BZIP43 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300. Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
BZIP43 antibody; At5g38800 antibody; K15E6.1 antibody; Basic leucine zipper 43 antibody; AtbZIP43 antibody; bZIP protein 43 antibody
Target Names
BZIP43
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
BZIP43 is a putative transcription factor implicated in somatic embryogenesis. It functions as a positive regulator of BHLH109.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G38800

STRING: 3702.AT5G38800.1

UniGene: At.30383

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is bZIP43 and why is it important in research?

bZIP43 belongs to the S group of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor family. These transcription factors contain a basic region for DNA binding and a leucine zipper domain for dimerization. bZIP43 forms heterodimers with other bZIP proteins, particularly with members of the E group like bZIP34 and bZIP61, to regulate gene expression. This heterodimerization network is crucial for understanding transcriptional regulation in various biological processes. The specificity of these interactions relies on the composition of the leucine zipper (LZ), which consists of structural repetitions called heptads arranged around α-helix turns .

What experimental applications are appropriate for bZIP43 antibodies?

bZIP43 antibodies can be utilized in multiple experimental applications including:

  • Western blotting to detect protein expression levels

  • Immunoprecipitation to study protein-protein interactions

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to identify DNA binding sites

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) to visualize cellular localization

  • Flow cytometry to quantify expression in cell populations
    These applications allow researchers to investigate bZIP43's role in transcriptional networks, similar to how other transcription factor antibodies like c-Fos are utilized in neuronal activation studies .

What controls should be included when validating a new bZIP43 antibody?

Proper validation of bZIP43 antibodies requires several critical controls:

  • Positive control: Tissue or cell lysates known to express bZIP43

  • Negative control: Samples from knockout models or cells where bZIP43 expression is silenced

  • Peptide competition: Pre-incubation of antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm specificity

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing against related bZIP family members, particularly those with high sequence homology

  • Multiple technique validation: Confirming specificity across different applications (Western blot, IHC, ICC)
    These controls help establish antibody specificity, which is particularly important for transcription factors like bZIP43 that may share conserved domains with other family members .

What are the optimal fixation and retrieval methods for bZIP43 detection in tissues?

Optimal fixation and retrieval methods for bZIP43 detection depend on the experimental context:
For IHC on paraffin-embedded tissues:

  • Fix tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours

  • Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)

  • Test both retrieval methods to determine optimal conditions for bZIP43 epitope exposure
    For frozen sections or ICC:

  • Fix cells/tissues with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature

  • Perform mild permeabilization with 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100
    Since detection of transcription factors like bZIP43 can be threshold-dependent, optimization of these parameters is crucial for accurate results. As observed with c-Fos antibodies, factors such as tissue storage conditions, sectioning method, staining parameters, and signal enhancing reagents can all affect detection sensitivity .

How can researchers optimize blocking conditions for bZIP43 antibody specificity?

To optimize blocking conditions and minimize non-specific binding:

  • Test different blocking agents:

    • 5-10% normal serum from the species of the secondary antibody

    • 3-5% BSA in PBS or TBS

    • Commercial blocking buffers

  • Optimize blocking duration:

    • 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C

  • Include protein additives to reduce background:

    • 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for membrane permeabilization

    • 0.05% Tween-20 to reduce non-specific binding

  • Consider dual blocking strategy:

    • Initial blocking with serum followed by incubation with Fc receptor blockers if working with tissues containing immune cells
      The effectiveness of different blocking strategies should be empirically determined, as the optimal conditions may vary depending on the specific bZIP43 antibody and sample type .

How can researchers use bZIP43 antibodies to study heterodimerization with other bZIP transcription factors?

bZIP43 forms specific heterodimers with other bZIP family members, particularly from the E group. To study these interactions:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Use bZIP43 antibody to pull down protein complexes

    • Probe for potential binding partners (e.g., bZIP34, bZIP61) in Western blots

    • Alternatively, perform reciprocal Co-IP with antibodies against suspected partners

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Utilize antibodies against bZIP43 and potential partners

    • Fluorescent signal occurs only when proteins are in close proximity (<40nm)

    • Provides spatial information about protein interactions in cells

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):

    • Generate fusion proteins of bZIP43 and potential partners with split fluorescent protein fragments

    • Interaction brings fragments together, restoring fluorescence

  • FRET/FLIM analysis:

    • Create fluorescently tagged versions of bZIP43 and partners

    • Measure energy transfer between fluorophores when proteins interact
      These approaches can reveal the heterodimerization network of bZIP43, similar to how other bZIPs form specific interaction networks. For example, studies have shown that E group members like bZIP34 and bZIP61 cannot homodimerize due to the presence of a proline residue in their leucine zipper but can form heterodimers with bZIP43 from the S group .

What are the best approaches for studying bZIP43 binding to specific DNA sequences?

To investigate bZIP43's DNA binding properties:

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP):

    • Cross-link proteins to DNA in living cells

    • Immunoprecipitate bZIP43-bound DNA fragments using specific antibodies

    • Identify bound sequences through sequencing (ChIP-seq) or PCR (ChIP-qPCR)

  • Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA):

    • Incubate recombinant bZIP43 or nuclear extracts with labeled DNA probes

    • Detect mobility shifts indicating protein-DNA binding

    • Confirm specificity using bZIP43 antibody for supershift assays

  • DNA Pull-down Assays:

    • Immobilize DNA sequences containing potential binding sites

    • Incubate with nuclear extracts

    • Detect bound bZIP43 using specific antibodies

  • Reporter Gene Assays:

    • Clone potential target sequences upstream of a reporter gene

    • Assess transcriptional activity when bZIP43 is expressed or silenced
      The specificity of DNA recognition by bZIP factors arises from the contribution of each basic region individually, with heterodimerization determining how bZIP pairs recognize their target sequences. For instance, some bZIPs lose their DNA-binding capacity when associated with particular partners, as demonstrated for bZIP1 when combined with bZIP63 or bZIP10 .

How can researchers differentiate between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of bZIP43?

Phosphorylation can significantly impact bZIP43 function, affecting its DNA binding, protein interactions, and transcriptional activity. To distinguish phosphorylated variants:

  • Phospho-specific antibodies:

    • Utilize antibodies specifically recognizing phosphorylated residues

    • Compare with total bZIP43 antibodies to determine phosphorylation ratio

  • Phos-tag™ SDS-PAGE:

    • Use Phos-tag™ acrylamide gels to separate phosphorylated proteins

    • Detect with standard bZIP43 antibodies to visualize mobility shifts

  • Lambda phosphatase treatment:

    • Treat samples with lambda phosphatase to remove phosphate groups

    • Compare migration patterns before/after treatment

    • Visualize using standard bZIP43 antibodies

  • Mass spectrometry:

    • Immunoprecipitate bZIP43 using specific antibodies

    • Identify phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry

    • Quantify changes in phosphorylation under different conditions
      Phosphorylation status is particularly important for bZIP transcription factors as it can regulate their activity. For example, bZIP family members like AREB3 contain phosphorylatable serine residues (S294) in their conserved SAP motif, similar to the threonine residues in related proteins FD (T282) and FDP (T231) .

What are common causes of non-specific binding with bZIP43 antibodies and how can they be resolved?

Non-specific binding can significantly impact experimental results. Common causes and solutions include:

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
High background in IHC/ICCInsufficient blocking, excessive antibody concentrationIncrease blocking time/concentration, titrate antibody, add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100
Multiple bands in Western blotCross-reactivity with related bZIP proteins, protein degradationUse more stringent washing, reduce antibody concentration, add protease inhibitors
Non-specific nuclear stainingHigh abundance of related transcription factorsPerform peptide competition assay, increase washing stringency
Inconsistent results between experimentsVariations in experimental conditionsStandardize protocols, control temperature, incubation time, and antibody concentration
Loss of signal over timeAntibody degradationAliquot antibodies, store properly, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Rigorous protocol optimization is essential for transcription factor antibodies like those against bZIP43, as their performance can be highly sensitive to experimental conditions. For instance, temperature during incubation in IHC experiments can significantly impact signal intensity, as observed with c-Fos antibodies .

How should researchers interpret conflicting results between different detection methods for bZIP43?

When confronted with conflicting results from different detection methods:

  • Evaluate antibody validation data:

    • Review specificity testing for each application

    • Confirm the antibody is validated for all applications used

  • Consider protein conformation differences:

    • Western blotting detects denatured proteins

    • IHC/ICC preserve some native structure

    • IP recognizes native conformation

  • Assess fixation and sample preparation effects:

    • Different fixatives may mask or expose epitopes

    • Formaldehyde can create protein cross-links affecting epitope accessibility

  • Verify with orthogonal methods:

    • Confirm results using alternative techniques

    • Use genetic approaches (siRNA knockdown, CRISPR knockout)

    • Utilize multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

  • Consider biological context:

    • Expression levels may vary between samples

    • Post-translational modifications may affect detection

    • Heterodimerization may mask epitopes
      Understanding the limitations of each technique is crucial for accurate interpretation of results. For example, the basic region of bZIP proteins is intrinsically unstructured in the absence of DNA, and folding is only induced upon association with the double helix, which can affect antibody recognition in different experimental contexts .

What factors affect bZIP43 detection sensitivity in different experimental contexts?

Multiple factors can influence bZIP43 detection sensitivity:

  • Antibody characteristics:

    • Affinity and avidity for the target epitope

    • Monoclonal vs. polyclonal nature

    • Clone selection and manufacturing process

  • Sample preparation:

    • Fixation method and duration

    • Antigen retrieval technique

    • Blocking efficiency

    • Permeabilization protocol

  • Detection system:

    • Direct vs. indirect detection

    • Signal amplification methods

    • Fluorophore/chromogen selection

    • Microscopy/imaging parameters

  • Biological variables:

    • Expression level of bZIP43

    • Post-translational modifications

    • Protein-protein interactions masking epitopes

    • Subcellular localization changes

  • Protocol parameters:

    • Incubation temperature and duration

    • Washing stringency

    • Buffer composition

    • Primary antibody concentration
      Similar to c-Fos detection, the total number of bZIP43-positive cells detected can be threshold-dependent. Parameters including tissue storage conditions, sectioning method, staining conditions, and signal enhancing reagents can all affect detection sensitivity .

How can researchers use bZIP43 antibodies in multiplex immunofluorescence to study transcription factor networks?

Multiplex immunofluorescence allows simultaneous detection of multiple proteins:

  • Antibody panel selection:

    • Choose bZIP43 antibody from appropriate species

    • Select antibodies against interaction partners or downstream targets

    • Ensure minimal cross-reactivity between antibodies

  • Sequential staining approaches:

    • Apply primary antibodies sequentially with stripping between rounds

    • Use directly conjugated antibodies with non-overlapping fluorophores

    • Employ tyramide signal amplification for weak signals

  • Spectral unmixing:

    • Use spectral detectors to separate overlapping fluorophore emissions

    • Apply computational algorithms to isolate individual signals

  • Colocalization analysis:

    • Quantify spatial relationships between bZIP43 and other factors

    • Calculate Pearson's or Mander's coefficients to measure overlap

    • Use nearest neighbor analysis for spatial relationships

  • Advanced imaging platforms:

    • Confocal microscopy for high-resolution colocalization

    • Super-resolution techniques for nanoscale protein interaction studies

    • Automated high-content imaging for large-scale quantitative analysis
      These approaches allow researchers to investigate how bZIP43 interacts with other transcription factors within regulatory networks, similar to how bZIP heterodimerization networks involving C and S groups have been described .

What are the latest approaches for studying the epigenetic effects of bZIP43 binding?

To investigate how bZIP43 influences chromatin structure and epigenetic regulation:

  • ChIP-seq combined with epigenetic mark analysis:

    • Perform parallel ChIP-seq for bZIP43 and histone modifications

    • Correlate bZIP43 binding with activating (H3K4me3, H3K27ac) or repressive (H3K27me3, H3K9me3) marks

    • Identify enhancer regions with H3K4me1/H3K27ac co-occurrence

  • ATAC-seq with bZIP43 binding sites:

    • Map chromatin accessibility genome-wide

    • Correlate accessible regions with bZIP43 occupancy

    • Identify pioneer factor activity if bZIP43 precedes accessibility changes

  • CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag approaches:

    • Higher resolution alternatives to traditional ChIP-seq

    • More efficient for transcription factors with lower abundance

    • Reduced background and input material requirements

  • Hi-ChIP or HiC with ChIP-seq integration:

    • Map 3D chromatin contacts associated with bZIP43 binding

    • Identify long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters

    • Characterize topologically associating domains influenced by bZIP43
      These approaches can reveal how bZIP43 influences gene expression through chromatin remodeling, similar to how other transcription factors like BATF regulate histone acetylation to influence effector T-cell differentiation .

How can researchers investigate the role of bZIP43 in cellular metabolism and energy production?

To study bZIP43's potential involvement in metabolic regulation:

  • Metabolic profiling after bZIP43 modulation:

    • Measure changes in cellular metabolites following bZIP43 knockdown/overexpression

    • Analyze glycolytic and mitochondrial function using Seahorse analyzer

    • Quantify NAD+/NADH ratios and ATP production

  • Integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic data:

    • Perform RNA-seq after bZIP43 modulation

    • Identify metabolic pathways enriched among differentially expressed genes

    • Correlate with actual metabolite changes

  • ChIP-seq focused on metabolic genes:

    • Identify direct bZIP43 binding to promoters/enhancers of metabolic genes

    • Correlate binding with expression changes

    • Compare with known metabolic transcriptional regulators

  • Protein-protein interaction studies with metabolic regulators:

    • Screen for interactions between bZIP43 and known metabolic regulators

    • Identify potential coactivators or corepressors

    • Map domains involved in these interactions
      This research direction is particularly relevant given findings with other bZIP transcription factors like BATF, which regulates energy metabolism through Sirt1 expression, influencing NAD+ levels and ATP production .

How might single-cell approaches advance our understanding of bZIP43 function?

Single-cell technologies offer unprecedented insights into cellular heterogeneity:

  • Single-cell RNA-seq with bZIP43 modulation:

    • Identify cell type-specific responses to bZIP43 knockdown/overexpression

    • Discover rare cell populations particularly dependent on bZIP43

    • Map trajectory of cellular differentiation influenced by bZIP43

  • Single-cell ATAC-seq with bZIP43 ChIP-seq integration:

    • Correlate chromatin accessibility changes with bZIP43 binding

    • Identify cell type-specific regulatory elements

    • Map regulatory networks at single-cell resolution

  • CITE-seq approaches for protein and transcript detection:

    • Simultaneous measurement of bZIP43 protein and mRNA levels

    • Correlate with cell surface markers for phenotypic characterization

    • Identify post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms

  • Live-cell imaging of bZIP43 dynamics:

    • Track bZIP43 localization and activity in real-time

    • Monitor responses to cellular stimuli at single-cell level

    • Quantify heterogeneity in transcription factor dynamics
      These approaches could reveal how bZIP43 functions across different cell types or states, similar to how other transcription factors show context-dependent activity in different cellular environments .

What are the implications of bZIP43 post-translational modifications for antibody selection and experimental design?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly impact antibody recognition and experimental outcomes:

  • Mapping bZIP43 PTM landscape:

    • Identify phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation sites

    • Determine how PTMs change with cellular conditions

    • Develop modification-specific antibodies

  • Epitope-specific antibody selection:

    • Choose antibodies recognizing epitopes unlikely to be modified

    • Alternatively, select PTM-specific antibodies for functional studies

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different regions

  • Temporal dynamics of modifications:

    • Track changes in PTMs following cellular stimulation

    • Correlate with functional outcomes

    • Develop time-course experimental designs

  • Functional consequences of PTMs:

    • Determine how modifications affect DNA binding

    • Assess impact on protein-protein interactions

    • Evaluate changes in transcriptional activity
      Understanding these modifications is critical as bZIP transcription factors are known to be regulated by phosphorylation. For example, AREB3 is phosphorylated at S294 in its SAP motif, which influences its signaling capabilities .

How can researchers best study the role of bZIP43 in different disease models?

To investigate bZIP43's potential roles in disease:

  • Tissue-specific expression analysis:

    • Compare bZIP43 levels between normal and diseased tissues

    • Use immunohistochemistry with validated antibodies

    • Correlate with clinical outcomes

  • Genetic association studies:

    • Identify polymorphisms in bZIP43 or its binding sites

    • Correlate with disease susceptibility

    • Validate functional consequences

  • Disease model systems:

    • Modulate bZIP43 expression in disease-relevant cell lines

    • Develop animal models with conditional bZIP43 knockout

    • Test pharmacological modulators of bZIP43 activity

  • Therapeutic targeting strategies:

    • Identify protein-protein interactions amenable to disruption

    • Develop methods to modulate bZIP43 binding to specific promoters

    • Explore indirect regulation through upstream pathways
      This research direction is particularly relevant given the roles of other bZIP factors in diseases like cancer, immune disorders, and metabolic conditions. For example, BATF has been implicated in regulating effector CD8 T-cell differentiation, which has implications for immune responses in various disease contexts .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.