CYP71B31 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Cytochrome P450 Antibodies

Cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) are heme-containing monooxygenases involved in xenobiotic metabolism and biosynthesis of steroids, fatty acids, and vitamins. Antibodies targeting CYPs are critical for:

  • Diagnostic applications: Detecting enzyme expression in tissues (e.g., cancer biomarkers ).

  • Functional studies: Characterizing enzyme localization, activity, and interactions .

  • Therapeutic development: Targeting disease-associated CYPs (e.g., cancer, metabolic disorders ).

Methodological Approaches for CYP Antibody Development

Key steps in generating and validating CYP antibodies include:

StageDescriptionExample from Literature
Antigen DesignRecombinant protein production or peptide synthesisCYP4Z1 full-length protein used for ELISA
Antibody ScreeningHybridoma technology or phage displayRecombinant Antibody Network protocols
ValidationWestern blot, immunofluorescence, ELISACYP8B1 validated via IHC and Western blot
Functional AssaysEnzyme activity inhibition, epitope mappingHigh-resolution epitope mapping for CYP4Z1

Challenges in CYP Antibody Research

  • Specificity Issues: Many commercial CYP antibodies lack adequate validation, leading to irreproducible results (e.g., 12% of antibodies in YCharOS study failed target recognition ).

  • Epitope Diversity: Linear vs. conformational epitopes require distinct validation strategies (e.g., CYP4Z1 autoantibodies recognized surface-exposed residues ).

  • Cross-Reactivity: Antibodies may bind homologous regions in related CYPs (e.g., CYP7A1 vs. CYP8B1 ).

CYP4Z1 in Breast Cancer

  • Role: Overexpressed in breast/ovarian cancer; detectable via anti-CYP4Z1 autoantibodies in patient sera .

  • Applications:

    • Diagnostic biomarker (ELISA sensitivity: 0.5–1.0 OD415 ).

    • Epitope mapping identified surface-exposed residues (His-198–Leu-212 ).

CYP1B1 in Tumor Immunology

  • Role: Linked to immune subtype stratification and CAF infiltration in 33 cancers .

  • Antibody Use: IHC staining for prognostic stratification (anti-CYP1B1 antibody: 1:200 dilution ).

Recommended Pathways for CYP71B31 Antibody Development

If CYP71B31 is a novel or understudied target, the following steps are advised:

  1. Antigen Production:

    • Express recombinant CYP71B31 protein in HEK293 or insect cells .

    • Validate via mass spectrometry and enzymatic assays .

  2. Hybridoma Generation:

    • Immunize mice/rats with purified antigen .

    • Screen clones using peptide microarrays .

  3. Validation Pipeline:

    • Specificity: Test against CYP71 family paralogs (e.g., CYP71B34).

    • Functional Assays: Measure inhibition of CYP71B31 enzymatic activity.

Data Gap Analysis

The absence of CYP71B31-specific data suggests:

  • The target may be newly identified or nomenclatureally distinct (e.g., orthologs in non-human species).

  • Limited commercial/research interest compared to CYPs with established roles in disease (e.g., CYP4Z1, CYP1B1).

Future Directions

  • Collaborate with antibody characterization consortia (e.g., YCharOS ).

  • Leverage single-cell BCR sequencing to identify natural antibodies .

  • Explore therapeutic potential in metabolic or oncologic contexts, akin to anti-CYP19A1 antibodies in breast cancer .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
CYP71B31 antibody; At3g53300 antibody; T4D2.220Cytochrome P450 71B31 antibody; EC 1.14.-.- antibody
Target Names
CYP71B31
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G53300

STRING: 3702.AT3G53300.1

UniGene: At.26339

Protein Families
Cytochrome P450 family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the function of CYP71B31 and why are antibodies against it valuable for research?

CYP71B31 belongs to the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase family, which plays critical roles in metabolizing various endogenous substrates. Similar to other CYP family members, it likely catalyzes the hydroxylation of carbon-hydrogen bonds and participates in the metabolism of specific compounds . Antibodies against CYP71B31 are invaluable research tools for:

  • Detecting protein expression in different tissues and cellular compartments

  • Quantifying protein levels under various experimental conditions

  • Isolating the protein for functional studies via immunoprecipitation

  • Determining subcellular localization through immunocytochemistry techniques

  • Validating gene expression studies by correlating mRNA levels with protein production

Understanding the specific function of CYP71B31 through antibody-based approaches helps establish its role in metabolic pathways and potential applications in biotechnology or medicine.

What are the key considerations when selecting a CYP71B31 antibody for my research?

When selecting a CYP71B31 antibody for research applications, consider the following methodological factors:

  • Immunogen sequence: Verify the exact epitope used to generate the antibody. For CYP family proteins, antibodies raised against unique regions rather than conserved domains offer higher specificity .

  • Host species: Consider the host species (rabbit, mouse, goat, etc.) in relation to your experimental design, especially for co-staining experiments or when working with tissue samples.

  • Clonality: Polyclonal antibodies generally provide broader epitope recognition but may have batch-to-batch variability, while monoclonal antibodies offer higher consistency and specificity .

  • Validated applications: Confirm the antibody has been validated for your specific applications (Western blot, IHC, ICC, IP, etc.) with documented experimental evidence.

  • Cross-reactivity profile: Examine cross-reactivity with other CYP family members, particularly those with high sequence homology, to ensure accurate interpretation of results .

These considerations are essential for experimental success and should be evaluated before finalizing your antibody selection.

How should I optimize immunohistochemistry protocols for CYP71B31 detection in tissue samples?

Optimizing immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols for CYP71B31 detection requires methodical adjustment of multiple parameters:

  • Fixation method optimization:

    • Test both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and frozen section approaches

    • Compare fixation times (4-24 hours) to balance antigen preservation and tissue morphology

  • Antigen retrieval optimization:

    • Evaluate heat-induced epitope retrieval with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) vs. Tris-EDTA (pH 9.0)

    • Test enzymatic retrieval methods if heat-based methods prove insufficient

  • Antibody dilution optimization:

    • Perform a dilution series (typically 1:100 to 1:1000) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio

    • Include appropriate controls at each dilution (positive tissue, negative tissue, no-primary controls)

  • Detection system selection:

    • Compare DAB-based vs. fluorescence-based detection systems

    • Evaluate signal amplification methods (e.g., tyramide signal amplification) for low-abundance targets

  • Counterstaining and mounting optimization:

    • Test compatibility of nuclear counterstains with CYP71B31 antibody signals

    • Evaluate mounting media for long-term preservation of signals

Document all optimization steps systematically and maintain consistency once the optimal protocol is established to ensure reproducibility across experiments .

What are the recommended procedures for validating CYP71B31 antibody specificity?

Thorough validation of CYP71B31 antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Genetic validation:

    • Test the antibody in tissues/cells with genetic knockout or knockdown of CYP71B31

    • Compare staining patterns in wild-type vs. modified samples to identify specific signals

  • Peptide competition assays:

    • Pre-incubate the antibody with excess immunizing peptide

    • Observe elimination of specific signals while non-specific signals remain

  • Multiple antibody validation:

    • Test different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of CYP71B31

    • Concordant results from multiple antibodies increase confidence in specificity

  • Recombinant protein controls:

    • Use purified CYP71B31 protein as a positive control

    • Include related CYP family proteins to assess cross-reactivity

  • Orthogonal method correlation:

    • Compare antibody-based detection with mRNA expression data

    • Analyze correlation between protein levels and functional assays

This multi-faceted validation approach helps distinguish true target binding from potential cross-reactivity with other CYP family members, particularly important given the high sequence homology within this enzyme family .

How can I address potential cross-reactivity issues when using CYP71B31 antibodies?

Addressing cross-reactivity concerns with CYP71B31 antibodies requires systematic investigation and mitigation strategies:

  • Sequence homology analysis:

    • Perform bioinformatic alignment of CYP71B31 with related CYP family members

    • Identify regions of high homology that may cause cross-reactivity issues

  • Experimental cross-reactivity testing:

    • Test the antibody against recombinant proteins of closely related CYP isoforms

    • Quantify binding affinity to CYP71B31 versus other family members

  • Absorption controls:

    • Pre-absorb antibodies with recombinant proteins of related CYP family members

    • Verify that specific CYP71B31 signals persist while cross-reactive signals diminish

  • Epitope engineering approach:

    • When possible, use antibodies raised against unique regions of CYP71B31

    • Consider computational design approaches to identify antibodies with optimized specificity

  • Combined antibody approach:

    • Use multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes of CYP71B31

    • Analyze co-localization patterns to distinguish specific from non-specific signals

This systematic approach helps discriminate between highly similar ligands, a critical consideration when working with members of the cytochrome P450 family that share considerable structural and sequence similarity .

What controls should be included when performing Western blot analysis with CYP71B31 antibodies?

A robust Western blot experiment for CYP71B31 detection requires comprehensive controls:

Essential Controls Table:

Control TypeDescriptionPurposeImplementation
Positive ControlTissue/cells known to express CYP71B31Confirms antibody functionalityInclude liver or specific tissue extracts with verified CYP71B31 expression
Negative ControlTissue/cells without CYP71B31 expressionIdentifies non-specific bindingUse tissues from knockout models or unrelated cell lines
Loading ControlDetection of housekeeping proteinEnsures equal protein loadingProbe for β-actin, GAPDH, or other appropriate housekeeping proteins
Molecular Weight MarkerProtein standards of known sizesConfirms target band sizeUse pre-stained ladder covering expected CYP71B31 size range
Primary Antibody OmissionSample processed without primary antibodyIdentifies secondary antibody non-specificityInclude one lane with secondary antibody only
Competing Peptide ControlAntibody pre-incubated with immunizing peptideConfirms signal specificityCompare signal with and without peptide competition
Recombinant ProteinPurified CYP71B31 proteinServes as definitive positive controlInclude purified protein at known concentration

Additionally, when working with CYP71B31 antibodies, verify the expected molecular weight (typically 50-60 kDa for CYP family members) and consider membrane fractionation approaches to enrich for this membrane-associated protein . Document all experimental parameters including blocking reagents, antibody dilutions, and exposure times to ensure reproducibility.

How can CYP71B31 antibodies be utilized for studying protein-protein interactions?

CYP71B31 antibodies enable multiple sophisticated approaches for investigating protein-protein interactions:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) strategies:

    • Direct Co-IP: Use CYP71B31 antibodies to precipitate the protein and its binding partners

    • Reverse Co-IP: Use antibodies against suspected interaction partners to precipitate complexes, then probe for CYP71B31

    • Sequential Co-IP: Perform two rounds of immunoprecipitation with different antibodies to isolate specific complexes

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA) approach:

    • Use primary antibodies against CYP71B31 and putative interaction partners

    • Apply species-specific secondary antibodies with attached oligonucleotides

    • Visualize interactions as fluorescent spots only when proteins are in close proximity (<40 nm)

  • FRET/BRET analysis with antibody validation:

    • Generate fluorescent protein-tagged constructs based on antibody-validated interactions

    • Measure energy transfer between tagged proteins to quantify interaction dynamics in living cells

    • Validate findings with antibody-based approaches in endogenous systems

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry:

    • Use chemical cross-linkers to stabilize protein-protein interactions

    • Immunoprecipitate CYP71B31 complexes with validated antibodies

    • Identify interaction partners through mass spectrometry analysis

  • Antibody-based protein interaction screens:

    • Employ antibody arrays or protein microarrays with CYP71B31 antibodies

    • Identify novel interaction partners through high-throughput screening approaches

These advanced techniques can reveal CYP71B31's participation in metabolic complexes and regulatory networks, providing insights into its functional role in cellular processes .

What approaches can be used to study CYP71B31 localization at the subcellular level?

Investigating CYP71B31 subcellular localization requires multi-modal imaging approaches combined with biochemical validation:

  • High-resolution confocal microscopy:

    • Perform multi-color immunofluorescence with CYP71B31 antibodies and organelle markers

    • Implement z-stack imaging to generate 3D reconstructions of protein distribution

    • Calculate colocalization coefficients (Pearson's, Mander's) for quantitative analysis

  • Super-resolution microscopy techniques:

    • STED (Stimulated Emission Depletion) microscopy for ≈50 nm resolution

    • STORM/PALM approaches for single-molecule localization at ≈20 nm resolution

    • Correlate antibody-based detection with structural information at nanoscale resolution

  • Electron microscopy immunogold labeling:

    • Use gold-conjugated secondary antibodies to detect CYP71B31 primary antibodies

    • Visualize precise localization at ultrastructural level (≈2-5 nm resolution)

    • Perform quantitative spatial distribution analysis of gold particles

  • Biochemical fractionation with Western blot validation:

    • Separate cellular components (membrane, cytosol, organelles) through differential centrifugation

    • Verify fraction purity with established markers

    • Detect CYP71B31 distribution across fractions with validated antibodies

  • Live-cell correlative approaches:

    • Use fluorescent protein-tagged CYP71B31 for dynamic studies

    • Validate localization patterns with antibody staining in fixed samples

    • Correlate live imaging with super-resolution immunofluorescence

These complementary approaches provide a comprehensive view of CYP71B31 localization, essential for understanding its functional context within cellular compartments .

What are common challenges when working with CYP71B31 antibodies, and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with CYP71B31 antibodies, which can be systematically addressed:

  • High background signal issues:

    • Challenge: Non-specific binding causing high background

    • Solution: Optimize blocking (test BSA vs. normal serum vs. commercial blockers), increase washing stringency, and titrate antibody concentration

    • Validation: Include appropriate negative controls to distinguish specific from non-specific signals

  • Inconsistent detection sensitivity:

    • Challenge: Variable detection of CYP71B31 across experiments

    • Solution: Standardize sample preparation protocols, optimize extraction buffers for membrane proteins, and consider antigen retrieval optimization

    • Validation: Include internal standards and positive controls in each experiment

  • Cross-reactivity with related CYP family members:

    • Challenge: Difficulty distinguishing between closely related CYP isoforms

    • Solution: Perform absorption controls with recombinant proteins, use multiple antibodies against different epitopes, and validate with genetic approaches

    • Validation: Test antibody specificity in samples with manipulated expression of CYP71B31 and related isoforms

  • Fixation-sensitive epitopes:

    • Challenge: Loss of antibody recognition after certain fixation procedures

    • Solution: Compare multiple fixation methods (PFA, methanol, acetone) and optimize fixation duration

    • Validation: Perform parallel detection with multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes

  • Batch-to-batch variability:

    • Challenge: Inconsistent results across antibody lots

    • Solution: Validate each new lot against previous standards, maintain reference samples, and consider monoclonal antibodies for critical applications

    • Validation: Document lot-specific optimal dilutions and detection parameters

Systematic documentation of optimization efforts and maintenance of standardized protocols are essential for overcoming these challenges .

How should contradictory results between CYP71B31 antibody data and gene expression data be interpreted?

Discrepancies between CYP71B31 antibody-based protein detection and gene expression data require systematic investigation:

  • Methodological validation approach:

    • Verify antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls

    • Confirm primer/probe specificity for gene expression assays

    • Evaluate technical variables (sample preparation, detection methods) for both approaches

    • Implement multiple detection methods for both protein and mRNA

  • Biological interpretation framework:

    • Consider post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms:

      • mRNA stability and degradation rates

      • microRNA regulation of translation

      • Alternative splicing events affecting epitope presence

    • Evaluate post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition

    • Assess protein stability and degradation dynamics

    • Examine temporal relationships between transcription and translation

  • Sample-specific considerations:

    • Tissue heterogeneity effects on bulk measurements

    • Single-cell vs. population-level differences

    • Developmental or condition-specific regulatory mechanisms

    • Species-specific regulation of CYP71B31 expression

  • Integrated analysis approach:

    • Correlate protein and mRNA levels across multiple conditions

    • Implement time-course studies to capture dynamic relationships

    • Perform computational modeling of transcript-to-protein relationships

    • Design experiments to test specific hypotheses about observed discrepancies

This systematic framework helps distinguish technical artifacts from genuine biological regulatory mechanisms, enabling proper interpretation of seemingly contradictory results .

How do genetic variants in CYP71B31 affect antibody recognition and experimental interpretation?

Genetic variations in CYP71B31 can significantly impact antibody recognition and must be considered for accurate experimental interpretation:

  • Epitope-altering variants:

    • Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or mutations within antibody epitopes can alter binding affinity

    • Amino acid substitutions may change epitope conformation or accessibility

    • Deletions or insertions can completely eliminate or modify epitope structures

  • Experimental approaches to address variant effects:

    • Sequence the CYP71B31 gene in experimental samples to identify potential variants

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to ensure detection regardless of variants

    • Develop variant-specific antibodies for polymorphism studies

    • Implement complementary detection methods not dependent on epitope recognition

  • Quantitative impact assessment:

    • Perform comparative binding studies with recombinant wildtype and variant proteins

    • Document variant-specific detection efficiency differences

    • Develop correction factors for quantitative analyses when variants are present

  • Biological significance considerations:

    • Distinguish between variants affecting only antibody binding and those altering protein function

    • Correlate antibody recognition patterns with functional activity measurements

    • Consider population-specific variant frequencies when designing experiments

When conducting studies across populations or with clinical samples, researchers should consider the potential impact of CYP71B31 variants on both technical aspects of antibody recognition and biological interpretation of results .

What methodologies can be used to study the correlation between CYP71B31 genetic variants and protein function using antibody-based approaches?

Investigating relationships between CYP71B31 genetic variants and protein function requires integrated methodologies:

Comprehensive Analysis Workflow:

  • Variant identification and classification:

    • Sequence CYP71B31 in study populations to identify common variants

    • Perform in silico analysis to predict functional consequences

    • Classify variants based on predicted impact (missense, nonsense, regulatory, etc.)

    • Generate recombinant proteins expressing key variants

  • Antibody-based functional assessment:

    • Develop variant-specific antibodies when feasible

    • Evaluate protein expression levels across variant genotypes

    • Assess subcellular localization changes using immunofluorescence

    • Measure protein stability through pulse-chase experiments with antibody detection

    • Analyze protein-protein interaction profiles via co-immunoprecipitation

  • Enzymatic activity correlation:

    • Measure catalytic activities in samples with different CYP71B31 variants

    • Correlate activity with protein levels detected by antibodies

    • Perform substrate metabolism studies across variant panels

    • Develop structure-function relationships based on variant location and effect

  • Integrated analysis approaches:

    • Combine genotype, antibody-detected protein levels, and functional data in multifactorial analyses

    • Implement machine learning to identify patterns correlating variants with functional outcomes

    • Develop predictive models for variant effects on protein function

This systematic approach enables the identification of genetic variants that influence CYP71B31 function through various mechanisms, from expression changes to altered catalytic properties or substrate specificities .

How can CYP71B31 antibodies be effectively employed in comparative studies across species?

Utilizing CYP71B31 antibodies for cross-species research requires careful methodological considerations:

  • Epitope conservation analysis:

    • Perform sequence alignment of CYP71B31 across target species

    • Identify conserved and variable regions that might affect antibody recognition

    • Select antibodies targeting highly conserved epitopes for multi-species studies

    • Consider species-specific antibodies for detailed comparative analyses

  • Cross-species validation protocol:

    • Test antibody reactivity against recombinant CYP71B31 from each species

    • Develop species-specific positive controls with verified expression

    • Perform side-by-side testing with standardized protocols

    • Quantify relative detection efficiency across species

  • Orthogonal validation approaches:

    • Correlate antibody detection with mRNA expression data

    • Confirm specificity using genetic knockout/knockdown models in each species

    • Implement mass spectrometry validation of detected proteins

  • Experimental design optimization:

    • Adjust fixation and extraction protocols for species-specific tissues

    • Modify antibody concentrations and incubation conditions for each species

    • Develop species-specific quantification standards

    • Account for evolutionary differences in protein expression patterns

  • Data interpretation framework:

    • Distinguish between true biological differences and technical variation

    • Consider evolutionary context when interpreting expression differences

    • Analyze functional conservation in relation to structural conservation

This comprehensive approach enables reliable comparative studies while accounting for species-specific factors that might influence antibody-based detection of CYP71B31 .

What innovative approaches combine CYP71B31 antibodies with emerging technologies for advanced research applications?

The integration of CYP71B31 antibodies with cutting-edge technologies opens new research frontiers:

  • Single-cell proteomics applications:

    • Employ CyTOF (mass cytometry) with metal-conjugated CYP71B31 antibodies

    • Implement microfluidic antibody capture for single-cell protein quantification

    • Correlate with single-cell transcriptomics for multi-omics integration

    • Develop computational models of cell-to-cell variation in CYP71B31 expression

  • Spatial biology integration:

    • Apply multiplexed immunofluorescence with CYP71B31 antibodies

    • Implement CODEX or Imaging Mass Cytometry for spatial proteomics

    • Correlate protein localization with spatial transcriptomics

    • Generate 3D tissue maps of CYP71B31 distribution

  • Live-cell dynamic studies:

    • Utilize antibody fragments for live-cell imaging

    • Implement optogenetic tools validated with antibody-based methods

    • Develop FRET-based biosensors calibrated against antibody detection

    • Perform high-content screening with automated antibody-based detection

  • Computational biology integration:

    • Train machine learning models on antibody-generated datasets

    • Develop predictive models for protein-ligand interactions

    • Implement biophysical models of protein function based on antibody-validated structures

    • Design new antibodies with customized specificity using computational approaches

  • Therapeutic development applications:

    • Generate antibody-drug conjugates targeting CYP71B31-expressing cells

    • Develop nanobodies based on conventional antibody validation

    • Implement antibody-guided CRISPR delivery systems

    • Design antibody-based biosensors for detecting metabolic products

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.