BOP3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Search Results Analysis

  • BOP1/BOP2 belong to the BTB-ankyrin protein family, which includes NPR1/3/4 and LRB1/2/3 (Source ).

  • No homologs or isoforms labeled "BOP3" are mentioned in these studies.

BOP vs. BMP-3

  • BMP-3 (bone morphogenetic protein 3) is a distinct protein in the TGF-β superfamily, unrelated to BOP proteins. It regulates osteogenesis and is targeted by antibodies such as Anti-BMP-3 (Source ).

  • No evidence links BMP-3 to the "BOP3" designation.

Other BOP-Related Proteins

  • The term "BOP" in existing literature refers to BLADE-ON-PETIOLE proteins (e.g., BOP1/BOP2 in Arabidopsis), which regulate developmental processes (Source ).

Antibody Nomenclature & Databases

A review of antibody-specific databases (e.g., Antibody Society data in Source ) reveals no entries for "BOP3 Antibody." Current antibody therapeutics target antigens such as HER2, CD3, and TNFα (Sources ), but none mention BOP3.

Hypothetical Scenarios

If "BOP3 Antibody" exists outside the reviewed sources, potential contexts might include:

  • A typographical error (e.g., BOP2, BMP-3, or ACP3 antibodies).

  • An experimental antibody in early-stage research not yet published or cataloged.

  • A proprietary compound with undisclosed data.

Recommendations for Further Research

To resolve ambiguity:

  1. Verify the correct nomenclature of the target antigen (e.g., BOP2, BMP-3, or ACP3).

  2. Consult specialized antibody databases (e.g., The Antibody Society, CiteAb).

  3. Explore structural or functional homologs (e.g., BOP1/BOP2 or BTB-ankyrin family members).

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
BOP3 antibody; YNL042W antibody; N2670Protein BOP3 antibody; Bypass of PAM1 protein 3 antibody
Target Names
BOP3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The BOP3 antibody is involved in resistance to methylmercury. Overexpression of this antibody suppresses a PAM1-SLV3 double null mutation.
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YNL042W

STRING: 4932.YNL042W

Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Nucleus.

Q&A

What are the most common applications for antibodies in protein research?

Antibodies serve as versatile tools across multiple experimental platforms. Western Blot (WB) remains the standard for protein detection based on molecular weight, while ELISA provides quantitative measurements with high sensitivity. Flow cytometry enables analysis of membrane-associated proteins in intact cells, as demonstrated with the BAI3 antibody in HEK293 and SHSY-5Y cell lines . Immunohistochemistry (IHC) allows visualization of protein localization in tissue sections, which can be performed on both fixed and frozen samples . For comprehensive protein studies, researchers should validate antibodies across multiple applications to ensure consistent detection of the target protein.

How do I select the appropriate antibody type for my experiment?

Selection depends on your experimental goals and technical requirements:

Antibody TypeCharacteristicsBest ApplicationsConsiderations
MonoclonalSingle epitope recognition, high specificityFlow cytometry, assays requiring high reproducibilityMay miss isoforms, sensitive to epitope modifications
PolyclonalMultiple epitope recognition, robust signalWestern blot, IHC, detecting denatured proteinsBatch-to-batch variation
RecombinantDefined sequence, consistent productionApplications requiring high reproducibilityMay have higher cost

For studying proteins with multiple isoforms like ASK3 (which has 3 identified isoforms ), consider whether you need isoform-specific detection or pan-recognition of all variants.

What validation steps should I perform before using an antibody in my research?

  • Confirm reactivity profile matches your experimental species (e.g., human, mouse)

  • Verify antibody performance in your specific application (WB, IHC, flow cytometry)

  • Include appropriate positive controls (e.g., overexpression systems like the HEK293 transfection model used for BAI3 validation )

  • Use negative controls such as irrelevant transfectants or isotype controls (as demonstrated with BAI3 antibody testing )

  • Consider knockout/knockdown validation where appropriate

Document all validation steps as part of your experimental methods to strengthen publication quality.

How do I troubleshoot poor antibody performance in flow cytometry?

When facing challenges with antibody performance in flow cytometry, consider this systematic approach:

  • Verify cell viability (>90% viable cells recommended)

  • Optimize antibody concentration through titration experiments

  • Adjust fixation/permeabilization protocols if targeting intracellular antigens

  • Include proper controls as demonstrated in the BAI3 validation using isotype control antibodies

  • Ensure proper compensation when using multiple fluorophores

  • Consider alternative clones if initial antibody performs poorly

  • Examine protein expression levels in your cell type of interest

For membrane proteins like BAI3, specialized staining protocols for membrane-associated proteins may improve detection sensitivity .

What are the considerations when selecting antibodies for detecting post-translational modifications?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) critically influence protein function. For proteins involved in signaling cascades like ASK3/MAP3K15 that function in protein phosphorylation :

  • Differentiate between modification-specific and total protein antibodies

  • Ensure the antibody recognizes the specific modified residue (e.g., phospho-Ser, phospho-Thr)

  • Consider treatments that enhance the modification (e.g., phosphatase inhibitors)

  • Include controls with and without stimulation that induces the modification

  • Consider temporal dynamics of modifications in experimental design

  • Validate specificity using mutated constructs where the modified residue is substituted

The detection sensitivity for PTMs is often lower than for total protein, requiring optimization of sample preparation and detection methods.

How can structural data improve antibody selection and validation?

Structural insights enhance antibody research through several mechanisms:

  • Epitope mapping to predict antibody accessibility in native vs. denatured conditions

  • Identification of conserved regions for cross-species reactivity

  • Modeling of antibody-antigen interactions to predict binding characteristics

Recent advances in cryoEM have expanded antibody research capabilities by enabling identification of functional antibody sequences from structural data . This approach allows researchers to:

  • Evaluate antibody model-to-map fit with quantitative metrics

  • Calculate alignment scores for matching sequences based on CDR (Complementarity-Determining Region) lengths

  • Identify clonal relationships between monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal antibody responses

These structural approaches provide deeper insights into antibody-antigen interactions beyond traditional binding assays.

What strategies should I employ when studying proteins with multiple isoforms using antibodies?

Proteins like ASK3 with multiple isoforms (3 identified for human ASK3 ) present unique challenges:

  • Determine whether your research question requires isoform-specific detection or pan-isoform recognition

  • Map antibody epitopes to isoform-specific or shared regions

  • Use complementary detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry) to confirm isoform identity

  • Consider RNA analysis (RT-PCR, RNA-seq) to correlate protein detection with transcript expression

  • When possible, express individual isoforms in cellular systems as positive controls

For ASK3/MAP3K15 with its canonical 1313 amino acid residues and 147.4 kilodalton mass , understanding which isoform variants your antibody detects is critical for accurate data interpretation.

How do I design experiments to evaluate antibody cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins?

Cross-reactivity assessment is particularly important for protein families with conserved domains, such as the STE Ser/Thr protein kinase family to which ASK3 belongs :

  • Test antibody reactivity against recombinant proteins of related family members

  • Employ overexpression systems with tagged constructs of target and related proteins

  • Utilize knockout/knockdown models to confirm signal specificity

  • Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all captured proteins

  • Compare epitope sequences across family members using bioinformatics approaches

When working with kinase-specific antibodies, consider testing under conditions with varying ATP concentrations or inhibitor treatments to distinguish between active and inactive conformations.

What advanced considerations should be taken into account when using antibodies for neuronal research?

When studying neuronal proteins like BAI3 in neuroblastoma cell lines :

  • Consider neuronal subtype-specific expression patterns

  • Evaluate antibody performance in relevant neuronal models (primary cultures, organoids, tissue sections)

  • Account for developmental regulation of neuronal proteins

  • Address subcellular compartmentalization (axonal vs. dendritic vs. synaptic localization)

  • Consider activity-dependent regulation and protein trafficking

  • Optimize fixation and permeabilization protocols for maintaining neuronal morphology

The SHSY-5Y human neuroblastoma cell line used for BAI3 antibody validation serves as a useful model, but results should be confirmed in more physiologically relevant systems when possible.

What are the optimal approaches for antibody-based protein quantification?

Accurate protein quantification requires careful experimental design:

MethodQuantification ApproachDynamic RangeBest Practices
Western BlotDensitometry of bands~10-foldInclude standard curve, linear detection range validation
ELISAAbsorbance/fluorescence against standard curve~100-foldPerform spike-recovery experiments
Flow CytometryMean fluorescence intensity~1000-foldUse calibration beads for quantitative analysis

For all quantitative applications:

  • Establish linear range of detection for your specific antibody

  • Include appropriate loading/housekeeping controls

  • Validate reproducibility across technical and biological replicates

  • Consider absolute quantification using purified protein standards

How can advanced structural techniques enhance antibody-based research?

Recent developments in structural biology have expanded antibody research capabilities:

  • CryoEM provides structural insights that can be used to identify functional antibody sequences

  • Structure-based scoring systems help evaluate antibody-antigen interactions with quantitative metrics

  • Computational approaches can predict antibody-epitope binding characteristics

  • Structural data can guide humanization of therapeutic antibodies

These approaches facilitate understanding of antibody-antigen interactions at the molecular level, enabling better experimental design and interpretation of results.

What considerations should be made when combining multiple antibodies in multiplexed analyses?

Multiplexed detection requires additional technical considerations:

  • Verify antibody compatibility in the same buffer systems

  • Confirm absence of cross-reactivity between secondary detection reagents

  • Validate that antibody combinations don't interfere with individual target detection

  • Establish appropriate controls for each antibody in the multiplex panel

  • Consider sequential staining approaches if direct multiplexing creates interference

  • Optimize signal-to-noise ratio for each target protein

When developing multiplex panels for flow cytometry, careful selection of fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap is essential for accurate data interpretation.

How do I critically evaluate contradictory antibody-based experimental results?

When facing conflicting results:

  • Compare antibody clones, epitopes, and suppliers

  • Evaluate validation evidence for each antibody

  • Assess experimental conditions (fixation, detergent, buffers)

  • Consider biological variables (cell types, treatments, timing)

  • Implement orthogonal detection methods (mass spectrometry, genetic approaches)

  • Evaluate target protein characteristics (stability, PTMs, interactions)

Antibody-independent validation of key findings strengthens confidence in results and helps resolve contradictions.

What are the best practices for reporting antibody usage in scientific publications?

Comprehensive reporting enhances reproducibility:

  • Provide complete antibody identification (supplier, catalog number, RRID if available)

  • Detail validation performed (positive/negative controls, knockout verification)

  • Specify experimental conditions (dilution, incubation time/temperature, buffers)

  • Include all technical parameters (exposure times, gain settings, analysis thresholds)

  • Present representative images of controls alongside experimental samples

  • Disclose any image processing or quantification methods used

For antibodies like BAI3 used in publications , citation of previous validation studies strengthens the reliability of your research findings.

How can I integrate antibody-based data with other "-omics" approaches for comprehensive protein analysis?

Multi-omics integration enhances research depth:

  • Correlate protein detection with transcriptomic data

  • Combine with phosphoproteomics for functional pathway analysis

  • Link to interactome studies to place proteins in functional networks

  • Integrate with structural biology approaches as demonstrated with cryoEM

  • Correlate with genetic or CRISPR screening data

  • Validate key findings across multiple methodological platforms

This integrative approach provides a more complete understanding of protein function within cellular systems.

How are advanced structural biology techniques changing antibody research?

Structural biology is revolutionizing antibody research approaches:

  • CryoEM enables identification of functional antibody sequences from structural data

  • Structure-guided epitope mapping enhances antibody design

  • Computational prediction of antibody-antigen interactions improves selection strategies

  • Model-to-map fit analyses provide quantitative metrics for antibody evaluation

  • Structural insights facilitate development of conformation-specific antibodies

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.