BHLH145 (Basic helix-loop-helix protein 145) is a transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana, also known as SACL2, EN131, or At5g50010 . It belongs to the bHLH family of transcription factors that regulate various developmental processes and stress responses in plants. The protein is primarily localized in the nucleus and functions as a DNA-binding transcription factor that regulates gene expression through interaction with specific DNA sequences.
The significance of BHLH145 lies in its role in controlling plant developmental processes. As a transcription factor, it likely influences gene expression networks that regulate specific physiological or developmental pathways in Arabidopsis. Understanding its function contributes to our knowledge of plant growth regulation, developmental transitions, and potentially stress responses.
BHLH145 antibodies serve multiple critical functions in plant molecular biology research:
Western blotting: Detection of BHLH145 protein expression levels in different tissues or under various conditions at the expected molecular weight of approximately 35 kDa
Immunohistochemistry: Visualization of protein localization within plant tissues and cells
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Identification of genomic regions bound by BHLH145 to determine its direct transcriptional targets
Co-immunoprecipitation: Investigation of protein-protein interactions involving BHLH145 in transcriptional complexes
ELISA: Quantitative measurement of BHLH145 protein abundance across different experimental conditions
These applications allow researchers to investigate the expression patterns, subcellular localization, and functional interactions of BHLH145 in plant biology.
For maximum stability and activity of BHLH145 antibodies, the following storage and handling guidelines should be followed:
| Storage Condition | Duration | Temperature |
|---|---|---|
| Lyophilized form | 12 months | -20 to -70°C |
| After reconstitution | 6 months | -20 to -70°C |
| Working solution | 1 month | 2 to 8°C |
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to prevent loss of lyophilized material
Reconstitute with 150 μl of sterile water for lyophilized antibodies
Mix gently to ensure complete dissolution
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they may denature the antibody and decrease activity
Store in small aliquots after reconstitution to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Ship at 4°C and store immediately at recommended temperature upon receipt
For working solutions, maintain sterile conditions to prevent contamination
Validating BHLH145 antibody specificity is crucial for reliable experimental results. Standard validation methods include:
Western blot analysis:
Peptide competition assay:
Knockout/knockdown controls:
Testing the antibody in BHLH145 knockout or knockdown plant lines
Should show reduced or absent signal compared to wild-type samples
Cross-reactivity testing:
Evaluating antibody reactivity against related BHLH family members to ensure specificity
Important because the BHLH family contains multiple related proteins with similar structural domains
Effective sample preparation is critical for successful detection of BHLH145 in plant tissues:
Harvest fresh plant tissue and immediately freeze in liquid nitrogen
Grind tissue to a fine powder while maintaining frozen state
Extract proteins using a buffer containing:
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)
150 mM NaCl
1% Triton X-100
0.5% sodium deoxycholate
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Centrifuge at 12,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Collect supernatant and determine protein concentration
Add sample buffer and heat at 95°C for 5 minutes
Load 20-30 μg total protein per lane for SDS-PAGE separation
Fix plant tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde
Embed in paraffin or prepare for cryosectioning
Section tissues at 5-10 μm thickness
Perform antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Block with 5% normal serum and proceed with antibody incubation
Nuclear protein enrichment (recommended for transcription factors):
Isolate nuclei using sucrose gradient centrifugation
Extract nuclear proteins using high-salt buffer
This approach increases detection sensitivity by concentrating the nuclear-localized BHLH145 protein
BHLH145 antibodies can be powerful tools for investigating protein-protein interactions within transcriptional complexes using the following approaches:
Prepare nuclear extracts from Arabidopsis tissues
Incubate extracts with BHLH145 antibody coupled to protein A/G beads
Wash to remove non-specific interactions
Elute bound proteins and analyze by mass spectrometry or Western blot
This technique can identify proteins that physically interact with BHLH145 in vivo
Generate transgenic plants expressing BHLH145 fused to a promiscuous biotin ligase
Biotin treatment leads to biotinylation of proteins in close proximity to BHLH145
Use BHLH145 antibodies to confirm expression of the fusion protein
Isolate biotinylated proteins using streptavidin beads and identify by mass spectrometry
Cross-link protein-DNA complexes in plant tissues
Immunoprecipitate with BHLH145 antibody
Identify co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
This approach can reveal proteins that interact with BHLH145 at chromatin sites
These methods are particularly valuable for understanding how BHLH145 functions within larger transcription factor complexes to regulate gene expression in plants.
Optimizing ChIP protocols for BHLH145 requires careful consideration of several parameters:
Use 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature
For weaker or transient interactions, consider dual cross-linking with disuccinimidyl glutarate (DSG) followed by formaldehyde
Quench with 0.125 M glycine for 5 minutes
Sonicate to generate fragments of 200-500 bp
Optimize sonication conditions (amplitude, cycle number, duration) for plant tissues
Verify fragment size by agarose gel electrophoresis
Antibody amount: 2-5 μg per immunoprecipitation reaction
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C with rotation
Protein A/G beads: 30-50 μl of pre-blocked bead slurry
Washing buffers: Use increasingly stringent wash buffers to minimize background
Input DNA (non-immunoprecipitated chromatin)
IgG control (non-specific antibody of same isotype)
Positive control (known BHLH145 target regions)
Negative control (genomic regions not expected to be bound by BHLH145)
Design primers targeting E-box motifs (CANNTG) in promoter regions
Include primers for housekeeping genes as negative controls
Test primer efficiency using standard curves with input DNA
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact antibody recognition of BHLH145:
Phosphorylation may alter protein conformation or directly block epitopes, particularly if the epitope includes common phosphorylation sites
Ubiquitination or SUMOylation can mask epitopes or create steric hindrance
Glycosylation may prevent antibody access to epitopes in certain experimental conditions
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of BHLH145
Phosphatase treatment of samples prior to immunoblotting to remove phosphorylation
Deglycosylation enzymes to remove glycosyl groups that may interfere with antibody binding
Denaturing conditions in Western blotting may expose epitopes that are masked in native conformations
Consider developing modification-specific antibodies if particular PTMs of BHLH145 are functionally relevant
These can be used to study the dynamics of BHLH145 modifications under different conditions
This understanding is especially important when conflicting results arise between different detection methods or experimental conditions.
Detection of BHLH145 across tissues and developmental stages presents several technical challenges:
BHLH145 may be expressed at very low levels in certain tissues or developmental stages
Enhanced detection methods may be required, such as signal amplification or enrichment of nuclear fractions
Plant tissues contain various compounds that can interfere with antibody binding:
Phenolic compounds may cross-link with proteins
Secondary metabolites may cause background fluorescence
Cell wall components may limit antibody penetration
BHLH145 expression and localization may change dramatically during development
Timing of sample collection becomes critical for reproducible results
Tissue-specific extraction protocols optimized to remove interfering compounds
Nuclear enrichment to concentrate BHLH145 protein from dilute samples
Signal amplification techniques such as tyramide signal amplification for immunohistochemistry
Tissue clearing methods for improved antibody penetration in whole-mount samples
Developmental time course experiments to capture transient expression patterns
A systematic approach comparing detection methods across tissues and developmental stages can help establish optimal protocols for each specific research question.
When facing inconsistent results with BHLH145 antibodies, consider the following troubleshooting approaches:
| Problem | Potential Causes | Troubleshooting Steps |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Protein degradation | Add additional protease inhibitors, prepare fresh samples |
| Low expression | Increase protein loading, enrich nuclear fractions | |
| Antibody degradation | Use fresh aliquots, verify antibody activity | |
| Multiple bands | Non-specific binding | Optimize blocking (5% BSA or milk), increase wash stringency |
| Protein degradation | Add protease inhibitors, reduce sample processing time | |
| Alternative splice variants | Verify with transcript analysis (RT-PCR) | |
| Inconsistent results | Batch variation | Use the same antibody lot for comparative experiments |
| Protocol inconsistency | Standardize protocols, create detailed SOPs |
Positive controls: Include recombinant BHLH145 protein or overexpression samples
Negative controls: Include knockdown/knockout samples if available
Method comparison: Verify results using complementary methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)
Antibody comparison: Test multiple antibodies targeting different BHLH145 epitopes
Maintain detailed records of antibody lots, sample preparation methods, and experimental conditions
Report all relevant details in publications to enhance reproducibility
Systematically addressing these factors can help identify the source of inconsistency and establish reliable protocols for BHLH145 detection.
Understanding the comparative advantages of antibody-based detection versus other methods provides important context for experimental design:
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody detection (Western blot, IHC) | Detects endogenous protein, Post-translational modifications can be studied | Dependent on antibody quality, May have cross-reactivity | Protein expression levels, Tissue localization |
| GFP/tag fusion proteins | Live imaging possible, No antibody needed | May alter protein function, Overexpression artifacts | Subcellular localization, Dynamics |
| RNA analysis (qPCR, RNA-seq) | High sensitivity, Transcript variants detectable | Does not reflect protein levels, No protein modification info | Expression patterns, Transcriptional regulation |
| Mass spectrometry | Highly specific, Can identify modifications | Low throughput, Complex sample preparation | Protein identification, PTM mapping |
Combining antibody detection with transcript analysis provides correlation between mRNA and protein levels
Verification of antibody results with tagged protein constructs can validate localization patterns
Integration of ChIP-seq (antibody-based) with RNA-seq provides functional context for binding sites
The choice of detection method should be guided by the specific research question, available resources, and the strengths and limitations of each approach.
BHLH145 antibodies can be adapted for high-throughput and multiplexed studies using several advanced approaches:
Multiplex Western blotting:
Use antibodies from different species or isotypes
Label with distinct fluorophores for simultaneous detection
Allows co-detection of BHLH145 along with interaction partners or pathway components
Protein microarrays:
Spot samples in array format for parallel analysis
Use BHLH145 antibodies to detect protein across multiple conditions
Enables screening of hundreds of samples simultaneously
Combine BHLH145 immunofluorescence with automated microscopy
Quantify protein levels, subcellular localization, and co-localization with other factors
Process thousands of cells or tissue sections in a single experiment
Adapt BHLH145 antibodies for mass cytometry (CyTOF) using metal-conjugated antibodies
Enables single-cell analysis of BHLH145 in heterogeneous plant tissues
Can be combined with multiple cellular markers for comprehensive phenotyping
Validate antibody performance in each specific application format
Establish robust positive and negative controls for automated analysis
Develop standardized protocols to ensure consistency across large sample sets
Implement quality control metrics to identify technical artifacts
These approaches allow researchers to scale up BHLH145 studies and integrate them into systems biology frameworks.
When applying BHLH145 antibodies to study related proteins across different plant species, several factors must be considered:
Align BHLH145 protein sequences from target species to assess epitope conservation
Predict cross-reactivity based on sequence homology in the epitope region
The central region of BHLH145 used as immunogen in some commercial antibodies shows variable conservation across plant species
Western blot validation in each target species
Peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Recombinant protein controls from each species of interest
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target identity
BHLH proteins have undergone significant diversification during plant evolution
Functional conservation may not correlate with sequence conservation
Paralogous BHLH proteins in different species may have divergent functions
This careful approach allows meaningful cross-species comparisons while avoiding artifacts from variable antibody reactivity.
Several cutting-edge technologies are poised to expand the applications of BHLH145 antibodies:
TurboID or miniTurbo fusions with BHLH145 for rapid biotin labeling of proximal proteins
Integration with antibody validation to confirm proper fusion protein function
Enables mapping of dynamic protein interaction networks in living plant cells
Antibody-based detection of BHLH145 with techniques like STORM, PALM, or STED
Achieves nanoscale resolution of protein localization beyond the diffraction limit
Reveals detailed nuclear distribution patterns and co-localization with chromatin features
Antibody-based detection combined with in situ sequencing or spatial transcriptomics
Correlates BHLH145 protein distribution with gene expression patterns
Provides spatial context for transcription factor function in complex tissues
CRISPR-based tagging of endogenous BHLH145 for antibody-free detection
Validation using existing antibodies ensures accurate representation of native protein
Enables live-cell imaging while maintaining physiological expression levels
Fluorophore-conjugated antibody fragments for tracking individual BHLH145 molecules
Reveals dynamics of DNA binding, residence time, and mobility within the nucleus
Provides mechanistic insights into transcription factor function
These technologies represent promising directions for advanced BHLH145 research, potentially revealing new aspects of its function and regulation in plant biology.
Researchers can enhance the quality and availability of BHLH145 antibody resources through several collaborative approaches:
Implement comprehensive validation protocols for BHLH145 antibodies
Document detailed methods, including:
Exact experimental conditions
Cell/tissue types tested
Positive and negative controls used
Observed limitations or cross-reactivity
Share validation data in public repositories or as supplementary material in publications
Generate and characterize monoclonal antibodies against different BHLH145 epitopes
Develop modification-specific antibodies (phospho-specific, etc.)
Create knockout/knockdown validation lines and share as community resources
Contribute to antibody validation databases like Antibodypedia or CiteAb
Share protocols on platforms like protocols.io
Deposit detailed methods in repositories specific to plant research
Participate in establishing minimum validation standards for plant antibodies
Advocate for transparent reporting of antibody validation in publications
Support initiatives for independent antibody validation
By contributing to these efforts, researchers can collectively improve the reliability and reproducibility of BHLH145 research and accelerate progress in understanding this important transcription factor.