STRING: 3702.AT5G01310.1
BHLH140 (Basic Helix-Loop-Helix protein 140) is a transcription factor belonging to the bHLH family in Arabidopsis thaliana. It functions as a DNA-binding protein that regulates gene expression by recognizing specific DNA sequences such as E-box motifs (CANNTG) . As a member of the bHLH transcription factor family, it likely plays roles in developmental processes, stress responses, or metabolism regulation.
The bHLH domain consists of approximately 60 amino acids with two functionally distinct regions: the basic region at the N-terminal end involved in DNA binding, and the HLH region at the C-terminal end that functions as a dimerization domain . BHLH140 is encoded by the gene At5g01310 and is also known as EN122.
BHLH140 shares the characteristic domain architecture of the bHLH family, featuring:
A basic DNA-binding region composed of approximately 15 amino acids with numerous basic residues
A helix-loop-helix region consisting of two amphipathic α-helices separated by a loop region
In Arabidopsis, comprehensive phylogenetic analysis has revealed 147-152 bHLH proteins that can be classified into 21 subfamilies based on their sequence similarities . These proteins often function as homo- or heterodimers, with the HLH region mediating protein-protein interactions and the basic region recognizing specific DNA sequences. The dimerization capacity allows for combinatorial interactions that expand their regulatory potential in controlling diverse transcriptional programs .
The predicted subcellular localization of BHLH140 is the nucleus, consistent with its role as a transcription factor.
Based on product information, the BHLH140 antibody is primarily validated for:
These techniques are fundamental for detecting and quantifying BHLH140 protein in various experimental contexts. The antibody is designed to specifically recognize Arabidopsis thaliana BHLH140 protein and can be used to study its expression patterns, protein levels, and potential post-translational modifications.
For optimal results, researchers should design experiments considering that:
BHLH140 antibody is polyclonal, raised in rabbit against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana BHLH140 protein
The storage buffer contains 0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, and 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4
It's recommended to store the antibody at -20°C or -80°C and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
For successful Western blot experiments with BHLH140 antibody:
Sample preparation:
Extract nuclear proteins since BHLH140 is primarily localized in the nucleus
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of the target protein
Use appropriate lysis buffers optimized for nuclear proteins
Gel electrophoresis parameters:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels to effectively resolve proteins in the expected molecular weight range
Load sufficient protein (20-50 μg of total protein) to ensure detection of low-abundance transcription factors
Transfer conditions:
Semi-dry or wet transfer systems can be used with optimization for nuclear proteins
PVDF membranes may provide better results than nitrocellulose for nuclear transcription factors
Antibody dilution:
For Western blot applications, start with a dilution range of 0.2-0.5 μg/ml, which is recommended for mouse-derived antibodies
For rabbit-derived antibodies like BHLH140, consider using a slightly lower concentration (20-50 ng/ml)
Optimize through titration experiments if initial results are unsatisfactory
Detection system:
Both chemiluminescence and fluorescence-based detection systems are compatible
For low abundance targets, enhanced chemiluminescence may provide better sensitivity
When working with plant tissues, several strategies can enhance antibody specificity:
Tissue preparation:
Use young, actively growing tissues where transcription factors are more abundantly expressed
For Arabidopsis, consider using seedlings or specific tissues known to express BHLH140
Fresh tissue typically yields better results than stored samples
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat dry milk, commercial blockers)
Plant samples may benefit from 5% BSA in TBS-T rather than milk-based blockers
Include 0.1% Tween-20 in wash buffers to reduce background
Cross-reactivity minimization:
Pre-absorb the antibody with plant extract from knockout or knockdown lines lacking BHLH140
Include competing proteins in the antibody diluent to reduce non-specific binding
Consider longer, more frequent washing steps (4-5 washes of 10 minutes each)
Controls to include:
Positive control: Overexpression line of BHLH140
Negative control: bhlh140 knockout/knockdown line
Technical control: Primary antibody omission
Specificity control: Preincubation of antibody with excess antigen
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Insufficient protein loading; Antibody concentration too low; Target protein not expressed | Increase protein load; Optimize antibody concentration; Verify BHLH140 expression by RT-qPCR first |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity with other bHLH family members; Protein degradation; Post-translational modifications | Use more stringent washing; Add protease inhibitors; Compare with predicted molecular weight (MW) |
| High background | Insufficient blocking; Antibody concentration too high; Non-specific binding | Increase blocking time/concentration; Dilute antibody further; Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce hydrophobic interactions |
| Inconsistent results | Variable expression of BHLH140; Sample degradation; Technical variability | Standardize growth conditions; Process samples consistently; Include loading controls for normalization |
For troubleshooting approaches specific to transcription factor detection:
Nuclear enrichment protocols can significantly improve detection sensitivity
Consider crosslinking before extraction to preserve protein-DNA interactions
For developmental studies, carefully stage plant materials as transcription factor expression can be highly temporal
Though not explicitly listed among the validated applications for BHLH140 antibody, researchers interested in identifying BHLH140 binding sites can adapt ChIP protocols based on approaches used for other bHLH transcription factors:
Experimental design considerations:
Crosslinking: Use 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature
Chromatin fragmentation: Optimize sonication conditions to achieve fragments of 200-500 bp
Immunoprecipitation: Use 2-5 μg of antibody per ChIP reaction
Include appropriate controls: IgG control, input control, and positive control regions
Protocol adaptations for plant tissues:
Consider vacuum infiltration for efficient crosslinking
Use glass beads or specialized disruption methods for plant cell wall lysis
Include plant-specific protease inhibitors in all buffers
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce background
Data analysis approach:
Focus on E-box motifs (CANNTG) and particularly G-box motifs (CACGTG) which are commonly bound by bHLH transcription factors
Perform motif enrichment analysis to identify BHLH140-specific binding preferences
Consider the effect of potential heterodimerization with other bHLH proteins on binding specificity
Based on research with other bHLH transcription factors, BHLH140 likely regulates genes by binding to E-box elements in their promoters, similar to the characterized interactions of other family members .
To investigate BHLH140 interaction partners:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) approach:
Use BHLH140 antibody to immunoprecipitate the protein complex from plant nuclear extracts
Mild lysis conditions are essential to preserve protein-protein interactions
Identify interacting partners through mass spectrometry analysis of co-precipitated proteins
Validate interactions through reciprocal Co-IP or alternative methods
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Clone the BHLH140 coding sequence into appropriate bait vectors
Screen against Arabidopsis cDNA libraries or specific candidate interactors
Focus on other transcription factors, particularly other bHLH family members
Validate interactions through BiFC (Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation) in planta
Investigating heterodimerization patterns:
bHLH proteins frequently form heterodimers to expand their regulatory potential
Evidence from other bHLH proteins suggests that dimerization patterns significantly impact DNA binding specificity and biological function
For instance, PIF3 and PIF4, two related phytochrome-interacting bHLH members in Arabidopsis, can form both homodimers and heterodimers, with all three configurations binding to G-box DNA sequences
To establish direct regulatory relationships:
Integrated approach combining:
ChIP-seq to identify genome-wide binding sites
RNA-seq to determine differentially expressed genes in bhlh140 mutants versus wild-type
The intersection represents potential direct targets (both bound and regulated)
Validation strategies:
Perform ChIP-qPCR on selected targets to confirm binding
Use reporter gene assays with wild-type and mutated E-box elements from target promoters
Employ inducible systems (e.g., glucocorticoid-inducible or estradiol-inducible BHLH140) combined with cycloheximide treatment to identify primary response genes
Data interpretation framework:
Consider that transcription factors often bind many sites without functional regulation
The absence of an expression change doesn't necessarily indicate lack of regulation (redundancy may mask effects)
Binding site location relative to transcription start sites can provide insights into regulatory mechanisms
To elucidate BHLH140 function in plants:
Genetic analysis approach:
Generate and characterize knockout/knockdown lines (T-DNA insertion, CRISPR-Cas9, RNAi)
Create overexpression lines under constitutive and tissue-specific promoters
Analyze phenotypes under normal growth conditions and various stresses
Perform complementation experiments to confirm phenotype-genotype relationships
Expression pattern analysis:
Use quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) to measure BHLH140 expression across tissues and conditions
Generate promoter-reporter fusions (BHLH140pro:GUS or BHLH140pro:GFP) to visualize expression patterns
Standard qPCR conditions: 95°C for 30s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10s and 60°C for 30s
Analyze gene expression levels using the 2^-ΔΔCT method with appropriate reference genes
Functional genomics integration:
Perform transcriptome analysis (RNA-seq) comparing wild-type and mutant plants
Conduct Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes
Map the results onto known biological pathways to identify processes regulated by BHLH140
Consider chromatin dynamics, as bHLH transcription factors can cooperate with chromatin remodelers to regulate cell fate decisions
Understanding the evolutionary conservation of BHLH140:
Comparative genomics approach:
Identify orthologs of BHLH140 in other plant species through reciprocal BLAST searches
Perform multiple sequence alignments focusing on the bHLH domain and other functional regions
Construct phylogenetic trees to determine evolutionary relationships with other bHLH proteins
The bHLH family in Arabidopsis has been classified into 21 subfamilies based on phylogenetic analysis
Structural conservation analysis:
Examine conservation of key functional residues, particularly in the DNA-binding basic region
Analyze conservation of protein-interaction surfaces in the HLH region
Investigate whether domain architecture is preserved across species
Predict functional importance based on evolutionary constraint patterns
Functional prediction framework:
Highly conserved orthologs likely maintain similar functions across species
Differences in conservation may indicate species-specific adaptations
Compare expression patterns of orthologs in different plant species to identify conserved regulatory modules
Cross-species complementation experiments can provide evidence for functional conservation
To characterize BHLH140 DNA binding preferences:
Sequence-based prediction:
Experimental determination approaches:
Perform EMSA (Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay) with recombinant BHLH140 and labeled DNA probes
Conduct protein-binding microarrays to determine sequence preferences systematically
Utilize ChIP-seq data to identify enriched motifs in vivo
Heterodimerization effects on binding specificity:
bHLH proteins often form both homodimers and heterodimers with differential binding preferences
The selection of dimerization partners can significantly alter DNA sequence recognition
For example, research on PIF3 and PIF4 has shown that both homodimers and heterodimers can bind to G-box DNA sequences, suggesting potential combinatorial regulation
These different dimeric configurations may regulate distinct sets of target genes
Through this comprehensive characterization of DNA binding preferences, researchers can better understand the regulatory networks controlled by BHLH140 and its position within the broader transcriptional landscape of Arabidopsis.