The H131 monoclonal antibody specifically recognizes the TCR Vβ13.1 subunit of the αβ T-cell receptor, a protein complex critical for antigen recognition in adaptive immunity. It is widely used in immunology research to study T-cell repertoire diversity, clonality, and immune responses .
T-Cell Repertoire Analysis: H131 identifies subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing TCR Vβ13.1, aiding in studies of immune responses to infections (e.g., HIV) .
Autoimmunity and Cancer: Used to investigate clonal expansions in autoimmune diseases and malignancies .
T-Cell Activation: H131 can stimulate proliferation of TCR Vβ13.1+ T cells, making it useful for in vitro functional assays .
H131 binds a conformational epitope on the TCR Vβ13.1 subfamily but does not cross-react with other Vβ13 subtypes (e.g., Vβ13.2 or Vβ13.3) .
Flow Cytometry: Validated for use in multi-parameter panels with minimal background staining .
Staining Protocol: Optimized for 1 × 10^6 cells per 100 µl sample volume .
HIV Research: TCR Vβ13.1+ T cells show altered frequencies in HIV-infected individuals, suggesting a role in disease progression .
Superantigen Responses: H131 detects T-cell expansions induced by bacterial superantigens .
KEGG: ath:AT4G38070
UniGene: At.31207
BHLH131 belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors, which represents the second largest class of transcription factors widely distributed across plants, animals, and microorganisms. The bHLH domain comprises approximately 60 amino acids with a basic amino acid region and a helix-loop-helix region. The basic region (15-20 amino acids) at the N-terminal forms a DNA-binding domain that regulates G-box and E-box binding activity, while the HLH region (40-50 amino acids) in the C-terminal domain contains two alpha helixes separated by a loop of variable length . This structure facilitates interactions with other bHLH proteins and the formation of homodimers and heterodimers, making it crucial for understanding transcriptional regulation and protein-protein interactions in cellular pathways.
Antibodies against bHLH transcription factors like BHLH131 are typically generated through several approaches. The most common method involves immunizing animals (often rabbits or mice) with either synthetic peptides corresponding to unique regions of the target protein or with recombinant proteins. For enhanced immunogenicity, particularly for challenging targets, researchers often employ protein conjugation techniques, such as coupling the antigen to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) . This approach promotes T cell-dependent affinity maturation of the antibody response by B cells. Following immunization, B cells from animals showing the strongest immune response are isolated for cloning of variable heavy (VH) and variable light (VL) chains, which are then co-transfected into appropriate cell lines for antibody production . Screening methods like ELISA, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry are used to validate specificity and sensitivity.
Antibodies against BHLH131 typically target distinctive structural features of the protein. The bHLH domain consists of two functionally distinct regions: the basic region for DNA binding and the HLH region for dimerization. Effective antibodies may target unique epitopes within these regions or protein-specific sequences outside the conserved bHLH domain. When designing antibodies, researchers often analyze the amino acid sequence to identify regions with:
Low sequence homology with other bHLH family members to ensure specificity
Surface-exposed locations to increase accessibility for antibody binding
Low structural complexity to maintain epitope recognition in various assay conditions
Post-translational modification sites if detecting specific protein states
These structural considerations are crucial for developing antibodies that can distinguish BHLH131 from other closely related bHLH proteins that share the conserved domain structure .
Thorough validation of BHLH131 antibodies is critical for ensuring experimental reliability. A comprehensive validation approach should include:
ELISA Testing: Perform dose-dependent binding assays using purified recombinant BHLH131 protein versus related bHLH proteins to establish specificity profiles. Results should demonstrate specific binding to BHLH131 with minimal cross-reactivity .
Western Blot Analysis: Test the antibody against lysates from cells with known BHLH131 expression levels, including:
Immunoprecipitation: Verify that the antibody can specifically pull down BHLH131 from complex protein mixtures, with subsequent mass spectrometry confirmation.
Immunohistochemistry Controls: Include positive tissues known to express BHLH131 and negative controls where the protein is absent, similar to validation approaches used for other transcription factor antibodies .
Genetic Validation: Test antibody reactivity in BHLH131-null backgrounds created through CRISPR/Cas9 or similar gene editing technologies to confirm signal absence.
This multi-platform validation approach minimizes the risk of experimental artifacts and ensures that observed signals genuinely represent BHLH131 detection .
For optimal Western blot results with BHLH131 antibodies, researchers should consider the following protocol adaptations:
Sample Preparation:
Gel Separation:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation of BHLH131 (expected MW ~45-60 kDa)
Include positive control lysates from cells with confirmed BHLH131 expression
Transfer Conditions:
Semi-dry transfer: 15V for 30-45 minutes
Wet transfer: 30V overnight at 4°C for maximum protein transfer efficiency
Blocking and Antibody Incubation:
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or 3-5% BSA in TBS-T for 1 hour at room temperature
Dilute primary BHLH131 antibody 1:500 to 1:2000 (optimize for each lot)
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Detection and Troubleshooting:
Use ECL detection systems with exposure times starting at 30 seconds
For weak signals, consider enhanced chemiluminescence substrates or signal amplification systems
If background is high, increase washing times and detergent concentration in wash buffer
This methodological approach has been shown to produce reliable results for other bHLH transcription factor antibodies and should be applicable to BHLH131 detection .
Optimizing immunoprecipitation (IP) for BHLH131 and its interacting partners requires careful consideration of protein complex preservation:
Cell Lysis Conditions:
Use gentle lysis buffers (e.g., 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40) with protease/phosphatase inhibitors
For nuclear proteins like BHLH131, include a nuclear extraction step before IP
Sonicate minimally to avoid disrupting protein-protein interactions
Antibody Coupling:
Pre-couple 2-5 μg of BHLH131 antibody to protein A/G beads or magnetic beads
For co-IP studies, consider cross-linking the antibody to beads using bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate (BS3) to prevent antibody contamination in the eluted sample
Binding and Washing Conditions:
Incubate lysate with antibody-coupled beads for 3-4 hours at 4°C with gentle rotation
Perform at least 4 washes with buffer containing reduced detergent concentration
Include salt gradient washes (150-300 mM NaCl) to reduce non-specific binding
Elution Strategies:
For routine IP, use SDS sample buffer at 95°C for 5 minutes
For co-IP mass spectrometry analysis, consider native elution with competing peptides or low pH glycine buffers (pH 2.5-3.0) followed by immediate neutralization
This optimized approach enables researchers to capture BHLH131 along with its interacting partners, including other bHLH proteins with which it forms heterodimers, facilitating the study of transcriptional regulatory complexes .
BHLH131 antibodies provide powerful tools for investigating complex protein-protein interactions within the bHLH transcription factor family. Advanced experimental approaches include:
Sequential Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP-reChIP):
Perform primary ChIP with BHLH131 antibody
Elute complexes under native conditions
Perform secondary ChIP with antibodies against suspected partner proteins
This technique identifies genomic loci bound by BHLH131-containing heterodimers
Proximity-Dependent Biotin Identification (BioID) or APEX2 Proximity Labeling:
Generate BHLH131-BioID or BHLH131-APEX2 fusion proteins
Use BHLH131 antibodies to confirm expression and localization of fusion proteins
Identify proximal proteins through streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Analysis:
Employ BHLH131 antibodies to validate expression levels of fluorescently tagged BHLH131 and potential partner proteins
Measure energy transfer between fluorophores to confirm direct protein interactions
Analyze interaction kinetics and affinity
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):
Split fluorescent protein fragments are fused to BHLH131 and potential interactors
BHLH131 antibodies verify expression levels before visualization
Reconstituted fluorescence indicates interaction in living cells
These advanced techniques allow researchers to map intricate interaction networks of BHLH131 with other transcription factors, co-activators, or co-repressors, illuminating its role in transcriptional regulation .
Investigating BHLH131 subcellular localization dynamics across different cellular contexts requires multiple complementary approaches:
Immunofluorescence Microscopy Optimization:
Fixation: Compare paraformaldehyde (4%) versus methanol fixation for optimal epitope preservation
Permeabilization: Test Triton X-100 (0.1-0.5%) versus saponin (0.1-0.3%) for nuclear transcription factor access
Antibody dilution: Typically start at 1:100-1:500 for primary antibodies
Include co-staining with nuclear markers (DAPI), and other cellular compartment markers
Biochemical Fractionation Coupled with Western Blotting:
Separate nuclear, cytoplasmic, chromatin-bound, and soluble nuclear fractions
Analyze BHLH131 distribution across fractions using validated antibodies
Include fraction-specific control proteins (e.g., Lamin B1 for nuclear envelope, GAPDH for cytoplasm)
Live-Cell Imaging with Fluorescent Protein Tags:
Validate constructs using BHLH131 antibodies to confirm that tagged proteins behave like endogenous BHLH131
Monitor dynamic changes in localization following stimuli or during cell cycle progression
Combine with photobleaching techniques (FRAP) to measure mobility and binding dynamics
Super-Resolution Microscopy:
Employ STORM or PALM techniques with BHLH131 antibodies for nanoscale localization
Analyze co-localization with chromatin marks or other transcription factors at enhanced resolution
These approaches collectively provide a comprehensive view of BHLH131 localization patterns, revealing how its distribution correlates with function across different cellular states and environmental conditions .
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) using BHLH131 antibodies requires careful optimization to generate high-quality, reproducible binding profiles:
Antibody Validation for ChIP Applications:
Perform ChIP-qPCR on known or predicted BHLH131 binding sites
Compare enrichment using different antibody concentrations (2-10 μg per reaction)
Include IgG control and input normalization
Verify specificity using cells with BHLH131 knockdown or knockout
Crosslinking and Chromatin Preparation Optimization:
Test multiple formaldehyde concentrations (0.5-1.5%) and crosslinking times (5-20 minutes)
Optimize sonication conditions to achieve 200-500 bp fragments
Verify fragmentation efficiency by agarose gel electrophoresis
Consider dual crosslinking (formaldehyde plus disuccinimidyl glutarate) for improved efficiency
ChIP Protocol Refinements:
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads to reduce background
Incubate chromatin and antibody overnight at 4°C with rotation
Include extensive washing steps with increasing salt concentrations
Reverse crosslinks at 65°C for 4-16 hours
Data Analysis and Validation:
Identify enriched regions using peak-calling algorithms like MACS2
Perform motif analysis to identify the consensus binding sequence for BHLH131
Validate novel binding sites with ChIP-qPCR
Correlate binding sites with gene expression data
This methodical approach enables accurate mapping of BHLH131 binding sites genome-wide, revealing its regulatory targets and potential co-regulatory networks with other transcription factors .
When faced with contradictory results between different antibody-based assays for BHLH131, researchers should systematically analyze potential sources of discrepancy:
Epitope Accessibility Assessment:
Different assays expose different epitopes
Western blotting detects denatured epitopes
IP and ChIP require native epitope recognition
IF may require partially denatured structures
Resolution Strategy: Map the epitope recognized by each antibody and select the appropriate antibody for each application based on epitope characteristics.
Post-Translational Modification Interference:
Phosphorylation, acetylation, or ubiquitination may mask epitopes
Different cellular conditions alter BHLH131 modification states
Resolution Strategy: Use phosphatase treatment or other relevant enzymes to remove modifications before detection. Consider using modification-specific antibodies if available.
Isoform-Specific Detection:
Alternative splicing may generate BHLH131 variants
Different antibodies may recognize different isoforms
Resolution Strategy: Sequence the region recognized by each antibody and compare with known isoforms. Validate with recombinant isoforms if possible.
Experimental Condition Variables:
Assay Type | Potential Variables | Optimization Approach |
---|---|---|
Western Blot | Reducing conditions, buffer pH | Test non-reducing conditions, adjust buffer composition |
IP | Salt concentration, detergent type | Titrate salt (150-500 mM), try different detergents (NP-40, Triton, CHAPS) |
ChIP | Crosslinking time, sonication | Compare various crosslinking times, optimize sonication |
IHC/IF | Fixation method, antigen retrieval | Test multiple fixatives, try heat-mediated or enzymatic retrieval methods |
Cross-validation using complementary techniques, such as mass spectrometry or RNA interference, can help resolve contradictions and establish which results most accurately reflect BHLH131 biology .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with BHLH131 antibodies can produce several common artifacts that require specific mitigation strategies:
Non-specific Nuclear Staining:
False-Negative Results in Nuclear Proteins:
Edge Artifacts and Uneven Staining:
Cause: Tissue drying during processing or uneven antibody distribution
Solution: Maintain humidity during incubations; use sufficient antibody volume; employ automated staining platforms if available
Background Staining in Extracellular Matrix:
Inconsistent Results Between Batches:
Cause: Antibody lot variation or tissue processing differences
Solution: Include standard positive control tissues in each run; maintain detailed protocols; consider using automated systems for consistency
These optimization strategies can significantly reduce artifacts in BHLH131 IHC staining, leading to more reliable interpretation of expression patterns across different tissue types .
Accurate quantitative analysis of BHLH131 expression across experimental conditions requires rigorous methodological approaches:
Western Blot Quantification:
Use gradient loading of samples to ensure detection in the linear range
Include recombinant BHLH131 protein standards for absolute quantification
Normalize to appropriate loading controls (nuclear proteins like Lamin B for nuclear transcription factors)
Employ fluorescent secondary antibodies for wider linear detection range
Use image analysis software with background subtraction and lane profile analysis
Quantitative Immunofluorescence:
Collect images with identical exposure settings across all samples
Include fluorescence calibration standards in each experiment
Perform nuclear segmentation based on DAPI staining
Measure mean nuclear intensity of BHLH131 signal
Apply appropriate statistical tests for comparing conditions
Flow Cytometry for BHLH131 Detection:
Optimize fixation and permeabilization for nuclear transcription factors
Include fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls
Measure median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for population analysis
Gate on specific cell populations when analyzing heterogeneous samples
Quantitative Analysis Workflow:
Analysis Step | Recommended Approach | Common Pitfalls to Avoid |
---|---|---|
Background Correction | Use rolling ball algorithm | Manual background selection |
Normalization | Use spike-in controls | Relying solely on housekeeping genes |
Statistical Analysis | Apply non-parametric tests for small sample sizes | Using parametric tests without checking data distribution |
Data Presentation | Include all data points with mean/median indicators | Showing only fold changes without absolute values |
These quantitative approaches provide robust measurements of BHLH131 expression levels, enabling meaningful comparisons across different experimental conditions and treatments .
Emerging single-cell protein analysis technologies offer exciting opportunities for applying BHLH131 antibodies to understand heterogeneity in transcription factor expression and activity:
Mass Cytometry (CyTOF) Applications:
Metal-conjugated BHLH131 antibodies enable simultaneous detection with dozens of other proteins
Correlation of BHLH131 expression with cell cycle markers, signaling pathways, and other transcription factors
Identification of rare cell populations with unique BHLH131 expression patterns
Required validation: Titration experiments to determine optimal concentration of metal-conjugated antibodies
Single-Cell Western Blot Adaptation:
Microfluidic platforms for analyzing BHLH131 in thousands of individual cells
Correlation of expression levels with functional outcomes at single-cell resolution
Technical considerations: Optimization of cell lysis conditions to preserve nuclear proteins
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) for Protein Interactions:
Detection of BHLH131 interaction with specific partners in individual cells
Visualization of spatial distribution of interactions within subcellular compartments
Quantification of interaction frequency across cell populations
Emerging Technologies:
Technology | Application with BHLH131 Antibodies | Technical Requirements |
---|---|---|
Imaging Mass Cytometry | Spatial mapping of BHLH131 in tissue context | Metal-conjugated primary or secondary antibodies |
Digital Spatial Profiling | Quantitative spatial analysis of BHLH131 | Oligonucleotide-tagged antibodies |
SeqFISH/MERFISH | Combined protein-RNA detection at single-cell level | Optimized multiplexed immunofluorescence protocols |
These technologies promise to reveal unprecedented insights into the heterogeneous expression and function of BHLH131 across different cell types and states, potentially uncovering new regulatory mechanisms and cellular functions .
Recent advances in antibody engineering offer promising approaches to enhance BHLH131 detection:
Recombinant Antibody Fragments:
Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) and antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) provide superior tissue penetration
Smaller size allows access to sterically hindered epitopes in protein complexes
Bacterial or yeast display libraries can be screened for fragments with enhanced affinity and specificity
Potential for site-specific labeling with fluorophores or other detection moieties
Bi-specific Antibody Development:
Recognition of two distinct epitopes on BHLH131 or simultaneous binding of BHLH131 and interacting partners
Increased specificity through dual epitope recognition
Enhanced sensitivity through avidity effects
Applications in super-resolution microscopy and proximity-dependent detection methods
Nanobody Technology:
Single-domain antibodies derived from camelid heavy-chain-only antibodies
Exceptional stability under various buffer conditions
Small size (~15 kDa) for accessing restricted epitopes
Potential for intracellular expression as "intrabodies" for live-cell applications
Synthetic Biology Approaches:
Directed evolution of antibody binding domains using yeast or phage display
Computational design of binding interfaces with enhanced specificity for BHLH131
Integration with split reporter systems for real-time detection of BHLH131 activity
These emerging antibody technologies could significantly advance our ability to detect and monitor BHLH131 with improved sensitivity, specificity, and spatiotemporal resolution, enabling new insights into its biological functions and regulatory mechanisms .