BUD3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
BUD3 antibody; YCL014W antibody; YCL012W antibody; YCL013W antibody; YCL12W antibody; YCL13W antibody; YCL14WBud site selection protein 3 antibody
Target Names
BUD3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
BUD3 antibody co-assembles with BUD4 at bud sites. BUD4 and BUD3 may collaborate to identify a specific location (the neck filaments) during mitosis. Subsequently, they establish a landmark for defining the axial budding pattern in the G1 phase of the cell cycle.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. In *Saccharomyces cerevisiae*, cell polarization to a designated growth site necessitates the activation of Cdc42 by Bud3. PMID: 25002677
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YCL014W

STRING: 4932.YCL014W

Protein Families
BUD3 family

Q&A

What is BUD3 protein and what are its key functional domains?

BUD3 is a large multi-domain protein that plays a crucial role in bud neck targeting during cell division. Key functional domains include:

  • N-terminal region (residues 1-846): Generally dispensable for bud neck targeting

  • Central amphipathic helix (AH) domain (residues 847-865): Essential for membrane association and robust bud neck localization

  • C-terminal region (particularly residues 1172-1273): Contains a conserved motif critical for bud neck targeting

  • A small conserved region at residues 1207-1260: Likely involved in interactions with other proteins at the bud neck

The comprehensive domain analysis reveals that coordinate action of the central AH domain paired with the C-terminal fragment (1172-1273) is sufficient to promote localization to the septin collar, with the AH domain primarily contributing through membrane-binding capabilities rather than direct septin association .

How does BUD3 protein localize to the bud neck in cellular systems?

BUD3 localization to the bud neck involves a coordinated two-domain mechanism:

  • Membrane association through the central amphipathic helix (AH) domain (residues 847-865)

  • Specific targeting to the bud neck via a C-terminal fragment (residues 1172-1273)

Experimental evidence demonstrates that the AH domain can be replaced with other membrane-binding domains (like the C2 domain from bovine lactadherin) while maintaining bud neck localization, indicating that membrane association capability, rather than the specific AH sequence, is the critical factor . The C-terminal fragment contains a conserved region that likely interacts with septin subunits and/or Bud4 (or other factors at the bud neck) . The localization can occur through both Bud4-dependent and Bud4-independent mechanisms, suggesting multiple targeting signals within the protein .

What methodological approaches are used to visualize BUD3 localization?

To visualize BUD3 localization, researchers employ several techniques:

  • Fluorescence microscopy using N-terminally GFP-tagged BUD3 constructs expressed in yeast cells along with Cdc10-mCherry to mark septin structures

  • Expression of various N-terminal and C-terminal truncations to test co-localization with septins

  • Creation of fusion proteins that combine different domains in trans to evaluate their coordinated function

  • Replacement of domains with heterologous membrane-binding domains (e.g., LactC2) to test the contribution of membrane association to localization

These methodologies allow researchers to precisely map the domains responsible for BUD3 localization and to distinguish between membrane association and specific bud neck targeting contributions .

What strategies should be considered when generating antibodies against BUD3?

When generating antibodies against BUD3, researchers should consider:

  • Target epitope selection: Based on domain analysis, antibodies targeting the conserved C-terminal region (residues 1172-1273) would be valuable for detecting functional BUD3

  • Immunogen design: Consider using recombinant fragments containing the conserved motif (residues 1207-1260) to generate antibodies that recognize functionally relevant domains

  • Validation controls: Include experiments in systems expressing truncated BUD3 variants to confirm epitope specificity

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test against related proteins to ensure specificity, particularly when working with homologous proteins across species

The precise selection of immunogen is critical, as antibodies targeting different domains may provide distinct information about BUD3 localization, function, or protein-protein interactions.

How can researchers validate the specificity of BUD3 antibodies?

Validation of BUD3 antibodies should follow a multi-step approach:

  • Western blot analysis comparing wild-type samples with BUD3 knockout/knockdown samples

  • Immunofluorescence microscopy to confirm proper localization pattern at the bud neck, which should match the established GFP-fusion localization patterns

  • Testing against a panel of BUD3 truncation mutants to map the epitope recognition region

  • Co-immunoprecipitation experiments to verify that the antibody does not disrupt known protein-protein interactions (e.g., with Bud4 or septin components)

  • Cross-validation with epitope-tagged versions of BUD3 using commercial tag antibodies

This comprehensive validation approach ensures that the antibody specifically recognizes BUD3 and can reliably detect its normal cellular distribution and interactions.

How can BUD3 antibodies be used to study protein-protein interactions?

BUD3 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating protein-protein interactions through several approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): BUD3 antibodies can pull down BUD3 and its associated proteins to identify interaction partners, particularly focusing on septin subunits and Bud4

  • Proximity labeling: Combining BUD3 antibodies with proximity labeling techniques (BioID or APEX) can identify proteins in close proximity to BUD3 at the bud neck

  • Domain-specific antibodies: Generating antibodies that target specific domains (e.g., the 1172-1273 region) can help determine which interactions depend on particular domains

  • Competition assays: Using antibodies that recognize specific BUD3 epitopes can help map interaction interfaces by competing with binding partners

  • Immunofluorescence co-localization: BUD3 antibodies can determine the temporal and spatial relationship between BUD3 and potential interacting proteins at the bud neck

These applications can provide insights into the molecular mechanisms of BUD3 function in bud site selection and cytokinesis.

What methodological considerations are important when using BUD3 antibodies for immunofluorescence?

When using BUD3 antibodies for immunofluorescence, researchers should consider:

  • Fixation methods: Test different fixation protocols as they may affect epitope accessibility, especially for membrane-associated domains like the AH region (847-865)

  • Cell cycle synchronization: BUD3 localization changes throughout the cell cycle, so synchronizing cells or analyzing cells at different cell cycle stages is crucial

  • Co-staining markers: Include septin markers (e.g., Cdc10) for reference, as BUD3 should co-localize with the septin collar at the bud neck

  • Antibody concentration optimization: Titrate antibody concentrations to minimize background while maintaining specific signal

  • Validation controls: Include BUD3 deletion strains as negative controls and GFP-BUD3 expressing strains as positive controls to validate staining patterns

  • Permeabilization considerations: Ensure proper permeabilization to allow antibody access to the bud neck structure while preserving cellular architecture

These methodological considerations help ensure reliable and reproducible immunofluorescence results when studying BUD3 localization and interactions.

How might bispecific antibody technology be applied to study BUD3 in complex cellular systems?

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) represent an innovative approach for studying BUD3 in complex systems:

  • Dual target recognition: Design BsAbs that simultaneously recognize BUD3 and interacting partners (e.g., BUD4 or septins) to investigate protein complexes in situ

  • Domain-specific targeting: Create BsAbs with one arm targeting the membrane-binding domain and another targeting the bud neck localization domain to study the coordinate function of these regions

  • Live-cell imaging: Develop non-inhibitory BsAbs conjugated to fluorophores for dynamic tracking of BUD3 without disrupting its function

  • Perturbation studies: Engineer BsAbs that not only bind to BUD3 but also recruit effector proteins to modify BUD3 function or localization

  • Cross-species comparisons: Design BsAbs recognizing conserved epitopes across species to enable comparative studies of BUD3 function

These advanced applications of bispecific antibody technology could overcome limitations of conventional monospecific antibodies and provide new insights into BUD3 biology .

What are the challenges in generating antibodies against specific BUD3 domains and how can they be overcome?

Generating domain-specific BUD3 antibodies presents several challenges with corresponding solutions:

ChallengeSolution Approach
Conformational epitopes may differ between isolated domains and full-length proteinUse native purification methods and screen antibodies against both isolated domains and full-length protein
The AH domain (847-865) is small and may be poorly immunogenicCouple to carrier proteins or use synthetic peptides with strategic modifications to enhance immunogenicity
Conserved C-terminal domain (1172-1273) may cross-react with homologous proteinsPerform thorough bioinformatics analysis to identify unique regions within this domain for immunogen design
Accessibility issues for membrane-associated domainsGenerate antibodies against regions predicted to be exposed based on structural modeling
Post-translational modifications may block epitope recognitionCharacterize BUD3 modifications and design immunogens that account for these modifications

By addressing these challenges methodically, researchers can develop a toolkit of domain-specific antibodies that enable detailed investigation of BUD3 function and localization.

How can researchers use BUD3 antibodies to investigate the temporal dynamics of BUD3 localization during cell division?

Investigating temporal dynamics of BUD3 localization requires sophisticated approaches:

  • Time-lapse immunofluorescence: Fix cells at precisely timed intervals during cell division and stain with BUD3 antibodies to create a temporal map of localization changes

  • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM): Combine BUD3 immunofluorescence with electron microscopy to relate BUD3 localization to ultrastructural changes during cell division

  • Super-resolution microscopy: Use techniques like STORM or PALM with BUD3 antibodies to achieve nanometer-scale resolution of BUD3 dynamics at the bud neck

  • FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) with antibody fragments: Use fluorescently labeled antibody fragments to perform FRAP analysis and measure BUD3 mobility during different cell cycle stages

  • Cell cycle marker co-staining: Combine BUD3 antibody staining with markers for specific cell cycle phases to precisely map BUD3 behavior throughout division

These methodologies provide researchers with tools to investigate the complex dynamic behavior of BUD3 during the cell division process, revealing how its localization correlates with functional outcomes.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.