BOR4 antibody targets the BOR4 protein, a member of the boron transporter family first identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. Unlike its homolog BOR1, which undergoes ubiquitination and degradation under high boron conditions, BOR4 remains stable and maintains plasma membrane localization even with elevated boron levels . This antibody enables precise detection of BOR4’s spatial distribution and functional analysis in experimental models.
Sequence Features: BOR4 shares homology with BOR1 but lacks critical lysine residues (e.g., Lys-590 in BOR1) responsible for ubiquitination .
Localization: Localizes to the plasma membrane without inward polarity, even under high boron stress .
Stability: Resists vacuolar sorting and degradation due to absent ubiquitination signals, unlike BOR1 .
Validated via GFP-tagged BOR4 constructs and knockout cell lines to confirm target specificity .
Detects BOR4 in western blotting (predicted size: ~75 kDa) and immunofluorescence, with no cross-reactivity to BOR1 .
| Property | BOR1 | BOR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Ubiquitination | Yes (Lys-590 dependent) | No |
| Degradation | High boron induces vacuolar sorting | Stable under high boron |
| Polarity | Inward polarity in root cells | Non-polar membrane localization |
Functional Rescue: BOR4-GFP partially restores boron transport in BOR1-deficient mutants, indicating overlapping but distinct roles .
Biotechnological Applications: BOR4’s stability makes it a candidate for engineering boron-tolerant crops .
Subcellular Localization: Immunofluorescence reveals BOR4’s membrane persistence under stress .
Protein Interaction Studies: Identifies binding partners regulating boron efflux.
Gene Expression Analysis: Correlates BOR4 levels with boron toxicity responses in plants.
Western Blot: Distinct ~75 kDa band in wild-type vs. knockout lines .
Immunohistochemistry: Membrane-specific staining in root tissues .
BOR1 vs. BOR4: While BOR1 regulates boron uptake under deficiency, BOR4 facilitates excess boron exclusion, highlighting functional divergence .
Evolutionary Conservation: BOR4-like transporters are found in fungi and bacteria, suggesting conserved boron management strategies .
Agricultural Engineering: Modifying BOR4 expression could enhance crop resilience in boron-rich soils.
Medical Research: Investigating boron transporters in human cells may reveal roles in trace element homeostasis.
A: To validate antibody specificity, implement a multi-step approach:
Recombinant protein control: Use purified BOR4 protein (e.g., CSB-YP896395DOA from E. coli or CSB-EP896395DOA from E. coli) as a positive control in Western blot (WB) or ELISA .
Epitope mapping: Perform epitope blocking assays using synthetic peptides corresponding to BOR4 domains (e.g., transmembrane regions, cytoplasmic loops) to identify binding sites.
Cross-reactivity testing: Test against homologous proteins (e.g., BOR2, BOR1) using immunoblotting to exclude nonspecific binding .
A:
Sample preparation: Use membrane-enriched fractions from A. thaliana roots or leaves to isolate BOR4 localization. Optimize protein extraction buffers to preserve membrane integrity (e.g., 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) .
Boron treatment: Apply varying boron concentrations (e.g., 10 µM to 1 mM) to elicit BOR4 activity. Monitor pH gradients, as BOR4 functions optimally in acidic conditions .
Negative controls: Include bor4 mutants or RNAi-silenced plants to confirm BOR4 dependency.
Methodological Insight:
Boron-induced changes in BOR4 localization (e.g., endoplasmic reticulum vs. plasma membrane) can be tracked using immunofluorescence with secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorescent tags (e.g., Alexa Fluor 488) .
A:
Pre-absorption: Incubate antibodies with lysates from non-plant cells (e.g., E. coli) to remove nonspecific binders.
Species-specific validation: Confirm antibody reactivity using A. thaliana cDNA libraries or protein arrays.
Optimize dilution: Use higher dilutions (1:500–1:1000) to reduce background noise in WB or ELISA .
Case Study:
A study using CSB-PA896395XA01DOA (rabbit polyclonal) reported no cross-reactivity with Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Homo sapiens proteins, ensuring specificity in plant-focused assays .
A:
Domain-focused mutagenesis: Introduce alanine substitutions in BOR4 transmembrane domains and test antibody binding via ELISA or surface plasmon resonance (SPR) .
Cryo-EM structural analysis: Use cryo-electron microscopy to resolve antibody-BOR4 complexes, identifying critical residues for epitope design .
Computational modeling: Apply RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) to predict CDR-H3 interactions with BOR4, guiding rational antibody optimization .
| Method | Resolution | Cost | Throughput |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryo-EM | Atomic-level | High | Low |
| SPR | Binding kinetics | Moderate | Medium |
| RAbD | Predictive | Low | High |
A:
Contextual analysis: Compare experimental conditions (e.g., plant vs. mammalian expression systems) and antibody isotypes (polyclonal vs. monoclonal).
Epitope classification: Distinguish linear (continuous) vs. conformational (discontinuous) epitopes, as plant-expressed BOR4 may lack post-translational modifications present in mammalian systems .
Immune response profiling: Use flow cytometry to assess T-cell activation (e.g., CD4+ T-cell proliferation) in response to BOR4 peptides, identifying immunogenic regions .
Key Finding:
Boron-containing compounds (e.g., 4-hydroxymethyl-phenylboronic acid) modulate lymphocyte populations, suggesting boron’s role in immune system interactions that may influence antibody efficacy .
A:
Signal amplification: Use tyramide signal amplification (TSA) in immunofluorescence or enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates in WB.
Denaturation optimization: Test reducing vs. non-reducing SDS-PAGE conditions to preserve BOR4’s native conformation.
Antibody conjugation: Label primary antibodies with biotin (e.g., AviTag-BirA system) for streptavidin-based detection .
A:
Thermodynamic interpretation: Use FoldX or Discovery Studio to predict ΔΔG changes, prioritizing mutants with |ΔΔG| >1.0 kcal/mol for functional assays .
Binding kinetics: Perform SPR or biolayer interferometry (BLI) to measure k<sub>d</sub>, ensuring antibody affinity aligns with experimental goals.
Structural context: Map ΔΔG hotspots to BOR4’s crystal structure (if available) to identify critical binding residues.
| Software | AUC for ΔΔG >1.0 kcal/mol | Affinity Prediction |
|---|---|---|
| FoldX | 0.87 | High |
| Discovery Studio | 0.88 | High |
| STATIUM | 0.81 | Moderate |
A:
Sequence alignment: Compare BOR4 orthologs using BLAST or ClustalW, focusing on conserved epitopes.
Pilot testing: Validate cross-reactivity in Brassica napus or Oryza sativa using immunoblotting with recombinant proteins.
Epitope engineering: Design chimeric antibodies with CDRs targeting conserved regions if cross-reactivity fails .
Align A. thaliana BOR4 (UniProt: Q9XI23) with B. napus BOR4.
Identify conserved regions (e.g., cytoplasmic loop) for epitope design.
Test CSB-PA896395XA01DOA in B. napus lysates.
A:
Lot-to-lot validation: Perform side-by-side testing of new vs. old antibody lots in WB using reference samples.
Affinity chromatography: Purify antibodies using BOR4-conjugated resin to standardize binding capacity.
Stability testing: Assess shelf-life under -20°C vs. -80°C storage, monitoring degradation via mass spectrometry .
| Batch | WB Signal Intensity | ELISA EC<sub>50</sub> |
|---|---|---|
| Lot1 | 100% | 0.1 µg/mL |
| Lot2 | 90% | 0.15 µg/mL |
| Lot3 | 95% | 0.12 µg/mL |
A:
Antigen design: Use RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) to predict BOR4 epitopes for vaccine or diagnostic applications .
Immunogenicity prediction: Apply in silico T-cell epitope mapping to minimize ADA formation risks .
Structural insights: Model antibody-BOR4 complexes using AlphaFold or cryo-EM structures to guide mutagenesis .
Case Study:
A genetic algorithm (GA) combining molecular dynamics and docking simulations optimized BOR4-targeting mimetic antibodies, improving binding affinity by 10–50-fold .
Prioritize specificity validation using recombinant BOR4 controls and cross-reactivity testing.
Leverage computational tools (e.g., RAbD, FoldX) for epitope mapping and affinity prediction.
Address batch variability through rigorous lot-to-lot validation and stability testing.
Explore cross-species applications via sequence alignment and pilot testing in non-Arabidopsis models.