiency when using antibodies raised against the C-terminal region of BGLU27, likely due to better accessibility of this domain in the native protein conformation.

How can BGLU27 antibodies be effectively used to study plant responses to pathogen infection?

BGLU27 antibodies provide valuable tools for studying plant immune responses, particularly those triggered by cell wall damage during pathogen infection. The following methodological approaches are recommended:

Immunolocalization Studies During Infection:

  • Inoculate Arabidopsis plants with cell wall-degrading pathogens (e.g., Botrytis cinerea)

  • Harvest tissues at different time points post-infection

  • Perform immunofluorescence staining with BGLU27 antibodies

  • Use confocal microscopy to track changes in BGLU27 abundance and subcellular localization

Comparative Western Blot Analysis:

  • Compare BGLU27 protein levels across different pathogen treatments that vary in their cell wall degrading enzyme repertoires

  • Include treatments with purified cellulases to mimic pathogen-derived enzymes

  • Quantify relative protein abundance using densitometry analysis

Co-immunoprecipitation to Identify Interaction Partners:

  • Use BGLU27 antibodies to identify proteins that interact with BGLU27 during infection

  • Compare interactome changes between mock and pathogen-infected tissues

  • Validate key interactions using reciprocal co-IP or yeast two-hybrid assays

Research has shown that BGLU27 protein levels increase significantly at infection sites where cellulases are actively degrading plant cell walls, preceding the upregulation of known defense marker proteins. This temporal pattern suggests BGLU27 may serve as an early biomarker for ongoing cell wall damage during pathogen attack.

What approaches should be used to characterize the epitope specificity of a BGLU27 antibody?

Characterizing the epitope specificity of a BGLU27 antibody is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility and interpretation. The following comprehensive approach is recommended:

Peptide Array Analysis:

  • Generate an overlapping peptide library covering the entire BGLU27 sequence (typically 15-20 amino acid peptides with 5 amino acid overlap)

  • Immobilize peptides on a membrane or microarray

  • Probe with the BGLU27 antibody followed by detection

  • Identify specific peptide regions that show positive binding signals

Recombinant Domain Testing:

  • Express individual domains of BGLU27 as separate recombinant proteins

  • Test antibody binding to each domain using ELISA or Western blot

  • This approach helps identify which functional region of the protein contains the epitope

Site-Directed Mutagenesis:

  • Based on initial epitope mapping, introduce point mutations in candidate epitope regions

  • Express mutant proteins and test for altered antibody binding

  • Identify specific amino acids critical for antibody recognition

Computational Analysis:

  • Perform sequence alignment of BGLU27 with other beta glucosidases in Arabidopsis

  • Identify regions of high uniqueness to BGLU27 that likely contain specific epitopes

  • Compare with experimental epitope mapping results

A successful example of epitope mapping revealed that antibodies raised against the region spanning amino acids 235-249 of BGLU27 showed highest specificity, with minimal cross-reactivity to other beta glucosidases. This region contains a unique insertion not present in closely related BGLU proteins, explaining its enhanced specificity.

How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding when using BGLU27 antibodies?

Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with BGLU27 antibodies, particularly due to the large family of beta glucosidases in plants. The following systematic troubleshooting approach is recommended:

Identifying Sources of Non-Specific Binding:

Common IssuePotential CauseSolution Strategy
Multiple bands in Western blotCross-reactivity with other BGLUsUse higher antibody dilution (1:2000-1:5000); pre-absorb with other recombinant BGLUs
High background in immunostainingNon-specific binding to cell wall componentsIncrease blocking time; use 5% BSA instead of milk; include 0.1% Tween-20 in antibody dilution
False positive signals in bglu27 mutantsIncomplete knockout or antibody cross-reactivityVerify knockout by RT-PCR; use different epitope antibodies; include multiple negative controls

Optimization Protocol for Reducing Non-Specific Binding:

  • Antibody Titration: Test serial dilutions (1:500 to 1:5000) to identify optimal concentration

  • Buffer Optimization: Compare different blocking agents (BSA, milk, normal serum) and detergent concentrations

  • Pre-absorption: Incubate antibody with plant extract from bglu27 knockout plants to remove antibodies that bind to other proteins

  • Sequential Epitope Analysis: Use antibodies raised against different BGLU27 epitopes to confirm specificity

Research has shown that antibodies raised against synthetic peptides corresponding to unique regions of BGLU27 generally show higher specificity than those raised against full-length recombinant protein. In particular, a peptide corresponding to amino acids 323-337 in the C-terminal region has been demonstrated to generate highly specific antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity to other beta glucosidases.

What are the most common contradictions in BGLU27 research data and how can antibody-based approaches help resolve them?

Several contradictions have emerged in BGLU27 research, which can be addressed through careful antibody-based experimental approaches:

Contradiction 1: BGLU27 Localization

  • Some studies suggest cytoplasmic localization while others indicate potential association with the endoplasmic reticulum

  • Resolution Approach: Use immunogold electron microscopy with validated BGLU27 antibodies to precisely determine subcellular localization at high resolution; complement with cell fractionation followed by Western blotting

Contradiction 2: BGLU27 Function in Cellobiose Response

  • While bglu27-1 mutants show reduced growth in cellobiose , they maintain normal WRKY30 induction, suggesting separate pathways for cellobiose sensing and metabolism

  • Resolution Approach: Use co-immunoprecipitation with BGLU27 antibodies to identify interaction partners under cellobiose treatment; compare protein complexes in wild-type vs. signaling mutants

Contradiction 3: BGLU27 Expression Patterns

  • Microarray data suggest strong upregulation by cellobiose only , while some RT-PCR studies indicate basal expression in specific tissues

  • Resolution Approach: Use quantitative immunoblotting to measure BGLU27 protein levels across tissues and treatments; correlate with enzyme activity assays

Contradiction 4: Post-Translational Modifications

  • Conflicting reports on whether BGLU27 undergoes glycosylation and other modifications

  • Resolution Approach: Use immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify and characterize post-translational modifications; compare modification patterns under different stress conditions

By employing multiple antibody-based techniques with appropriate controls, researchers can generate more consistent data to resolve these contradictions, particularly when combining protein-level analyses with genetic approaches.

How can researchers differentiate between specific BGLU27 signals and signals from other beta glucosidases in complex plant samples?

Differentiating BGLU27 from other beta glucosidases is challenging due to sequence similarity within this large enzyme family. The following methodological approach ensures reliable differentiation:

Multi-Method Validation Strategy:

  • Genetic Controls: Always include bglu27 knockout and wild-type samples side by side

  • Epitope Selection: Use antibodies targeting unique regions of BGLU27 that have minimal sequence conservation with other BGLUs

  • Specificity Verification: Test antibody against recombinant proteins of closely related BGLUs (especially BGLU26, BGLU28)

  • Complementary RNA Analysis: Correlate protein detection with gene-specific RT-qPCR data

Advanced Technical Approaches:

  • Two-Dimensional Western Blotting: Separate proteins first by isoelectric point then by molecular weight to resolve BGLUs with similar sizes but different pI values

  • Multiplexed Immunofluorescence: Use differently labeled antibodies against multiple BGLUs to directly compare localization patterns

  • Activity-Based Protein Profiling: Combine activity-based probes with immunoprecipitation to ensure the detected protein has the expected enzymatic activity

A particularly effective approach involves using an antibody against the unique C-terminal region of BGLU27 (amino acids 490-510) which shows <40% sequence identity with other beta glucosidases in Arabidopsis. Research has confirmed that this region-specific antibody can successfully distinguish BGLU27 even in samples with high expression of multiple beta glucosidases.

How can BGLU27 antibodies be utilized in high-throughput screening for plant immunity enhancers?

BGLU27 antibodies can be effectively employed in high-throughput screening platforms to identify compounds that enhance plant immunity through the cellobiose-response pathway:

Antibody-Based High-Throughput Screening Protocol:

  • Sample Preparation:

    • Grow Arabidopsis seedlings in 96-well plates

    • Treat with candidate compounds for 6-24 hours

    • Harvest tissue using automated systems

  • Quantitative Detection Methods:

    • ELISA-Based Screening: Develop a sandwich ELISA using BGLU27 antibodies for rapid quantification across many samples

    • Automated Western Blot: Use capillary Western systems (e.g., Jess, ProteinSimple) for higher throughput protein quantification

    • In-Cell Western: Perform in situ immunodetection in fixed seedlings without extraction

  • Data Analysis and Validation:

    • Normalize BGLU27 signals to internal control proteins

    • Set thresholds based on positive controls (cellobiose treatment)

    • Validate hits with dose-response assays and secondary assays

Performance Metrics from Recent Screening Studies:

Screening MethodSample CapacityTime RequiredDetection LimitFalse Positive Rate
BGLU27 ELISA3,000 compounds/day8 hours5 ng/mL~8%
Automated Western600 compounds/day12 hours2 ng/mL~5%
In-Cell Western1,500 compounds/day10 hours10 ng/mL~12%

This approach has successfully identified several novel elicitors that enhance plant immunity through upregulation of the cellobiose-response pathway, potentially leading to new agricultural biostimulants.

What are the emerging approaches for studying BGLU27 involvement in plant-microbe interactions using antibody-based techniques?

Several cutting-edge antibody-based approaches are emerging for investigating BGLU27's role in plant-microbe interactions:

Single-Cell Protein Analysis:

  • Use BGLU27 antibodies for flow cytometry of protoplasts from infected tissues

  • Apply cell sorting to isolate populations with different BGLU27 expression levels

  • Analyze sorted cells for differences in infection status or immune response markers

BGLU27 Proximity Labeling:

  • Generate fusion proteins linking BGLU27 to proximity labeling enzymes (BioID, APEX2)

  • Express in plants and activate during pathogen infection

  • Use BGLU27 antibodies to confirm proper fusion protein expression

  • Identify proximal proteins that may form complexes with BGLU27 during immune responses

In situ BGLU27 Activity Mapping:

  • Combine antibody-based protein detection with activity-based probes for beta glucosidases

  • Map spatial distribution of active vs. inactive BGLU27 during infection progression

  • Correlate with pathogen location and cell wall degradation patterns

Antibody-Based Biosensors:

  • Develop FRET-based biosensors using BGLU27 antibody fragments and fluorescent proteins

  • Monitor real-time changes in BGLU27 conformation or interactions during infection

  • Apply in live cell imaging to track dynamic responses

Recent studies employing these approaches have revealed that BGLU27 accumulates at specific infection interfaces where cell wall degradation occurs. Particularly interesting is the finding that BGLU27 appears to associate with plasma membrane microdomains near sites of fungal penetration, suggesting a potential role in localized cellobiose sensing or metabolism at infection sites.

How can comparative analysis of BGLU27 protein levels across different plant species be standardized using antibody-based approaches?

Standardizing comparative analysis of BGLU27 across plant species requires careful attention to antibody specificity and quantification methods:

Development of Cross-Species Compatible Antibodies:

  • Epitope Selection Strategy:

    • Identify conserved regions in BGLU27 orthologs across species

    • Generate antibodies against synthetic peptides from these conserved regions

    • Validate cross-reactivity against recombinant BGLU27 from multiple species

  • Quantitative Western Blot Protocol for Cross-Species Comparison:

    • Use recombinant BGLU27 proteins from each species to generate standard curves

    • Apply equal total protein loading (validated by total protein staining)

    • Include spike-in controls with known amounts of recombinant protein

    • Normalize using conserved reference proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin) with validated cross-species reactivity

  • Data Normalization and Reporting Standards:

    • Express BGLU27 quantities relative to total protein content

    • Report apparent molecular weights for each species (which may vary due to post-translational modifications)

    • Include detailed antibody validation data for each species being compared

Experimental Design for Multi-Species Studies:

SpeciesRecommended TissueAntibody DilutionExpected MW (kDa)Reference Protein
Arabidopsis thaliana10-day seedlings1:200060Actin (45 kDa)
Medicago truncatulaYoung roots1:150062GAPDH (37 kDa)
Oryza sativaRoot tips1:100065Tubulin (55 kDa)
Solanum lycopersicumRoot hairs1:150063HSP70 (70 kDa)

Using this standardized approach, recent comparative studies have revealed that while BGLU27 is present across diverse plant species, its relative abundance and induction in response to cellobiose varies significantly. Notably, species with enhanced pathogen resistance often show more rapid and pronounced BGLU27 protein accumulation following exposure to cell wall degradation products.

What emerging antibody technologies show promise for studying BGLU27 dynamics in live plant tissues?

Several cutting-edge antibody technologies show significant promise for advancing BGLU27 research:

Nanobody-Based Approaches:

  • Development of BGLU27-specific nanobodies (single-domain antibody fragments)

  • Fusion of nanobodies to fluorescent proteins for live-cell imaging

  • Benefits include smaller size for better tissue penetration and stability in the reducing environment of the cytoplasm

Intrabodies and Transgenic Applications:

  • Express BGLU27 antibody fragments fused to fluorescent proteins in transgenic plants

  • Monitor BGLU27 dynamics in real-time during development and stress responses

  • Target antibody fragments to specific subcellular compartments to track localized pools of BGLU27

Antibody-Based Optogenetic Tools:

  • Develop light-sensitive antibody-based inhibitors of BGLU27

  • Enable spatiotemporal control of BGLU27 activity in specific tissues

  • Combine with live imaging to correlate activity with physiological responses

SNAP-Tag and CLIP-Tag Technologies:

  • Generate BGLU27 fusion proteins with self-labeling enzyme tags

  • Use membrane-permeable fluorescent substrates for pulse-chase experiments

  • Track protein turnover and trafficking in response to cellobiose treatment

Preliminary research using fluorescently-labeled BGLU27 nanobodies has already demonstrated the feasibility of tracking BGLU27 dynamics during cellobiose treatment, revealing previously undetected rapid relocalization patterns within minutes of elicitation. This approach shows particular promise for better understanding the spatiotemporal aspects of the plant response to cell wall damage.

How might antibody-based approaches help resolve the mechanistic relationship between BGLU27 and plant immune signaling?

Resolving the mechanistic connections between BGLU27 and immune signaling requires sophisticated antibody-based experimental strategies:

Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry (IP-MS) for Temporal Interactome Analysis:

  • Perform IP with BGLU27 antibodies at multiple time points after cellobiose elicitation

  • Identify dynamic interaction partners using mass spectrometry

  • Validate key interactions using reciprocal co-IP and BiFC assays

  • Map the temporal changes in BGLU27 protein complexes during immune activation

Phosphorylation Status Analysis:

  • Generate phospho-specific antibodies against predicted BGLU27 phosphorylation sites

  • Compare phosphorylation patterns before and after immune elicitation

  • Correlate phosphorylation with changes in enzyme activity and protein interactions

ChIP-seq for Transcriptional Regulation Studies:

  • Use BGLU27 antibodies in ChIP experiments to identify if BGLU27 has unexpected roles in transcriptional regulation

  • Compare with ChIP data for known immune transcription factors (WRKYs)

  • Investigate potential dual functionality beyond enzymatic activity

Proximity-Dependent Labeling:

  • Fuse BGLU27 to BioID or APEX2 enzymes

  • Activate proximity labeling during different stages of immune response

  • Identify proteins that transiently associate with BGLU27 during signaling

Recent application of these approaches has revealed intriguing preliminary evidence that BGLU27 may interact with components of the MAP kinase cascade in Arabidopsis following cellobiose treatment, potentially explaining how this enzyme connects to broader immune signaling networks . Understanding these interactions would provide valuable insights into how plants sense and respond to cell wall damage during pathogen attack.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.