cert1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
cert1 antibody; cert antibody; col4a3bp antibody; gpbp antibody; si:ch211-129a6.6Ceramide transfer protein antibody; CERT antibody; Collagen type IV alpha-3-binding protein antibody; Goodpasture antigen-binding protein antibody; GPBP antibody
Target Names
cert1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CERT1 Antibody shelters ceramides and diacylglycerol lipids within its START domain. It facilitates the intracellular trafficking of ceramides and diacylglycerol lipids in a non-vesicular manner. Isoform 1 plays a crucial role in neural development and skeletal muscle development. It negatively regulates apoptosis during development.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Golgi apparatus. Endoplasmic reticulum.
Tissue Specificity
Widely expressed during embryogenesis.

Q&A

What is the CERT1 protein and what are its primary cellular functions?

CERT1, also known as ceramide transfer protein (hCERT), collagen type IV alpha-3-binding protein, or START domain-containing protein 11 (StARD11), plays a critical role in intracellular lipid transport. The protein functions primarily in transporting ceramide from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus in a non-vesicular manner . CERT1 contains a START domain that shelters ceramides and diacylglycerol lipids, facilitating their movement within cellular compartments . Recent research has demonstrated that mutations in the CERT1 gene are associated with intellectual disability and can lead to aberrant function and subcellular distribution of the protein . Understanding CERT1 is particularly important for researchers studying lipid metabolism, membrane trafficking, and certain neurological disorders.

What types of CERT1 antibodies are currently available for research applications?

Researchers can access several types of CERT1 antibodies with varying characteristics and applications:

Antibody TypeTypical ApplicationsSpecies ReactivityClonalityCommon Catalog Examples
PolyclonalWB, IP, ELISAHumanPolyclonalab72536, FNab01834
MonoclonalWB, IP, ICCHuman, othersMonoclonalVarious

Polyclonal antibodies like those described in the search results typically recognize multiple epitopes and are suitable for Western blot (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP), and ELISA applications . The most characterized antibodies appear to target regions within Human CERT1 amino acids 300-350, though antibodies targeting other regions are also available . When selecting an antibody, researchers should consider the specific experimental needs and the epitope location, particularly if studying phosphorylation events or specific domains of CERT1.

How can I properly validate a CERT1 antibody before using it in critical experiments?

Proper validation of CERT1 antibodies is essential for generating reliable and reproducible research data. Following the "five pillars" of antibody characterization is recommended :

  • Genetic strategies: Use CERT1 knockout or knockdown cells/tissues as negative controls. The CERT KO cell lines mentioned in result provide excellent control material for antibody validation.

  • Orthogonal strategies: Compare antibody-based detection with antibody-independent methods (e.g., mass spectrometry) to confirm target identification.

  • Multiple independent antibody strategy: Use different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of CERT1 and compare results. This helps confirm specificity and reduce epitope-specific artifacts.

  • Recombinant expression strategy: Compare signal in cells with normal versus overexpressed CERT1 levels to confirm proportional detection.

  • Immunocapture MS strategy: Use mass spectrometry to identify proteins captured by the CERT1 antibody to confirm specificity.

What are the optimal conditions for Western blot analysis using CERT1 antibodies?

Based on the documented applications of commercial CERT1 antibodies, the following Western blot conditions have proven effective:

ParameterRecommended Conditions
Antibody concentration0.1-1 μg/mL for primary antibody
Sample loading5-50 μg of whole cell lysate
Expected band sizePrimary band at ~71 kDa (predicted); Multiple bands may be observed (28, 60, 70, 100 kDa)
Detection systemStandard chemiluminescence or fluorescence-based detection
Blocking solutionTypically 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST

When performing Western blot with CERT1 antibodies, researchers should be aware that multiple bands may be observed (28, 60, 70, 71, and 100 kDa) . These could represent different isoforms, post-translationally modified versions, or degradation products of CERT1. The presence of multiple bands necessitates proper controls and careful interpretation of results.

How should I approach immunoprecipitation experiments with CERT1 antibodies?

For successful immunoprecipitation of CERT1 protein:

  • Lysate preparation: Use mild lysis buffers containing 1% NP-40 or similar detergents that maintain protein-protein interactions while efficiently extracting membrane-associated proteins like CERT1.

  • Antibody selection: Choose antibodies specifically validated for immunoprecipitation applications. Search result indicates successful IP applications with certain CERT1 antibodies.

  • Protocol guidance: Follow a method similar to that described in search result :

    • Prepare cell lysates in appropriate buffer

    • Pre-clear with protein A/G beads if needed

    • Incubate lysates with CERT1 antibody (typically 1-5 μg per sample)

    • Add protein A/G beads and incubate overnight at 4°C

    • Wash extensively (at least 3-5 washes)

    • Elute by heating in sample buffer at 70°C for 5 minutes

    • Analyze by Western blotting

  • Controls: Always include negative controls (non-specific IgG of the same species) and, if possible, lysates from CERT1 knockout cells to confirm specificity.

What considerations are important when studying CERT1 phosphorylation states?

Researchers investigating CERT1 phosphorylation should consider:

  • Phosphorylation sites: CERT1 is known to be phosphorylated at multiple sites, including S315, which is induced during hyperosmotic stress without affecting the SRM-phosphorylation state .

  • Phospho-specific antibodies: When available, use antibodies that specifically recognize phosphorylated forms of CERT1 at sites of interest.

  • Dephosphorylation controls: Include protein phosphatase treatments as negative controls when studying phosphorylated states of CERT1 .

  • Stress conditions: For studying stress-induced phosphorylation, carefully control exposure time and intensity of stressors (e.g., hyperosmotic conditions) .

  • Detection methods: Consider using Phos-tag gels or mass spectrometry to complement antibody-based detection methods for comprehensive phosphorylation analysis.

When designing experiments to study CERT1 phosphorylation states, researchers should be mindful that external stimuli like hyperosmotic stress can induce site-specific phosphorylation (e.g., at S315) without affecting phosphorylation at other sites .

How can proximity ligation assay (PLA) be applied to study CERT1 interactions with other proteins?

In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) offers a powerful approach for studying CERT1 interactions with potential binding partners in intact cells:

  • Principle: PLA detects proteins that are in close proximity (<40 nm), making it ideal for studying protein-protein interactions in their native cellular context.

  • Protocol implementation:

    • Fix and permeabilize cells using standard methods

    • Block with appropriate blocking solution

    • Incubate with primary antibodies against CERT1 and the potential interacting protein (must be from different species)

    • Apply PLA probes (species-specific secondary antibodies with oligonucleotide labels)

    • Perform ligation and amplification steps

    • Visualize using fluorescence microscopy

  • Controls: Include negative controls omitting one primary antibody and positive controls with proteins known to interact with CERT1.

  • Quantification: Quantify PLA signals (dots) per cell using appropriate image analysis software to provide a semi-quantitative measure of interaction frequency.

PLA is particularly valuable for studying the interactions between CERT1 and proteins involved in ceramide transport or membrane contact sites, providing spatial information that biochemical techniques like co-immunoprecipitation cannot offer.

What approaches are recommended for studying CERT1 localization changes during cellular stress?

The subcellular localization of CERT1 can change in response to cellular stressors, affecting its function in ceramide transport. To study these dynamic changes:

  • Immunocytochemistry optimization:

    • Use antibodies validated for immunofluorescence applications

    • Optimize fixation methods (paraformaldehyde vs. methanol) based on epitope accessibility

    • Include colabeling with organelle markers (ER, Golgi, etc.)

  • Live-cell imaging approaches:

    • Generate stable cell lines expressing fluorescently-tagged CERT1 (mVenus-CERT1 constructs have been successfully used)

    • Consider photoactivatable or photoswitchable fluorescent protein tags for pulse-chase experiments

    • Use spinning disk confocal microscopy for rapid acquisition with minimal phototoxicity

  • Stress induction protocols:

    • Hyperosmotic stress can be induced with sorbitol or NaCl addition to media

    • Monitor phosphorylation state in parallel with localization changes

    • Include time-course experiments to capture the dynamics of CERT1 redistribution

  • Quantitative analysis:

    • Measure colocalization coefficients with organelle markers

    • Analyze intensity profiles across cellular compartments

    • Consider automated high-content imaging for population-level analysis

By combining these approaches, researchers can correlate CERT1 phosphorylation status with its subcellular distribution, providing insights into the regulation of ceramide transport under different cellular conditions.

How should researchers approach contradictory results when using different CERT1 antibodies?

When faced with contradictory results using different CERT1 antibodies, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Antibody characterization comparison:

    • Review available validation data for each antibody

    • Check epitope locations to determine if they recognize different domains or isoforms

    • Assess sensitivity and specificity metrics from vendors or publications

  • Experimental validation:

    • Test antibodies on CERT1 knockout or knockdown samples

    • Compare results with overexpression systems

    • Evaluate performance across different applications (WB, IP, IF)

  • Resolution strategies:

    • Utilize orthogonal detection methods independent of antibodies

    • Combine results from multiple antibodies to build a more complete picture

    • Consider the possibility that differences reflect real biological phenomena (isoforms, post-translational modifications)

  • Reporting practices:

    • Document antibody catalog numbers, lot numbers, and dilutions used

    • Report all contradictory results transparently in publications

    • Provide detailed methods to enable reproduction by other researchers

As highlighted in the literature, nearly 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic standards for characterization . Contradictory results may stem from antibodies recognizing different epitopes, having variable specificity, or performing differently across experimental conditions.

What are the most common issues when working with CERT1 antibodies and how can they be resolved?

Researchers commonly encounter several challenges when working with CERT1 antibodies:

IssuePotential CausesResolution Strategies
Multiple unexpected bandsIsoforms, degradation, cross-reactivityCompare with predicted sizes (71 kDa) , use knockout controls, optimize sample preparation
Weak or no signalLow expression, epitope masking, degraded antibodyIncrease protein loading, try different extraction methods, check antibody storage conditions
High backgroundInsufficient blocking, excessive antibody, non-specific bindingOptimize blocking, reduce antibody concentration, increase wash steps
Inconsistent results between experimentsLot-to-lot variation, improper storage, protocol inconsistenciesUse same lot number when possible, aliquot antibodies, standardize protocols

When troubleshooting weak or inconsistent signals, consider that hyperosmotic stress and other cellular conditions can alter CERT1 phosphorylation state , potentially affecting epitope recognition. Additionally, the observed molecular weight of CERT1 in Western blots can vary (28-100 kDa) , so researchers should not rely solely on molecular weight for identification.

How can I ensure reproducibility when using CERT1 antibodies across different studies?

To maximize reproducibility when working with CERT1 antibodies:

  • Documentation practices:

    • Record complete antibody information including catalog number, lot number, and vendor

    • Document detailed experimental protocols including dilutions, incubation times, and buffer compositions

    • Use Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) for antibodies in publications

  • Standardization measures:

    • Establish standard operating procedures for key applications

    • Create reference samples (e.g., lysates from cells with known CERT1 expression) to calibrate between experiments

    • Consider using recombinant antibodies when available, as they show higher reproducibility than polyclonal antibodies

  • Quality control procedures:

    • Regularly validate antibody performance using positive and negative controls

    • Test new lots against old lots before switching

    • Maintain proper storage conditions and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Training considerations:

    • Ensure all lab members receive comprehensive training in antibody handling and experimental protocols

    • Implement peer review of experimental design and execution

    • Utilize resources like the Antibody Society's webinar series for continuing education

Applying these practices helps address the estimated $0.4–1.8 billion per year in financial losses attributed to poorly characterized antibodies in the United States alone .

What are the best practices for long-term storage and handling of CERT1 antibodies?

Proper storage and handling of CERT1 antibodies is crucial for maintaining their activity and specificity:

  • Storage conditions:

    • Store antibodies according to manufacturer recommendations, typically at -20°C in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol (pH 7.3)

    • Create small working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

    • Consider adding carrier proteins (BSA) for dilute antibody solutions

  • Handling guidelines:

    • Always use clean, nuclease-free tubes and pipette tips

    • Wear gloves to prevent contamination with proteases from skin

    • Allow antibodies to thaw completely before use, but keep cold when possible

    • Mix gently by flicking or gentle inversion, avoid vortexing

  • Stability monitoring:

    • Include positive control samples when using antibodies that have been stored for extended periods

    • Document performance over time to identify potential degradation

    • Consider performing periodic validation tests for antibodies in long-term storage

  • Working solution practices:

    • Prepare fresh working dilutions when possible

    • If storing diluted antibody, add preservatives (0.02% sodium azide) and carrier proteins

    • Keep track of dilution dates and discard according to established timelines

Following these recommendations will help ensure consistent antibody performance across experiments and extend the useful life of valuable CERT1 antibodies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.