CYP90B1 is a steroid C-22 hydroxylase encoded by the DWF4 gene. Mutations in DWF4 result in BR deficiency, causing dwarfism and reduced cell elongation . Its substrate specificity favors C27–C28 sterols (e.g., campesterol) over C29 sterols, with catalytic efficiency 325-fold higher for campesterol compared to campestanol .
Antibodies targeting P450 enzymes are essential for:
Protein quantification (e.g., Western blotting)
Localization studies (e.g., immunohistochemistry)
Functional inhibition assays (e.g., monoclonal antibodies blocking activity)
For CYP90B1, antibodies would enable:
Expression profiling: Assessing CYP90B1 levels in tissues or under stress conditions.
Subcellular localization: Identifying whether CYP90B1 resides in the endoplasmic reticulum (typical for P450s).
Interaction mapping: Identifying proteins that regulate CYP90B1 activity (e.g., via co-immunoprecipitation).
Antibody specificity is critical for P450 studies due to sequence homology among isoforms. For example:
CYP90A1 (CPD) and CYP90C1 (ROT3) share functional roles in BR biosynthesis but differ in substrate specificity .
Cross-reactivity with these enzymes could confound results.
Single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies, as used for CYP1B1 , offer high specificity. Steps include:
Antigen selection: Use purified CYP90B1 protein or synthetic peptides (e.g., conserved regions distinct from CYP90A1/C1).
Phage display libraries: Screen for scFv or monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) with high affinity .
Validation: Confirm specificity via ELISA or Western blotting against CYP90B1 and homologs.
Immunoprecipitation: Isolate CYP90B1 complexes to identify regulatory proteins (e.g., CES transcription factors ).
Inhibitory assays: Assess whether antibodies block CYP90B1 activity in vitro, as demonstrated for human P450s .
Epitope mapping: Identify CYP90B1-specific epitopes to avoid cross-reactivity.
In vivo imaging: Fluorescently tagged antibodies for real-time tracking of CYP90B1 in plants.
Diagnostic tools: Develop assays to monitor BR biosynthesis defects in crops.
CYP90B1 (DWF4) expression is downregulated in BR-deficient mutants (det2) and wild-type plants under BR treatment .
| Treatment | DWF4/CYP90B1 Expression (Fold Change) |
|---|---|
| det2 (BR-deficient) | −7.5 ± 0.76 (microarray) |
| WT (BR-treated) | −2.8 ± 0.40 (microarray) |
CYP90B1 shows higher activity toward campesterol than campestanol, contrasting with CYP90C1/D1, which act on 22-hydroxylated intermediates .
CYP90B1 (DWF4) Function and Regulation: The following research highlights the crucial role of CYP90B1 (DWF4) in brassinosteroid biosynthesis and its interaction with other pathways:
References:
CYP90B1 (also known as DWF4) is a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that catalyzes the 22(S)-hydroxylation of campesterol and is the first and rate-limiting enzyme at the branch point of the brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthetic pathway in plants . This enzyme is particularly significant because it:
Preferentially catalyzes the conversion of campesterol (CR) to 22-hydroxycampesterol with remarkably high efficiency (325 times greater than for campestanol)
Exhibits substrate specificity for sterols with a double bond at positions C-5 and C-6
Utilizes molecular oxygen to insert one oxygen atom into the substrate while reducing the second into a water molecule, with electrons provided by NADPH via cytochrome P450 reductase
Functions as a rate-limiting step in BR biosynthesis, making it a key regulatory point for plant growth and development
When studying plant growth regulation, brassinosteroid signaling, or hormone biosynthesis pathways, CYP90B1 represents a critical target for investigation.
Based on the applications of comparable cytochrome P450 antibodies, CYP90B1 antibodies would typically be suitable for:
Western blotting (WB): For quantitative analysis of protein expression levels
Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF): For subcellular localization studies in fixed cells
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For tissue-specific expression analysis in plant sections
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): For protein interaction studies
When selecting applications, researchers should verify the validation data for their specific antibody. As with other cytochrome P450 enzymes, proper microsomal preparation techniques are often required for successful detection of membrane-bound CYP90B1.
For optimal Western blot detection of CYP90B1:
Sample preparation:
Prepare microsomes from plant tissues since CYP90B1 is a membrane-associated protein
Use a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor cocktail
Avoid boiling samples (heat at 37°C for 30 minutes instead) to prevent aggregation of membrane proteins
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation
Transfer to PVDF membranes (rather than nitrocellulose) for better retention of hydrophobic proteins
Use a wet transfer system at low voltage (30V) overnight at 4°C for efficient transfer of membrane proteins
Antibody incubation:
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1-2 hours at room temperature
Dilute primary antibody according to manufacturer recommendations (typically 1/500 to 1/2000)
Incubate with primary antibody overnight at 4°C
Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at 1/5000 to 1/10000 dilution
Expected results:
To validate CYP90B1 antibody specificity:
Positive and negative controls:
Peptide competition assay:
Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide before application
A significant reduction in signal indicates specificity for the target epitope
Molecular validation:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
To establish relationships between CYP90B1 protein abundance and its enzymatic activity:
Combined protein and metabolite analysis:
Quantify CYP90B1 protein levels by Western blot using calibrated standards
Simultaneously measure endogenous brassinosteroid levels using GC-MS or LC-MS/MS
Analyze both parameters across developmental stages or in response to environmental stimuli
Enzymatic activity correlation:
Experimental manipulations:
Data presentation:
Create correlation plots between protein abundance and enzymatic activity
Present data in a table format similar to:
| Plant Line/Treatment | CYP90B1 Protein (relative units) | 22-Hydroxylation Activity (pmol/mg/min) | Endogenous BR Levels (ng/g FW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | 1.0 | X | Y |
| CYP90B1-OE | 2.5 | 2.8X | 2.1Y |
| cyp90b1/+ (heterozygous) | 0.5 | 0.4X | 0.6Y |
| + Brassinazole | 1.0 | 0.1X | 0.3Y |
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of CYP90B1 can be investigated using:
Phosphorylation analysis:
Immunoprecipitate CYP90B1 using validated antibodies
Analyze samples by:
a) Western blot with phospho-specific antibodies
b) Phosphoprotein staining (e.g., Pro-Q Diamond)
c) Mass spectrometry analysis of phosphopeptides
Compare samples from plants under different conditions (e.g., light/dark, stressed/unstressed)
Ubiquitination and protein stability:
Treat plants with proteasome inhibitors (MG132)
Immunoprecipitate CYP90B1 and probe with anti-ubiquitin antibodies
Perform cycloheximide chase assays to measure protein half-life
Compare protein degradation kinetics in different genetic backgrounds or conditions
Glycosylation assessment:
Treat immunoprecipitated CYP90B1 with glycosidases
Observe mobility shifts by Western blot
Use lectin blotting to detect specific glycan structures
PTM site identification and mutation:
Identify modification sites by mass spectrometry
Generate site-directed mutants (e.g., S→A for phosphorylation sites)
Express mutant proteins in plants and assess:
a) Protein stability and localization
b) Enzymatic activity in microsomal assays
c) Ability to complement cyp90b1/dwf4 mutant phenotypes
To investigate CYP90B1 interactions with other proteins:
Co-immunoprecipitation approaches:
Use anti-CYP90B1 antibodies to pull down native protein complexes
Validate interactions by reciprocal co-IP with antibodies against suspected partners
Analyze isolated complexes by mass spectrometry to identify novel interactors
Focus particularly on interactions with NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase, which is required for electron transfer
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC):
Create fusion constructs of CYP90B1 and potential interactors with split YFP fragments
Express in plant protoplasts or through transient expression
Visualize interactions through restored fluorescence
Include appropriate controls (e.g., known non-interactors)
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET):
Generate CYP90B1 fusions with donor fluorophores (e.g., CFP)
Create partner protein fusions with acceptor fluorophores (e.g., YFP)
Measure energy transfer as evidence of protein proximity
Calculate FRET efficiency and distance parameters
Split-ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid for membrane proteins:
Use this specialized Y2H system designed for membrane proteins like CYP90B1
Screen libraries to identify novel interaction partners
Validate interactions in planta using the methods described above
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID):
Create CYP90B1-BioID fusion proteins
Express in plant systems and provide biotin
Identify biotinylated proximity partners by streptavidin pull-down and mass spectrometry
To investigate CYP90B1 subcellular localization and membrane integration:
Subcellular fractionation:
Isolate microsomal fractions from plant tissues
Further separate endoplasmic reticulum (ER) from other organelles using sucrose gradient centrifugation
Detect CYP90B1 by Western blot in different fractions
Use organelle-specific markers (e.g., BiP for ER, cytochrome c oxidase for mitochondria) as controls
Fluorescence microscopy:
Generate CYP90B1-GFP fusion constructs
Express in plant cells through stable transformation or transient expression
Co-localize with organelle markers (e.g., ER-Tracker, MitoTracker)
Perform live cell imaging to track protein movement
Immunogold electron microscopy:
Use CYP90B1 antibodies with gold-conjugated secondary antibodies
Visualize precise localization at ultrastructural level
Quantify gold particle distribution across cellular compartments
Topology analysis:
Perform protease protection assays on microsomes
Use selective membrane permeabilization followed by immunodetection
Create epitope-tagged versions of CYP90B1 with tags in different domains
Determine which portions are accessible to antibodies in intact versus permeabilized membranes
Monitoring trafficking:
Use photoactivatable or photoconvertible fluorescent protein fusions
Track movement after photoactivation in specific compartments
Employ inhibitors of vesicular trafficking to determine transport mechanisms
When facing difficulties detecting CYP90B1:
Sample preparation optimization:
Ensure complete tissue disruption using appropriate homogenization methods for plant tissues
Add protease inhibitors immediately after tissue homogenization
Optimize microsome preparation protocol (consider differential centrifugation conditions)
Avoid freeze-thaw cycles of prepared samples
Antibody-related solutions:
Test different antibody concentrations (perform a titration series)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Try alternative detection systems (e.g., more sensitive ECL reagents, fluorescent secondary antibodies)
Consider using antibodies raised against different epitopes of CYP90B1
Signal enhancement strategies:
Increase protein loading (while ensuring the gel runs properly)
Reduce washing stringency (shorter washes, lower detergent concentration)
Use signal enhancers compatible with your detection system
Consider enhanced chemiluminescence substrates with extended signal duration
Expression level considerations:
To ensure specificity when analyzing CYP90B1:
Antibody selection:
Choose antibodies raised against unique regions of CYP90B1 not conserved in related P450s
Verify antibody specificity using recombinant proteins or knockout mutants
Consider using epitope-tagged CYP90B1 constructs for unambiguous detection
Experimental controls:
Include samples from cyp90b1/dwf4 mutant plants as negative controls
Use recombinant CYP90B1 protein as a positive control and size reference
Include other purified CYP90 family members to assess cross-reactivity
Validation approaches:
Complement Western blot data with RT-PCR using gene-specific primers
Perform mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated proteins
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of CYP90B1
Differential analysis:
Compare protein expression patterns with known tissue-specific expression data
Analyze responses to treatments that specifically induce CYP90B1 but not related enzymes
Examine enzymatic activity using substrate specificity differences (e.g., CYP90B1 has 325× higher activity with campesterol than campestanol)
When working with modified CYP90B1 variants:
Point mutations and antibody binding:
Mutations near antibody epitopes may reduce detection efficiency
If using antibodies against specific domains, verify that these regions remain intact in your mutant
For critical mutations, consider using multiple antibodies targeting different regions
Truncated proteins:
Confirm that the epitope recognized by your antibody is present in truncated forms
Use antibodies raised against different regions to detect specific fragments
Consider size differences when interpreting Western blot results
Tagged proteins:
Verify that tags do not interfere with antibody epitopes
Use tag-specific antibodies as alternative detection methods
Consider the impact of tags on protein folding, localization, and function
Experimental design considerations:
Include appropriate negative controls (null mutants) and positive controls (wild-type)
When possible, use multiple detection methods to confirm results
For complementation studies, consider both protein level and functional recovery
Recommendations for specific scenarios:
To study pathway integration using CYP90B1 antibodies:
Hormone crosstalk analysis:
Treat plants with different hormones (auxin, gibberellin, ethylene, etc.)
Monitor CYP90B1 protein levels via Western blot
Compare protein changes with transcriptional responses
Perform these experiments in hormone signaling mutants to define pathway dependencies
Stress response integration:
Subject plants to various stresses (drought, salt, temperature)
Analyze CYP90B1 protein abundance in different tissues
Correlate with BR biosynthesis activity and physiological responses
Use immunolocalization to determine if stress alters subcellular distribution
Light signaling connections:
Given the known relationship between CYP90B1/DWF4 and light-responsive transcription factors (like PIFs)
Compare CYP90B1 levels under different light conditions (quality, intensity, duration)
Analyze protein expression in photoreceptor mutants
Use ChIP assays with transcription factor antibodies to study direct regulation of CYP90B1
Developmental regulation:
Immunolocalize CYP90B1 across developmental stages and tissues
Compare with expression patterns of key developmental regulators
Use co-immunoprecipitation to identify stage-specific interacting partners
To investigate regulation beyond transcriptional control:
In vitro activity modulation:
Immunopurify CYP90B1 from plants under different conditions
Perform enzymatic assays with campesterol substrate
Compare specific activity (activity normalized to protein amount)
Test effects of potential regulators added to the reaction mixture
Protein modification analysis:
Use phospho-specific antibodies to detect phosphorylated CYP90B1
Treat samples with phosphatases to assess impact on activity
Perform mass spectrometry to identify modification sites
Create site-directed mutants to confirm functional significance
Protein-protein interaction effects:
Membrane environment influences:
Investigate if localization within specialized ER domains affects activity
Test effects of membrane lipid composition on enzyme function
Analyze potential associations with lipid rafts or detergent-resistant membranes
Consider sterol-dependent regulation mechanisms
When investigating CYP90B1 inhibitors like brassinazole and uniconazole :
Inhibitor binding studies:
Protein stability and turnover:
Treat plants with inhibitors and monitor CYP90B1 protein levels over time
Perform cycloheximide chase experiments to determine if inhibitors affect protein half-life
Investigate if inhibitor binding alters susceptibility to degradation pathways
Subcellular localization effects:
Examine if inhibitor treatment changes CYP90B1 localization
Use immunofluorescence or CYP90B1-GFP fusions
Determine if inhibition triggers relocalization or aggregation
Experimental design considerations:
Include dose-response analyses with both biochemical and physiological readouts
Compare time courses of inhibitor effects on protein activity vs. abundance
Design recovery experiments by inhibitor removal to distinguish temporary from permanent effects
To investigate transcriptional regulation of CYP90B1:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) approaches:
Correlation analyses:
Monitor transcription factor abundance by Western blot
Simultaneously assess CYP90B1 protein levels
Create correlation plots between transcription factor levels and CYP90B1 abundance
Test causality in transcription factor mutants or overexpression lines
Multi-level regulation studies:
Compare CYP90B1 transcript levels (by RT-qPCR) with protein abundance (by Western blot)
Assess if post-transcriptional mechanisms are involved in specific conditions
Calculate protein-to-mRNA ratios across experimental treatments
Factor-specific approaches:
For COG1 (known to regulate CYP90B1 via PIF4/PIF5) :
Compare CYP90B1 protein levels in wild-type, cog1 mutant, and COG1 overexpression lines
Assess if COG1's effects on CYP90B1 are direct or mediated through other factors
Use inducible systems to determine the kinetics of CYP90B1 upregulation following transcription factor activation