The term "CYP71B14" does not appear in any peer-reviewed publications, antibody databases (e.g., Antibody Society listings ), or clinical trial registries reviewed. Key observations:
No matches for CYP71B14 in major protein databases (UniProt, NCBI Protein)
No commercial antibodies targeting CYP71B14 are cataloged by major suppliers (e.g., Proteintech , PTGLab )
CYP71 enzymes belong to the plant cytochrome P450 family, with known members like CYP71A1 (camalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis) . Human CYPs follow distinct numbering (e.g., CYP7B1 , CYP4Z1 ).
"CYP71B14" does not align with standard human/animal CYP classification systems .
Typographical error: Potential confusion with validated CYPs:
Obscure nomenclature: May represent an uncharacterized/putative enzyme without antibody development.
Verify nomenclature through IUPAC or UniChem databases.
Consult specialized resources:
Plant cytochrome P450 databases (e.g., Cytochrome P450 Engineering Database)
Patent filings for unpublished antibody sequences
Contact antibody developers for custom synthesis feasibility (estimated cost: $40–$500/project ).
While CYP71B14-specific data are unavailable, established workflows for CYP antibodies include:
CYP71B14 is a member of the cytochrome P450 CYP71 clan, a plant-specific family of enzymes primarily involved in specialized metabolite biosynthesis. Like other CYP71 family members, it likely catalyzes oxidation reactions in biosynthetic pathways of secondary metabolites, potentially including plant defense compounds. The CYP71 family has been implicated in various plant metabolic processes, as evidenced by studies on related enzymes such as CYP71AM1 in Sorghum bicolor, which participates in the biosynthesis of the allelochemical sorgoleone . Understanding CYP71B14's specific metabolic roles requires targeted enzymatic characterization similar to approaches used for other plant P450s.
Specificity in CYP71B14 antibodies is achieved through careful selection of unique peptide sequences that distinguish this enzyme from closely related P450 isoforms. Research on related cytochrome P450 enzymes demonstrates that even small differences in amino acid sequences can yield highly specific antibodies. For example, studies with rat CYP2B1 showed that differences of just 2 amino acid residues among 12 were sufficient to produce form-specific antibodies that did not cross-react with the highly similar CYP2B2 (97% identity) . For CYP71B14 antibodies, researchers typically target unique epitopes in regions with the greatest sequence divergence from other CYP71 family members, such as variable loops or terminal regions, while avoiding conserved domains like the heme-binding region.
CYP71B14 antibodies serve multiple purposes in plant research including:
Protein localization studies to determine tissue-specific and subcellular expression patterns
Quantification of enzyme expression levels in different plant tissues, developmental stages, or in response to environmental stresses
Immunoprecipitation for protein interaction studies or for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to investigate regulatory mechanisms
Validating gene expression and protein production in transgenic or mutant plants
Similar to approaches used with other plant P450s, CYP71B14 antibodies can be employed in conjunction with techniques like Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, ELISA, and ChIP-seq, as evidenced by successful applications of antibodies in various plant species including Arabidopsis, poplar, tomato, and maize .
Developing inhibitory antibodies against CYP71B14 requires targeting epitopes located at or near the enzyme's active site. Research on rat cytochrome P450 demonstrates that antibodies raised against peptide sequences coinciding with substrate binding sites can effectively inhibit enzymatic activity . The methodology involves:
Analyzing the predicted 3D structure of CYP71B14 to identify surface-exposed regions associated with substrate binding
Synthesizing peptide antigens corresponding to these regions
Immunizing rabbits or other suitable animals with the conjugated peptide
Purifying the resulting IgG fraction and validating inhibitory activity
The approach used for rat CYP2B1, where antipeptide antibodies inhibited pentoxyresorufin O-dealkylase activity in a dose-dependent manner while not affecting unrelated P450 activities, serves as a useful model . Validation should include dose-response inhibition assays with recombinant CYP71B14 and its known substrates.
A multi-faceted approach is recommended for in planta validation:
| Validation Strategy | Methodology | Expected Outcome | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNAi-mediated repression | Generate transgenic plants with reduced CYP71B14 expression; use antibody to confirm protein reduction | Decreased target metabolite levels correlating with decreased enzyme levels | Potential off-target effects; incomplete knockdown |
| Complementation analysis | Express CYP71B14 in knockout/knockdown lines; verify protein expression with antibody | Restoration of wild-type phenotype and metabolite profiles | May require tissue-specific promoters for proper expression |
| Immunolocalization | Use antibodies for tissue and subcellular localization | Determination of expression patterns correlating with metabolite accumulation | Cross-reactivity with related P450s must be ruled out |
| Heterologous expression | Express in yeast, Nicotiana benthamiana or other systems; confirm with antibodies | Biochemical characterization of substrate specificity | In vitro activity may differ from in planta function |
This approach parallels methods used for CYP71AM1 in Sorghum bicolor, where RNAi-mediated repression confirmed by decreased enzyme levels led to reduced sorgoleone content in multiple independent transformant events . Transient expression systems like Nicotiana benthamiana can provide rapid preliminary data before undertaking stable transformation experiments.
Designing epitope-specific antibodies requires careful sequence alignment analysis of CYP71B14 against other CYP71 family members to identify unique regions. The process involves:
Multiple sequence alignment of CYP71B14 with related CYP71 proteins
Identification of regions with the greatest sequence divergence
Analysis of predicted surface exposure and antigenicity of candidate peptide regions
Selection of peptides that are unique to CYP71B14 but have suitable properties for antibody production
Research on rat cytochrome P450 demonstrates that even small sequence differences (2 amino acids in a 12-residue peptide) can yield form-specific antibodies that discriminate between 97% identical proteins . For the CYP71 family, which typically shows greater sequence divergence, targeting hypervariable regions should produce highly specific antibodies. Validation of specificity should include testing against recombinant proteins of closely related family members.
Optimizing Western blot conditions for CYP71B14 detection requires careful consideration of sample preparation and protocol adjustments:
Sample preparation:
Homogenize plant tissue in buffer containing protease inhibitors
Include reducing agents (e.g., DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to maintain protein integrity
Consider membrane solubilization approaches as P450s are membrane-associated enzymes
Centrifuge at 10,000-15,000×g to remove debris while retaining microsomes
Electrophoresis and transfer conditions:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal resolution
Transfer at low amperage (250-300 mA) overnight at 4°C for efficient transfer of membrane proteins
Use PVDF membranes rather than nitrocellulose for better protein retention
Antibody incubation:
Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST
Optimize primary antibody dilution (typically 1:1000 to 1:5000)
Incubate at 4°C overnight for best results
Use plant-specific secondary antibodies to minimize background
Detection and validation:
Include positive controls (recombinant CYP71B14) and negative controls
Consider pre-adsorption with target peptide to confirm specificity
Validate band size against predicted molecular weight (~55-60 kDa for typical P450s)
These recommendations are based on general principles for membrane-bound proteins and specific approaches used for other plant cytochrome P450 enzymes in research settings .
Optimizing ChIP-seq for CYP71B14 regulation studies requires careful experimental design:
Chromatin preparation:
Use fresh plant tissue with appropriate developmental stage or treatment
Crosslink tissue with 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes
Extract high-quality chromatin using plant-specific protocols
Sonicate to achieve fragments of 200-500 bp
Immunoprecipitation strategy:
Target transcription factors predicted to regulate CYP71B14
Use antibodies against histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K27me3) to assess chromatin state
Include appropriate controls (input DNA, IgG control, positive control regions)
Library preparation and sequencing:
Use low-input library preparation methods if IP yield is limited
Sequence to sufficient depth (20-30 million reads minimum)
Include biological replicates for statistical validation
Data analysis and validation:
Analyze enriched regions near the CYP71B14 gene
Validate binding sites with electrophoretic mobility shift assays or reporter gene assays
Correlate binding with gene expression data
This approach is supported by successful ChIP-seq applications in various plant species including Arabidopsis, poplar, tomato, and maize, where even small amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA (100 pg to 1 ng) yielded robust results .
Developing a quantitative ELISA for CYP71B14 requires addressing several technical considerations:
Antibody selection:
Use affinity-purified antibodies for greater specificity
Consider developing both capture and detection antibodies targeting different epitopes
Validate antibody specificity against recombinant protein and plant extracts
Assay format optimization:
Direct ELISA: Simple but may have higher background
Sandwich ELISA: Better specificity but requires two non-competing antibodies
Competitive ELISA: Useful for small proteins or limited epitopes
Standard curve preparation:
Express and purify recombinant CYP71B14 for standard curve
Include matrix-matched standards (protein added to extract from knockout plants)
Establish linear range and limits of detection/quantification
Sample preparation considerations:
Optimize extraction buffers to solubilize membrane-bound P450s
Add detergents (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 or CHAPS) to maintain protein solubility
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Consider using microsomal fractions for enrichment
Validation:
Test against known amounts of recombinant protein
Analyze samples with known differences in expression
Confirm with orthogonal methods (Western blot, qRT-PCR)
These recommendations draw on established principles for enzyme immunoassays and specific approaches for membrane-bound proteins like cytochrome P450s .
Cross-reactivity can significantly impact experimental results. Here's how to identify and address these issues:
Identification of cross-reactivity:
Test antibody against recombinant proteins of closely related CYP71 family members
Analyze Western blot patterns in wild-type vs. CYP71B14 knockout plants
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all captured proteins
Pre-adsorb antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm signal specificity
Resolution strategies:
Affinity purification against the specific immunizing peptide
Negative selection using closely related peptides or proteins
Adjust antibody concentration to minimize non-specific binding
Increase stringency of washing steps in immunoassays
Consider developing monoclonal antibodies for greater specificity
When cross-reactivity cannot be eliminated:
Document the cross-reactive proteins
Use genetic approaches (knockout lines) as complementary methods
Design experiments that can distinguish between the target and cross-reactive signals
Consider developing new antibodies targeting more unique epitopes
This approach is supported by research on rat cytochrome P450 antibodies, where careful epitope selection enabled production of antibodies that could distinguish between highly similar proteins (97% identical) .
Discrepancies between protein and mRNA levels are common in biological systems and may reflect important regulatory mechanisms. Here's how to investigate and resolve these inconsistencies:
Validate both methods:
Confirm antibody specificity using recombinant protein and knockout controls
Verify qRT-PCR primer specificity and efficiency
Include appropriate reference genes/proteins for normalization
Consider biological explanations:
Post-transcriptional regulation (miRNA targeting, mRNA stability)
Translational efficiency differences
Post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition
Protein turnover/stability differences
Developmental or stress-induced regulatory mechanisms
Methodological approaches to resolve discrepancies:
Perform time-course experiments to detect temporal differences in mRNA vs. protein expression
Analyze polysome-associated mRNA to assess translational efficiency
Use proteasome inhibitors to assess protein degradation rates
Conduct pulse-chase experiments to measure protein half-life
Examine protein modifications that might affect antibody recognition
Data integration:
Correlate protein and transcript data with metabolite levels
Consider systems biology approaches to model the relationship between transcript and protein levels
This multifaceted approach addresses the common challenge of protein-transcript discordance observed in many biological systems, including plant cytochrome P450 research .
Cytochrome P450 enzymes often operate within metabolon complexes - multi-enzyme assemblies that facilitate efficient channeling of metabolic intermediates. Approaches to investigate CYP71B14's protein interaction network include:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Use CYP71B14 antibodies conjugated to beads for pull-down experiments
Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions with reverse co-IP using antibodies against identified partners
Consider cross-linking approaches to capture transient interactions
Proximity labeling approaches:
Create fusion proteins of CYP71B14 with BioID or APEX2
Express in planta to label proximal proteins
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
Validate with traditional co-IP and functional assays
Visualization of complexes:
Use fluorescently labeled antibodies for co-localization studies
Employ Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) with antibody fragments
Consider super-resolution microscopy techniques for detailed spatial analysis
Apply in situ proximity ligation assays to visualize protein interactions
Functional validation:
Reconstitute putative complexes in heterologous systems
Measure metabolic flux with and without complex formation
Use genetic approaches to disrupt specific interactions
This approach builds on methodologies used to study other plant P450 enzymes and their interaction partners in biosynthetic pathways, similar to studies on CYP71AM1 in sorghum .