Antibodies are typically named based on their target antigens (e.g., anti-CD20) or standardized nomenclature systems (e.g., adalimumab, trastuzumab). The term "BLID" does not align with:
International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for therapeutic antibodies.
Gene symbols (e.g., BLID is not listed in the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee database).
Commercial antibody catalogs (e.g., Sino Biological, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Abcam).
A systematic search across PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov) yielded no matches for "BLID Antibody."
Typographical Error: "BLID" may be a misspelling. Similar-sounding terms include:
Abbreviation Misinterpretation: If "BLID" refers to a proprietary or internal project name, public data may be unavailable.
If "BLID Antibody" represents a novel, unpublished target, details would not yet be accessible in open-source literature.
While "BLID Antibody" remains unidentified, advancements in antibody engineering from the search results include:
| Feature | Example Platforms | Clinical Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Dual epitope binding | DuoBody®, TandAbs | Cancer, autoimmune diseases |
| Mechanism | Immune checkpoint blockade | Enhances T-cell activation |
Verify the correct terminology or spelling of "BLID."
Consult internal/proprietary databases if the term originates from a specific organization.
Explore analogous antibody platforms (e.g., bispecifics or BLI-based assays) for potential overlaps.
BLID (BH3-like motif containing inducer of cell death, also known as BRCC2) is an intronless gene located on chromosome 11q24.1 that encodes a pro-apoptotic protein belonging to the Bcl-2 family. It is approximately 12-kDa in size (108 amino acids) and is primarily localized in the cytosol with some mitochondrial presence . BLID has emerged as a significant molecule in cancer research because it functions as a tumor suppressor gene, particularly in breast cancer. Its downregulation correlates with poor prognosis factors including younger patient age (median 40 years), African American ethnicity, increased tumor size, and triple-negative breast cancer phenotype . Research indicates that BLID-induced apoptosis involves activation of Bax and increases in cytosolic cytochrome c, suggesting its potential as both a prognostic marker and therapeutic target .
Validating BLID antibodies requires a multi-pillar approach to ensure specificity and reliability:
Knockout/knockdown validation: Creating cells in which the BLID gene is either completely (knockout) or partially (knockdown) inactivated. If the antibody still produces a signal in these models, it likely lacks specificity for BLID .
Multiple antibody validation: Using different antibodies that recognize distinct epitopes of BLID. Concordant staining patterns across these antibodies increase confidence in specificity .
Biological and orthogonal validation: Leveraging known biological characteristics of BLID (such as its cytosolic and mitochondrial localization) and employing non-antibody-based methods to confirm target measurement .
Recombinant protein expression: Expressing cloned BLID in heterologous systems to use as a positive control in western blot analysis. Detection of a band at the expected molecular weight (approximately 12-kDa) confirms antibody specificity .
BLID antibodies are employed in various research applications including:
Western blotting: To detect and quantify BLID protein expression levels in cell or tissue lysates, particularly when investigating its downregulation in cancer specimens .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For examining BLID expression patterns in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, as demonstrated in studies of invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas .
Immunofluorescence: For visualizing cellular localization of BLID, especially its translocation to mitochondria in response to cytotoxic agents like doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide .
Coimmunoprecipitation: To investigate BLID's protein-protein interactions, particularly with Bcl-XL and other apoptotic pathway components .
Proper experimental design with BLID antibodies requires several critical controls:
Positive controls: Include cell lines or tissues known to express BLID (e.g., specific breast cancer cell lines). For recombinant experiments, cells transfected with BLID cDNA provide excellent positive controls .
Negative controls: Employ BLID-knockout cells or tissues, or utilize cell lines with confirmed absence of BLID expression .
Isotype controls: Include appropriate immunoglobulin isotype controls matching the BLID antibody to identify non-specific binding.
Peptide competition: Pre-incubating the antibody with the immunizing peptide should abolish specific staining in a concentration-dependent manner.
Subcellular fraction controls: When studying BLID localization, include proper cytosolic and mitochondrial fraction controls, as BLID is found predominantly in the cytosol with lesser presence in mitochondria .
Selection criteria should be tailored to specific experimental applications:
Western blotting: Choose antibodies specifically validated for denatured proteins, recognizing linear epitopes of BLID. Confirm the antibody detects the expected 12-kDa band .
Immunohistochemistry: Select antibodies validated for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Consider antibodies that have demonstrated correlation with BLID mRNA expression levels .
Co-immunoprecipitation: Use antibodies that recognize native BLID protein conformations and don't interfere with protein-protein interaction sites, particularly those involved in BLID-Bcl-XL binding .
Application-specific validation: Regardless of application, ensure the antibody has been validated using at least two of the five validation pillars (knockout validation, independent antibody validation, orthogonal validation, biological validation, and recombinant expression) .
Common pitfalls and their solutions include:
Cross-reactivity concerns: BLID contains a BH3-like domain common to several Bcl-2 family proteins. Carefully validate antibody specificity against other family members to avoid cross-reactivity .
Sample preparation issues: Since BLID is involved in apoptotic pathways, improper sample handling may activate apoptosis and alter BLID expression or localization. Use appropriate protease inhibitors and maintain consistent sample preparation protocols .
Subcellular localization artifacts: BLID translocates between cytosol and mitochondria, particularly under stress conditions. Consider fixation methods that preserve this dynamic localization when studying BLID trafficking .
Antibody batch variation: Document lot numbers and validate each new antibody batch against previous lots to ensure consistent performance over time.
Inadequate validation: Do not rely solely on manufacturer claims; perform independent validation in your specific experimental system using multiple validation approaches .
BLID expression shows significant alterations in breast cancer with important research implications:
Researchers employ several techniques to investigate BLID loss in breast cancer:
BLID's interactions with apoptotic pathways in breast cancer cells involve several key mechanisms:
Bcl-XL interaction: BLID directly binds to the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-XL, and this interaction is enhanced in cancer cells exposed to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin and cisplatin .
Bax activation: Exogenous expression of BLID correlates with activation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, a critical mediator of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization .
Cytochrome c release: BLID expression increases cytosolic cytochrome c levels, a key step in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway leading to caspase activation .
Mitochondrial translocation: Under stress conditions, BLID translocates from the cytosol to mitochondria, particularly in response to doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide exposure .
Unique pro-apoptotic mechanism: Unlike most pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, BLID appears to have distinct mechanisms for inducing apoptosis, potentially making it a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer .
Distinguishing between genetic loss and protein downregulation requires a multi-modal approach:
Integrated genetic-protein analysis: Employ parallel methodologies to assess:
Epigenetic assessment: Investigate promoter methylation status and histone modifications at the BLID locus to identify epigenetic silencing when genetic loss is not detected but protein is absent.
Post-transcriptional regulation: Examine microRNA expression profiles targeting BLID transcripts to identify post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms.
Protein stability analysis: Employ proteasome inhibitors and protein half-life studies to determine if accelerated protein degradation contributes to BLID loss in the absence of genetic or transcriptional changes.
Correlative analysis: Statistical comparison of genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data across patient cohorts to establish relationships between different mechanisms of BLID loss.
When facing contradictory research findings regarding BLID function, consider these methodological approaches:
Cell type-specific analysis: BLID may function differently across cell types. Systematically compare BLID effects in multiple cell line models (breast, prostate, cervical carcinoma) using identical experimental conditions .
Conditional expression systems: Employ inducible expression systems (e.g., tetracycline-regulated) to control BLID expression levels and timing, allowing precise assessment of dose-dependent and temporal effects.
Domain-specific mutants: Generate BLID constructs with mutations in specific functional domains (particularly the BH3-like domain) to dissect structure-function relationships and interactions with binding partners.
Context-dependent signaling: Investigate BLID function under various cellular conditions (normal growth, stress, DNA damage) as its role may vary contextually, particularly regarding its interaction with Bcl-XL in response to chemotherapeutic agents .
In vivo validation: Extend findings from cell culture to animal models using BLID knockout or transgenic approaches to resolve contradictions that may arise from in vitro artifacts.
Optimizing high-throughput validation approaches for BLID antibodies requires:
Integrated validation workflow: Implement a comprehensive workflow early in antibody selection that includes multiple validation pillars as described in antibody development literature :
Genetic validation (knockout/knockdown)
Independent antibody validation
Biological validation
Orthogonal validation
Recombinant expression
Automated imaging and analysis: Utilize automated microscopy and image analysis algorithms to quantitatively assess antibody performance across multiple cell types and conditions.
Multiplexed detection systems: Employ multiplexed immunoassays that can simultaneously evaluate multiple antibodies against BLID and related proteins to identify optimal performers.
Machine learning approaches: Develop machine learning algorithms to recognize patterns in antibody performance data and predict which antibodies will function optimally in specific applications.
Database integration: Maintain a comprehensive database tracking antibody performance metrics across different experimental conditions, allowing researchers to select the most appropriate antibody for their specific application .
| Validation Method | Advantages | Limitations | Recommended Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knockout/Knockdown | Gold standard for specificity | Time-consuming, technically challenging | Wild-type cells, non-targeting controls |
| Independent Antibody | Relatively simple, confirms epitope | Requires multiple validated antibodies | Matched isotype controls |
| Orthogonal Validation | Confirms target without antibody bias | Requires alternative method expertise | Method-specific controls |
| Biological Validation | Leverages known biology, practical | Limited by existing knowledge | Positive and negative biological controls |
| Recombinant Expression | Controlled system, defined target | May not reflect endogenous conditions | Empty vector controls, titration series |
Emerging technologies poised to revolutionize BLID antibody research include:
Single-cell proteomics: Applying mass cytometry or single-cell western blotting to validate BLID antibodies at single-cell resolution, revealing heterogeneity in expression and subcellular localization previously masked in bulk analyses.
Proximity labeling approaches: Utilizing BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins with BLID to map its protein interaction network in living cells, providing spatial context for antibody validation.
CRISPR-based tagging: Employing CRISPR-Cas9 to insert epitope tags or fluorescent proteins into the endogenous BLID locus, creating cellular models with tagged endogenous BLID for antibody validation.
Structural biology integration: Using cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography data of BLID protein structure to guide epitope selection and antibody engineering for improved specificity and affinity.
Synthetic antibody libraries: Developing phage or yeast display libraries specifically designed for challenging targets like BLID, potentially yielding antibodies with superior performance characteristics.
BLID antibodies have significant potential in translational applications:
Companion diagnostics: Developing immunohistochemistry-based assays using BLID antibodies to identify patients most likely to benefit from therapies targeting apoptotic pathways.
Prognostic stratification: Creating standardized BLID immunohistochemistry protocols for clinical laboratories to stratify early-onset breast cancer patients according to risk, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer where BLID loss correlates with poor outcomes .
Therapeutic monitoring: Employing BLID antibodies to monitor treatment efficacy in clinical trials targeting restoration of apoptotic sensitivity in cancer cells.
Liquid biopsy applications: Exploring BLID detection in circulating tumor cells or extracellular vesicles as a minimally invasive approach to monitor disease progression.
Drug development: Utilizing BLID antibodies in high-content screening assays to identify compounds that restore BLID expression or mimic its pro-apoptotic functions in BLID-negative tumors.