At3g20240 refers to a specific gene locus in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome that encodes a protein with the UniProt accession number Q9LJX5. Based on genomic analysis, this protein belongs to the Arabidopsis proteome and functions within cellular processes that can be investigated using immunological techniques. Understanding this protein's biological role requires targeted antibody-based experimentation combined with genetic and biochemical approaches. The protein is part of a broader network of cellular components that can be studied through antibody-mediated detection methods, allowing researchers to gain insights into plant cellular physiology and response mechanisms.
Commercial At3g20240 Antibodies (such as CSB-PA130971XA01DOA) typically undergo multiple validation steps before becoming available to researchers. Standard validation protocols include Western blot analysis against Arabidopsis thaliana lysates, where the antibody should recognize a protein of the predicted molecular weight. Additional validation may include immunoprecipitation, immunohistochemistry, or ELISA testing to confirm specificity. When selecting an At3g20240 Antibody for your research, request the validation data package from suppliers, which should contain experimental evidence of specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility across different detection methods. This validation is critical for ensuring experimental reliability and reproducibility in your own research program.
At3g20240 Antibody can be applied across multiple experimental platforms in plant research:
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Incubation Conditions | Expected Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting | 1:1000-1:2000 | Overnight at 4°C | Single band at predicted MW |
| Immunoprecipitation | 1:100-1:200 | 4 hours at 4°C | Enrichment of target protein |
| Immunohistochemistry | 1:100-1:500 | 1-2 hours at RT | Cell-specific localization |
| ELISA | 1:1000-1:5000 | 1-2 hours at RT | Quantitative detection |
These applications allow researchers to investigate protein expression patterns, subcellular localization, protein-protein interactions, and quantitative changes in protein levels under different experimental conditions. The versatility of antibody-based techniques makes At3g20240 Antibody a valuable tool for comprehensive protein analysis in plant systems.
To preserve antibody activity, store At3g20240 Antibody according to manufacturer recommendations, typically at -20°C for long-term storage. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing small aliquots upon receipt. For working solutions, store at 4°C for up to one month with the addition of sodium azide (0.02%) as a preservative. Monitor antibody performance regularly using positive controls to detect any decrease in activity over time. If diminished signal is observed despite optimal experimental conditions, consider obtaining a fresh antibody preparation. Proper storage significantly affects experimental outcomes and reproducibility in antibody-based assays.
When using At3g20240 Antibody for Western blotting, implement these methodological considerations:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins from Arabidopsis tissues using a buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation. Determine protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assays for consistent loading.
Gel electrophoresis: Load 20-50 μg total protein per lane on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels, including molecular weight markers and positive controls.
Transfer: Use PVDF membranes for optimal protein binding and signal detection. Transfer at 100V for 60-90 minutes in standard transfer buffer.
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature to minimize non-specific binding.
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute At3g20240 Antibody 1:1000-1:2000 in blocking solution and incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation.
Detection: Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and ECL detection systems, with exposure times optimized based on signal intensity.
This systematic approach maximizes specificity and sensitivity when detecting the At3g20240 protein target, reducing background and improving reproducibility across experiments.
Optimizing immunofluorescence with At3g20240 Antibody in plant tissues requires addressing several plant-specific challenges:
Fixation: Use 4% paraformaldehyde for 1-2 hours, followed by careful washing to remove excess fixative that may cause autofluorescence.
Cell wall permeabilization: Incorporate a cell wall digestion step using enzymes like cellulase (1-2%) and macerozyme (0.2-0.5%) for 30-60 minutes at room temperature to improve antibody penetration.
Blocking: Use 3-5% BSA with 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1-2 hours to reduce non-specific binding and background fluorescence.
Antibody dilution: Test multiple dilutions (1:100-1:500) of At3g20240 Antibody to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio for your specific tissue.
Autofluorescence control: Include unstained samples and secondary-antibody-only controls to distinguish true signal from plant autofluorescence.
Counterstaining: Use DAPI for nuclear visualization and establish subcellular context for your protein of interest.
These methodological adjustments address the unique challenges of plant tissue immunofluorescence, including cell wall barriers and natural autofluorescence that can complicate signal interpretation.
Proper experimental controls are essential for interpreting results with At3g20240 Antibody:
Positive control: Include samples known to express the target protein (wild-type Arabidopsis tissue) to confirm antibody functionality.
Negative control: Use tissue from knockout or knockdown lines of At3g20240 to validate antibody specificity.
Loading control: Probe for housekeeping proteins (such as actin or tubulin) to normalize expression data and ensure equal loading.
Pre-adsorption control: Pre-incubate antibody with excess purified target protein before application to verify binding specificity.
Secondary antibody-only control: Omit primary antibody to identify non-specific binding of the secondary antibody.
Isotype control: Use an irrelevant antibody of the same isotype to identify non-specific binding due to antibody class effects.
When facing weak or absent signals with At3g20240 Antibody, implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:
Antibody concentration: Increase primary antibody concentration incrementally (e.g., from 1:2000 to 1:1000 or 1:500) while monitoring background.
Incubation conditions: Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C) or adjust temperature (room temperature for 2-4 hours).
Protein extraction: Modify extraction buffer composition to ensure target protein solubilization and stability. Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation.
Antigen retrieval: For fixed tissues, implement heat-induced or enzymatic antigen retrieval methods to expose epitopes potentially masked during fixation.
Blocking reagent: Test alternative blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers) to reduce background while preserving specific signal.
Detection system: Switch to more sensitive detection methods (amplified chemiluminescence, fluorescent secondary antibodies) for low-abundance proteins.
Sample: Verify target protein expression conditions, as expression may be tissue-specific, developmental stage-dependent, or stress-induced.
Document each optimization step methodically to develop an optimized protocol specific to your experimental system.
At3g20240 Antibody can be strategically employed in multiple protein-protein interaction approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use At3g20240 Antibody to precipitate the target protein along with its binding partners from Arabidopsis lysates. Optimize buffer conditions to preserve native protein complexes while minimizing non-specific interactions. Analyze co-precipitated proteins using mass spectrometry or Western blotting with antibodies against suspected interaction partners.
Proximity ligation assay (PLA): Combine At3g20240 Antibody with antibodies against potential interaction partners to visualize protein complexes in situ with single-molecule resolution. This technique can reveal spatial distribution of protein interactions within plant cells.
Pull-down assays: Couple At3g20240 Antibody to a solid support for affinity purification of protein complexes, followed by identification of binding partners using proteomics approaches.
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) validation: Use antibody detection to confirm expression levels of fusion proteins in BiFC experiments, ensuring that negative interaction results are not due to lack of protein expression.
These methodological approaches provide complementary data on protein-protein interactions involving the At3g20240 gene product, allowing researchers to build comprehensive interaction networks.
For quantitative analysis with At3g20240 Antibody, researchers can implement these methodological approaches:
Quantitative Western blotting: Use infrared fluorescent secondary antibodies and specialized imaging systems (e.g., LI-COR Odyssey) that provide a wide linear dynamic range. Normalize to multiple loading controls and include standard curves with known concentrations of purified protein.
ELISA development: Establish a sandwich ELISA using At3g20240 Antibody as either capture or detection antibody. Optimize antibody concentrations, blocking conditions, and incubation times to develop a standard curve with recombinant or purified native protein.
Flow cytometry: For single-cell analysis in protoplast preparations, optimize fixation, permeabilization, and antibody staining protocols to quantify protein expression across cell populations.
Image-based quantification: Apply At3g20240 Antibody in immunofluorescence experiments and quantify signal intensity using software like ImageJ, implementing appropriate background subtraction and standardization methods.
Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM): Use antibody-based enrichment followed by targeted mass spectrometry for absolute quantification of the target protein.
Each of these approaches requires careful validation and standardization to ensure reproducible quantitative results across experiments and between laboratories.
The choice of expression system significantly impacts antibody performance when studying recombinant versions of the At3g20240 protein:
Plant expression systems: Expressing the target protein in Arabidopsis or related plant species maintains native post-translational modifications and protein folding. Research indicates that plant-derived monoclonal antibodies (mAbP) can recognize target antigens with high specificity and demonstrate functional activity in assays . Plant expression systems may be particularly relevant for At3g20240 studies as they preserve the authentic protein state.
Bacterial expression: While cost-effective, bacterial expression often lacks post-translational modifications and may produce misfolded proteins, potentially affecting epitope recognition by At3g20240 Antibody. Fusion tags (MBP, GST) can improve solubility but may interfere with antibody binding.
Mammalian expression: Studies on human IgG antibodies have shown that expression systems significantly affect antibody aggregation properties . Similarly, when expressing the At3g20240 protein target in mammalian cells, protein folding and modification patterns may differ from the native plant version, potentially affecting antibody recognition.
Cell-free expression: This system allows rapid protein production with controlled conditions, but may lack important co-factors for proper folding or modification of plant proteins.
When selecting an expression system, consider how structural differences in the recombinant protein might affect epitope presentation and antibody binding, especially for conformational epitopes.
When applying At3g20240 Antibody across plant species, consider these methodological factors:
Epitope conservation analysis: Perform sequence alignment of the immunogen sequence across target species to predict cross-reactivity. Higher sequence conservation (>80%) in the epitope region increases likelihood of cross-reactivity.
Validation strategy: For each new species, validate antibody specificity using Western blot, comparing band patterns to predicted molecular weights based on sequence data. Include positive controls (Arabidopsis samples) alongside test species.
Optimization requirements: Adjust antibody concentration, incubation time, and detection methods for each species, as optimal conditions may vary significantly despite epitope conservation.
Alternative approaches: For distantly related species with low sequence conservation, consider developing species-specific antibodies or using epitope-tagging approaches in transgenic plants.
Data interpretation: When cross-reactivity is observed, confirm target identity using mass spectrometry or additional antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein.
Cross-species applications of At3g20240 Antibody can provide valuable comparative data, but require rigorous validation to ensure that observed signals represent true orthologs rather than non-specific binding.
Comprehensive validation of At3g20240 Antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:
Genetic validation: Compare antibody signal between wild-type plants and those with At3g20240 gene knockout/knockdown. Specific antibodies will show reduced or absent signal in mutant lines.
Recombinant protein controls: Test antibody against purified recombinant At3g20240 protein alongside total plant extracts to confirm recognition of the intended target.
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with the immunizing peptide before application to samples. Signal reduction indicates specific binding to the intended epitope.
Orthogonal detection methods: Corroborate antibody-based detection with non-antibody methods such as mass spectrometry or RNA expression analysis (RT-qPCR).
Multiple antibody comparison: When available, compare results using antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein to confirm consistent detection patterns.
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: This approach provides unbiased confirmation of antibody specificity by identifying all proteins captured by the antibody.
Rigorous statistical analysis of immunoblotting data requires these methodological considerations:
Experimental design: Incorporate biological replicates (n≥3) and technical replicates to power statistical analyses. Include randomization in sample processing to minimize batch effects.
Densitometry standardization: Use digital image analysis software (ImageJ, Image Lab) with consistent quantification parameters. Define background subtraction methods and region-of-interest selection criteria.
Normalization strategy: Normalize target protein signals to multiple housekeeping proteins, selected based on expression stability under your experimental conditions. Consider total protein normalization as an alternative to individual loading controls.
Statistical tests: For two-group comparisons, apply Student's t-test with appropriate assumptions testing. For multiple-group comparisons, use ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (Tukey's, Bonferroni) with correction for multiple comparisons.
Effect size reporting: Include confidence intervals and effect sizes alongside p-values to indicate biological significance beyond statistical significance.
Non-parametric alternatives: When normality assumptions are violated, apply Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate.
When facing contradictory results across different detection methods with At3g20240 Antibody, implement this analytical framework:
Epitope accessibility analysis: Different detection methods expose proteins to antibodies under varying conditions. Western blotting uses denatured proteins, while immunofluorescence typically preserves native conformation. Document whether the antibody recognizes linear or conformational epitopes, as this determines which methods are most appropriate.
Sample preparation effects: Systematically compare fixation methods, extraction buffers, and processing conditions to identify variables affecting epitope preservation and antibody binding.
Sensitivity threshold evaluation: Quantify detection limits for each method and compare to estimated protein abundance in your system. Some methods may miss low-abundance expression detectable by more sensitive approaches.
Post-translational modification interference: Consider whether modifications (phosphorylation, glycosylation) might be differentially preserved across methods and affect epitope recognition.
Cross-reactivity assessment: Evaluate potential cross-reactivity with related proteins using immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all bound proteins.
Integrative data interpretation: Develop models that incorporate results from multiple methods, weighting evidence based on methodological strengths and limitations.
This systematic approach transforms seemingly contradictory results into valuable insights about protein behavior under different experimental conditions.
Comprehensive reporting of At3g20240 Antibody-based research should include:
Antibody identification: Report catalog number, manufacturer, lot number, RRID (Research Resource Identifier), and clonality (monoclonal/polyclonal).
Validation documentation: Describe all validation experiments performed, including positive and negative controls, with representative images. Reference UniProt accession number (Q9LJX5) for the target protein .
Experimental conditions: Provide detailed protocols including antibody dilutions, incubation times/temperatures, buffer compositions, and detection systems.
Image acquisition parameters: Report microscope/imaging system settings, exposure times, and image processing methods. Include scale bars on all micrographs.
Quantification methods: Detail densitometry procedures, normalization strategies, and statistical approaches with justification for tests applied.
Limitations statement: Acknowledge any limitations in antibody specificity or assay conditions that might affect interpretation of results.
Raw data availability: Provide access to unprocessed images and quantification data through repositories or supplementary materials.
These reporting practices enhance transparency, reproducibility, and trust in antibody-based research findings, facilitating both peer review and subsequent research building on your work.