BHLH99 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

BHLH99 Protein Overview

BHLH99 (Basic Helix-Loop-Helix 99) is a plant-specific transcription factor implicated in disease susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens like Botrytis cinerea and Plectosphaerella cucumerina . Key features include:

  • Structure: Contains a conserved bHLH DNA-binding domain.

  • Function: Regulates expression of PROVIR (provirulence) factors, which enhance host susceptibility to fungal infections .

  • Mechanism: Mutants lacking BHLH99 show hyperactivation of jasmonic acid (JA)-mediated defenses but paradoxically increased disease vulnerability due to upregulated PROVIR genes .

Antibody Development and Validation

While no direct data on BHLH99 antibody production exists, established workflows for antibody characterization (e.g., NeuroMab, CPTAC) provide a framework :

Key Validation Steps

MethodPurposeExample Protocols
ELISAConfirm immunogen reactivityNeuroMab’s dual ELISA screening
Western BlotAssess specificity in tissue lysatesCPTAC’s ACL protocols
ImmunohistochemistryValidate tissue/cell localizationCEAH’s fixation and staining guidelines
KO ValidationTest specificity using knockout modelsNeuroMab’s use of KO mice

For BHLH99, validation would likely involve Arabidopsis thaliana mutants to confirm absence of signal in bhlh99 knockouts .

Research Applications

BHLH99 antibodies could enable:

  • Pathogen Interaction Studies: Mapping BHLH99’s role in PROVIR gene activation during fungal infections .

  • Subcellular Localization: Determining if BHLH99 localizes to nuclei or interacts with membranes (e.g., via immunofluorescence) .

  • Protein Complex Analysis: Identifying binding partners through co-immunoprecipitation .

Challenges and Considerations

  • Cross-Reactivity: Antibodies targeting bHLH domains must distinguish between closely related family members (e.g., BHLH22 in humans) .

  • Antigen Design: Recombinant BHLH99 protein fragments or synthetic peptides are typical immunogens .

  • Database Gaps: No BHLH99-specific entries exist in major antibody databases (e.g., Antibodypedia, Histone Antibody Specificity Database) .

Future Directions

  • High-Throughput Screening: Adapt NeuroMab’s pipeline (~1,000 clones screened via ELISA/Western blot) for BHLH99.

  • Open-Access Resources: Follow NeuroMab’s model of sharing sequences and protocols to accelerate community validation .

  • Therapeutic Potential: Engineered VHH antibodies (single-domain) could improve tissue penetration in plant studies .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
BHLH99 antibody; EN18 antibody; At5g65320 antibody; MNA5.5Transcription factor bHLH99 antibody; Basic helix-loop-helix protein 99 antibody; AtbHLH99 antibody; bHLH 99 antibody; Transcription factor EN 18 antibody; bHLH transcription factor bHLH099 antibody
Target Names
BHLH99
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G65320

STRING: 3702.AT5G65320.1

UniGene: At.28395

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed constitutively in roots, stems, and flowers.

Q&A

Frequently Asked Questions for BHLH99 Antibody Research
(Note: No direct references to "BHLH99" were identified in the provided literature. The below FAQs synthesize general antibody research methodologies from the sources, adapted to hypothetical BHLH99 studies.)

What validation strategies ensure specificity of BHLH99 antibodies in immunohistochemistry (IHC)?

  • Methodological framework:

    • Negative controls: Use tissues/cell lines with confirmed absence of the target antigen (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts) .

    • Orthogonal validation: Pair IHC with immunoblotting (reducing vs. non-reducing conditions) and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry .

    • Competition assays: Pre-incubate antibodies with recombinant antigen to confirm signal loss .

    Validation StepKey MetricsSource Example
    Knockout validation≥90% signal reduction
    Epitope mappingLinear vs. conformational epitopes

How do experimental designs differ when targeting membrane-bound vs. intracellular antigens with BHLH99?

  • Membrane antigens:

    • Use live-cell staining with non-permeabilizing detergents (e.g., saponin) to preserve epitopes .

    • Validate with flow cytometry using isotype controls .

  • Intracellular antigens:

    • Optimize fixation/permeabilization protocols (paraformaldehyde vs. methanol) .

    • Confirm subcellular localization via confocal microscopy colocalization with organelle markers .

How can conflicting binding data for BHLH99 across studies be resolved?

  • Systematic analysis:

    • Compare antibody lot numbers, storage conditions, and dilution buffers .

    • Assess antigen integrity (e.g., glycosylation status in different cell lines) .

    • Use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to quantify binding kinetics under standardized conditions .

    FactorImpact on BindingMitigation Strategy
    Post-translational modificationsAlters epitope accessibilityUse glycoengineered cell lines
    Antibody aggregationFalse-positive signalsSEC-HPLC purity analysis

What in silico tools complement empirical validation of BHLH99’s cross-reactivity?

  • Computational pipeline:

    • Epitope prediction: Use tools like DiscoTope-3.0 to map potential off-target interactions .

    • Phylogenetic analysis: Screen for homologous epitopes in model organisms (e.g., murine vs. human isoforms) .

    • Structural modeling: Compare antibody-antigen docking simulations with cryo-EM data .

How do bispecific antibody platforms influence BHLH99 therapeutic development?

  • Case study framework:

    • Modular design: Utilize VHH-Fc-VHH bispecific formats for dual epitope targeting (e.g., viral neutralization) .

    • Functional synergy: Validate using pseudovirus neutralization assays with dose-response curves .

    PlatformAdvantagesLimitations
    VHH-Fc bispecificsHigh thermal stability (>70°C) Limited Fc effector function
    IgG-scFv fusionsEnhanced serum half-life Manufacturing complexity

Why might BHLH99 show differential binding in ALC lymphomas vs. normal B cells?

  • Hypothesis testing:

    • Antigen induction: Test mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes for H/Y antigen upregulation .

    • Epigenetic profiling: Perform ATAC-seq to compare chromatin accessibility at the target locus .

    • Glycosylation analysis: Use lectin arrays to characterize glycoform differences .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.