STRING: 7955.ENSDARP00000124594
UniGene: Dr.121862
CERT1, also known as ceramide transfer protein (hCERT), collagen type IV alpha-3-binding protein, or START domain-containing protein 11 (StARD11), plays a critical role in intracellular lipid transport. The protein functions primarily in transporting ceramide from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus in a non-vesicular manner . CERT1 contains a START domain that shelters ceramides and diacylglycerol lipids, facilitating their movement within cellular compartments . Recent research has demonstrated that mutations in the CERT1 gene are associated with intellectual disability and can lead to aberrant function and subcellular distribution of the protein . Understanding CERT1 is particularly important for researchers studying lipid metabolism, membrane trafficking, and certain neurological disorders.
Researchers can access several types of CERT1 antibodies with varying characteristics and applications:
| Antibody Type | Typical Applications | Species Reactivity | Clonality | Common Catalog Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal | WB, IP, ELISA | Human | Polyclonal | ab72536, FNab01834 |
| Monoclonal | WB, IP, ICC | Human, others | Monoclonal | Various |
Polyclonal antibodies like those described in the search results typically recognize multiple epitopes and are suitable for Western blot (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP), and ELISA applications . The most characterized antibodies appear to target regions within Human CERT1 amino acids 300-350, though antibodies targeting other regions are also available . When selecting an antibody, researchers should consider the specific experimental needs and the epitope location, particularly if studying phosphorylation events or specific domains of CERT1.
Proper validation of CERT1 antibodies is essential for generating reliable and reproducible research data. Following the "five pillars" of antibody characterization is recommended :
Genetic strategies: Use CERT1 knockout or knockdown cells/tissues as negative controls. The CERT KO cell lines mentioned in result provide excellent control material for antibody validation.
Orthogonal strategies: Compare antibody-based detection with antibody-independent methods (e.g., mass spectrometry) to confirm target identification.
Multiple independent antibody strategy: Use different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of CERT1 and compare results. This helps confirm specificity and reduce epitope-specific artifacts.
Recombinant expression strategy: Compare signal in cells with normal versus overexpressed CERT1 levels to confirm proportional detection.
Immunocapture MS strategy: Use mass spectrometry to identify proteins captured by the CERT1 antibody to confirm specificity.
Based on the documented applications of commercial CERT1 antibodies, the following Western blot conditions have proven effective:
When performing Western blot with CERT1 antibodies, researchers should be aware that multiple bands may be observed (28, 60, 70, 71, and 100 kDa) . These could represent different isoforms, post-translationally modified versions, or degradation products of CERT1. The presence of multiple bands necessitates proper controls and careful interpretation of results.
For successful immunoprecipitation of CERT1 protein:
Lysate preparation: Use mild lysis buffers containing 1% NP-40 or similar detergents that maintain protein-protein interactions while efficiently extracting membrane-associated proteins like CERT1.
Antibody selection: Choose antibodies specifically validated for immunoprecipitation applications. Search result indicates successful IP applications with certain CERT1 antibodies.
Protocol guidance: Follow a method similar to that described in search result :
Prepare cell lysates in appropriate buffer
Pre-clear with protein A/G beads if needed
Incubate lysates with CERT1 antibody (typically 1-5 μg per sample)
Add protein A/G beads and incubate overnight at 4°C
Wash extensively (at least 3-5 washes)
Elute by heating in sample buffer at 70°C for 5 minutes
Controls: Always include negative controls (non-specific IgG of the same species) and, if possible, lysates from CERT1 knockout cells to confirm specificity.
Researchers investigating CERT1 phosphorylation should consider:
Phosphorylation sites: CERT1 is known to be phosphorylated at multiple sites, including S315, which is induced during hyperosmotic stress without affecting the SRM-phosphorylation state .
Phospho-specific antibodies: When available, use antibodies that specifically recognize phosphorylated forms of CERT1 at sites of interest.
Dephosphorylation controls: Include protein phosphatase treatments as negative controls when studying phosphorylated states of CERT1 .
Stress conditions: For studying stress-induced phosphorylation, carefully control exposure time and intensity of stressors (e.g., hyperosmotic conditions) .
Detection methods: Consider using Phos-tag gels or mass spectrometry to complement antibody-based detection methods for comprehensive phosphorylation analysis.
When designing experiments to study CERT1 phosphorylation states, researchers should be mindful that external stimuli like hyperosmotic stress can induce site-specific phosphorylation (e.g., at S315) without affecting phosphorylation at other sites .
In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) offers a powerful approach for studying CERT1 interactions with potential binding partners in intact cells:
Principle: PLA detects proteins that are in close proximity (<40 nm), making it ideal for studying protein-protein interactions in their native cellular context.
Protocol implementation:
Fix and permeabilize cells using standard methods
Block with appropriate blocking solution
Incubate with primary antibodies against CERT1 and the potential interacting protein (must be from different species)
Apply PLA probes (species-specific secondary antibodies with oligonucleotide labels)
Perform ligation and amplification steps
Controls: Include negative controls omitting one primary antibody and positive controls with proteins known to interact with CERT1.
Quantification: Quantify PLA signals (dots) per cell using appropriate image analysis software to provide a semi-quantitative measure of interaction frequency.
PLA is particularly valuable for studying the interactions between CERT1 and proteins involved in ceramide transport or membrane contact sites, providing spatial information that biochemical techniques like co-immunoprecipitation cannot offer.
The subcellular localization of CERT1 can change in response to cellular stressors, affecting its function in ceramide transport. To study these dynamic changes:
Immunocytochemistry optimization:
Use antibodies validated for immunofluorescence applications
Optimize fixation methods (paraformaldehyde vs. methanol) based on epitope accessibility
Include colabeling with organelle markers (ER, Golgi, etc.)
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Generate stable cell lines expressing fluorescently-tagged CERT1 (mVenus-CERT1 constructs have been successfully used)
Consider photoactivatable or photoswitchable fluorescent protein tags for pulse-chase experiments
Use spinning disk confocal microscopy for rapid acquisition with minimal phototoxicity
Stress induction protocols:
Hyperosmotic stress can be induced with sorbitol or NaCl addition to media
Monitor phosphorylation state in parallel with localization changes
Include time-course experiments to capture the dynamics of CERT1 redistribution
Quantitative analysis:
Measure colocalization coefficients with organelle markers
Analyze intensity profiles across cellular compartments
Consider automated high-content imaging for population-level analysis
By combining these approaches, researchers can correlate CERT1 phosphorylation status with its subcellular distribution, providing insights into the regulation of ceramide transport under different cellular conditions.
When faced with contradictory results using different CERT1 antibodies, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:
Antibody characterization comparison:
Experimental validation:
Resolution strategies:
Utilize orthogonal detection methods independent of antibodies
Combine results from multiple antibodies to build a more complete picture
Consider the possibility that differences reflect real biological phenomena (isoforms, post-translational modifications)
Reporting practices:
As highlighted in the literature, nearly 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic standards for characterization . Contradictory results may stem from antibodies recognizing different epitopes, having variable specificity, or performing differently across experimental conditions.
Researchers commonly encounter several challenges when working with CERT1 antibodies:
When troubleshooting weak or inconsistent signals, consider that hyperosmotic stress and other cellular conditions can alter CERT1 phosphorylation state , potentially affecting epitope recognition. Additionally, the observed molecular weight of CERT1 in Western blots can vary (28-100 kDa) , so researchers should not rely solely on molecular weight for identification.
To maximize reproducibility when working with CERT1 antibodies:
Documentation practices:
Standardization measures:
Quality control procedures:
Regularly validate antibody performance using positive and negative controls
Test new lots against old lots before switching
Maintain proper storage conditions and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Training considerations:
Applying these practices helps address the estimated $0.4–1.8 billion per year in financial losses attributed to poorly characterized antibodies in the United States alone .
Proper storage and handling of CERT1 antibodies is crucial for maintaining their activity and specificity:
Storage conditions:
Handling guidelines:
Always use clean, nuclease-free tubes and pipette tips
Wear gloves to prevent contamination with proteases from skin
Allow antibodies to thaw completely before use, but keep cold when possible
Mix gently by flicking or gentle inversion, avoid vortexing
Stability monitoring:
Include positive control samples when using antibodies that have been stored for extended periods
Document performance over time to identify potential degradation
Consider performing periodic validation tests for antibodies in long-term storage
Working solution practices:
Prepare fresh working dilutions when possible
If storing diluted antibody, add preservatives (0.02% sodium azide) and carrier proteins
Keep track of dilution dates and discard according to established timelines
Following these recommendations will help ensure consistent antibody performance across experiments and extend the useful life of valuable CERT1 antibodies.