C2orf15 antibodies are utilized in diverse experimental workflows:
C2orf15 has 2,447 functional associations across biological categories :
Expression Profiles: Highly expressed in brain tissues (Allen Brain Atlas) and macrophages (GTEx) .
Pathway Links: Co-expressed with genes involved in ciliary function (e.g., CROCC2) and immune regulation (e.g., ZNF365) .
While not directly linked to C2orf15, autoantibody discovery platforms (e.g., PhIP-Seq) have identified related proteins like ZNF365 and CEACAM3 in autoimmune contexts, suggesting potential cross-reactive epitopes or unexplored roles .
Antibody Specificity: Many commercial antibodies lack extensive validation, as evidenced by sparse functional data in peer-reviewed studies .
Biological Role Uncertainty: The protein’s function remains uncharacterized, complicating hypothesis-driven research .
C2orf15 is identified as an uncharacterized protein encoded by the chromosome 2 open reading frame 15 gene in humans. It is also referenced by the protein designation CB015_HUMAN with NCBI Gene ID 150590 . Despite being identified as a protein-coding sequence, C2orf15's specific cellular functions remain largely uncharacterized. Current bioinformatic analyses suggest extensive functional associations, with data indicating 2,447 potential biological interactions spanning 6 different categories . Research efforts continue to elucidate its structure, localization, and physiological relevance.
Expression analysis through resources like the Allen Brain Atlas indicates tissue-specific expression patterns of C2orf15, particularly in brain tissues . This suggests potential neurological functions that warrant further investigation. Researchers should consider designing tissue-specific experiments when studying C2orf15, as expression levels may vary significantly between different anatomical regions and cell types. Additional expression data from other tissues beyond the nervous system remains limited, highlighting an area requiring further research.
When selecting C2orf15 antibodies, researchers should evaluate multiple parameters:
For uncharacterized proteins like C2orf15, validation documentation becomes particularly critical to ensure experimental reliability.
Given C2orf15's uncharacterized nature, rigorous validation is essential:
Molecular validation: Western blot analysis comparing wild-type samples with C2orf15 knockout/knockdown models to confirm band specificity at the expected molecular weight
Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing against recombinant C2orf15 protein (such as ABIN2714092 from HEK-293 cells) alongside other proteins with sequence homology
Epitope mapping: Determining precise binding regions to predict potential cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins
Cell-type specificity: Validating consistent staining patterns across multiple cell types known to express C2orf15 based on transcriptomic data
Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubating antibody with immunizing peptide to demonstrate signal specificity
These validation approaches are particularly important for uncharacterized proteins where reference standards may be limited.
Western blotting for C2orf15 requires careful optimization:
Sample preparation: Use RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail; sonicate briefly to ensure complete protein extraction from relevant cellular compartments
Gel selection: Begin with 10-12% polyacrylamide gels based on the predicted molecular weight of C2orf15
Transfer parameters: For potentially hydrophobic proteins like C2orf15, consider:
Extended transfer times (90-120 minutes)
Addition of 0.1% SDS to transfer buffer to facilitate protein movement
PVDF membranes for better protein retention
Antibody conditions: For antibodies like ABIN7174820 :
Initial dilution range: 1:500-1:1000
Extended incubation (overnight at 4°C)
TBS-T with 5% BSA as diluent
Include positive control samples based on expression database information
Detection optimization: For potentially low-abundance proteins:
Use high-sensitivity ECL substrates
Consider signal amplification systems
Optimize exposure times systematically
Researchers should validate these parameters empirically with each specific C2orf15 antibody.
For IHC applications with C2orf15 antibodies (ABIN7174820 or LS-C378304) :
Tissue preparation:
For formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, test multiple antigen retrieval methods (citrate pH 6.0, EDTA pH 9.0, and enzymatic approaches)
For frozen sections, optimize fixation conditions (4% PFA timing)
Blocking strategy:
Antibody optimization:
Test concentration gradient (1:50 to 1:500)
Compare incubation conditions (1h room temperature vs. overnight 4°C)
For biotin-conjugated antibodies, optimize streptavidin-HRP dilution
Signal development:
Time DAB development precisely to avoid background
Consider tyramide signal amplification for low-abundance targets
Counterstaining:
Adjust hematoxylin timing to maintain visibility of potentially weak C2orf15 signals
For developing ELISA assays using C2orf15 antibodies (ABIN7174820, ABIN7174823, LS-C378304) :
Assay format determination:
Protocol optimization:
Coating concentration: Test range from 1-10 μg/ml
Blocking buffer: Compare BSA-, casein-, and commercial blocking reagents
Sample diluent: Evaluate additives to minimize matrix effects
Reagent titration:
Validation parameters:
Establish limit of detection using recombinant protein
Determine assay precision (intra/inter-assay CV < 15%)
Spike-and-recovery experiments to assess matrix effects
C2orf15 antibodies enable multiple approaches to investigate protein-protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Forward approach: Immunoprecipitate with C2orf15 antibody and identify binding partners by mass spectrometry
Reverse approach: Immunoprecipitate with antibodies against predicted interactors and probe for C2orf15
Crosslinking optimization to capture transient interactions
Proximity labeling coupled with immunoprecipitation:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins validated with C2orf15 antibodies
Use C2orf15 antibodies to confirm proximity labeling results by orthogonal methods
Microscopy-based interaction analysis:
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) using C2orf15 antibodies paired with antibodies against putative interactors
FRET-based approaches with appropriate controls
Validation of interactions:
These approaches can help establish C2orf15's functional network and suggest potential biological roles.
Based on antibody applications in tumor research , C2orf15 investigation may include:
Expression profiling across tumor types:
Tissue microarray analysis using validated C2orf15 antibodies
Correlation with clinical parameters and patient outcomes
Comparison with matched normal tissues
Functional characterization:
siRNA/shRNA knockdown validated with C2orf15 antibodies
Phenotypic assays (proliferation, migration, invasion)
Signaling pathway analysis through phosphoprotein detection
Tumor microenvironment interactions:
Potential therapeutic applications:
When encountering contradictory results regarding C2orf15:
Antibody validation reconciliation:
Test multiple antibodies against different epitopes
Confirm specificity using genetic approaches (CRISPR knockout)
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Context-dependent analysis:
Systematically evaluate expression across different:
Cell types and differentiation states
Tissue origins and microenvironments
Experimental conditions (stress, nutrient availability, etc.)
Isoform-specific investigation:
Design experiments to distinguish potential splice variants
Use antibodies with mapped epitopes to differentiate isoforms
Correlate with RNA-seq data to identify expression patterns
Technical parameter assessment:
Standardize extraction methods to ensure consistent protein recovery
Compare fixation protocols that may affect epitope accessibility
Document lot-to-lot antibody variation
When encountering detection challenges with C2orf15 antibodies:
Sample-related factors:
Verify C2orf15 expression levels in chosen samples using transcript data
Optimize protein extraction based on predicted cellular localization
Consider enrichment approaches (subcellular fractionation, immunoprecipitation)
Antibody-specific optimization:
Protocol adjustments:
Western blot: Extend exposure times; consider enhanced chemiluminescence reagents
IHC: Optimize antigen retrieval; implement signal amplification systems
ELISA: Increase sample concentration; adjust incubation times
Positive control inclusion:
Systematic documentation:
Maintain comprehensive records of optimization attempts
Document reagent lots and experimental conditions
Consider temperature, incubation time, and buffer composition variations
To differentiate specific from non-specific signals:
Validation controls:
Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide
Genetic validation: Compare signal in wild-type vs. C2orf15 knockdown/knockout samples
Isotype controls: Use matched concentration of non-targeting antibody
Signal pattern analysis:
Compare observed cellular/tissue distribution with RNA expression databases
Evaluate consistency of signal localization across different detection methods
Assess molecular weight precision in Western blots
Cross-antibody validation:
Compare signal patterns using antibodies targeting different C2orf15 epitopes
Correlate signals across different applications (WB, IHC, ELISA)
Technical refinements:
Quantitative assessment:
Establish signal-to-noise ratios for objective comparison
Document pattern consistency across technical and biological replicates
C2orf15 antibodies can advance tissue expression mapping through:
Comprehensive tissue profiling:
Developmental expression mapping:
Analysis across embryonic, postnatal, and adult tissues
Correlation with differentiation markers
Temporal regulation assessment
Comparative analysis methods:
Multi-omics correlation: Integrate antibody-based protein detection with transcriptomic and proteomic datasets
Cross-species comparison using antibodies with appropriate reactivity
Standardized quantification approaches for objective comparison
Pathological state evaluation:
Expression analysis in disease models
Correlation with pathological markers
Potential biomarker assessment
To investigate PTMs of C2orf15:
Modification-specific detection strategies:
Phosphorylation: Use phosphatase treatments as controls; combine with phospho-specific antibodies if available
Glycosylation: Employ enzymatic deglycosylation followed by mobility shift analysis
Ubiquitination: Use proteasome inhibitors to enhance detection
Mass spectrometry validation:
Functional correlation:
Assess modification changes in response to stimuli
Correlate with protein localization changes
Develop modification-specific antibodies if significant sites are identified
Technical considerations:
Optimize sample preparation to preserve labile modifications
Include appropriate inhibitors during extraction
Validate findings with multiple methodological approaches
C2orf15 antibodies can enhance single-cell analyses through:
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) integration:
Metal-conjugate C2orf15 antibodies for multiplexed analysis
Combine with lineage markers for cell type-specific expression
Correlate with functional markers in heterogeneous populations
Spatial transcriptomics validation:
Combine antibody-based protein detection with spatial RNA analysis
Validate transcriptomic findings at protein level
Assess subcellular localization in tissue context
Microfluidic applications:
Antibody-based sorting of C2orf15-expressing cells
On-chip immunoassays for limited samples
Integration with single-cell proteomics
Technical optimization requirements:
Minimize background in low-input samples
Validate antibody performance in multiplexed formats
Develop standardized quantification approaches
These integrated approaches can provide comprehensive understanding of C2orf15 biology at unprecedented resolution.